On 2/13/2009, mouss (mo...@ml.netoyen.net) wrote: > because in your original post, the check in question was before > permit_*, so doesn't need a permit_* when moved.
Actually, I guess that was confusing, but... The check that is above the permit_* in my original post was the check_recipient_access, and was *not* one of the two (check_client_access and check_sender_access) I was moving. But your answer makes sense, so now I know the answer too... :) Thanks again... -- Best regards, Charles
