Michael Reck a écrit :
> Zitat von Patrick Ben Koetter :
>
>> * Michael Reck :
>>> Hi List,
>>>
>>> I`m looking for a SA replacement in an large scale enviroment.
>>> DSPAM seems to use filesystem (--with-userdir=) for various
>>> functions which is not what i want. dspam also needs per user
>>> a
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 04:28:37PM +0100, Michael Reck wrote:
> Anyway, our customers complaining the usual way ( to much spam in
> my inbox...) and are not getting smarter (i don`t want to train
> SA...) so i must bear the challenge :)
Such is the story with content filtering for spam control. It
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Mon, 18 Jan 2010 16:40:40 +0100
> Von: Michael Reck
> An: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Betreff: Re: OT: Alternative for Spamassassin
> Zitat von Steve :
>
> >
> > Original-Nachricht
> >>
Zitat von Steve :
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Sun, 17 Jan 2010 19:49:49 +0100
Von: Michael Reck
An: postfix-users@postfix.org
Betreff: OT: Alternative for Spamassassin
Hi List,
I`m looking for a SA replacement in an large scale enviroment.
DSPAM seems to use filesystem
Zitat von Patrick Ben Koetter :
* Michael Reck :
Hi List,
I`m looking for a SA replacement in an large scale enviroment.
DSPAM seems to use filesystem (--with-userdir=) for various
functions which is not what i want. dspam also needs per user
activation.
Anything except Mailstorage is placed i
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Sun, 17 Jan 2010 19:49:49 +0100
> Von: Michael Reck
> An: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Betreff: OT: Alternative for Spamassassin
> Hi List,
>
> I`m looking for a SA replacement in an large scale enviroment.
> DSPAM seems t
Michael Reck wrote:
> I`m looking for a SA replacement in an large scale enviroment.
> DSPAM seems to use filesystem (--with-userdir=) for various functions
> which is not what i want. dspam also needs per user activation.
Your assumptions about Dspam are wrong. Using --with-userdir is
optional,
* Michael Reck :
> Hi List,
>
> I`m looking for a SA replacement in an large scale enviroment.
> DSPAM seems to use filesystem (--with-userdir=) for various
> functions which is not what i want. dspam also needs per user
> activation.
> Anything except Mailstorage is placed in DB and i don`t want
Hi List,
I`m looking for a SA replacement in an large scale enviroment.
DSPAM seems to use filesystem (--with-userdir=) for various functions
which is not what i want. dspam also needs per user activation.
Anything except Mailstorage is placed in DB and i don`t want to change this.
Does anybo
