Rob Sterenborg (Lists) via Postfix-users:
> Hi,
>
> I was reading the SASL_README, "The ldapdb plugin" at:
>
> https://www.postfix.org/SASL_README.html#auxprop_ldapdb
>
> [quote]
> Tip: [...snip...] Instead, you can use "saslauthd -a ldap" to query the
> LDAP database directly, with approp
Hi,
I was reading the SASL_README, "The ldapdb plugin" at:
https://www.postfix.org/SASL_README.html#auxprop_ldapdb
[quote]
Tip: [...snip...] Instead, you can use "saslauthd -a ldap" to query the
LDAP database directly, with appropriate configuration in
saslauthd.conf, as described here. [
Ralf Hildebrandt via Postfix-users:
> * Wietse Venema via Postfix-users :
> > Wietse Venema via Postfix-users:
> > > If you use defer_transports to freeze mail deliveries, then some
> > > messages may get close to the bounce_queue_lifetime, meaning that
> > > Postfix will try to deliver them only o
* Wietse Venema via Postfix-users :
> Wietse Venema via Postfix-users:
> > If you use defer_transports to freeze mail deliveries, then some
> > messages may get close to the bounce_queue_lifetime, meaning that
> > Postfix will try to deliver them only once.
>
> And that was incorrect. defer_transp
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users:
> If you use defer_transports to freeze mail deliveries, then some
> messages may get close to the bounce_queue_lifetime, meaning that
> Postfix will try to deliver them only once.
And that was incorrect. defer_transports will not freeze mail in
the queue, it just
Phil Stracchino wrote:
On 11/13/20 1:22 PM, John Fawcett wrote:
On 13/11/2020 07:38, li...@lazygranch.com wrote:
My server bounced a message. Here is the server log (sanitized).
-
Nov 13 02:07:52 myserver postfix/smtpd[27706]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT
from sonic302-23.c
On 15/11/2020 09:52, Nick Tait wrote:
> On 14/11/20 7:30 am, Phil Stracchino wrote:
>> I think what the OP is asking here is, can Yahoo/Oath be compelled to
>> provide a more useful failure message relaying the informative response
>> provided by OP's Postfix instance.
>>
>> And the answer to that,
On 14/11/20 7:30 am, Phil Stracchino wrote:
I think what the OP is asking here is, can Yahoo/Oath be compelled to
provide a more useful failure message relaying the informative response
provided by OP's Postfix instance.
And the answer to that, unfortunately, is no.
But by the look of things t
On 11/13/20 1:22 PM, John Fawcett wrote:
> On 13/11/2020 07:38, li...@lazygranch.com wrote:
>> My server bounced a message. Here is the server log (sanitized).
>> -
>> Nov 13 02:07:52 myserver postfix/smtpd[27706]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT
>> from sonic302-23.consmr.mail.gq
On 13/11/2020 07:38, li...@lazygranch.com wrote:
> My server bounced a message. Here is the server log (sanitized).
> -
> Nov 13 02:07:52 myserver postfix/smtpd[27706]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT
> from sonic302-23.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com[98.137.68.149]: 554 5.7.1
> Service
Peter:
> I just noticed this in SASL_README
> (http://www.postfix.org/SASL_README.html#client_sasl_enable):
>
>* The Postfix SMTP client does not support the obsolete "wrappermode"
> protocol, which uses TCP port 465 on the SMTP server. See
> TLS_README for a
> solution that uses t
I just noticed this in SASL_README
(http://www.postfix.org/SASL_README.html#client_sasl_enable):
* The Postfix SMTP client does not support the obsolete "wrappermode"
protocol, which uses TCP port 465 on the SMTP server. See
TLS_README for a
solution that uses the stunnel command.
I
May I request a correction to the announcements page:
http://www.postfix.org/announcements.html
For the last three annoucements, the page has erroneously mentioned
the 3.3.x update as a 3.2.x update:
Example:
"June 4, 2020: Postfix stable release 3.5.3 and legacy releases
3.4.13, 3
Hi
while looking through the code for the previous post I noticed that the
return type for smtpd_sasl_auth_cmd in the comment does not correspond
to the one in the code.
John
--- smtpd/smtpd_sasl_proto.c.orig 2018-12-29 12:00:06.168219924 +0100
+++ smtpd/smtpd_sasl_proto.c 2018-12-29 12:00
Ok, thanks.
From: Wietse Venema
To: Postfix users
Sent: Wednesday, November 5, 2014 7:59 AM
Subject: Re: Correction
[actual quote from qmail non-delivery notification, address anonymized]
> :
> Remote host said:
> 550 5.7.1 Spam not accepted here
[actual quote from qmail non-delivery notification, address anonymized]
> :
> Remote host said:
> 550 5.7.1 Spam not accepted here.
> [BODY]
>
> --- Below this line is a copy of the message.
>
> Received: from [etc...]
[actual Postfix configuration details]
> header_checks:
> /Subject: VvVvV/
header_checks:
/Subject: VvVvV/ REJECT Spam not accepted here.
body_checks:/VvVvV/ REJECT Spam not accepted here.
From: Wietse Venema
To: Postfix users
Sent: Wednesday, November 5, 2014 7:15 AM
Subject: Re: Correction
J.:
> This is the mess
J.:
> This is the message failure notice I received from my web-mail
> related to the log file entry (the second one I believe) The only
> thing I'm changing is the email address. I don't include what
> follows the received from because that's just the web mail co's
> ip addresses etc. I'm not sure
, November 5, 2014 1:48 AM
Subject: Re: Correction
Am 05.11.2014 um 06:45 schrieb J.:
> I don't think my assumption is completely unwarranted. I created a
> header_checks rule and then sent a message from outside our system and
> this shows up in the log:
>
> No
From: Wietse Venema
To: Postfix users
Sent: Wednesday, November 5, 2014 4:26 AM
Subject: Re: Correction
J.:
> I don't think my assumption is completely unwarranted. I created a
> header_checks rule and then sent a message from outside our system and this
&g
J.:
> I don't think my assumption is completely unwarranted. I created a
> header_checks rule and then sent a message from outside our system and this
> shows up in the log:
>
> Nov 4 12:09:24 kest postfix/cleanup[13287]: 375FR2F2491F: reject: header
> Subject: VvVvV test message...[etc]
>
>
Am 05.11.2014 um 06:45 schrieb J.:
I don't think my assumption is completely unwarranted. I created a
header_checks rule and then sent a message from outside our system and
this shows up in the log:
Nov 4 12:09:24 kest postfix/cleanup[13287]: 375FR2F2491F: reject:
header Subject: VvVvV test me
I don't think my assumption is completely unwarranted. I created a
header_checks rule and then sent a message from outside our system and this
shows up in the log:
Nov 4 12:09:24 kest postfix/cleanup[13287]: 375FR2F2491F: reject: header
Subject: VvVvV test message...[etc]
Then when I do a tes
J.:
> Apologies. I'm not sure why "[BODY]" is showing up after the
> rejection line from header_checks and body_checks, but I was
> mistaken about it disclosing exactly why the message was rejected.
> Regardless of whether it's a body_check or header_check that is
> matched, the failure message say
Apologies. I'm not sure why "[BODY]" is showing up after the rejection line
from header_checks and body_checks, but I was mistaken about it disclosing
exactly why the message was rejected. Regardless of whether it's a body_check
or header_check that is matched, the failure message says "[BODY]"
Sharma, Ashish:
> Wietse,
>
> Thanks for the reply. The suggestion that you have given is already
> being worked out in the team.
>
> Meanwhile I am also trying to explore what other options I can
> have, maybe if every now and then I start facing such a
> situation/problem repeatedly.
In my sim
-
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org]
On Behalf Of Wietse Venema
Sent: Saturday, October 30, 2010 5:54 PM
To: Postfix users
Subject: Re: Correction in Postconf output: Persistent mails being received
Sharma, Ashish:
> The problem that I am facing
Sharma, Ashish:
> The problem that I am facing is that I am receiving same email every 15
> second from same sender 'pete...@warwick.net' with same message-ID on my
> production mail servers, following are my postfix logs:
>
> "Oct 25 01:11:02 g2t0433g postfix/smtpd[6497]: connect from
> webmai
Please find the corrected output for postconf on my 'postfix', and reply to my
query.
I need help.
# /usr/sbin/postconf -n
alias_database = hash:/etc/aliases to use for recipients that are not found in
the UNIX passwd database.
alias_maps = hash:/etc/aliases
command_directory = /usr/sbin
con
* Sharma, Ashish :
> Attached is the output:
> # postconf -n
... doesn't list smtpd_recipient_restritions!
...
> setgid_group = postdrop
> inet:localhost:10028,calhost:10026,
> permit_rbl_client bl.spamcop.netrg,ix/senderRestrictionList,
> reject_unauth_destination,onList,
> smtpd_tls_ask_cc
...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org]
On Behalf Of Sharma, Ashish
Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2010 4:50 PM
To: postfix users
Subject: Correction: Persistent mails being received
There's a correction in my Postfix 'main.cf' settings in the mail below.
-Original Me
On 10/27/2010 6:19 AM, Sharma, Ashish wrote:
There's a correction in my Postfix 'main.cf' settings in the mail below.
We don't care about random snippings from main.cf. If you
want to show your config, show "postconf -n" output.
smtpd_recipient_restrictio
There's a correction in my Postfix 'main.cf' settings in the mail below.
-Original Message-
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org]
On Behalf Of Sharma, Ashish
Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2010 2:52 PM
To: postfix users
Subject: P
> > > I suppose the 2nd link is correct.
> > How did you install cyrus-sasl2?
>
>
> I followed this howto;
> http://www.postfixvirtual.net/postfixvirtual.html#cyrussasl
Don't use this howto at all. It's a .!
> New discovery, on manually running;
>
> # su - amavis -c
--- áÌÅËÓÅÊ äÏÍÏÒÁÄÏ× <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > # ldd /usr/libexec/postfix/smtpd
> > > > linux-gate.so.1 => (0xb7fa)
> > > > libmysqlclient.so.15 =>
> > > > /usr/local/mysql/lib/mysql/libmysqlclient.so.15 (0xb7f23000)
> > > > libm.so.6 => /lib/tls/i686/cmov/l
> > > # ldd /usr/libexec/postfix/smtpd
> > > linux-gate.so.1 => (0xb7fa)
> > > libmysqlclient.so.15 =>
> > > /usr/local/mysql/lib/mysql/libmysqlclient.so.15 (0xb7f23000)
> > > libm.so.6 => /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libm.so.6 (0xb7efe000)
> > > libsasl2.so.2 => /usr/loc
On Wed, Nov 05, 2008 at 11:42:16PM +0800, Stephen Liu wrote:
> # imtest -a cyrus -m LOGIN localhost
> imtest: /usr/local/lib/libsasl2.so.2: no version information available
> (required by imtest)
Don't override system libraries, ever, if you don't know how to do this
properly. You just lost your w
--- áÌÅËÓÅÊ äÏÍÏÒÁÄÏ× <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > # ldd /usr/libexec/postfix/smtpd
> > linux-gate.so.1 => (0xb7fa)
> > libmysqlclient.so.15 =>
> > /usr/local/mysql/lib/mysql/libmysqlclient.so.15 (0xb7f23000)
> > libm.so.6 => /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libm.so.6 (0xb7efe000
> # ldd /usr/libexec/postfix/smtpd
> linux-gate.so.1 => (0xb7fa)
> libmysqlclient.so.15 =>
> /usr/local/mysql/lib/mysql/libmysqlclient.so.15 (0xb7f23000)
> libm.so.6 => /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libm.so.6 (0xb7efe000)
> libsasl2.so.2 => /usr/local/lib/libsasl2.so.2 (0x
--- áÌÅËÓÅÊ äÏÍÏÒÁÄÏ× <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > --- Sahil Tandon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Stephen Liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Nov 5 03:49:45 xen03 postfix/smtpd[1245]: warning: unsupported
> > > SASL
> > > > server implementation: cyrus
> > > > Nov 5 03:49:45
> --- Sahil Tandon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Stephen Liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Nov 5 03:49:45 xen03 postfix/smtpd[1245]: warning: unsupported
> > SASL
> > > server implementation: cyrus
> > > Nov 5 03:49:45 xen03 postfix/smtpd[1245]: fatal: SASL per-process
> > > initializ
* Stephen Liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm following this howto;
>
> POSTFIX
> http://www.postfixvirtual.net/postfixvirtual.html#postfix
>
> CYRUS_SASL
> http://www.postfixvirtual.net/postfixvirtual.html#cyrussasl
>
>
> building the mail server. All packages were compiled from sources.
>
On Wednesday, November 05, 2008 at 06:25 CET,
Stephen Liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> I have tried building Postfix Virtual by following other 3 howtos
> before, all packages download on Debian repo. After finish all servers
> can't work properly. This is my 4th round.
>
> I think
--- Sahil Tandon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Stephen Liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Nov 5 03:49:45 xen03 postfix/smtpd[1245]: warning: unsupported
> SASL
> > server implementation: cyrus
> > Nov 5 03:49:45 xen03 postfix/smtpd[1245]: fatal: SASL per-process
> > initialization failed
> >
Stephen Liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nov 5 03:49:45 xen03 postfix/smtpd[1245]: warning: unsupported SASL
> server implementation: cyrus
> Nov 5 03:49:45 xen03 postfix/smtpd[1245]: fatal: SASL per-process
> initialization failed
>
> # grep pwcheck /usr/local/lib/sasl2/smtpd.conf
> #pwcheck_
cyrus
http://bugs.donarmstrong.com/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=350151
I have the patch file "cyrus-sasl-patch-1.diff" download. Please
advise how to run it to make correction. TIA
B.R.
Stephen L
Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
46 matches
Mail list logo
