Re: Current problems solved, but question...

2020-08-10 Thread cfs_postfix
Viktor Dukhovni wrote .. > The intention is not to suggest you avoid the list. Please keep asking, Since I have been able to thus far fix all of the problems I've had (and indeed mostly caused) myself; activate the complete virtusertable successfully; set up the mean-ugly sendmail access

Re: Current problems solved, but question...

2020-08-10 Thread Viktor Dukhovni
On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 08:52:52PM -0400, cfs_post...@insec.lofcom.com wrote: > > Without *context* your question was and remains much too vague. > >Since there is no good way to answer this, I won't. Thank you for >your help; I will try not to bother the list any more than >absolutel

Re: Current problems solved, but question...

2020-08-10 Thread cfs_postfix
Viktor Dukhovni wrote .. > Without *context* your question was and remains much too vague. Since there is no good way to answer this, I won't. Thank you for your help; I will try not to bother the list any more than absolutely necessary in the future. Charlie

Re: Current problems solved, but question...

2020-08-10 Thread Wietse Venema
cfs_post...@insec.lofcom.com: >Yes, I understand this (I never use catchalls), again it was >more a fear of the possibility that a bad rewrite (missed space >in a virtusertable line for example) might cause postfix to do >bad things as it did in this case; and other than my never >

Re: Current problems solved, but question...

2020-08-10 Thread Viktor Dukhovni
On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 04:44:34PM -0400, cfs_post...@insec.lofcom.com wrote: > Viktor Dukhovni wrote .. > > > You're indeed falling into the very trap I tried to steer you away > > from, that is, describing problems only in free-from prose, rather > > than clearly stated data (logs, configs, ..

Re: Current problems solved, but question...

2020-08-10 Thread cfs_postfix
Viktor Dukhovni wrote .. > You're indeed falling into the very trap I tried to steer you away > from, that is, describing problems only in free-from prose, rather > than clearly stated data (logs, configs, ...). No, I'm really not, and I'm a little insulted that you would accuse me of such.

Re: Current problems solved, but question...

2020-08-10 Thread Wietse Venema
cfs_post...@insec.lofcom.com: >1) May I assume every delivery must have a fully-qualified email >address, even those to MBOX files on the server? Internally in Postfix, all email addresses are in user@domain form. The null sender address is required by RFCm and is the main exception.

Re: Current problems solved, but question...

2020-08-10 Thread Viktor Dukhovni
On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 01:39:55PM -0400, cfs_post...@insec.lofcom.com wrote: >1) May I assume every delivery must have a fully-qualified email >address, even those to MBOX files on the server? This question is too vague to have an answer (I have no idea what you're actually getting at).