On 2/13/2009, mouss (mo...@ml.netoyen.net) wrote:
> because in your original post, the check in question was before
> permit_*, so doesn't need a permit_* when moved.
Actually, I guess that was confusing, but...
The check that is above the permit_* in my original post was the
check_recipient_acce
Charles Marcus a écrit :
> On 2/13/2009 4:23 PM, mouss wrote:
smtpd_sender_restrictions =
check_recipient_access hash:/etc/postfix/moved-employees,
>
>>> Ah! I never even considered I could put check_recipient_access under
>>> smtpd_sender_restrictions... but if I can put check_client_a
On 2/13/2009 4:23 PM, mouss wrote:
>>> smtpd_sender_restrictions =
>>> check_recipient_access hash:/etc/postfix/moved-employees,
>> Ah! I never even considered I could put check_recipient_access under
>> smtpd_sender_restrictions... but if I can put check_client_access under
>> smtpd_recipient_re
Charles Marcus a écrit :
> On 2/13/2009 3:42 PM, mouss wrote:
>> you can do this
>>
>> smtpd_sender_restrictions =
>> check_recipient_access hash:/etc/postfix/moved-employees,
>
> Ah! I never even considered I could put check_recipient_access under
> smtpd_sender_restrictions... but if I can put
On 2/13/2009 3:42 PM, mouss wrote:
> you can do this
>
> smtpd_sender_restrictions =
> check_recipient_access hash:/etc/postfix/moved-employees,
Ah! I never even considered I could put check_recipient_access under
smtpd_sender_restrictions... but if I can put check_client_access under
smtpd_reci
Charles Marcus a écrit :
> On 2/13/2009, Ralf Hildebrandt (ralf.hildebra...@charite.de) wrote:
>>> I'm thinking it would be better to move the check_client_access check to
>>> smtpd_client_restrictions, and the check_sender_access check to
>>> smtpd_sender_restrictions, so I'd then have:
>
>> No,
On 2/13/2009, Justin Piszcz (jpis...@lucidpixels.com) wrote:
> I have one question to add to this thread, in the past it has always
> been up to the admin whether to put all beneath recipient
> restrictions (with the exception of SAV), is this still considered
> best-practice? Or should one follow
On Fri, 13 Feb 2009, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2/13/2009, Ralf Hildebrandt (ralf.hildebra...@charite.de) wrote:
I'm thinking it would be better to move the check_client_access check to
smtpd_client_restrictions, and the check_sender_access check to
smtpd_sender_restrictions, so I'd then have:
On 2/13/2009, Ralf Hildebrandt (ralf.hildebra...@charite.de) wrote:
>> I'm thinking it would be better to move the check_client_access check to
>> smtpd_client_restrictions, and the check_sender_access check to
>> smtpd_sender_restrictions, so I'd then have:
> No, don't do it.
Ok... I do apprecia
* Charles Marcus :
> Hello again,
>
> I just want to confirm before I change this that I'm not missing
> something that will cause me some pain...
>
> Currently I have all of my restrictions under
> smtpd_recipient_restrictions, but after seeing some questions about
> these on the list, I'm think
Hello again,
I just want to confirm before I change this that I'm not missing
something that will cause me some pain...
Currently I have all of my restrictions under
smtpd_recipient_restrictions, but after seeing some questions about
these on the list, I'm thinking that there are two that should
11 matches
Mail list logo
