Joey wrote:
> >
> > Actually, I use a header_checks rule:
> >
> > /X-Spam-Level: \*{5,}/ REJECT
I wrote;
> I looked at this myself and asked 'hang on, what if I put a header
> filter in for X-Spam-Level'. I assumed (and that is all it was) that it
> was not fed into the content filter until *after* Postfix had accepted
> the whole message. ? ? If that is the case and it tried to bounce this
> I'm not entirely sure of the carnage this would create. I'll have to
> play with it as this looks like to easy and obvious to miss!
And yep, having tested it - that does not work as intended;
250 2.0.0 Ok: queued as C4E83AC0C6
So it takes it and then has to bounce it :-(
It then tries to 'bounce' and could end up joe-jobbing some innocent
person. I just did.....
