Thegeswini S:
> Could some one help on below request ?
>
> On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 1:02 PM, Thegeswini S wrote:
>
> >
> > Presently we use primary MTA as Postfix for outbound mail server and we
> > were not configured inbound mails as we don;t have POP server in our env.
> >
> > The mail server
On Sun, Apr 6, 2014 at 2:05 PM, Ramesh wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
>
Hi!
> Presently we have primary MX and backup MX servers, when primary goes down
> mails will be queued in secondary MX, once primary restored all messages
> pushed from backup MX to primary MX, messages are not lost. I would like to
I don't see any reason to complicate things by implementing HA solution,
when you can simply have multiple MX records.
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 12:35 AM, Ramesh wrote:
>
>
> Hi All,
>
> Presently we have primary MX and backup MX servers, when primary goes
down mails will be queued in secondary MX,
Miles Fidelman:
> Wietse Venema wrote:
> > Miles Fidelman:
> >>> Have you considered the following:
> >>>
> >>> - Inbound mail spends a fraction of a second in the queue.
> >>>
> >>> - Inbound mail spends days or weeks or more in the mailbox.
> >>>
> >>> - If an MTA goes down, mail flows via altern
Wietse Venema wrote:
Miles Fidelman:
Have you considered the following:
- Inbound mail spends a fraction of a second in the queue.
- Inbound mail spends days or weeks or more in the mailbox.
- If an MTA goes down, mail flows via alternate MX hosts.
- If the mailbox store goes down, then you
Miles Fidelman:
> > Have you considered the following:
> >
> > - Inbound mail spends a fraction of a second in the queue.
> >
> > - Inbound mail spends days or weeks or more in the mailbox.
> >
> > - If an MTA goes down, mail flows via alternate MX hosts.
> >
> > - If the mailbox store goes down, t
Wietse Venema wrote:
Miles Fidelman:
To find solutions, open your favorite search engine and try "cyrus
mailbox replication", "dovecot meailbox replication", and so on.
I've been wondering about this too, and it strikes me that "mailbox
replication" is only relevant to local delivery. What abo
Miles Fidelman:
> > To find solutions, open your favorite search engine and try "cyrus
> > mailbox replication", "dovecot meailbox replication", and so on.
>
> I've been wondering about this too, and it strikes me that "mailbox
> replication" is only relevant to local delivery. What about replic
On 7/4/2014 8:17 πμ, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
On Linux use DRBD to replicate mail queues between a pair of machines and crm
to control a second Postfix instance that will be started locally to pickup
any remaining mails once the partner machine dies.
Hmm, I think DRBD is only advised in case
* Miles Fidelman :
> Hi Wietse,
>
> Wietse Venema wrote:
> >Wietse:
> >>The right question is "I need a message store that is replicated
> >>in multiple locations". Once you have such a message store, any
> >>number of Postfix MTAs and mail clients can use it.
> >Ramesh:
> >>Please let me know how
Hi Wietse,
Wietse Venema wrote:
Wietse:
The right question is "I need a message store that is replicated
in multiple locations". Once you have such a message store, any
number of Postfix MTAs and mail clients can use it.
Ramesh:
Please let me know how to implement this, share me urls i will g
Wietse:
>The right question is "I need a message store that is replicated
>in multiple locations". Once you have such a message store, any
>number of Postfix MTAs and mail clients can use it.
Ramesh:
>Please let me know how to implement this, share me urls i will go
>through it how replication hel
Im sorry Wietse,
Please let me know how to implement this, share me urls i will go through it
how replication helps to solve our problem.
Regards,
Ramesh
On Monday, 7 April 2014 1:00 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Ramesh:
>Presently we have primary MX and backup MX servers, when primary
>goes do
Ramesh:
>Presently we have primary MX and backup MX servers, when primary
>goes down mails will be queued in secondary MX, once primary restored
>all messages pushed from backup MX to primary MX, messages are not
>lost. I would like to know any solution sending and receiving
>messages from backup M
On Jun 19, 2012, at 16:36, John Hudak wrote:
> He stated his requirement, specifically, the need for a high availability
> system. The details of what lead him to having this requirement are somewhat
> irrelevant - unless you want to go down the path of eliciting all the quality
> attributes a
He stated his requirement, specifically, the need for a high availability
system. The details of what lead him to having this requirement are
somewhat irrelevant - unless you want to go down the path of eliciting all
the quality attributes and look at architectural tradeoffs (which is not
what he
John Doe:
> From: Ansgar Wiechers
>
> > On 2012-06-18 Kaushal Shriyan wrote:
> >> Are there any High Availability Solution for Postfix SMTP Server meaning
> >> primary and secondary nodes in Active/Active or Active/Passive Clustering
> >> mode?
> >
> > Please describe the problem you're tryin
John Doe wrote:
From: Ansgar Wiechers
On 2012-06-18 Kaushal Shriyan wrote:
Are there any High Availability Solution for Postfix SMTP Server meaning
primary and secondary nodes in Active/Active or Active/Passive Clustering
mode?
Please describe the problem you're trying to solve instead
From: Ansgar Wiechers
> On 2012-06-18 Kaushal Shriyan wrote:
>> Are there any High Availability Solution for Postfix SMTP Server meaning
>> primary and secondary nodes in Active/Active or Active/Passive Clustering
>> mode?
>
> Please describe the problem you're trying to solve instead of what
On 2012-06-18 Kaushal Shriyan wrote:
> Are there any High Availability Solution for Postfix SMTP Server meaning
> primary and secondary nodes in Active/Active or Active/Passive Clustering
> mode?
Please describe the problem you're trying to solve instead of what you
perceive as the solution.
Rega
Jeroen Geilman wrote:
On 03/14/2012 04:19 PM, Miles Fidelman wrote:
Hi Folks,
I'm currently running a pretty basic high-availability configuration
for our mail server (postfix) - it simply runs in a Xen virtual
machine, with mirrored disks across two machines (DRBD), and failover
of the VM i
On 03/14/2012 04:19 PM, Miles Fidelman wrote:
Hi Folks,
I'm currently running a pretty basic high-availability configuration
for our mail server (postfix) - it simply runs in a Xen virtual
machine, with mirrored disks across two machines (DRBD), and failover
of the VM if something goes wrong
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 10:49 AM, Miles Fidelman
wrote:
> Hi Folks,
Hi.
>
> I'm currently running a pretty basic high-availability configuration for our
> mail server (postfix) - it simply runs in a Xen virtual machine, with
> mirrored disks across two machines (DRBD), and failover of the VM if
Am 21.10.2011 18:10, schrieb Robert Schetterer:
> Am 21.10.2011 15:27, schrieb Miles Fidelman:
>> Hi Folks,
>>
>> I'm about to rebuild a server farm, and I'm thinking about alternate
>> approaches to high-availability for our mail services.
>>
>> Right now, I just run a collection of services (incl
Am 21.10.2011 15:27, schrieb Miles Fidelman:
> Hi Folks,
>
> I'm about to rebuild a server farm, and I'm thinking about alternate
> approaches to high-availability for our mail services.
>
> Right now, I just run a collection of services (including mail) on a
> virtual machine, on top of a disk f
On Fri, 21 Oct 2011 09:27:03 -0400, Miles Fidelman
wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> I'm about to rebuild a server farm, and I'm thinking about alternate
> approaches to high-availability for our mail services.
>
> Right now, I just run a collection of services (including mail) on a
> virtual machine, on
26 matches
Mail list logo
