KLaM Postmaster a écrit :
>
> So far I am not seeing a lot of "funny" addresses, however I am seeing a
> fair number for non-existent recipients fortunately the standard checks
> handle those very well.
>
if the "non-existent recipients" aren't addresses that real people could
mistype or gues
** At 23:24 +0100 on 02/24/2009, mouss wrote:
I don't know for you, but I get a lot of attempts to "funny" addresses
like <47f280be.9000...@netoyen.net>. one of my pseudo-traps is
/\d{5...@netoyen\.net$/.
Those "funny" addresses look a lot like Message-IDs. I suspect that
harvesters (dumb har
mouss wrote:
> KLaM Postmaster a écrit :
>
>> [snip]
>>
>>>
>>>
>> An alternative is to put up a decoy address. One for which email appears
>> to be accepted, but where it is dropped,
>>
>
> I use what I call pseudo-traps here. they are only enabled from time to
> time. when
KLaM Postmaster a écrit :
> [snip]
>>
> An alternative is to put up a decoy address. One for which email appears
> to be accepted, but where it is dropped,
I use what I call pseudo-traps here. they are only enabled from time to
time. when they are enabled, I check the messages, and I use that
mouss wrote:
> KLaM Postmaster a écrit :
>
>> /dev/rob0 wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun February 22 2009 16:05:09 KLaM Postmaster wrote:
>>>
>>>
Is this mailing list closed (or fairly closed), I only ask because if
it is then there does not seem to any good reason to munge addresse
KLaM Postmaster a écrit :
> /dev/rob0 wrote:
>> On Sun February 22 2009 16:05:09 KLaM Postmaster wrote:
>>
>>> Is this mailing list closed (or fairly closed), I only ask because if
>>> it is then there does not seem to any good reason to munge addresses,
>>> domain names etc.
>>> If it open (tha
/dev/rob0 wrote:
> On Sun February 22 2009 16:05:09 KLaM Postmaster wrote:
>
>> Is this mailing list closed (or fairly closed), I only ask because if
>> it is then there does not seem to any good reason to munge addresses,
>> domain names etc.
>> If it open (that is publicly readable) then there
mouss wrote:
> KLaM Postmaster a écrit :
>
>> Mark Goodge wrote:
>>
>>> KLaM Postmaster wrote:
>>>
Is this mailing list closed (or fairly closed), I only ask because if it
is then there does not seem to any good reason to munge addresses,
domain names etc.
If it o
KLaM Postmaster a écrit :
> Mark Goodge wrote:
>> KLaM Postmaster wrote:
>>> Is this mailing list closed (or fairly closed), I only ask because if it
>>> is then there does not seem to any good reason to munge addresses,
>>> domain names etc.
>>> If it open (that is publicly readable) then there is
On Sun February 22 2009 16:05:09 KLaM Postmaster wrote:
> Is this mailing list closed (or fairly closed), I only ask because if
> it is then there does not seem to any good reason to munge addresses,
> domain names etc.
> If it open (that is publicly readable) then there is.
http://www.google.com/
Mark Goodge wrote:
> KLaM Postmaster wrote:
>> Is this mailing list closed (or fairly closed), I only ask because if it
>> is then there does not seem to any good reason to munge addresses,
>> domain names etc.
>> If it open (that is publicly readable) then there is.
>
> It's publicly archived in a
KLaM Postmaster wrote:
Is this mailing list closed (or fairly closed), I only ask because if it
is then there does not seem to any good reason to munge addresses,
domain names etc.
If it open (that is publicly readable) then there is.
It's publicly archived in a number of places, and posts here
Is this mailing list closed (or fairly closed), I only ask because if it
is then there does not seem to any good reason to munge addresses,
domain names etc.
If it open (that is publicly readable) then there is.
TIA
JLA
13 matches
Mail list logo
