On 27/11/2010, at 06:59, Michael J Wise wrote:
>> Microsoft pay no heed to standards, ...
>
> Microsoft pays heed to standards, or a lot of the Internet just wouldn't work.
This does seem a bit funny, given the subject under discussion. I understand
that it is a big gorilla, and hard to turn on
Victor Duchovni:
> On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 11:03:58PM -0800, Michael J Wise wrote:
>
> > I do not know how fast (or even if) this can be addressed, it's so
> > not my department, but I will do my best to present the issue to the
> > right people and assert its importance and annoyance factor to th
2010/11/26 Terry Gilsenan :
> Microsoft's b0rged hosted exchange and frontbridge system is very broken.
Yes, that's right.
The other question is ...
Why has Microsoft changed from Postfix to Forefront?
Postfix is faster, safer and more compatible with RFC.
> Added to this sender verification d
Am 26.11.2010 22:36, schrieb Terry Gilsenan:
> ___
> From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On
> Behalf Of Arnim Sommer [rantho...@googlemail.com]
> Sent: Friday, 26 November 2010 11:11 PM
> To: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Subjec
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 11:03:58PM -0800, Michael J Wise wrote:
> I do not know how fast (or even if) this can be addressed, it's so
> not my department, but I will do my best to present the issue to the
> right people and assert its importance and annoyance factor to the rest
> of the community,
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 09:59:08PM -0800, Michael J Wise wrote:
> That having been said
>
> On Nov 26, 2010, at 1:36 PM, Terry Gilsenan wrote:
Yes, Terry was posturing. No need to take it too seriously. Putting the
posturing aside, there is an underlying interoperability issue. The new
softw
On Nov 26, 2010, at 10:50 PM, Michael J Wise wrote:
> On Nov 26, 2010, at 10:42 PM, Stephen Thorne wrote:
>> Our only option at this point is to turn off pipelining when talking to
>> frontbridge, because frontbridge's pipelines are broken. This is a
>> terribly negative thing. It would be much be
On Nov 26, 2010, at 10:42 PM, Stephen Thorne wrote:
> On 2010-11-26, Michael J Wise wrote:
>>
>
> Michael,
>
> Here is a very quick description of the issue.
>
> Frontbridge advertises that it supports pipelined requests. But it
> disconnects after the current request is served if any request i
On 2010-11-26, Michael J Wise wrote:
>
Michael,
Here is a very quick description of the issue.
Frontbridge advertises that it supports pipelined requests. But it
disconnects after the current request is served if any request in the
pipeline is a QUIT.
This causes a serious problem because send
ofFullDisclosure, I work at what was formerly known as BigFish, then
Frontbridge, but is now Forefront Online for Office, in the capacity of
Knowledge Engineer (Spam Analysis), and among other things help out with abuse
and deliverability issues.
And also... this discussion really doesn't seem
___
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On
Behalf Of Arnim Sommer [rantho...@googlemail.com]
Sent: Friday, 26 November 2010 11:11 PM
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: Mail.Global.FrontBridge.com
>Hello,
>unfortunately, @
2010/11/26 Wietse Venema :
> Arnim Sommer:
>> Hello,
>> unfortunately, @work we are hosted at microsoftonline.com.
>>
>> Since monday, we are getting mail delays with one of our partners, and
>> I could track it down to address verification getting timeouts.
>>
>> Has anyone else seen that problem,
Arnim Sommer:
> Hello,
> unfortunately, @work we are hosted at microsoftonline.com.
>
> Since monday, we are getting mail delays with one of our partners, and
> I could track it down to address verification getting timeouts.
>
> Has anyone else seen that problem, or is it just one isolated proble
13 matches
Mail list logo
