-------- Original-Nachricht -------- > Datum: Fri, 2 Dec 2011 12:15:34 -0800 (PST) > Von: Steve Fatula <compconsult...@yahoo.com> > An: Postfix users <postfix-users@postfix.org> > Betreff: Re: OT: Yahoo spam load (was: Dead Destination configuration)
> From: Wietse Venema <wie...@porcupine.org> > >To: postfix-users@postfix.org > >Sent: Friday, December 2, 2011 8:42 AM > >Subject: OT: Yahoo spam load (was: Dead Destination configuration) > > > >To get some idea of Yahoo spam load (and keyword trends) see > >http://visualize.yahoo.com/ and click the green buttons. > > > > > >I wish there was a chart for spam sent FROM yahoo. 99% of our spam comes > from yahoo (that gets through postscreen). > On my end it is hotmail. Anyway.... postscreen is as good as you configure and use it. There is IMHO no universal valid conclusion about quality when you write "that goes through postscreen". IMHO there is a reason for content filters. They are able to catch those remaining messages passing such filter types like postscreen. From the viewpoint of such filters (like postscreen) the mail coming from yahoo (or in my case hotmail) are legitimate since they are coming from the proper sources, obey EHLO/HELO delays, are often digitally signed, are in no blacklist, etc... > Steve > Steve -- NEU: FreePhone - 0ct/min Handyspartarif mit Geld-zurück-Garantie! Jetzt informieren: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/freephone
