Re: Long queue_id collision probability with multiple servers?

On Sat, Dec 13, 2014 at 4:24 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: > > Yes, micro seconds and inode number. > > As documented, long queue IDs also include the epoch time in seconds. > Yes, I meant time in microsecond resolution. That is mainly the reason why I thought about using it globally, but I'll use qu

Re: Long queue_id collision probability with multiple servers?

On Sat, Dec 13, 2014 at 2:52 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: > > Mehmet Tolga Avcioglu: > > Can long queue_ids be used as a globally unique identifier within a multi > > server setup? > > As documented, the queue ID is made up from inode number and time. > The inode number is

Long queue_id collision probability with multiple servers?

Can long queue_ids be used as a globally unique identifier within a multi server setup? I guess the chances decrease as the disk space and inode numbers increase and increase as the number of servers and number of mails processed increase. I was not able to do the math but trying to come up with a

Preventing sendmail -f option

Is there a way to prevent sendmail -f option from being used to change the envelope sender address? Thanks -- Mehmet

Re: Receiving one mail at a time

On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 1:13 AM, Wietse Venema wrote: > > Thank you for the information. I usually do search for those before going > > to the lists, but googling "smtp rfc" didn't reveal the right one easily. > > When I type 'smtp rfc' into a google search window it suggests > the following quer

Re: Receiving one mail at a time

Wietse Venema: > RFC 5321 defines the SMTP protocol. This requires that the server > can receive at least 100 recipients. This document is available at > no cost beyond that of a network connection. You should read it. Thank you for the information. I usually do search for those before going to

Receiving one mail at a time

Hello, I have been searching if SMTP protocol supports limiting the number of recipients an MTA will accept and if there is any way to implement such a setup in postix, but couldn't find a definitive answer. What I mean is telling the other side not to send more than one rcpt, just like default_de

E-mail sending prevention

Hi, I've been getting the below messages for quite some time now, and I also get them on postqueue -p. What can I do about it? When I look at postqueue -p, the ID is 44C5E220E91 and when I do a grep, I get 44C5E220E91: to=, relay=alt1.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com[173.194.70.27]:25, delay=96931, de

Single copy between hops

Is it possible to come up with a configuration so a mail with multiple recipients will only be sent once to the next hop? For example, a mail has multiple envelope recipients and it is delivered to postfix in one smtp session using multiple rcpt to commands. It resides as one queue item in postfix

Re: Graphical stats by domain

On 04/04/2013 10:30 AM, Antoine Nguyen wrote: Muzaffer Tolga Özses wrote: Good morning everyone :) Do you guys know of a tool that will act like pflogsumm, only based on domain and graphical? Regards, Hi, take a look at modoboa (http://modoboa.org/). It supports per-domain graphical

Graphical stats by domain

Good morning everyone :) Do you guys know of a tool that will act like pflogsumm, only based on domain and graphical? Regards,

Re: Lost connection

On 02/27/2013 04:04 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: Wietse Venema: and restarted postfix. However, I'm now getting "(connect to 127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]:10024: Connection refused)". I did a grep in the logs and the output was "Feb 27 09:48:17 server postfix/smtp[11674]: 3C361768793: to=, relay=127.0.0.1[1

Re: Lost connection

On 02/27/2013 02:04 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: egrep '(warning|error|fatal|panic): Unfortunately, all I get was these and similar, and the most recent one is from 2 days ago. egrep '(warning|error|fatal|panic):' /var/log/mail.log | head Feb 25 01:56:26 server postfix/smtpd[10324]: warning: s

Lost connection

Hi, It seems my service provider's network has been blocked by Hotmail. After many correspondences, I was mailed by Hotmail that the issue was cleared for one IP, however I gave them wrong one. So, I edited main.cf and replaced inet_interfaces = all with inet_interfaces = the.ip.I.gave, and r

Re: troubleshooting inability to receive email: should I see a process running on port 25?

myPhone'dan gönderdim 18 Oca 2013 tarihinde 07:25 saatinde, Reindl Harald şunları yazdı: > > > Am 18.01.2013 06:13, schrieb Tracy Wise: >> Thanks Reindl. >> >> I do indeed have that line in main.cf . >> >> However in master.cf there is a slight difference. Mi

Re: SASL authentication fails

On 01/15/2013 07:11 AM, Erwan David wrote: Le 15/01/2013 05:53, Muzaffer Tolga Ozses a écrit : myPhone'dan gönderdim 14 Oca 2013 tarihinde 22:37 saatinde, Brian Evans mailto:grkni...@scent-team.com>> şunları yazdı: On 1/14/2013 3:02 PM, Muzaffer wrote: Hi, I'm tryin

Re: SASL authentication fails

myPhone'dan gönderdim 14 Oca 2013 tarihinde 22:37 saatinde, Brian Evans şunları yazdı: On 1/14/2013 3:02 PM, Muzaffer wrote: Hi, I'm trying to get postfix/dovecot working on a Webmin enabled server and I can't get SASL working for the life of me. Below are my logs and postconf -n. Logs --

Re: Block a domain via smtpd_sender_restrictions ?

On 12/12/2012 11:39 AM, Frank Bonnet wrote: Hello is it possible to block all a domain using smtpd_sender_restrictions ? @spammers.com DISCARD Thank you Read http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#smtpd_sender_restrictions Muzaffer,

Re: virtual_alias_maps map lookup problem

On 12/12/2012 02:01 AM, Wietse Venema wrote: Muzaffer: virtual_mailbox_domains = mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql_virtual_domains_maps.cf virtual_mailbox_maps = mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql_virtual_mailbox_maps.cf .. Dec 12 01:11:27 kartagis postfix/trivial-rewrite[24213]: warning: connect to mysql serve

Fwd: Re: virtual_alias_maps map lookup problem

Original Message Subject:Re: virtual_alias_maps map lookup problem Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 09:01:51 +0200 From: Muzaffer Tolga Özses To: Wietse Venema CC: postfix users On 12/12/2012 02:01 AM, Wietse Venema wrote: Muzaffer: virtual_mailbox_domains

Re: virtual_alias_maps map lookup problem

On 12/12/2012 02:01 AM, Wietse Venema wrote: Muzaffer: virtual_mailbox_domains = mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql_virtual_domains_maps.cf virtual_mailbox_maps = mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql_virtual_mailbox_maps.cf .. Dec 12 01:11:27 kartagis postfix/trivial-rewrite[24213]: warning: connect to mysql serve

Re: Bounces back to myself

On 12/07/2012 12:39 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 07.12.2012 09:37, schrieb Muzaffer Tolga Özses: do not accept mail unless you deliver it. now, if you have queued mail to remove, you can use # postsuper -d $queueid The domain exists, but not the user. How do I achieve your suggestion? in

Re: Bounces back to myself

On 12/06/2012 11:38 PM, mouss wrote: Le 06/12/2012 14:58, Muzaffer Tolga Özses a écrit : On 12/05/2012 03:57 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote: Muzaffer Tolga Özses skrev den 04-12-2012 09:10: mydestination = localhost try using it as default, comment it in main.cf if it still loops then recipient

Re: Bounces back to myself

On 12/05/2012 03:57 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote: Muzaffer Tolga Özses skrev den 04-12-2012 09:10: mydestination = localhost try using it as default, comment it in main.cf if it still loops then recipient domain is missing in mysql virtual_mailbox_domains virtual_alias_maps = mysql:/etc

Re: Bounces back to myself

On 12/04/2012 12:38 PM, Mark Alan wrote: (postconf -d;postconf -n)|sort|uniq -d I was asking about how to remove that queue. Other than that, thanks for the tips. Muzaffer

Bounces back to myself

Hi, Dec 4 09:57:29 kartagis postfix/pickup[21399]: D576E9988: uid=48 from= Dec 4 09:57:29 kartagis postfix/cleanup[21291]: D576E9988: message-id=<20121204075729.d576e9...@mail.bilgisayarciniz.org> Dec 4 09:57:29 kartagis postfix/qmgr[16547]: D576E9988: from=, size=650, nrcpt=1 (queue active

Bad address syntax

Hi, I'm getting the log entry in my to=, relay=none, delay=0, delays=0/0/0/0, dsn=5.1.3, status=bounced (bad address syntax). Googling says I should add allow_min_users = yes, which I would like to confirm. My postconf -n is alias_database = hash:/etc/aliases alias_maps = hash:/etc/aliases

Re: check_client_access

On 07/22/2012 03:12 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: Tolga: Hi, I have put line in my main.cf check_client_access = cidr:/etc/postfix/sinokorea.cidr In Postfix 2.9, this will result in a warning: postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: check_client_access=cidr:/etc/postfix

check_client_access

Hi, I have put line in my main.cf check_client_access = cidr:/etc/postfix/sinokorea.cidr I then restarted postfix, but I can't see it in postconf -n. How come? For reference: my postconf -n output is: [root@vps ~]# postconf -n alias_database = hash:/etc/aliases alias_maps = hash:/etc/aliases

Fwd: Re: Postfix document

Sorry, forgot to reply to all. Original Message Subject:Re: Postfix document Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 13:23:15 +0300 From: Tolga To: Jack Mathews On 06/27/2012 12:16 PM, Jack Mathews wrote: please forward me the document for postfix All documents can be

Re: Searching for config directives and having epic fail (virtual domains)

sure about the openldap part though, but I'm most certain it is possible. Regards, Tolga Peter L. Berghold salty.cowd...@gmail.com <mailto:salty.cowd...@gmail.com> http://blog.berghold.net “ "You are the embodiment of the information you choose to accept and act upon. T

Re: virtual vacation with mysql

02/28/2012 06:21 PM, Marco Aimar wrote: Hi, I'm trying to configure virtual vacation on my server. In documentation I see which I do insert similary value in transport *vacation:[autoreply.mydomain.com ]* What is the autoreply.mydomain.com

Re: spy problem

On 02/01/2012 12:17 PM, lst_ho...@kwsoft.de wrote: Zitat von Baptiste Bauer : Hi ! I am suspicious ! I use POSTFIX. I suppose my workmate spy my mail sending ! ( i don’t know how ! ) ð I checked « aliases » : no redirection. But there is a « generic.db » file …. And the file « generi

Fwd: Re: Mailbox path not used

Forgot to CC Original Message Subject:Re: Mailbox path not used Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2012 13:40:03 +0200 From: Tolga To: Hervé Hénoch On 01/18/2012 01:30 PM, Hervé Hénoch wrote: Thanks for response but I want to keep virtual_mailbox_base = /mnt/vmail but

Re: Mailbox path not used

On 01/18/2012 11:59 AM, Hervé Hénoch wrote: Hello I've a postfix server with LDAP In main.cf : home_mailbox = Maildir/ virtual_mailbox_base = /mnt/vmail virtual_mailbox_domains = ldap:/etc/postfix/ldap-domains.cf virtual_mailbox_maps = ldap:/etc/postfix/ldap-accounts.cf virtual_alias_maps

Re: Illegal block?

On 01/03/2012 11:57 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 03.01.2012 22:37, schrieb Tolga: Hi, I thought I'd check the logs today, and I found something curious to me: Jan 3 15:58:44 bilgisayarciniz postfix/smtpd[6179]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from unknown[85.95.233.13]: 554 5.7.1 Se

Re: Illegal block?

On 01/06/2012 03:23 AM, Benny Pedersen wrote: On Tue, 03 Jan 2012 23:37:16 +0200, Tolga wrote: Jan 3 15:58:44 bilgisayarciniz postfix/smtpd[6179]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from unknown[85.95.233.13]: 554 5.7.1 Service unavailable; Client host [85.95.233.13] blocked using sbl.spamhaus.org; http

Re: Illegal block?

On 04-01-2012 00:14, Noel Jones wrote: On 1/3/2012 3:37 PM, Tolga wrote: Hi, I thought I'd check the logs today, and I found something curious to me: Jan 3 15:58:44 bilgisayarciniz postfix/smtpd[6179]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from unknown[85.95.233.13]: 554 5.7.1 Service unavailable; C

Illegal block?

Hi, I thought I'd check the logs today, and I found something curious to me: Jan 3 15:58:44 bilgisayarciniz postfix/smtpd[6179]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from unknown[85.95.233.13]: 554 5.7.1 Service unavailable; Client host [85.95.233.13] blocked using sbl.spamhaus.org; http://www.spamhaus.org

Re: Fwd: Re: CIDR

On 12/20/2011 02:13 AM, Wietse Venema wrote: Stan Hoeppner: [ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ] On 12/19/2011 5:10 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote: On 12/19/2011 12:44 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: Tolga: I did like you said (did a postmap -q ip.add.ress.here cidr:sinokorea.cidr). Today

Fwd: Re: CIDR

Forgot to CC Original Message Subject:Re: CIDR Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 20:27:50 +0200 From: Tolga To: s...@hardwarefreak.com On 18-12-2011 13:36, Stan Hoeppner wrote: On 12/18/2011 4:49 AM, Duane Hill wrote: Hi, I've confirmed that the IP is from

Re: CIDR

On 18 December 2011 00:34, Stan Hoeppner wrote: > On 12/17/2011 2:32 PM, Ansgar Wiechers wrote: > > On 2011-12-17 Tolga wrote: > >> I've been getting a lot of Chinese spam. I've googled and come across > >> a guide that advises to use a cidr file and tell p

CIDR

Hello, I've been getting a lot of Chinese spam. I've googled and come across a guide that advises to use a cidr file and tell postfix to use it. I got the file, edited it, and told postfix to use it. However, it doesn't seem to be working (I tested it by putting in my own IP address). How can

Test postfix on another server

Hi, Is there some solution to test postfix on another server without changing MX? I'm in the phase of switching servers. Regards,

Chinese characters

Hi, Our mail server is getting A LOT of Chinese spam e-mails. How can I block these? In fact, how do I block e-mail with Chinese characters in Subject? Thanks,

Re: What DB would you choose for a (small) virtual server ?

On 16 November 2011 16:18, /dev/rob0 wrote: > On Wednesday 16 November 2011 03:03:42 Frank Bonnet wrote: > > I have to setup a "virtual" postfix server and I wonder what would > > be the best / most efficient choice for the DB backend ? > > "Best" is subjective. All choices have good and bad poin

Re: CentOS issue

On 12-11-2011 12:25, Tolga wrote: Hi, I'm using postfix 2.3.3 on CentOS 5 and I am noticing fatal: unsupported dictionary type: mysql in the logs when I start it. What to do? What RPM do I get? Thanks, Did it, thanks. I've enabled the right repo

CentOS issue

Hi, I'm using postfix 2.3.3 on CentOS 5 and I am noticing fatal: unsupported dictionary type: mysql in the logs when I start it. What to do? What RPM do I get? Thanks,

Re: No email

On 11/01/2011 03:12 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 01.11.2011 13:59, schrieb Tolga: Nov 1 14:54:10 vps postfix/smtp[9644]: 702364100B61: to=, relay=mx1.sabanciuniv.edu[193.255.135.184]:25, delay=11, delays=0.23/0.05/11/0, dsn=4.4.2, status=deferred (lost connection with mx1.sabanciuniv.edu

No email

Hi, I was doing a test, I signed up for an account at my server and I was told an e-mail had been sent. When I checked my mail log afterwards, I got the below lines. What gives? Nov 1 14:53:59 vps postfix/pickup[9623]: 702364100B61: uid=33 from= Nov 1 14:53:59 vps postfix/cleanup[9639]: 70

Re: Unable to send e-mail

On 10/19/2011 04:01 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 19.10.2011 14:57, schrieb Tolga: Oct 19 15:40:01 vps postfix/pickup[3517]: 5DBFA4100B2B: uid=1005 from= Oct 19 15:40:01 vps postfix/cleanup[3575]: 5DBFA4100B2B: message-id=<20111019124001.5dbfa4100...@mail.bilgisayarciniz.org> Oct 19 15

Unable to send e-mail

Hi, I am using postfixadmin to add mailboxes. Oct 19 15:40:01 vps postfix/pickup[3517]: 5DBFA4100B2B: uid=1005 from= Oct 19 15:40:01 vps postfix/cleanup[3575]: 5DBFA4100B2B: message-id=<20111019124001.5dbfa4100...@mail.bilgisayarciniz.org> Oct 19 15:40:01 vps postfix/qmgr[5859]: 5DBFA4100B2B:

Re: Not receiving e-mail on submission port

On 10/13/2011 03:24 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 13.10.2011 14:18, schrieb Tolga: On 10/13/2011 03:09 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: is this your first mailserver? No, it's not my first mailserver, but I have lost my previous configuration the question "if i need both" cares

Re: Not receiving e-mail on submission port

On 10/13/2011 03:09 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 13.10.2011 14:04, schrieb Tolga: Yes, it's a client connection. So, bottom line is, I need both 25 *and* 587 if this is an MX. If yes, I'm trying for days for nothing. is this your first mailserver? No, it's not my first ma

Re: Not receiving e-mail on submission port

On 10/13/2011 02:49 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 13.10.2011 13:43, schrieb Tolga: submission inet n - n - - smtpd # -o smtpd_tls_security_level=encrypt # -o smtpd_sasl_auth_enable=yes # -o smtpd_client_restrictions=permit_sasl_authenticated,reject # -o

Re: Not receiving e-mail on submission port

On 10/12/2011 05:35 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 09:13:45AM +0300, Tolga wrote: Below are my postconf -n and master.cf: root@vps:~# postconf -n debug_peer_level = 3 debug_peer_list = localhost Don't. What should I do? Remove these? myhostname = vps.ozses.ne

Re: Not receiving e-mail on submission port

Unfortunately, there are no errors / logs related to this. I just don't get any mail/logs when I use the submission port. Regards, On 10/11/2011 10:25 PM, Jeroen Geilman wrote: On 2011-10-11 09:11, Tolga wrote: On 10/11/2011 08:58 AM, Tolga wrote: On 10/10/2011 11:41 PM, Charles Marcus

Re: Not receiving e-mail on submission port

On 10/11/2011 08:58 AM, Tolga wrote: On 10/10/2011 11:41 PM, Charles Marcus wrote: On 2011-10-10 4:17 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: Tolga: On 10-10-2011 21:09, Charles Marcus wrote: On 2011-10-10 2:56 AM, Tolga wrote: I was reported that the e-mails people send never get to my server. When I

Re: Not receiving e-mail on submission port

On 10/10/2011 11:41 PM, Charles Marcus wrote: On 2011-10-10 4:17 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: Tolga: On 10-10-2011 21:09, Charles Marcus wrote: On 2011-10-10 2:56 AM, Tolga wrote: I was reported that the e-mails people send never get to my server. When I first was reported, I tested and it

Re: Not receiving e-mail on submission port

On 10-10-2011 21:09, Charles Marcus wrote: On 2011-10-10 2:56 AM, Tolga wrote: I was reported that the e-mails people send never get to my server. When I first was reported, I tested and it was true. I tested some more and found out I couldn't get e-mail when I switch to submission port

Re: Not receiving e-mail on submission port

On 10/10/2011 01:27 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote: On 10/10/2011 4:56 AM, Tolga wrote: Sorry, I have absolutely no log for that entry. And no, there is no firewall. Can you ping your Postfix host by name and IP address from the remote host? Yes.

Re: Not receiving e-mail on submission port

Sorry, I have absolutely no log for that entry. And no, there is no firewall. On 10/10/2011 12:41 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote: On 10/10/2011 4:18 AM, postfix wrote: Firewall sitting on submission port? Log entries of the transactions would be very helpful. The list welcome msg instructed you to

Not receiving e-mail on submission port

ix-nn-2pipe flags=R user=scalemail argv=/usr/lib/scalemail/bin/scalemail-store ${nexthop} ${user} ${extension} mailman unix - n n - - pipe flags=FR user=list argv=/usr/lib/mailman/bin/postfix-to-mailman.py ${nexthop} ${user} Regards, Tolga

Re: SASL problem

On 02-10-2011 18:14, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 02.10.2011 13:47, schrieb Patrick Ben Koetter: there's a difference between telling people they need to do something in order to get help and insulting them. If you want to help people just do it, if you don't want to help them then don't. In any cas

SASL problem

Hi, Oct 2 12:35:18 vps postfix/smtpd[16201]: warning: SASL: Connect to private/auth failed: Permission denied Oct 2 12:35:18 vps postfix/smtpd[16201]: fatal: no SASL authentication mechanisms Oct 2 12:35:19 vps postfix/master[9841]: warning: process /usr/lib/postfix/smtpd pid 16201 exit status

Re: SASL

t; Am 29.09.2011 20:50, schrieb Tolga: > > Hi, > > > > I've solved 99% of the problems of my mail server thanks to you guys, > however I get this in my log: > > 2011 Sep 29 22:46:25 xxx fatal: no SASL authentication mechanisms > > this is not a complete log for

SASL

Hi, I've solved 99% of the problems of my mail server thanks to you guys, however I get this in my log: 2011 Sep 29 22:46:25 xxx fatal: no SASL authentication mechanisms. Why do I get this? Below is my postconf -n: alias_database = hash:/etc/aliases alias_maps = hash:/etc/aliases append_dot_myd

Throttling

Hi, I am sending myself a test message from outside my domain, and I am getting the following error: Sep 29 13:27:53 vps postfix/master[11943]: warning: process /usr/lib/postfix/smtpd pid 11960 exit status 1 Sep 29 13:27:53 vps postfix/master[11943]: warning: /usr/lib/postfix/smtpd: bad comm

Re: SASL / LDAP authentication, multiple domains

I fixed it by using the ldap_filter parameter instead of ldap_search_base. -- Mehmet On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 2:32 PM, Mehmet Tolga Avcioglu wrote: > This is probably not a postfix issue but I figured I should ask this > list anyway. > > In /etc/saslauthd.conf I have the following an

SASL / LDAP authentication, multiple domains

This is probably not a postfix issue but I figured I should ask this list anyway. In /etc/saslauthd.conf I have the following and this works to authenticate u...@domain.com ldap_search_base: uid=%u,ou=people,dc=%2,dc=%1 However it of course doesn't work for u...@domain.co.uk. My ldap has multipl

pflogsumm by domain

Hello, Is it possible to have pflogsumm detail the report by domain? eg. 291 messages received by example.com 354 messages received by example.net xxx messages received by example.org and so on... Regards,

Re: SASL

11-04-2011 19:59, Noel Jones yazmış: smtpd_recipient_restrictions = permit_mynetworks, permit_sasl_authenticated, reject_unauth_destination It worked, thanks a lot Noel :) Regards, Tolga

Re: SASL

11-04-2011 19:41, Wietse Venema yazmış: Tolga: mail.log: [snip] Apr 11 16:25:39 216235 postfix/smtpd[24241]: connect from unknown[193.255.135.1] Apr 11 16:25:40 216235 postfix/smtpd[24241]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from unknown[193.255.135.1]: 554 5.7.1: Relay access denied; from= to= proto

SASL

Hi, I've been trying to follow http://www.postfix.org/SASL_README.html and trying to get it working, but I keep getting relay access denied. As far as I know, SASL AUTH works (I've tested). Can you help me? Below is my postconf -n output and relevant log. postconf -n: command_directory = /u

Reject the other user

hash:/etc/postfix/vmailbox virtual_minimum_uid = 100 virtual_uid_maps = static:1001 Regards, Tolga

Fwd: Re: Permissions

I forgot to cc it Original Message Subject:Re: Permissions Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2011 18:34:18 +0300 From: Tolga To: Nikolaos Milas On 4/6/11 6:30 PM, Nikolaos Milas wrote: On 6/4/2011 6:20 μμ, Tolga wrote: Creating the subdirectory manually and having it

Re: Permissions

On 4/6/11 5:33 PM, Nikolaos Milas wrote: On 6/4/2011 1:55 μμ, Tolga wrote: I have just checked, uid/gid 8 is vmail and the directory is owned by vmail:vmail, and I just chmod'd to 700. It still doesn't work :( Hi, I don't know what OS you are using, but I see you ar

Re: Permissions

On 4/6/11 1:46 PM, Nikolaos Milas wrote: On 6/4/2011 1:20 μμ, Tolga wrote: Hi, I have just tried with another user I added with postfixadmin, and I am still getting that permission error. So, I am wondering what /var/mail/vhosts permissions and owning user:group should be? chmod 777 works

Permissions

Hi, I have just tried with another user I added with postfixadmin, and I am still getting that permission error. So, I am wondering what /var/mail/vhosts permissions and owning user:group should be? chmod 777 works but I know 777 is evil, so I chmod'd 770 and chown'd mail:mail, then postfix:p

Virtual users

Hi, I have been following http://www.postfix.org/VIRTUAL_README.html#virtual_mailbox and I've made the changes in my main.cf, I restarted postfix, added a domain and mailbox using poftfixadmin, and this is what I am getting in /var/log/mail.log. Any ideas? Apr 6 05:58:33 vps postfix/virtua

Re: Non-smtp milter application and sasl macros

On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 6:38 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: > Mehmet Tolga Avcioglu: >> I have a milter application that works fine for smtp but throws >> undefined macro error messages for non-smtp. > > As far as I can tell in a few minutes time, Postfix sends no > auth_mumbl

Non-smtp milter application and sasl macros

I have a milter application that works fine for smtp but throws undefined macro error messages for non-smtp. I understand why sasl macros (auth_authen, auth_author, auth_type) would not be available for non-smtp milter applications but couldn't they be passed empty? I do specify them on milter_rcp

Re: Running postfix along with another MTA

On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 6:02 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: > Mehmet Tolga Avcioglu: >> On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 9:01 AM, Wietse Venema wrote: >> > Mehmet Tolga Avcioglu: >> >> I eventually fixed it by adding a transport rule "* >> >> relay:127.0.0.1:10025

Re: Running postfix along with another MTA

On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 5:56 PM, Victor Duchovni wrote: > On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 05:48:45PM -0400, Mehmet Tolga Avcioglu wrote: > >> Tried that and got the following: >> >> fatal: bad string length 0 < 1: inet_interfaces = > > Yes, you can set "inet_interfac

Re: Running postfix along with another MTA

On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 9:01 AM, Wietse Venema wrote: > Mehmet Tolga Avcioglu: >> I eventually fixed it by adding a transport rule "* >> relay:127.0.0.1:10025" and having the other MTA listen on 10025, but >> wondering if this is the best way. I would rather touc

Running postfix along with another MTA

I would like to run postfix on port 587, accept mail and than pass it onto another MTA that is running on port 25. Initially I thought I could achieve this by turning of smtp and turning on submission on master.conf and than add a default_transport to 127.0.0.1, but this resulted in "mail loops ba

Re: Fwd: Re: TLS certificate

On Fri, 6 Feb 2009 12:15:26 -0500, Victor Duchovni wrote: > On Fri, Feb 06, 2009 at 07:13:17PM +0200, Tolga wrote: > >> > Who can't use the certificate? >> >> I, when I try with Thunderbird from another location. > > Well, it is Thunderbird that needs t

Re: Fwd: Re: TLS certificate

Victor Duchovni yazmış: On Fri, Feb 06, 2009 at 07:13:17PM +0200, Tolga wrote: Who can't use the certificate? I, when I try with Thunderbird from another location. Well, it is Thunderbird that needs to extend its list of trusted CAs not Postfix. No amount of tweakin

Fwd: Re: TLS certificate

Forgot to CC it. Original Message Subject: Re: TLS certificate Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2009 19:11:43 +0200 From: Tolga To: Patrick Ben Koetter On Fri, 6 Feb 2009 15:58:29 +0100, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote: > * Tolga : >>> Here's your error: "unab

Re: TLS certificate

Patrick Ben Koetter yazmış: * Tolga : Please show evidence of such a session. to...@ozses:~$ openssl s_client -starttls smtp -CApath /etc/ssl/private -connect localhost:25 CONNECTED(0003) depth=0 /C=TR/ST=Marmara/L=Istanbul/O=ozses.net/OU=ozses.net/CN=mail.ozses.net

Re: TLS certificate

On Thu, Feb 05, 2009 at 07:43:38PM +0100, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote: > * Tolga : > > On Thu, Feb 05, 2009 at 04:25:50PM +0100, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote: > > > * Tolga : > > > > I am reading The Book of Postfix, I applied the steps CA.pl -newca, > > > &g

Re: TLS certificate

On Thu, Feb 05, 2009 at 07:43:38PM +0100, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote: > * Tolga : > > On Thu, Feb 05, 2009 at 04:25:50PM +0100, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote: > > > * Tolga : > > > > I am reading The Book of Postfix, I applied the steps CA.pl -newca, > > > &g

Re: TLS certificate

On Thu, Feb 05, 2009 at 04:25:50PM +0100, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote: > * Tolga : > > I am reading The Book of Postfix, I applied the steps CA.pl -newca, openssl > > req -new -nodes -keyout privatekey.pem -out privatekey.pem -days 1825 and > > openssl ca -policy policy_anythin

TLS certificate

/ssl/certs and restarted postfix, but I am obviously missing something and I can't use the new certificate. Can you help me? Regards, /Tolga

Re: smtpd.key

Wietse Venema yazmış: Tolga: Hello, I get the below in my logs. Why do I get this error? smtpd.key exists Jan 30 09:58:58 ozses postfix/smtpd[10310]: warning: cannot get private key from file /etc/ssl/private/smtpd.key Jan 30 09:58:58 ozses postfix/smtpd[10310]: warning: TLS library

smtpd.key

}/smtpd_scache smtpd_use_tls = yes smptpd.key: to...@ozses:~$ ls /etc/ssl/private/smtpd.key -l -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 887 2009-01-26 13:49 /etc/ssl/private/smtpd.key Regards, /Tolga -- Avoid gunfire in the bathroom tonight.

Re: how to filter

Jorey Bump yazmış: Tolga wrote, at 01/27/2009 08:19 AM: Heiko Wundram yazmış: I filter on the header List-Post: <mailto:postfix-users@postfix.org> which catches everything (AFAICT) that comes in over the list. or by the From: line Regards, /Tolga Yo

Re: how to filter

that comes in over the list. HTH! or by the From: line Regards, /Tolga -- Zounds! I was never so bethumped with words since I first called my brother's father dad. -- William Shakespeare, "Kind John"

Re: Mail certificate

Geert Hendrickx yazmış: On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 11:08:52AM +0200, Tolga wrote: http://www.google.com/search?q=self+signed+certificate I have been reading https://help.ubuntu.com/8.04/serverguide/C/postfix.html and I applied some parts and skipped some (as I don't have SASL any

[Fwd: Re: Mail certificate]

Orijinal Mesaj Konu: Re: Mail certificate Tarih: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 11:08:52 +0200 Kimden: Tolga Kime: Nick Warr CC: postfix-users@postfix.org Tercihler: <49781c25.9000...@ozses.net> <497828de.5030...@mobilia.it> Nick Warr yazmış: Tolg

  1   2   >