On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 09:46:52PM +0100, Jaroslaw Rafa wrote:
I'm not sure how exactly PSL is maintained, but I guess that if you'd want
scconsult.com to be included in PSL (so that you could somehow back up your
claim that it's a registry)
Every operator of any domain is a registry operator:
if you have made successfully a DIY registry you could benefit from it
by finance.
such as what "de.com", "uk.net", "in.com" does. :)
I always have a dream to buy a top-level domain from IANA and run my own
registry biz. For instance ".tomato" is my gTLD, welcome you to become
the registrar for
Let's all take a deep breath and recall that the origins of the PSL are in
web browsing, and directly tied to that invention so necessary to our
collective privacy: the cookie.
It was a list, originally maintained by Mozilla, of domains (or stems)
that you can't set cookies for.
--
Fred Mor
On 2021-12-14 at 15:46:52 UTC-0500 (Tue, 14 Dec 2021 21:46:52 +0100)
Jaroslaw Rafa
is rumored to have said:
Dnia 14.12.2021 o godz. 13:34:06 Bill Cole pisze:
For example, I could *CLAIM* to be an independent customer of
whoever runs scconsult.com as a registry, and I just "registered"
billmai
Dnia 14.12.2021 o godz. 13:06:49 Andrew Sullivan pisze:
> On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 12:31:07PM +0100, Jaroslaw Rafa wrote:
> >That's exactly what Public Suffix List is for. It lists all such domains.
>
> Well, to be a little more pointed about it, it attempts to provide a
> volunteer-curated list of
Dnia 14.12.2021 o godz. 13:34:06 Bill Cole pisze:
>
> For example, I could *CLAIM* to be an independent customer of
> whoever runs scconsult.com as a registry, and I just "registered"
> billmail.scconsult.com with them, and therefore am completely
> innocent of the bad behavior by some evil guy wh
On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 01:34:06PM -0500, Bill Cole wrote:
For example, I could *CLAIM* to be an independent customer of whoever
runs scconsult.com as a registry, and I just "registered"
billmail.scconsult.com with them, and therefore am completely innocent
of the bad behavior by some evil gu
On 2021-12-14 at 12:52:06 UTC-0500 (Tue, 14 Dec 2021 17:52:06 +)
Chris Green
is rumored to have said:
I have a mix of .co.uk, .com, .net, .org, .biz, .uk, .be and .eu
domains.
All of which are subject as domains to ICANN and/or governmental
registry rules.
Surely it's the provider of t
On 2021-12-14 at 13:10:36 UTC-0500 (Tue, 14 Dec 2021 13:10:36 -0500)
Andrew Sullivan
is rumored to have said:
Hi,
On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 12:35:17PM -0500, Bill Cole wrote:
On the other hand, anyone who wants to do so can buy a 2nd-level
domain in a gTLD and run a pseudo-registry like uk.co
Hi,
On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 12:35:17PM -0500, Bill Cole wrote:
On the other hand, anyone who wants to do so can buy a 2nd-level
domain in a gTLD and run a pseudo-registry like uk.com or eu.org for
subdomains.
Not any more in new TLDs. There's an ICANN consensus policy that is designed to p
> Surely it's the provider of the hosting who gets blacklisted not the
> 'name' of the host.
RBL public black list companies keep a database of both IP's and domain names.
While banning the IP does blacklist the hosting provider, banning the domain
name follows them no matter where they host.
Spa
On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 12:31:07PM +0100, Jaroslaw Rafa wrote:
That's exactly what Public Suffix List is for. It lists all such domains.
Well, to be a little more pointed about it, it attempts to provide a
volunteer-curated list of such domains. It does an amazing job for what it is,
but it'
On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 12:35:17PM -0500, Bill Cole wrote:
> On 2021-12-13 at 06:19:47 UTC-0500 (Mon, 13 Dec 2021 19:19:47 +0800)
> Frank Hwa
> is rumored to have said:
>
> > for the second level domain, some are "com.au", "com.hk" (the com one),
> > some are "co.uk", "co.jp" (the co one). I am n
On 2021-12-13 at 06:19:47 UTC-0500 (Mon, 13 Dec 2021 19:19:47 +0800)
Frank Hwa
is rumored to have said:
for the second level domain, some are "com.au", "com.hk" (the com
one), some are "co.uk", "co.jp" (the co one). I am not sure, isn't
there a standard for this naming?
No. The 2-letter TLDs
Dnia 13.12.2021 o godz. 10:10:07 jdebert pisze:
> On Mon, 13 Dec 2021 19:19:47 +0800
> Frank Hwa wrote:
>
> > for the second level domain, some are "com.au", "com.hk" (the com
> > one), some are "co.uk", "co.jp" (the co one). I am not sure, isn't
> > there a standard for this naming?
> >
>
> A
On Mon, 13 Dec 2021 19:19:47 +0800
Frank Hwa wrote:
> for the second level domain, some are "com.au", "com.hk" (the com
> one), some are "co.uk", "co.jp" (the co one). I am not sure, isn't
> there a standard for this naming?
>
A long-standing convention to use ISO 2-letter country
codes as TLD
On 2021-12-12 at 05:09:00 UTC-0500 (Sun, 12 Dec 2021 10:09:00 +)
Linkcheck
is rumored to have said:
b) The customer's domain is one of the hugely expensive UK.COM
pseudo-TLDs. UK.COM has been reported as being spammy; I assume due to
bad apples amongst a high number of otherwise ok subdoma
aha, you were smart.:)
On 2021/12/13 7:32, Benny Pedersen wrote:
i can make subdomain nameserver delegations if it was a good idear in
the first place
On 2021-12-13 12:19, Frank Hwa wrote:
for the second level domain, some are "com.au", "com.hk" (the com
one), some are "co.uk", "co.jp" (the co one). I am not sure, isn't
there a standard for this naming?
i can make subdomain nameserver delegations if it was a good idear in
the first place
i
Dnia 13.12.2021 o godz. 19:19:47 Frank Hwa pisze:
> for the second level domain, some are "com.au", "com.hk" (the com
> one), some are "co.uk", "co.jp" (the co one). I am not sure, isn't
> there a standard for this naming?
That's exactly what Public Suffix List is for. It lists all such domains.
-
On a side note, I see fraud and nigeria spam directly from Gmail accounts on
the rise for some time now.
Not only the Reply-To hosting, that they happily provide for many years to the
criminal world.
> If so, given they allow spammers virtually free range to send FROM gmail this
> is a bit hy
for the second level domain, some are "com.au", "com.hk" (the com one),
some are "co.uk", "co.jp" (the co one). I am not sure, isn't there a
standard for this naming?
regards.
Frank
On 2021/12/13 6:59, Benny Pedersen wrote:
co.uk co.dk
Dnia 13.12.2021 o godz. 11:59:28 Benny Pedersen pisze:
>
> publicsiffix is poinsende :=)
>
> co.uk co.dk
>
> later is now non existing or just marketing
>
> note imho dmarc see tld uk, and dmarc subdomains is not on co.uk, so
> maybe google is not that dumb ?
What does co.uk have to do wi
On 2021-12-13 11:41, Jaroslaw Rafa wrote:
Both eu.org and uk.com are on the Public Suffix List
(https://publicsuffix.org/list/public_suffix_list.dat ) which clearly
indicates that different subdomains of these domains should NOT be
treated
as a part of the same entity.
But yes, Google IS dumb
Dnia 12.12.2021 o godz. 10:09:00 Linkcheck pisze:
>
> My suspicion is that google is delaying the mail based on the
> reputation of the generic UK.COM domain name. Is this likely? Is
> google really dumb enough to treat all UK.COM subdomains as part of
> the same single domain?
Same happened for
I run a small postfix/dovecot mail service for my website customers. For
the past several months one of my customers has had mail to gmail
addresses delayed by approx 12 hours. The delaying/rejecting messages
returned by google are on the lines of:
(host alt1.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com[142.250
26 matches
Mail list logo
