Hello,
postfix mailq contains differents mails from differents domains.
Is it possible to have different "maximal_queue_lifetime" in postfix
depending on the domain names ?
Thank you
Paul
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To
very well.
Martin.
On Friday, 09 August, 2024 17:06 CEST, Benny Pedersen via Postfix-users
wrote:
Corey H via Postfix-users skrev den 2024-08-09 13:53:
> Hello list,
>
> I saw many logs like this in our server log,
>
> Aug 9 19:48:27 mx postfix/submission/smtpd[3731732]: war
Thank you, but I want to know about the last of the rules that was applied to
an email, not the general configuration.
Martin.
On Wednesday, 07 August, 2024 14:28 CEST, Ansgar Wiechers via Postfix-users
wrote:
On 2024-08-07 Martin Stenzel via Postfix-users wrote:
> this is part of
.combined.mail.abusix.zone
Now I wonder, how do I know that the later rules (starting with reject_rhsbl)
get parsed?
These are blacklist and whitelist entries to fight spam. Can I have this
information by expanding verbosity of postfix logging?
Martin.
--
Martin Stenzel · er/ihm · he/him
m.sten...@mail.xy-space.de
An
Happy Easter 🐣 - and thank you again for your support. I very much do
appreciate that!
As to your precious points... see below,
Martin.
On Sunday, 31 March, 2024 00:47 CET, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
wrote:
Martin Stenzel:
> Awesome, incredibly fast, you are awesome
&g
entries into main.cf the milters get run twice,
which obviously is not what is desirable.
Martin.
This is my scenario
https://www.ciphermail.com/documentation/gateway-administration-guide/network-architecture.html#content-scanner-with-redirect
Am 30/03/2024 um 23:38 schrieb Wietse Venema via
milter_mail_macros=i,{mail_addr},{client_addr},{client_name},{auth_authen}
master.cf does not "like" spaces.
When I put the entry into master.cf, functionality gets lost.
What is the right syntax of "milter_mail_macros" in master.cf?
Martin.
--
Martin Stenzel · er/ihm · he/h
there has been a kind of new configuration between old postfix
version and the 3.6.4 one.
Do you have a listing of the directory /usr/libexec/postfix of a clean
install?
Am 03.10.2022 18:51 schrieb Wietse Venema:
> Martin:
>
>> Hi there, I went back to the snapshot before trying to insta
7;s no warning
left
(and possibly there will be no problem when doing the next update :))
Best Regards, thanks for all your helpful answers,
Martin
Am 03.10.2022 14:44 schrieb Martin Hahn:
> P.S.: I went back to the snapshot before trying to install postfix
> from source, did an
&g
3.7.2 version
of postfix
but it would be great to get one of them to work properly.
Does anybody encounter similar problems (either the first one or the
second)?
Best Regards,
Martin
--
___
[born at 328 ppm atmospherical CO2]
-DHAS_PRCE -I/usr/include/prce2
-DHAS_MYSQL -I/usr/include/mysql" AUXLIBS="-lssl -lcrypto -lmysqlclient
-lz -lm -R/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu -lsasl2"
For me it's not that important to have a working 3.6.4 or 3.7.2 version
of postfix
but it would be great
Hi,
On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 04:38:33PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> Maybe try to set "recipient_delimiter"? Without delimiter, none will be
> used.
thanks, that was the problem.
Best regards,
Jan-Martin
--
Dr. Jan-Martin Rämer
Systemtechnik
Zentrum für Hochschul-IT
Hi,
On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 08:32:34AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Wietse Venema:
> > Jan-Martin Raemer:
> > > As I'm using a normal hash table, I assumed that user+$anything@domain
> > > would match user@domain (unless there is a specific entry for
> > >
lay.domain
Version: 3.5.6 (package from Debian bullseye)
Best regards,
Jan-Martin
--
Dr. Jan-Martin Rämer
Systemtechnik
Zentrum für Hochschul-IT Rheinland-Pfalz
Moselweißer Straße 4, 56073 Koblenz
Telefon +49(0)261 9528-906
rae...@zit-rlp.de
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Hi Viktor,
On Thu, 3 Feb 2022 at 14:07, Viktor Dukhovni
wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 03, 2022 at 01:39:44PM -0500, Martin Hicks wrote:
>
> > The only configuration change I made in response to this discussion was
> > to disable smtpd_tls_ask_ccert - I'm not sure why this was eve
m ca-certificates.
The only configuration change I made in response to this discussion was
to disable smtpd_tls_ask_ccert - I'm not sure why this was ever enabled.
I'll update in a week or two when I see another e-mail from aircanada.
Thanks,
mh
--
Martin Hicks P.Eng.| m...@bork.org
Bork Consulting Inc. | +1 (613) 266-2296
f the certificate printed in the logs. I'm
also not able to query the certificate from these servers using `openssl
s_client`.
Thanks,
mh
--
Martin Hicks P.Eng.| m...@bork.org
Bork Consulting Inc. | +1 (613) 266-2296
Am 19.07.2020 um 12:45 schrieb Martin Schmitt:
> Let me just say I'd like to give up ownership of twitter.com/postfix and
> pass it on into loving hands.
Hey all,
the credentials have been passed to Ralf Hildebrandt. Thanks Ralf! :-)
-martin
ps forward, I'll delete the account sometime in August.
Kind regards,
-martin
Else an idea would be to use docker
On Sat, Jun 27, 2020 at 2:51 PM Larry Stone
wrote:
> Where are you installing Postfix? While I have yet to upgrade to Catalina
> (10.15.x), I have done a test of 10.15.4 with no Postfix issues. My Postfix
> is in /usr/local (built from source - no Homebrew or
I think you're right, i will redirect using smtpd_recipient_restrictions,
thanks guys :)
On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 7:41 PM Noel Jones wrote:
> On 6/26/2020 10:13 AM, Martin Terp Jensen wrote:
> > Hi guys.
> >
> > I have some postfix servers running as a relay/gateway fo
Hi guys.
I have some postfix servers running as a relay/gateway for internal mails,
when they want to go to the world wide web.
These internal servers i trust, but sometimes mails from CRON gets send to
me, i know, the best solution would be to disable cron mails but that is
more for the long ter
Hello,
I have many logs postfix/lmtp "deferred" like:
Jun 2 11:38:21 mail331 postfix/lmtp[17386]: A2E3212C86D:
to=, relay=none, delay=5930,
delays=2879/2862/189/0, dsn=4.4.1, status=deferred (connect to
127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]:24: Connection timed out)
do you have a solution ?
Regards,
Paul
rchliche ordnung mit priesterschaft,
theologie, kultus, sakrament;
kurz, alles das, was jesus von nazareth bekämpft hatte..."
- friedrich nietzsche
spamtraps: madduck.bo...@madduck.net
digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital GPG sig
tive criticism and corrections.
spamtraps: madduck.bo...@madduck.net
digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital GPG signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/sig-policy/999bbcc4/current)
pp/#/room/#madduck:madduck.net
"arguments are extremely vulgar,
for everyone in good society
holds exactly the same opinion."
-- oscar wilde
spamtraps: madduck.bo...@madduck.net
digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital GPG sig
matics suffer it.
some can avoid it. geniuses remove it."
-- alan perlis
spamtraps: madduck.bo...@madduck.net
digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital GPG signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/sig-policy/999bbcc4/current)
ing to the address.
--
@martinkrafft | https://riot.im/app/#/room/#madduck:madduck.net
kermit: why are there so many songs about rainbows?
fozzy: that's part of what rainbows do.
spamtraps: madduck.bo...@madduck.net
digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital GPG signature (see http://ma
on: Digital GPG signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/sig-policy/999bbcc4/current)
s://riot.im/app/#/room/#madduck:madduck.net
"god is a comedian playing to an audience too afraid to laugh."
-- voltaire
spamtraps: madduck.bo...@madduck.net
digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital GPG signature (see http://
k.net
digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital GPG signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/sig-policy/999bbcc4/current)
Hello!
> Inspecting incomplete files is NOT SUPPORTED. As far as I am concerned
> postcan may go into a loop Xdepending on how incomplete the file is.
OK, thanks for the explanation.
Have a nice fortnight
--
Martin `MJ' Mareš
o. When I change both "<= 0" to "< 0", queue file contents are
printed correctly.
Are these queue files malformed, or is postcat overzealous with its
consistency checks?
Have a nice fortnight
--
Martin `MJ' Mareš
Thanks, but I'm looking for a way to set a default in postfix, not to
set a bounce address for a particular email. Is that possible?
On 03/03/2019 21:13, Wietse Venema wrote:
Martin Brampton:
Is there a way to set a from address for Postfix automatic messages on
delivery failure?
Is there a way to set a from address for Postfix automatic messages on
delivery failure?
019 à 14:25, Matus UHLAR - fantomas a
écrit :
> On 07.01.19 14:11, Paul Martin wrote:
> >Do you know how to balance outgoing emails with multiple IP addresses
> with
> >postfix ?
> >(I do not have randmap on my postfix)
>
> what exactly are you trying to achieve?
>
Hello,
Do you know how to balance outgoing emails with multiple IP addresses with
postfix ?
(I do not have randmap on my postfix)
Thank you.
Paul
Hello Wietse,
Could you explain me why "allow_min_user = no" ? Could we change to
"allow_min_user
= yes" ?
Thank you,Paul
ma a écrit :
Martin LEUSCH:
Hi,
I'm trying to create postfix master process listening on port 2525 and
redirect all email send trough this port to an external address.
I create regexp table "/etc/postfix/canonical-redirect-test" to map any
address to the external address I want
stfix.org/postconf.5.html#anvil_rate_time_unit> = 60s
Paul
2018-06-20 17:01 GMT+02:00 Wietse Venema :
> Paul Martin:
> > Hello
> >
> > I would like to send 5 messages per second with postfix.
>
> Postfix does not have sub-second rate limit, and the support that
> it ha
Hello
I would like to send 5 messages per second with postfix.
How can I do that with postfix ?
Thanks
Paul
Hi,
I'm trying to create postfix master process listening on port 2525 and
redirect all email send trough this port to an external address.
I create regexp table "/etc/postfix/canonical-redirect-test" to map any
address to the external address I want, test query with postmap return
the expec
Hello,
on debian , i am running postfix. I changed my IP ldap server in /etc/hosts
but /var/spool/postfix/etc/hosts is different. What shoud I do to make
postfix using the new IP ldap?
Regards,
Paul
I'm running a Postfix server that receives mail for a number of domains,
and provides service for mail users via Dovecot. It's not used for
sending mail from users, another server acts as the mail relay.
Is it possible to configure my Postfix server so that locally generated
mail (e.g. from cr
inkrafft | http://madduck.net/ | http://two.sentenc.es/
"computer science is no more about computers
than astronomy is about telescopes."
-- edsgar w. dijkstra
spamtraps: madduck.bo...@madduck.net
digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital GPG signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/sig-policy/999bbcc4/current)
n would be the min or the
max of the set of sub-decisions…
Thanks a lot for this enlightening exchange.
--
@martinkrafft | http://madduck.net/ | http://two.sentenc.es/
takt ist der auf das benehmen angewandte gute geschmack.
-- nicolas de chamfort
s
for the effort required to
manage our own PKI.
--
@martinkrafft | http://madduck.net/ | http://two.sentenc.es/
in the beginning was the word,
and the word was content-type: text/plain
spamtraps: madduck.bo...@madduck.net
digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital GPG signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/sig-policy/999bbcc4/current)
ntenc.es/
"the mind of the thoroughly well-informed man is a dreadful thing.
it is like a bric-à-brac shop, all monsters and dust,
with everything priced above its proper value."
-- oscar wilde
spamtraps: madduck.bo...@madduck.net
digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital GPG signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/sig-policy/999bbcc4/current)
music is a great difficulty.
you see, if one plays good music, people don't listen,
and if one plays bad music people don't talk."
-- oscar wilde
spamtraps: madduck.bo...@madduck.net
digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital GPG signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/sig-policy/999bbcc4/current)
o.sentenc.es/
remember, half the people are below average.
spamtraps: madduck.bo...@madduck.net
digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital GPG signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/sig-policy/999bbcc4/current)
ue that "permit" in
the first example?
--
@martinkrafft | http://madduck.net/ | http://two.sentenc.es/
it is better to remain silent and be thought a fool
than to open one's mouth and remove all doubt.
spamtraps: madduck.bo...@madduck.net
digital_signature_gpg.asc
Descrip
ink?
--
@martinkrafft | http://madduck.net/ | http://two.sentenc.es/
"god is a comedian playing to an audience too afraid to laugh."
-- voltaire
spamtraps: madduck.bo...@madduck.net
digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital GPG
Hello again,
I discovered possibility of milters. So I have created a milter that
performs the restriction I wanted. If someone would be interested, it
is here:
https://github.com/mjiricka/MailFrom_DNSBL_Milter
So far results are as expected – all spam filtered, zero false-positives! :)
Martin
> What I was trying to say is that (if there was 1 A record per domain), the
> number of spamhaus lookups would increase two times.
> If you check MX records, number of lookups can increase even more.
I am afraid I still do not understand how you count it :-( But it does
not matter, thank you very
> It seems natural (for me at least) to introduce a new map type
> dnsbl: that maps those IP addresses to an action.
That would be amazing! If I get it right this would also deprecate
e.g. `reject_rhsbl_client` and `reject_rbl_client`. As a Postfix
novice I would appreciate the reduction of config
> I'm not talking about DNS lookups, but about DNSBL lookups.
Yes, I did interchanged them, pardon.
> You ask each dnsbl for client IP, now you will ask them for each A or MX
> record. That means, number of DNSBL lookups will increase ad least two times
> (for each dnsbl you already query).
Hmm,
> Did you mean: reject_rhsbl_sender (i.e. reject the sender domain)?
> That already exists.
The `reject_rhsbl_sender` checks whether MAIL FROM domain is listed
under rbl_domain. And I would like to have `reject_rbl_sender` that
would check whether reversed sender domain is listed under rbl_domain.
> Doing it on MX would require dnsbl lookups for each MX server in all
> received mail.
> That would massively increase amount of dnsbl lookups.
I do not know if I would call it "massively". I already do
`reject_unknown_client_hostname` check and 4 other dnsbl lookups. So I
would do another 2 in a
i-spam setting would be filtered with such restriction according
sender domain. Maybe it is more problem of Spamhaus and its list
synchronization, I do not know.
Or is there any fundamental reason why rejecting emails according
sender's domain IP is not a good idea?
My best wishes,
Martin Jiřička
unsubscribe postfix-users
subscribe postfix-announce
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Thanks for the pointer. It seems that libsasl2-modules was missing.
Since I followed the same procedure in all cases, I guess it is the
result of a different image from a different VPS provider.
On 29/01/2017 19:17, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Sun, Jan 29, 2017 at 06:35:46PM +, Martin
I have several servers, all configured to send mail by relaying through
my main mail server on port 587. SFAIK they are all configured the same,
and use TLS with plain text authentication. They all have identical
sasl_passwd and sasl_passwd.db files. Security options are:
smtp_sasl_security_opt
Any suggestion please?
On 19 Jan 2017, 09:16 +, Martin Brampton ,
wrote:
> This is somewhat related to:
>
> On 19/01/2017 08:53, Petr Bena wrote: Re: How to effectively block
> communication to all domains except whitelisted?
>
> Since the start of this year, the amount
This is somewhat related to:
On 19/01/2017 08:53, Petr Bena wrote: Re: How to effectively block
communication to all domains except whitelisted?
Since the start of this year, the amount of mail blocked by blacklists
has dived from around 70% to around 30%. At the same time, spam that is
not
Den 2016-12-29 kl. 10:45, skrev Dominic Raferd:
> Two possibilities occur to me - (a) the email is not 'really' from
> i...@rabattgatan.com, maybe this is the envelope sender or just the
> display name? or (b) if your mailserver is relaying on incoming emails
> to another final destination mailbox
Den 2016-12-29 kl. 09:05, skrev Martin Skjöldebrand:
> Can you show evidence, i.e. the log file entries of an email passing
>> through your system from the arrival to the delivery, which shows that
>> the map was not taken into account?
>
> This is a bit weird. I can see othe
Den 2016-12-28 kl. 21:40, skrev Noel Jones:
> On 12/28/2016 1:03 PM, Martin Skjöldebrand wrote:
>> The output indicates it will discard the rubbish. I must've remembered
>> incorrectly or something. I'll spend some time later to look at the
>> logs. Thanks all who
ows that
> the map was not taken into account?
The output indicates it will discard the rubbish. I must've remembered
incorrectly or something. I'll spend some time later to look at the
logs. Thanks all who commented.
/Martin S
Yes I did, sorry I didn't mention it.
/martin s
Skickat från BlueMail
Den 28 dec. 2016 11:42, kI 11:42, Dominic Raferd
skrev:
>On 28 December 2016 at 09:06, Martin Skjöldebrand
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I was under the impression that
>>
>> smtp
about this?
In my main.cf it seems not to have the desired effect.
Anyone able to shed some light on my meager understandings of postfix.
/Martin S
lk to LDAP/Active Directory in the past, but never Postfix.
Will have to find documentation on the process.
Thanks,
Martin S
Today my mail server uses MySQL as a backend to keep all users/pw's
which is fine as far as that goes.
However, has anyone tried using Windows Azure Active Directory as a
authentication backend - any hints/pointers etc to this.
Might be lacking googlefu again - if so appoligies.
/Martin S
ty gateway. Thus, there is no issue with postfix.
Regards,
Martin
es in the local part, postfix won't accept those
addresses. Any hints, where to screw would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Martin
abitants into account.
/Martin S
--
This address is for technical mail lists only.For all other matters, please use
my main address at the .org domain.
box, it's one
thing, on a company or client server on the other hand ...
/Martin S
>
> Yeah, I agree that actually, only 644 is required on that config file. But
> why get so angry when someone 666's a file to just get things working?
> Its not like a list of banned spam dom
spamtraps: madduck.bo...@madduck.net
digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/sig-policy/999bbcc4/current)
he recipient list
would be skipped. But it is not.
The end result (5xx) isn't so bad, but I'd still like to understand
what's going on.
Is this behaviour tunable? Or am I doing something wrong?
Thanks!
martin
postconf -n follows:
alias_maps = hash:/etc/aliases
allow_percent_hack =
t assume this was done by accident…
Thanks,
--
@martinkrafft | http://madduck.net/ | http://two.sentenc.es/
due to lack of interest tomorrow has been cancelled.
spamtraps: madduck.bo...@madduck.net
digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/sig-policy/999bbcc4/current)
Hello Everyone,
I have a fairly complex mail server setup with
Postfix+Clamav+DSPAM+PPolicy+Dovecot+Virtual users on a single server.
I dealing with a very strange problem
Aliases are not working on my mailing system which are coming from
proxy:mysql:/etc/postfix/virtual_alias_maps.cf
host ma
Quoting Steve Jenkins :
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 10:07 AM, Martin Skjöldebrand
wrote:
Following the tutorial here:
http://arstechnica.com/business/2014/03/taking-e-mail-back-part-3-fortifying-your-box-against-spammers/
What would a DKIM DNS record look like for my server
s usually the server(s) recieving mail from the
internet. In some contexts (e.g. our old FirstClass system) it is
specifically the outward facing server instance. (It is (was?) very
common to have one instance handling internal mail (core services), and
one handling internet-based mail (internet s
it's been fixed and is working again.
/Martin S
After a lot of head scratching and despair, I *think* I got the
problem down to sasl authentication didn't authenticate. I can now
send from one account (this) but not my main address with the same
settings (w/ change of user/pw naturally). Looking further into this.
/Martin S
sting side)
Does your hosting provider filter your network traffic?
You should really have something in the logs when you try to connect.
I think I need to check with the hosting if things are have changed
somewhere (possibly due to their recent problems).
/Martin S
On Sun, 2015-08-23 at 14:16 +0200, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On August 23, 2015 11:04:32 AM Martin Skjöldebrand
> [mskjoldebrand@localhost ~]$ telnet mail.skjoldebrand.eu 465
you must be kidding here ?
No just not thinking.
However, after a major infrastructure crash at the hosting company
bian-spamd
argv=/usr/bin/spamc -f -e /usr/sbin/sendmail -oi -f ${sender} ${recipient}
makes things way easier to troubleshoot.
/Martin S
.eu.
Escape character is '^]'.
ehlo
^CConnection closed by foreign host.
[mskjoldebrand@localhost ~]$
That's there is no response to "EHlo" command.
Logs are not say much at all, possibly because I'm locking at the
wrong logs. Any thoughts on what might have happened here?
/Martin S
Quoting Benny Pedersen :
On August 19, 2015 7:08:22 PM Martin Skjöldebrand
wrote:
Following the tutorial here:
http://arstechnica.com/business/2014/03/taking-e-mail-back-part-3-fortifying-your-box-against-spammers/
see output from opendkim-genkey, it create a private and a public
file
Following the tutorial here:
http://arstechnica.com/business/2014/03/taking-e-mail-back-part-3-fortifying-your-box-against-spammers/
What would a DKIM DNS record look like for my server mail.skjoldebrand.eu?
/Martin S
Quoting Martin S :
Hi,
If I want to add SPF in this scenario:
Thanks for the input, it's basically how I thought it would be except the
part of not adding it to a normal domain.
/Martin S
en be:
v=spf1 include:foo.com ~all
For each domain?
I might just be confused (again).
/Martin S--
This address is for technical maillists only
Please use my primary mail address at the .org domain
for all other matters
Hello,
I have a VM on a CentOS 7 OpenVZ and i have install Kolab.
I just follow the procedure to make the Kolab multi-domain server with the
following pages:
https://docs.kolab.org/howtos/multi-domain.html#amavisd-changes
http://kolab.org/blog/cornelius-hald/2015/01/05/kolab-3.3-multi-domain-se
On Monday 13 July 2015 14.25.15 Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 12:35:33PM +0200, Martin S wrote:
> > I've googled this subject a bit and found a few suggested settings for
> > main.cf that are already in my configuration. Does anyone have a nice
> >
I've googled this subject a bit and found a few suggested settings for main.cf
that are already in my configuration. Does anyone have a nice guide on how to
harden a postfix installation (you should probably do it right and consider it
from the beginning, but anyway).
work it is on.
/Martin S
2015-06-15 19:45 GMT+02:00 Martin S :
>>You've not configured any "relay_recipient_maps", so this system
>>cannot be rejecting relay recipients. Seems your problem is fictional.
>
> I've followed
> http://learnlinuxonline.co
is in a domain I am authorative for it
results in the error message. (as stated previously)
The fictional account also includes the narrative that it actually
resolves the address locally but not from the rest of the internet.
Anyway thanks for reading this fictional account I've wasted 2 days
ilbox_maps
$virtual_mailbox_domains $relay_recipient_maps $relay_domains
$canonical_maps $sender_canonical_maps $recipient_canonical_maps
$relocated_maps $transport_maps $mynetworks
$virtual_mailbox_limit_maps
2015-06-15 15:41 GMT+02:00 Michael Munger :
> Martin:
>
> IMAP is managed by couri
ults in the error message.
However if I am logged into the problem server using imap then sending
mail from mail address c (on the problem server) which is in a domain
I am authorative to mail address b works - meaning it can actually
resolve the address and am able to find the address in the rec
OK maybe I was unclear.
Of course I understand that.
I am talking about a site that I am authorative for. It's my own
domain. DNS points to this server.
2015-06-15 14:38 GMT+02:00 Viktor Dukhovni :
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 06:41:55AM +0200, Martin S wrote:
>
>> I might be ex
1 - 100 of 252 matches
Mail list logo
