On Mar 13, 2016, at 10:52 AM, Curtis Villamizar
wrote:
> Are you saying they only looked at the primary NS record?
That’s my theory, yes.
> Maybe I misread a prior post but I thought you meant primary MX record. The
> former, if true, would be even more broken.
This is Yahoo.
Basically what
In message <612d47d4-9465-4031-9d48-e6a0c3a8a...@dukhovni.org>
Viktor Dukhovni writes:
>
> > On Mar 13, 2016, at 5:42 PM, Curtis Villamizar
> > wrote:
> >
> > The NS RR are typically delivered in a fixed order, the order in the
> > zone file, and while perhaps neither NS RR is properly a primar
> On Mar 13, 2016, at 5:42 PM, Curtis Villamizar
> wrote:
>
> The NS RR are typically delivered in a fixed order, the order in the
> zone file, and while perhaps neither NS RR is properly a primary in
> the sense that MX has preference, lots of code uses the first NS
> first, then tries the sec
In message <3qnxhn426dzj...@spike.porcupine.org>
Wietse Venema writes:
>
> Curtis Villamizar:
> > Are you saying they only looked at the primary NS record? Maybe I
> > misread a prior post but I thought you meant primary MX record. The
> > former, if true, would be even more broken.
>
> There
Curtis Villamizar:
> Are you saying they only looked at the primary NS record? Maybe I
> misread a prior post but I thought you meant primary MX record. The
> former, if true, would be even more broken.
There are no primary/secondary NS records; what matters are the NS
records for his domain the
In message
"@lbutlr" writes:
> On Fri Mar 11 2016 12:21:07 Noel Jones said:
> >=20
> > This problem (postscreen delays legit mail server) is nicely solved
> > by using a dns whitelist such as dnswl.org to bypass postscreen
> > tests for known mail servers... not necessarily "known good"
On Mar 11, 2016, at 7:05 AM, @lbutlr wrote:
> I’ve been trying to track down why users have stopped receiving any mail from
> yahoo users
OK, I don’t know if it is entirely fixed, but some mail from yahoo (I created a
yahoo account, gah! How do people use that webmail over gmail?) and was able
On Fri Mar 11 2016 12:21:07 Noel Jones said:
>
> This problem (postscreen delays legit mail server) is nicely solved
> by using a dns whitelist such as dnswl.org to bypass postscreen
> tests for known mail servers... not necessarily "known good"
> servers, just known to not be a bot. Then your
On 3/11/2016 12:54 PM, @lbutlr wrote:
> On Fri Mar 11 2016 11:45:31 Viktor Dukhovni
> said:
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 11:38:13AM -0700, @lbutlr wrote:
>>
You have some sort of proxy in front of your Postfix server. The
proxy may be blocking Yahoo's servers.
>>>
>>> That is postsc
On Fri Mar 11 2016 07:05:34 @lbutlr <@lbutlr> said:
>
> I know this isn;t a postfix problem since postfix is not ever getting
> anything, but I’m hoping someone on the list has some ideas?
I just found out that someone turned off the static IP pool for one of the DNS
servers, so that may be
On Fri Mar 11 2016 11:45:31 Viktor Dukhovni
said:
>
> On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 11:38:13AM -0700, @lbutlr wrote:
>
>>> You have some sort of proxy in front of your Postfix server. The
>>> proxy may be blocking Yahoo's servers.
>>
>> That is postscreen, which has a 4 or 5 second delay for ne
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 11:38:13AM -0700, @lbutlr wrote:
> > You have some sort of proxy in front of your Postfix server. The
> > proxy may be blocking Yahoo's servers.
>
> That is postscreen, which has a 4 or 5 second delay for new connections
> however, that connection would be logged, would
On Fri Mar 11 2016 09:09:29 Viktor Dukhovni
said:
>
> On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 08:57:48AM -0700, @lbutlr wrote:
>
>> I have MX monitoring that says I am not on any blacklists and that the
>> server is secure
>>
>> # dig @8.8.8.8 covisp.net any
>
> My first SMTP connection attempt to your
Viktor Dukhovni:
> On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 08:57:48AM -0700, @lbutlr wrote:
>
> > I have MX monitoring that says I am not on any blacklists and that the
> > server is secure
> >
> > # dig @8.8.8.8 covisp.net any
>
> My first SMTP connection attempt to your server resulted in:
>
> $ posttl
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 08:57:48AM -0700, @lbutlr wrote:
> I have MX monitoring that says I am not on any blacklists and that the server
> is secure
>
> # dig @8.8.8.8 covisp.net any
My first SMTP connection attempt to your server resulted in:
$ posttls-finger covisp.net
posttls-finge
> On Mar 11, 2016, at 7:37 AM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 07:05:34AM -0700, @lbutlr wrote:
>> I’ve been trying to track down why users have stopped receiving any
>> mail from yahoo users and after searching the logs and even going
>> so far as to create a yahoo mail account a
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 07:05:34AM -0700, @lbutlr wrote:
> I’ve been trying to track down why users have stopped receiving any
> mail from yahoo users and after searching the logs and even going
> so far as to create a yahoo mail account and send mail to myself, I
> see no attempts by yahoo to c
@lbutlr:
> I=E2=80=99ve been trying to track down why users have stopped receiving =
> any mail from yahoo users and after searching the logs and even going so =
> far as to create a yahoo mail account and send mail to myself, I see no =
> attempts by yahoo to connect to my server. It seems anythin
I’ve been trying to track down why users have stopped receiving any mail from
yahoo users and after searching the logs and even going so far as to create a
yahoo mail account and send mail to myself, I see no attempts by yahoo to
connect to my server. It seems anything sent to my mail server sim
From: Lima Union
>To:
>Cc: Postfix users
>Sent: Monday, December 5, 2011 8:02 AM
>Subject: Re: OT: Yahoo spam load (was: Dead Destination configuration)
>
>
>
>I'm having the same problem here, a lot of spam comming from YAHOO mail system.
>I didn't kn
From: Steve
> To: postfix-users@postfix.org
>Sent: Sunday, December 4, 2011 4:59 AM
>Subject: Re: OT: Yahoo spam load (was: Dead Destination configuration)
>
>
>> >I wish there was a chart for spam sent FROM yahoo. 99% of our spam comes
>> from yahoo (that gets t
On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 5:15 PM, Steve Fatula wrote:
> From: Wietse Venema
> To: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Sent: Friday, December 2, 2011 8:42 AM
> Subject: OT: Yahoo spam load (was: Dead Destination configuration)
>
> To get some idea of Yahoo spam load (and keyword
On Sun, 2011-12-04 at 17:06:02 -0600, Noel Jones wrote:
> On 12/4/2011 2:15 PM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
> > The point about "gets through postscreen" probably was that it's not
> > safe nor easy to try to block spammer-controlled freemail accounts
> > through postscreen. In postscreen, there is no differ
On 12/4/2011 2:15 PM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
> The point about "gets through postscreen" probably was that it's not
> safe nor easy to try to block spammer-controlled freemail accounts
> through postscreen. In postscreen, there is no difference between
> freemail spam and real mail from freemail users
[not entirely OT, but leaving the subject unchanged]
On Sunday 04 December 2011 04:59:45 Steve wrote:
> > Von: Steve Fatula
> > >I wish there was a chart for spam sent FROM yahoo. 99% of
> > >our spam comes from yahoo (that gets through postscreen).
>
> On my end it is hotmail. Anyway postsc
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Fri, 2 Dec 2011 12:15:34 -0800 (PST)
> Von: Steve Fatula
> An: Postfix users
> Betreff: Re: OT: Yahoo spam load (was: Dead Destination configuration)
> From: Wietse Venema
> >To: postfix-users@postfix.org
> >Sent: Frida
Am 02.12.2011 21:15, schrieb Steve Fatula:
> *From:* Wietse Venema
> *To:* postfix-users@postfix.org
> *Sent:* Friday, December 2, 2011 8:42 AM
> *Subject:* OT: Yahoo spam load (was: Dead Destination configuration)
>
> To get some idea of Yahoo spam load (
From: Wietse Venema
>To: postfix-users@postfix.org
>Sent: Friday, December 2, 2011 8:42 AM
>Subject: OT: Yahoo spam load (was: Dead Destination configuration)
>
>To get some idea of Yahoo spam load (and keyword trends) see
>http://visualize.yahoo.com/ and click the green but
To get some idea of Yahoo spam load (and keyword trends) see
http://visualize.yahoo.com/ and click the green buttons.
Wietse
29 matches
Mail list logo
