Wietse Venema via Postfix-users writes:
> Sam James via Postfix-users:
>> Wietse Venema via Postfix-users writes:
>>
>> > Sam James via Postfix-users:
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> Apologies if this was reported already.
>> >>
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users writes:
> Sam James via Postfix-users:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Apologies if this was reported already.
>>
>> Upcoming GCC 15 defaults to -std=gnu23 with which Postfix fails to build.
>>
>> As reported at https://bugs.gen
f int bool;
| ^~~
In file included from defer.c:176:
./mail_params.h:17:13: error: two or more data types in declaration specifiers
17 | typedef int bool;
| ^~~~
./mail_params.h:17:1: warning: useless type name in empty declaration
17 | typedef int bool;
| ^~~
[...]
```
t
experts here can suggest a better way. Though this is an extra
precaution that most likely isn't necessary, since your router's
NAT/firewall will protect from connecting to port 25 from the outside,
but being paranoid, you can restrict it at the postfix level too. Up to you.
Best
ammik. 2023 klo 10.39 Sam (lis...@afach.de) kirjoitti:
Hello everyone
when I run `nmap --script vuln example.com <http://example.com>`
against a server I manage, I
get the following vulnerability on my server on both ports 465 and
587.
The only solutions I found a
Thank you, guys. I appreciate it. Have a great day.
On 07/01/2023 9:23 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Sat, Jan 07, 2023 at 12:38:06PM +0400, Sam wrote:
when I run `nmap --script vuln example.com` against a server I manage, I
get the following vulnerability on my server on both ports 465 and
mehow, and then from
a previous discussion I learned that many TLS_* options were deprecated.
Besides, I saw in postfix documentation that DH options should be loaded
automatically from OpenSSL and not be specified (IIRC).
Best regards,
Sam
On 07/01/2023 6:38 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Wietse Ve
smtpd_tls_mandatory_protocols = !SSLv2,!SSLv3,!TLSv1,!TLSv1.1
smtpd_tls_protocols = !SSLv2,!SSLv3,!TLSv1,!TLSv1.1
smtpd_tls_security_level = may
```
Let me know what you think.
All the best,
Sam
right.
Cheers,
Sam
On 14/12/2022 8:44 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
On 14/12/2022 3:18 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
mynetworks_style applies to local interface addresses, not proxied
ones.
Sam:
Thank you for the response.
One of the reasons for me asking this question is that I'm not fully
sure
m not sure about
given the setup I described, given that the proxy gives that kind of
exposure. I would appreciate your insight into whether I'm doing
something wrong with the decisions I made.
Best regards,
Sam
On 14/12/2022 3:18 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
mynetworks_style applies to
about this and
whether it's right to choose that setting (and, also, whether I missed
something in my setup, if obvious).
Best regards,
Sam
d?
This whole movement to docker is a big set of trade-offs that I'm still
researching.
Best regards,
Sam
On 13/12/2022 3:17 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Sam:
[ text/html is unsupported, treating like TEXT/PLAIN ]
?html style="direction: ltr;"?
?head?
?meta http-equiv=&qu
isabling chroot for all the
postfix master services. Is this a bad move considering that
postfix is running in a docker container? I would appreciate your
insight into this.
Best regards,
Sam
email.
Thank you very much, guys. Have a great day!
Cheers,
Sam
On 12/12/2022 5:37 AM,
mailm...@ionos.gr wrote:
Docker containers don't log like normal linux distos do with syslog/rsyslog/syslog-ng/e
7;s going on step by
step in its failure?
Thank you and best regards,
Sam
time to keep doing this
again and again every time there's a potential security threat or some
kind of machine failure (which require me to migrate with minimal
effort, which happened recently, and I'm a software engineer running my
own little infrastructure with limited resources). What
the SSL/TLS termination I'm hoping to do? How
can I get postfix to forget about TLS and just work without any of it?
Best regards,
Sam
Understood, I adopt the communication in starttls port 25 between my
servers.
Thanks again to all.
Samuel
Le ven. 19 août 2022 à 13:09, Matus UHLAR - fantomas a
écrit :
> On 19.08.22 10:47, Sam R wrote:
> > So I am a little divided,
> >On the one hand I think that port 25 is eno
So I am a little divided,
On the one hand I think that port 25 is enough to transmit mails locally,
on the other hand I think that an encryption would be better, especially on
the dmz.
Also, I have 20 servers that send logwatch locally and I don't see myself
creating a tunnel for each of them.
Sam
it :
> On 8/17/2022 10:04 AM, Sam R wrote:
> >
> > Currently I use the following settings:
> > transport_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/transport
> > domain.fr <http://domain.fr> smtp:[192.168.X.X]:465
> > This works but I get the following Postfix message:
>
Hello to all,
I have several Postfix servers named MX, SMTP and MAIL on my dmz:
MX is used to receive mails to our "@domain.fr" from Internet
SMTP is used to send mails from "@domain.fr
MAIL is used as a storage server for "@domain.fr" mails
However, I would like to be able to for example directl
I have configured Postfix with Cyrus-sasl to send mail with Active
Directory authentication.
I'm very happy with the result, my users log in with a firstname.lastname
user and their Windows password.
But I have a router that needs to send mails and that has only one field
that is used for both the
also provide tracing but with fewer search options.
Screenshot: https://nextcloud.lightmeter.io/index.php/s/a2styNnAZ24NdQn
I work on Lightmeter so free to ask questions off-list. Sam.
Ok, Thank you for these useful clarifications
Samuel
Le lun. 4 oct. 2021 à 17:27, Viktor Dukhovni a
écrit :
> On Mon, Oct 04, 2021 at 04:34:39PM +0200, Sam R wrote:
>
> > Now it's working fine!
> >
> > I finally succeeded. I worked around by inc
;t thought about why the Kerberos ticket size is too big. Maybe
I should ask the question about the samba list?
In any case thank you all!
Samuel
Le lun. 4 oct. 2021 à 09:37, Sam R a écrit :
> Good morning Viktor,
>
> Thank you for all this information, I will do the necessary for the
&
Good morning Viktor,
Thank you for all this information, I will do the necessary for the keytabs
right away.
Concerning the clients, it is Thunderbird under Windows 10, the AD server
being Samba4. I will try to see why the Kerberos ticket is so long. I don't
think the problem is with Thunderbird b
Hello,
I want to set up a Postfix SMTP server with cyrus-sasl in GSSAPI mode. I
have two Samba4 servers in AD mode, and my clients are in windows 10.
I removed the execution of Posfix in chroot to simplify.
I added two keytab in /etc/krb5.keytab smtp/smtptest.domain.fr and host/
smtptest.domain.fr
> Any ideas why the background "to me" is now white when its been yellow for
> years?
There's a smoker in the house and you recently changed screens?
-- Sam (cigars)
On 2 June 2021 19:40:31 CEST, post...@ptld.com wrote:
>> On 06-02-2021 1:35 pm, Josef Vybíhal wrote:
Here the source code repo:
https://github.com/vdukhovni/postfix
Merry Christmas and a happy new year,
Sam.
On 13 December 2020 12:19:22 CET, "황병희" wrote:
>Hellow i'm pleasure to using Postfix which runs at my personal Google
>Cloud Platform. So i'm interested i
I see the value of the ability to recognise such Gmail address variants, and
would use it myself to prevent people trivially working around Gmail addresses
being on a blacklist email receipt or for service signup.
Sam.
On 30/04/2020 09:27, Walter Peng wrote:
> Hello community,
>
&g
Thank you all for your insightful replies.
Sam.
On 15/01/2020 15:24, Bill Cole wrote:
> On 15 Jan 2020, at 7:56, Sam Tuke wrote:
>
>> I noticed that newsletters which I receive from large firms are typically
>> sent from servers which have port 25 closed.
>>
>>
such senders use are so customised as to be capable of only
sending, not receiving, mail?
Thanks!
Sam.
ate.
See the (abandoned?) STEED project and their whitepaper:
https://g10code.com/steed.html. That is by g10code - the creator of GPG.
Disclaimer: I once worked for them.
Sam.
On 27 October 2019 07:27:53 CET, lists wrote:
>Let me try again. So the email comes in. Some programs gets your pu
Hi Wietse
Can you add this into mirrors list?
http://mirrors.standaloneinstaller.com/postfix/ (France)
On 3/6/2017 7:54 PM, Matthew McGehrin wrote:
Wietse,
There are several old mirrors with bad links that don't work on the
postfix download page and needs to be updated.
404 Not Found
h
suggestions made here on the list. Each user only has access to
> relevant projects, and you have the advantage of storing file metadata
> such as description, comments, versioning and so on.
>
> And at the very least, review your logs for the actual sizes of
> incoming messages, and see what usage dictates. I have a hunch it is
> going to be much lower than your current limit.
>
> Mvg,
> Joni
>
--
Sam Flint
flintfam.org/~swflint
assistance, please send mail to postmaster.
If you do so, please include this problem report. You can
delete your own text from the attached returned message.
The mail system
<|postman...@flintfam.org> (expanded from ): user
unknown
Any idea why?
Sam
--
Sam Fl
in "unexpected EOF"?
>
> 1) Use a network sniffer to see what Python actually sends. You may
>assume that your program sends \n, but Postfix does not receive \n.
>
> 2) Unrelated to this bug: closing the connection after one request
>is inefficient.
But is it the fact that he closes the connection? Keep in mind that any
time a network connection is closed it sends EOF. Could it be that
Postfix wants to keep a constant connection?
Sam
> Wietse
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 6:02 PM, Sam Flint wrote:
> It shouldn't be...
>
> On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 5:59 PM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 05:51:20PM -0500, Sam Flint wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 5:11 PM, Sam Flint wrote:
>>> > On
It shouldn't be...
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 5:59 PM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 05:51:20PM -0500, Sam Flint wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 5:11 PM, Sam Flint wrote:
>> > On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 5:08 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
>> >>
>>
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 5:11 PM, Sam Flint wrote:
> Sorry, Gmail.
>
> I'm testing by attempting to connect with my android tablet
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 5:08 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
>>
>> On 7/19/2013 4:58 PM, Sam Flint wrote:
>> > I'm runn
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 6:02 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Sam Flint:
>> Postfix is listening, I can still recieve email.
>
> Hi. I wrote most of Postfix. What evidence do you have (SHOW POSTFIX
> LOGGING) that Postfix is receiving mail for you?
>
> Wietse
It arrive
virtual_transport = dovecot
virtual_uid_maps = static:5000
Log entry:
none.
Sam
--
Sam Flint
flintfam.org/~swflint
lman unix - n n - - pipe
# flags=FR user=list argv=/usr/lib/mailman/bin/postfix-to-mailman.py
# ${nexthop} ${user}
dovecot unix - n n - - pipe
flags=DRhu user=vmail:vmail argv=/usr/libexec/dovecot/deliver -d
${recipient} -f ${recipient}
Thanks.
Sam
Ok, well thanks.
I'm sorry, I will try.
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 5:01 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
> On 7/19/2013 4:53 PM, Sam Flint wrote:
> > Still nothing
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 4:46 PM, Noel Jones > <mailto:njo...@megan.vbhcs.org>> wrote:
Sorry, Gmail.
I'm testing by attempting to connect with my android tablet
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 5:08 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
> On 7/19/2013 4:58 PM, Sam Flint wrote:
> > I'm running on a linode, and I'm sorry.
> >
> > Netstat:
> > Proto Recv-Q
t;
> > Do you see the issue?
>
> No issue with this entry, this is normal. (well, the final "permit"
> is unneeded, but won't hurt anything.)
>
>
>
> -- Noel Jones
>
--
Sam Flint
flintfam.org/~swflint
it's already like that
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 4:42 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
> On 7/19/2013 4:26 PM, Sam Flint wrote:
> > my postfix will not accept remote connections, but it will accept local.
>
> Some linux distros configure postfix to only listen on localhost,
> forcin
I see, but it does nothing.
Sam
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 4:32 PM, Simon B wrote:
>
> On 19 Jul 2013 23:28, "Sam Flint" wrote:
> >
> > my postfix will not accept remote connections, but it will accept local.
> >
> > postconf -n:
> > broken_sasl_
mail client is:
Transaction failed
554 5.7.1 : Relay access denied
Sam
--
Sam Flint
Happy Hacking!
swfl...@flintfam.org
flintfam.org/~swflint
Thank you Viktor - that is exactly it. I assumed it was an option but
when I read further that was incorrect.
It is now working just as intended. Thank you very much for taking the
time to look at my post and reply. I am very grateful for your time.
Kind regards and happy holidays.
Sam
On Fri
Good afternoon List Members,
I'm having a bit of a problem getting VERP to work on my multi-instance
Postfix. I'm probably missing a step.
I've checked I have PCRE available, and that they work. I've set up
everything as per http://www.postfix.org/VERP_README.html.
MAPS
/^(MAIL FROM:<.+@munged1\
Noel, once more you help me out. Thank you so very much. I did look at
that, but didn't fully understand it. Now I know I CAN do it, I'll work
with it and experiment.
Thank you so much,
Sam
On Fri, 2012-11-30 at 13:35 -0600, Noel Jones wrote:
> On 11/30/2012 1:27 PM, Sam Jones wr
I've read - but don't fully 'get' - the docs, so I'm really looking for
a basic 'yes you can, read this' or 'no, that's the job of the client'
type answer.
Kind regards
Sam
ay I don't need
it!
Warm regards
Sam
On Wed, 2012-11-21 at 11:23 -0600, Noel Jones wrote:
> On 11/21/2012 11:12 AM, Sam Jones wrote:
> > Good afternoon,
> >
> > When I start my Postfix up (fresh install I'm trying to commission to
> > take over newsletter dut
find it - but if I could get a headstart and some
pointers that would be kind and wonderful.
Warm regards
Sam
Appreciated, thanks.
I'm just installing it to an old bare metal test server so I can get it
right before putting it into production.
Many thanks to you both - really appreciated.
On Tue, 2012-11-20 at 09:58 -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Sam Jones:
> > That looks like a good
That looks like a good starting point, Thank you for the pointers
Robert, really appreciated.
On Tue, 2012-11-20 at 14:35 +0100, Robert Schetterer wrote:
> Am 20.11.2012 14:13, schrieb Sam Jones:
> > Good afternoon,
> >
> > I'm looking to get some views and advice on t
.
So I guess this means I'll need to simply do this in transports. I think
I read that it's possible to create transports for specific SMTP
destinations in the Book of Postfix. I guess I'd need to ask 'can I
assign a specific interface/IP on a per transport basis?'
Any suggestions or feedback would be gratefully received.
Sam
On Sun, 2012-09-02 at 22:46 +0200, Lorens Kockum wrote:
> The exact same question was sent by someone calling himself
> "Ron White" to the exim mailing list at almost exactly the same
> time. Peddling one's services by soliciting comparisons with
> competitors is so passé . . .
>
Yes, it was. Well
On Sun, 2012-09-02 at 15:39 +, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 02, 2012 at 10:43:07AM +0100, Sam Jones wrote:
>
> > More to satisfy my own curiosity than anything else, I'm wondering about
> > the performance that could be squeezed out of Postfix in a bu
More to satisfy my own curiosity than anything else, I'm wondering about
the performance that could be squeezed out of Postfix in a bulk mailing
capacity.
I have a client that currently uses and ESP who have an astounding
throughput of up to a million messages per hour. This brought up a
discussio
On Fri, 2012-06-08 at 11:26 +0100, Sam Jones wrote:
> A bit of a strange request, but is there a simple way to have Postfix
> continually defer mail to a specific recipient, say mail to
> 'defer.t...@domain.tld' ?
>
> I know with header checks I can do magic like rejecti
A bit of a strange request, but is there a simple way to have Postfix
continually defer mail to a specific recipient, say mail to
'defer.t...@domain.tld' ?
I know with header checks I can do magic like rejecting mail with 5xx
errors, but looking through http://www.postfix.org/header_checks.5.html
On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 12:58 -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Sam Jones:
> > Now, if I manually strip the line endings \r\n and replace them a plain
> > newline \n, it works perfectly suggesting something strips the line
> > endings if the are \r\n after it has been signed.
>
Good afternoon,
I've just been troubleshooting an issue with the php mail() function and
Postfix.
Keeping it short and to the point it appears that DKIM can be broken
because something (assuming Cleanup) changes the line endings in the
body section of the mail after it has been signed.
What I no
On Tue, 2012-04-17 at 11:50 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 17.04.2012 11:48, schrieb Claudius:
> > Hi,
> >
> > as nobody seems to have a working solution I built a little Perl script
> > that adds the IP of the server receiving outgoing mail to
> > postgrey_clients.db
> >
> > It's still a li
On Mon, 2012-04-16 at 08:34 -0500, /dev/rob0 wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 07:58:31AM +0100, Sam Jones wrote:
> > A bit of an extreme example, but i've often wondered, when
> > looking through my Postfix logs, why some senders do this:
> >
> > Received: from
Good morning,
A bit of an extreme example, but i've often wondered, when looking
through my Postfix logs, why some senders do this:
Received: from mx-out.facebook.com (outmail019.snc7.facebook.com
[69.171.232.153]) by .
The connecting host has HELO'd as 'mx-out.facebook.com'
If it is traced
> > I do apologise for the distress, offence and disturbance my rude stupid
> > question has obviously caused you. I won't repeat it and I hope you can
> > forgive me.
>
> Re-reading what I wrote, and reading your reply, leaves me at a bit of a
> loss as to what prompted this immature drivel. My
On Tue, 2012-04-03 at 11:53 -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> With Postfix, multiple IP address per A record are fine, as long
> as the CLIENT IP address is listed among them.
>
> However, having multiple PTR records for one IP address, that is a
> different matter. Postfix will not try to guess which
On Tue, 2012-04-03 at 10:36 -0500, /dev/rob0 wrote:
> >
> > If you have a client connect from 1.2.3.4 and perform a host name
> > lookup on that, so you get back host.example.com, would it impact
> > on mail if a forward query for host.example.com returned multiple
> > A records, say 1.2.3.4 & 5.6
On Tue, 2012-04-03 at 10:31 -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> On 4/3/2012 9:56 AM, Sam Jones wrote:
> > Good Afternoon,
> >
> > My senior tech and I have been having a squabble over PTR, Hostnames and
> > reverse mapping.
> >
> > If you have a client conne
reply is always
450 in case the address->name lookup failed due to a temporary
problem.
Sam
On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 8:48 PM, tmac wrote:
> I Have RHEL6 and am trying to use postfix for the first time.
>
> My host is server1.lab.my.org
>
> The mail server is mailserver.my.org
>
> I also have an alias file being passed around via NIS. This is used
> with sendmail to re-write usernames from
Wietse Venema porcupine.org> writes:
> It makes perfect sense: the IPv4 address is assigned FIRST
> and the IPv6 address is assigned LAST.
>
> If you want to find out why a FreeBSD jail network interface
> behaves the way it does, then that would be an excellent
> question for a FreeBSD mailing l
Wietse Venema porcupine.org> writes:
>
> Sam:
> > Hello!
> >
> > I have a server running FreeBSD 8.1 with FreeBSD 8.1 jails running on it. I
have
> > ipv6 running on both the main server and jails and that is all fine.
> >
> > I'm runni
Hello!
I have a server running FreeBSD 8.1 with FreeBSD 8.1 jails running on it. I
have
ipv6 running on both the main server and jails and that is all fine.
I'm running into a strange problem when it comes to postfix though and was
wondering if anyone has any clues. What's happening is that po
!
But what should be the origin of the problem and what is the quick fix ?
Thanks in advance.
Sam.
Martijn de Munnik - Postfix List a écrit :
On Fri, 19 Mar 2010 15:31:18 +0100, Sam Przyswa
wrote:
The problem occur when we send mail to this domain, we had no problems
before we changed our IP
The problem occur when we send mail to this domain, we had no problems
before we changed our IP mail server and MX record for our domain.
Sam.
Martijn de Munnik - Postfix List a écrit :
On Fri, 19 Mar 2010 15:06:42 +0100, Sam Przyswa
wrote:
Hi,
On last Postfix install on new server
Service. Contact the recipient or his/her administrator using
alternate means to resolve the issue. (in reply to RCPT TO command)
How to fix ?
Thanks for your help.
Sam.
/dev/rob0 a écrit :
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 12:47:45AM +0100, Sam Przyswa wrote:
Is it possible to accept and send in a default mail adddress all the
mail rejected for User unknown ?
Commonly referred to as a "catchall address", this is a bad idea. It
*will* be abused b
Hi,
Is it possible to accept and send in a default mail adddress all the
mail rejected for User unknown ?
Thanks for your help.
Sam.
2009/11/23 tobi
> Sam Wootton schrieb:
> > 2009/11/22 Magnus Bäck
> >
> >
> >> On Sunday, November 22, 2009 at 17:34 CET,
> >> Sam Wootton wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>> I nearly have Postfix working on Opensuse 11
2009/11/22 Magnus Bäck
> On Sunday, November 22, 2009 at 17:34 CET,
> Sam Wootton wrote:
>
> > I nearly have Postfix working on Opensuse 11.1.
> >
> > For a non system account user, it works. For example:
> >
> > /var/mail/vhosts/samwootton.com/bru
ient_maps = $virtual_mailbox_maps*
> *local_transport = virtual*
> *mynetworks_style = host*
> *virtual_mailbox_domains = samwootton.com*
> *virtual_mailbox_base = /var/mail/vhosts*
>
I have commented out 'mailbox_transport' completely.
Here is my vmailmaps:
s...@samwootton.com samwootton
Wietse Venema a écrit :
Sam Przyswa:
Hi,
I have to dispatch mail for a domain my_domain.com to severals servers.
All mail addresses are on the form u...@my_domain.com but users are
dispatched on different hosts (host1, host2, etc) All mails are received
on a main mail server
user is.
Then when user1 on the host1 want send a mail to user2 on host2 user1
send the mail to us...@my_domain.com. How to set the system on host1 to
route the mail on main mail server instead of "user unknown" message ?
What is the best setup to do that ?
Thanks for your help.
Sam.
serv1
and force to send it to main who know where to send it.
Thanks in advance for your help.
Sam.
--
Sam Przyswa - Chef de projet
Email: s...@arial-concept.com
Arial Concept - Intégrateur Internet
36, rue de Turin - 75008 - Paris - France
Tel: 01 40 54 86 04 - Fax: 01 40 54 83 01
Fax privé: 0
We use MailScanner as spam and virus filter and the mail archiving and
monitoring function to copy mails in dedicated account, it is easy
configurable with rules to copy mails in severals mails account, see
http://www.mailscanner.info/
Sam.
Adam Tauno Williams a écrit :
On Mon, 2008-09-22
mouss a écrit :
Sam Przyswa wrote:
Hi all,
I succeed to limit some local users to send mail only on my local
domain, but I would like to limit the mail received ONLY from the
local users too for these users, no mails from internet (others
domains).
There is my actual Postfix config
mouss a écrit :
Sam Przyswa wrote:
Hi,
How to restrict users to received outside mail (from internet) but
only from the local domain/network ?
If your goal is to restrict few addresses so that:
- they can only send mail to your own domains (domains in
mydestination, virtual_*_domains
Hi,
How to restrict users to received outside mail (from internet) but only
from the local domain/network ?
Thanks in advance for your help.
Sam.
--
Ce message a été vérifié par MailScanner
pour des virus ou des polluriels et rien de
suspect n'a été trouvé.
For all your IT require
/addr_class_1:
mjc-idf.asso.fr OK
--
What I have to add to restrict the received mail only from local domain
for these users ?
Thanks in advance for your help.
Sam.
--
Sam Przyswa - Chef de projet
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Arial Concept
93 matches
Mail list logo
