Hi,
On 2015-08-27 10:27, z...@oper.hu wrote:
2015-08-27 10:04 időpontban Koko Wijatmoko ezt írta:
On Thu, 27 Aug 2015 09:53:19 +0200
z...@oper.hu wrote:
Dear All, I would like to realize a postfix setup where: - I have
1 public IP address - at least 2 domains - one postfix instace
After sett
On 2015-08-27 Koko Wijatmoko wrote:
> PTR can only map to 1 IP, one PTR for one IP is enough even using
> multiple domain with postfix.
Technically you can have PTR records resolve to multiple names, just
like you can have A records resolving to multiple IP Addresses. It's
just best practice to re
2015-08-27 10:04 időpontban Koko Wijatmoko ezt írta:
> On Thu, 27 Aug 2015 09:53:19 +0200
> z...@oper.hu wrote:
>
>> Dear All, I would like to realize a postfix setup where: - I have 1 public
>> IP address - at least 2 domains - one postfix instace After setting up (one)
>> domain alias for
On Thu, 27 Aug 2015 09:53:19 +0200
z...@oper.hu wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> I would like to realize a postfix setup where:
>
> - I have 1 public IP address
>
> - at least 2 domains
>
> - one postfix instace
>
> After setting up (one) domain alias for the IP I experienced problem
> when sending mai
On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 12:49 PM, Marius Gologan
wrote:
> What you want is 100% doable and can work without drawbacks.
>
> You need to work on the VM to act as an incoming and outgoing gateway.
>
> You've been provided with a link from Wietse. That is the starting point.
Yes, that's what is on my
vide a .tar for Debian and Ubuntu <=13.04
that will do everything for you.
Marius.
-Original Message-
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org]
On Behalf Of hiren panchasara
Sent: Monday, May 5, 2014 10:28 PM
To: Rick Zeman
Cc: Postfix users
Subject:
On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 10:43 AM, Rick Zeman wrote:
> On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 3:36 AM, hiren panchasara
> wrote:
>
>> This is how it should work, afaik:
>> Sending: Initiates from my home box and go out via VM.
>> Receiving: VM receives it and forwards to home box.
>>
>> (I've also tried sending th
On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 3:36 AM, hiren panchasara
wrote:
> This is how it should work, afaik:
> Sending: Initiates from my home box and go out via VM.
> Receiving: VM receives it and forwards to home box.
>
> (I've also tried sending through my home machine on port 587 but the
> home comcast IP is
hiren panchasara:
> This link only shows VM side of configs. How about on the home machine
> postfix side?
For the machine that is FINAL DESTINATION:
http://www.postfix.org/BASIC_CONFIGURATION_README.html
> Also, if my domain is mail.exmaple.com, which machine's postfix should
> have that set? V
On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 4:17 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> hiren panchasara:
>> To circumvent all that, I got a VM with a live IP where nothing is
>> being blocked now.
>>
>> What I want to do is, use this VM as just a jump host and still keep
>> entire setup at home.
>
>
> http://www.postfix.org/STAN
hiren panchasara:
> To circumvent all that, I got a VM with a live IP where nothing is
> being blocked now.
>
> What I want to do is, use this VM as just a jump host and still keep
> entire setup at home.
http://www.postfix.org/STANDARD_CONFIGURATION_README.html#backup
"Configuring Postfix as p
On 6-May-2009, at 01:29, Rik wrote:
I could not agree more. To the point this is the very *LAST* place I
go
for help.
This should be the last place you go for help. You read the docs, you
google, you research, try and find the answer, and THEN you post here.
I can't tell you how often I'
On Wed, May 06, 2009 at 12:47:37PM -0500, /dev/rob0 wrote:
> The way it works here is that any fool
> like me can answer a newbie's question, and if we get it wrong, we are
> corrected by the ones who really know.
Let's end the thread here. :-) Hopefully the OP is trying to make sense of
the do
On Wed May 6 2009 00:44:28 Jonathan McMahon wrote:
> I'm 100% completely new to Postfix, somewhat new to *nix.
The former is not a problem; Postfix documentation has you covered.
Where you will find (have been finding) difficulty is in the latter.
Postfix documentation does not (and IMO mostly s
On Wed, 2009-05-06 at 06:52 -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:
> On 5/6/2009, Rik (hlug090...@buzzhost.co.uk) wrote:
> >> As it stands, this list gets poorly posed or lazy questions from
> >> time to time, usually from new users. The trend in these cases is
> >> that the new user ends up feeling insulted
On 5/6/2009, Rik (hlug090...@buzzhost.co.uk) wrote:
>> As it stands, this list gets poorly posed or lazy questions from
>> time to time, usually from new users. The trend in these cases is
>> that the new user ends up feeling insulted. This may well be the
>> poster's own fault for not respecting h
On May 6, 2009, at 12:29 AM, Rik wrote:
On Wed, 2009-05-06 at 03:18 -0400, Aaron Wolfe wrote:
SNIP
As it stands, this list gets poorly posed or lazy questions from time
to time, usually from new users. The trend in these cases is that
the
new user ends up feeling insulted. This may well
Zitat von Rik :
On Wed, 2009-05-06 at 03:18 -0400, Aaron Wolfe wrote:
SNIP
As it stands, this list gets poorly posed or lazy questions from time
to time, usually from new users. The trend in these cases is that the
new user ends up feeling insulted. This may well be the poster's own
fault fo
On Wed, 2009-05-06 at 03:18 -0400, Aaron Wolfe wrote:
SNIP
> As it stands, this list gets poorly posed or lazy questions from time
> to time, usually from new users. The trend in these cases is that the
> new user ends up feeling insulted. This may well be the poster's own
> fault for not respec
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 1:44 AM, Jonathan McMahon wrote:
>
> I'm 100% completely new to Postfix, somewhat new to *nix.
>
> My general feedback:
>
> 1. I find Postfix to be somewhat difficult, and the "google search"
> documentation for my specific setup is fragmented and incomplete at best. I
> d
Jonathan McMahon wrote:
I'm 100% completely new to Postfix, somewhat new to *nix.
My general feedback:
1. I find Postfix to be somewhat difficult, and the "google search" documentation for my specific setup is fragmented and incomplete at best. I did expect this given the number of possible sy
I'm 100% completely new to Postfix, somewhat new to *nix.
My general feedback:
1. I find Postfix to be somewhat difficult, and the "google search"
documentation for my specific setup is fragmented and incomplete at best. I did
expect this given the number of possible system permutations.
2.
On May 5, 2009, at 12:58 PM, Aaron Wolfe wrote:
I fully believe that the experts on this list have good intentions and
I appreciate the time they spend helping us. However, this scenario
has happened quite a few times.. A new user asks questions that are
vague or easily answered by the docs, e
On 5-May-2009, at 10:04, Jeff Bernier wrote:
There's really no need to berate me and otherwise treat me like a
buffoon Victor.
Is there someone willing to help? Please?
Consider two things. First, stop top-posting. Trim your quoted
material and reply after, preserving the conversatio
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 3:32 PM, Victor Duchovni
wrote:
> On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 03:18:18PM -0400, Brett Dikeman wrote:
>
>> > I had asked a fairly clear question... it was: Ho do I?set Postfix to
>> > accept
>> > email for, and relay email to another MTA? This is the one thing I need to
>> > acc
On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 03:18:18PM -0400, Brett Dikeman wrote:
> > I had asked a fairly clear question... it was: Ho do I?set Postfix to accept
> > email for, and relay email to another MTA? This is the one thing I need to
> > accomplish.
>
> http://www.lmgtfy.com/?q=postfix+firewall
>
> > There
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 12:04 PM, Jeff Bernier wrote:
> I had asked a fairly clear question... it was: Ho do I set Postfix to accept
> email for, and relay email to another MTA? This is the one thing I need to
> accomplish.
http://www.lmgtfy.com/?q=postfix+firewall
> There's really no need to be
Jeff Bernier wrote:
> I had asked a fairly clear question... it was: Ho do I set Postfix to
> accept email for, and relay email to another MTA? This is the one
> thing I need to accomplish.
>
> There's really no need to berate me and otherwise treat me like a
> buffoon Victor.
> Is there some
* Jeff Bernier :
> I had asked a fairly clear question... it was: Ho do I set Postfix to
> accept email for, and relay email to another MTA? This is the one thing
> I need to accomplish.
It's not really easy to answer that question:
"accept email for another MTA": why does the mail arrive on the
I had asked a fairly clear question... it was: Ho do I set Postfix to accept
email for, and relay email to another MTA? This is the one thing I need to
accomplish.
There's really no need to berate me and otherwise treat me like a buffoon
Victor.
Is there someone willing to help? Please?
On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 11:32:36AM -0400, Jeff Bernier wrote:
> I don't want to sound ungrateful for pointing me at the docs, but I
> was hoping for a little clarification on the process. I had looked at
> the docs, but was still unclear on how to go about it.
Specific questions are much easier t
I don't want to sound ungrateful for pointing me at the docs, but I was hoping
for a little clarification on the process. I had looked at the docs, but was
still unclear on how to go about it.
Jeff
victor.ducho...@morganstanley.com 5/5/2009 11:00 AM >>>
On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 10:51:58AM -0400
On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 10:51:58AM -0400, Jeff Bernier wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am a newbie...
>
> I wish to use my Postfix system (v2.1.5) to accept mail for, and relay
> mail to another MTA. How do I go about doing this?
http://www.postfix.org/BASIC_CONFIGURATION_README.html
http://www
Adam McCarthy wrote:
Well as far as I know SMTP is not blocked. I wanted to go through my
ISP's server to begin with, because places such as GMail didn't like
me. Yet everyone seems to love my ISP's server.
I had relayhost set to my ISP, but I musta had something wrong,
because some people would
Also, have a look here:
http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html
Adam McCarthy wrote:
Well as far as I know SMTP is not blocked. I wanted to go through my
ISP's server to begin with, because places such as GMail didn't like
me. Yet everyone seems to love my ISP's server.
I had relayhost set t
Send us the output of postconf -n from your smtp server. If your logs
didn't indicate the mail was rejected it could have been silently
discarded by spam filters or something of the like.
Adam McCarthy wrote:
Well as far as I know SMTP is not blocked. I wanted to go through my
ISP's server to
I would not point the MX record for your dynamic domain name (or any
other domain name) at your ISP's server. The mail will almost certainly
be rejected.
Adam McCarthy wrote:
So would I just tell no-ip.org (seperate from DynDNS as fair as I
know, but they also have MX records.), to just put i
Well as far as I know SMTP is not blocked. I wanted to go through my
ISP's server to begin with, because places such as GMail didn't like
me. Yet everyone seems to love my ISP's server.
I had relayhost set to my ISP, but I musta had something wrong,
because some people would get replies, while oth
So would I just tell no-ip.org (seperate from DynDNS as fair as I
know, but they also have MX records.), to just put in my address or
would I just throw in my ISP's SMTP server?
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 4:12 PM, J.P. Trosclair
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think DynDNS.com (the folks who have no-i
I think DynDNS.com (the folks who have no-ip.org right?) have an option
to setup a MX record for dynamic host names. You'll more than likely
want to enable this unless you have a reason not to.
Basic setup for accepting and sending mail with your ddns hostname:
mydomain = mymachine.no-ip.org
m
40 matches
Mail list logo
