EASY steve.h...@digitalcertainty.co.uk wrote, On 6/23/09 11:02 AM:
On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 15:52 +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* The Doctor:
I am contemplating howto use spamassassin effectively with postfix.
Usually we use amavisd-new
Depends how often you want to keep restarting it. My tim
* The Doctor :
> Anyway to use the spamassassin headers to reject mail
> instead of using amavisd?
amavisd-new USES Mail::SpamAssassin
The Doctor schrieb:
> On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 08:08:40PM +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
>> * The Doctor :
>>
>>> I tried runing amavisd but it is running into weird errors.
>> It's the wrong list here, but usually one shows the errors and is
>> being helped :)
>
>
> Anyway to use the spamassassin
The Doctor wrote:
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 08:08:40PM +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* The Doctor :
I tried runing amavisd but it is running into weird errors.
It's the wrong list here, but usually one shows the errors and is
being helped :)
Anyway to use the spamassassin headers to reject
On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 20:08 +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> * The Doctor :
>
> > I tried runing amavisd but it is running into weird errors.
>
> It's the wrong list here, but usually one shows the errors and is
> being helped :)
If you are running a Debian based distro, this will solve your prob
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 08:08:40PM +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> * The Doctor :
>
> > I tried runing amavisd but it is running into weird errors.
>
> It's the wrong list here, but usually one shows the errors and is
> being helped :)
Anyway to use the spamassassin headers to reject mail
inst
* Sahil Tandon :
> Noel are you suggesting something might not work for me because I don't
> know how to use it? Blasphemer!
Sigged.
* Wietse Venema :
> Perhaps there a case of name confusion. There are several tools
> that have "amavis" in the name. The one that reportedly works well
> with Postfix is called "amavisd-new".
Well, the other project are dead, really. amavis is nowadays synonym
for Mark^h^h^h^hamavisd-new.
Anyw
* The Doctor :
> I tried runing amavisd but it is running into weird errors.
It's the wrong list here, but usually one shows the errors and is
being helped :)
On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 11:50 -0500, Noel Jones wrote:
> Sahil Tandon wrote:
> > Noel are you suggesting something might not work for me because I don't
> > know how to use it? Blasphemer!
>
> ;-)
> Next I'll ask you about painting my bike shed...
How dare you waste a shed on Bikes! I would fill i
On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 18:59 +0200, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> On Tue, June 23, 2009 18:46, Steve wrote:
> > I am assured that it is amavis-new :-) However, I've also been told the
> > lottery numbers over and over and I've not won a penny.
>
> well you need to play if you want to win, admins like me
On Tue, June 23, 2009 18:46, Steve wrote:
> I am assured that it is amavis-new :-) However, I've also been told the
> lottery numbers over and over and I've not won a penny.
well you need to play if you want to win, admins like me get fingers very
dirthy one or more times, but for me its the road
Sahil Tandon wrote:
Noel are you suggesting something might not work for me because I don't
know how to use it? Blasphemer!
;-)
Next I'll ask you about painting my bike shed...
But enough of this.
While I appreciate that Steve had a bad experience with
amavisd-new, my point is that many, man
On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 12:38 -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> EASY steve.h...@digitalcertainty.co.uk:
> > Had I have been a Barracuda developer I would have asked for advice. I
> > was not. Me just a low grade tech support droid having to restart amavis
>
> Perhaps there a case of name confusion. The
EASY steve.h...@digitalcertainty.co.uk:
> Had I have been a Barracuda developer I would have asked for advice. I
> was not. Me just a low grade tech support droid having to restart amavis
Perhaps there a case of name confusion. There are several tools
that have "amavis" in the name. The one that
On Jun 23, 2009, at 12:08 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
EASY steve.h...@digitalcertainty.co.uk wrote:
On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 15:52 +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* The Doctor :
I am contemplating howto use spamassassin effectively with postfix.
Usually we use amavisd-new
Depends how often you want
On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 11:08 -0500, Noel Jones wrote:
> EASY steve.h...@digitalcertainty.co.uk wrote:
> > On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 15:52 +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> >> * The Doctor :
> >>
> >>> I am contemplating howto use spamassassin effectively with postfix.
> >> Usually we use amavisd-new
> >
EASY steve.h...@digitalcertainty.co.uk wrote:
On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 15:52 +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* The Doctor :
I am contemplating howto use spamassassin effectively with postfix.
Usually we use amavisd-new
Depends how often you want to keep restarting it. My time at Barracuda
taugh
On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 15:52 +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> * The Doctor :
>
> > I am contemplating howto use spamassassin effectively with postfix.
>
> Usually we use amavisd-new
Depends how often you want to keep restarting it. My time at Barracuda
taught me to steer clear of Amavis. 'Captain
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 03:52:15PM +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> * The Doctor :
>
> > I am contemplating howto use spamassassin effectively with postfix.
>
> Usually we use amavisd-new
I tried runing amavisd but it is running into weird errors.
--
Member - Liberal International This is do
* The Doctor :
> I am contemplating howto use spamassassin effectively with postfix.
Usually we use amavisd-new
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 09:21:52AM +0100, Steve wrote:
> Silly question. Currently I have Postfix using Spamassassin as a content
> filter thus;
>
> smtp inet n - - - 10 smtpd
> -o content_filter=spamassassin
> ...
> spamassassin unix - n n
EASY steve.h...@digitalcertainty.co.uk wrote, at 06/23/2009 09:12 AM:
> Joey wrote:
>>> Actually, I use a header_checks rule:
>>>
>>> /X-Spam-Level: \*{5,}/ REJECT
>
> I wrote;
>> I looked at this myself and asked 'hang on, what if I put a header
>> filter in for X-Spam-Level'. I assumed (and tha
Joey wrote:
> >
> > Actually, I use a header_checks rule:
> >
> > /X-Spam-Level: \*{5,}/ REJECT
I wrote;
> I looked at this myself and asked 'hang on, what if I put a header
> filter in for X-Spam-Level'. I assumed (and that is all it was) that it
> was not fed into the content filter until *af
On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 08:51 -0400, Jorey Bump wrote:
> Steve wrote, at 06/23/2009 04:21 AM:
> > Silly question. Currently I have Postfix using Spamassassin as a content
> > filter thus;
> >
> > smtp inet n - - - 10 smtpd
> > -o content_filter=spamassass
Steve wrote, at 06/23/2009 04:21 AM:
> Silly question. Currently I have Postfix using Spamassassin as a content
> filter thus;
>
> smtp inet n - - - 10 smtpd
> -o content_filter=spamassassin
> ...
> spamassassin unix - n n - -
On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 13:00 +0300, Dudi Goldenberg wrote:
> >The reason I ask is this bounce;
> >
> >...
> >: host mail.varna.net[217.145.80.1] said: 550 5.7.1
> >Blocked by SpamAssassin (in reply to end of DATA command)
>
> This is Spamassassin milter in action.
>
> Consult your distribution rep
>The reason I ask is this bounce;
>
>...
>: host mail.varna.net[217.145.80.1] said: 550 5.7.1
>Blocked by SpamAssassin (in reply to end of DATA command)
This is Spamassassin milter in action.
Consult your distribution repository or have a look at:
http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/spamass-milt/
Silly question. Currently I have Postfix using Spamassassin as a content
filter thus;
smtp inet n - - - 10 smtpd
-o content_filter=spamassassin
...
spamassassin unix - n n - - pipe
user=spamd argv=/usr/bin/spamc -f -e
29 matches
Mail list logo
