On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 6:02 PM, Wietse Venema <wie...@porcupine.org> wrote: > Mehmet Tolga Avcioglu: >> On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 9:01 AM, Wietse Venema <wie...@porcupine.org> wrote: >> > Mehmet Tolga Avcioglu: >> >> I eventually fixed it by adding a transport rule "* >> >> relay:127.0.0.1:10025" and having the other MTA listen on 10025, but >> >> wondering if this is the best way. I would rather touch the other MTA >> >> as little as possible and current setup requires me to do some >> >> configuration there. >> > >> > You need to set inet_interfaces and proxy_interfaces to the empty >> > value. >> >> Tried that and got the following: >> >> fatal: bad string length 0 < 1: inet_interfaces = > > Bugger. Specify some IP address that Postfix won't be delivering > mail to, then. It can't be 127.0.0.1. >
I understand. Now I got: warning: host 127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]:25 greeted me with my own hostname warning: host 127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]:25 replied to HELO/EHLO with my own hostname 1AB2BB0D9E: to=<m...@example.com>, relay=127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]:25, delay=3.2, delays=0/0/3.2/0, dsn=5.4.6, status=bounced (mail for 127.0.0.1:25 loops back to myself) Perhaps my transport/relay solution is elegant enough? -- Mehmet
