On 8/10/2012 12:06 AM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Thu, Aug 09, 2012 at 06:50:26PM -0400, Deeztek.com Support wrote:
Operationally a multi-instance system is easier to support. It
takes a small bit of effort to build, this is well worth it.
Maybe it's the way my brain works but what you are sugg
On Thu, Aug 09, 2012 at 06:50:26PM -0400, Deeztek.com Support wrote:
> >Operationally a multi-instance system is easier to support. It
> >takes a small bit of effort to build, this is well worth it.
>
> Maybe it's the way my brain works but what you are suggesting seems
> more complicated to me.
On Thu, Aug 09, 2012 at 10:36:30PM +, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
>
> Multiple instances also give you a more clear view of the state of
> the system with clearer log entries, separate queues for filtered
> and unfiltered mail, ...
This last item is nothing to sneeze at. It means you can see at a
On 8/9/2012 6:36 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Thu, Aug 09, 2012 at 06:26:23PM -0400, Deeztek.com Support wrote:
This is certainly not simpler then.
I would suggest that your simplicity metric is not the right one,
simplicity is about ease of understanding and ongoing maintenace,
more than abo
On Thu, Aug 09, 2012 at 06:26:23PM -0400, Deeztek.com Support wrote:
> This is certainly not simpler then.
I would suggest that your simplicity metric is not the right one,
simplicity is about ease of understanding and ongoing maintenace,
more than about effort to set it up. It takes more effort
On 8/9/2012 6:16 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Thu, Aug 09, 2012 at 05:11:49PM -0400, Deeztek.com Support wrote:
So at this time you are recommending two separate machines instead
of two instances on the same machine?
No, I am recommending two instances per machine, one before the
filters, and
On Thu, Aug 09, 2012 at 05:11:49PM -0400, Deeztek.com Support wrote:
> So at this time you are recommending two separate machines instead
> of two instances on the same machine?
No, I am recommending two instances per machine, one before the
filters, and one after
Separately, I am recommending t
So at this time you are recommending two separate machines instead of two
instances on the same machine?
-Original Message-
From: Viktor Dukhovni
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Sent: Thu, 09 Aug 2012 3:15 PM
Subject: Re: Issue with Postfix Amavisd-new S/MIME encryption and DKIM
On Thu
On Thu, Aug 09, 2012 at 02:48:19PM -0400, Deeztek.com Support wrote:
> The problem I'm having is this. It's my understanding that Amavis
> has to have an inject and re-inject port.
Certainly it listens for mail on the inject port, and forwards it
to the re-in(ject) port.
> In my case, I have cha
On 8/9/2012 2:16 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Thu, Aug 09, 2012 at 10:36:30AM -0400, Deeztek.com Support wrote:
So what are you saying is, instead of having amavis reinject back to
Postfix on 10022, to have it inject directly to the s/mime gateway
on port 10025 and then the s/mime gateway rein
On Thu, Aug 09, 2012 at 10:36:30AM -0400, Deeztek.com Support wrote:
> So what are you saying is, instead of having amavis reinject back to
> Postfix on 10022, to have it inject directly to the s/mime gateway
> on port 10025 and then the s/mime gateway reinject back to postfix
> on 10026? All the
On 8/9/2012 9:51 AM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Thu, Aug 09, 2012 at 09:28:57AM -0400, Deeztek.com Support wrote:
I have the following setup:
Postfix, Amavisd-new and an email encryption gateway called djigzo
integrated into the same system:
Email flows is as follows:
Postfix-
-->10021--->Am
On Thu, Aug 09, 2012 at 09:28:57AM -0400, Deeztek.com Support wrote:
> I have the following setup:
>
> Postfix, Amavisd-new and an email encryption gateway called djigzo
> integrated into the same system:
>
> Email flows is as follows:
>
> Postfix-
> -->10021--->Amavis--->10022>Postfix
Hi,
I have the following setup:
Postfix, Amavisd-new and an email encryption gateway called djigzo
integrated into the same system:
Email flows is as follows:
Postfix-
-->10021--->Amavis--->10022>Postfix>10025>Djigzo>10026>Postfix>25>Internet
Postfix injects
14 matches
Mail list logo
