He stated his requirement, specifically, the need for a high availability system. The details of what lead him to having this requirement are somewhat irrelevant - unless you want to go down the path of eliciting all the quality attributes and look at architectural tradeoffs (which is not what he is asking for). He wants some guidance on architectures for high availability postfix services. He did not state his availability requirements, e.g. 0.9, 0.99, 0.999 etc, but he doesn't have to. This is, if you will, his requirement. The solutions are the many architectural approaches that would be discussed in this, and other forums.
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 2:22 PM, Ansgar Wiechers <li...@planetcobalt.net>wrote: > On 2012-06-18 Kaushal Shriyan wrote: > > Are there any High Availability Solution for Postfix SMTP Server meaning > > primary and secondary nodes in Active/Active or Active/Passive Clustering > > mode? > > Please describe the problem you're trying to solve instead of what you > perceive as the solution. > > Regards > Ansgar Wiechers > -- > "Abstractions save us time working, but they don't save us time learning." > --Joel Spolsky >
