On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 08:52:52PM -0400, cfs_post...@insec.lofcom.com wrote:
> > Without *context* your question was and remains much too vague.
>
> Since there is no good way to answer this, I won't. Thank you for
> your help; I will try not to bother the list any more than
> absolutely necessary in the future.
The intention is not to suggest you avoid the list. Please keep asking,
but you may asked to make your questions more precise from time to time,
when it is not clear what it is you're asking.
All questions assume some frame of reference, and sometimes that frame
of reference is either non-obvious, or is sufficiently different from
the Postfix design, that is not possible to answer the question
literally as written.
--
Viktor.
