On 10/21/2024 6:36 PM, Bill Cole via Postfix-users wrote:
On 2024-10-21 at 16:43:05 UTC-0400 (Mon, 21 Oct 2024 16:43:05 -0400)
Steve Matzura via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
[ big snip...]
Here's a returned mail message I received when I tried to simply
send a messa
checked and fixed all of that there will be something new
to say.
On Oct 21, 2024, at 1:44 PM, Steve Matzura via Postfix-users
wrote:
On 10/21/2024 3:06 PM, Andrew Athan via Postfix-users wrote:
Clearly something has changed. It may be simply that you are now
routing to the isp via ipv6
connecting to outside SMTP
servers have PTR records.
this will typically require you to contact your comms provider to add
the PTRs if they are missing.
On Oct 21, 2024, at 10:55 AM, Steve Matzura via Postfix-users
wrote:
On 10/21/2024 1:33 PM, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote
On 10/21/2024 1:33 PM, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote:
Steve Matzura via Postfix-users:
On 10/21/2024 1:14 PM, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote:
Steve Matzura via Postfix-users:
On 10/21/2024 12:42 PM, postfix--- via Postfix-users wrote:
2024-10-21T16:29:00.942189+00:00
On 10/21/2024 1:14 PM, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote:
Steve Matzura via Postfix-users:
On 10/21/2024 12:42 PM, postfix--- via Postfix-users wrote:
2024-10-21T16:29:00.942189+00:00 theglobalvoice postfix/qmgr[3900]:
E53B5103176: from=<>, size=3212, nrcpt=1 (queue active)
2024-10
On 10/21/2024 12:42 PM, postfix--- via Postfix-users wrote:
2024-10-21T16:29:00.942189+00:00 theglobalvoice postfix/qmgr[3900]:
E53B5103176: from=<>, size=3212, nrcpt=1 (queue active)
2024-10-21T16:29:01.124528+00:00 theglobalvoice postfix/smtp[4038]:
E53B5103176: to=,
orig_to=,
relay=mail.ga
Everything's been fine up until this morning. With no knowledge of any
changes by anyone, I'm now getting entries in mail.log that look like this:
2024-10-21T16:29:00.942189+00:00 theglobalvoice postfix/qmgr[3900]:
E53B5103176: from=<>, size=3212, nrcpt=1 (queue active)
2024-10-21T16:29:01.124
d from the queue. I
expected to get a lot of test messages, but they were all removed.
Mail is now flowing nicely as it should when program streams complete.
On 9/30/2024 12:00 AM, Peter via Postfix-users wrote:
On 30/09/24 10:38, Steve Matzura via Postfix-users wrote:
2024-09-29T2
On 9/30/2024 11:20 AM, Jarosław Rafa via Postfix-users wrote:
W dniu pon, 30.09.2024 o godzinie 09∶52 -0400, użytkownik Steve Matzura
via Postfix-users napisał:
I enabled port 25.
$ sudo ufw allow 25
/var/log/mail.log still shows connection timeout. Maybe ports 465 and
587 as well?
It'
On 9/30/2024 1:54 AM, Danjel Jungersen via Postfix-users wrote:
On 30 September 2024 06:00:32 CEST, Peter via Postfix-users
wrote:
>On 30/09/24 10:38, Steve Matzura via Postfix-users wrote:
>> 2024-09-29T21:31:27.402601+00:00 tgv24 postfix/error[1775]:
B9E5510584F: to=, orig_to
Scott K:
On 9/30/2024 12:17 AM, Scott Kitterman via Postfix-users wrote:
On September 30, 2024 4:00:32 AM UTC, Peter via
Postfix-users wrote:
On 30/09/24 10:38, Steve Matzura via Postfix-users wrote:
2024-09-29T21:31:27.402601+00:00 tgv24 postfix/error[1775]: B9E5510584F:
to=, orig_to
On 9/29/2024 8:11 PM, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users wrote:
On Sun, Sep 29, 2024 at 05:38:16PM -0400, Steve Matzura via Postfix-users wrote:
2024-09-29T21:31:27.402601+00:00 tgv24 postfix/error[1775]: B9E5510584F:
to=, orig_to=, relay=none,
delay=48744, delays=48594/150/0/0.01, dsn=4.4.1
On 9/29/2024 7:56 PM, Phil Stracchino via Postfix-users wrote:
On 9/29/24 17:38, Steve Matzura via Postfix-users wrote:
sudo hostname theglobalvoice.info
The bash prompt changes, but after the reboot, it reverted back to
TGV24. I'll take this up elsewhere, but I thought I'd expl
Wietse,
On 9/28/2024 6:33 PM, Wesley wrote:
On 2024-09-29 05:15, Steve Matzura via Postfix-users wrote:
I just moved from Postfix 3.3.0 on an older Ubuntu system to 3.8.6 on
Ubuntu 24.04 LTS. I ran through the standard configuration script and
then edited /etc/postfix/main.cf on the new
Wietse,
On 9/29/2024 3:47 PM, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote:
Steve Matzura via Postfix-users:
/var/log/mail.log is length 0, but here is /var/log/mail.err:
2024-09-28T20:15:02.207931+00:00 tgv24 sSMTP[58912]: Unable to locate mail
2024-09-28T20:15:02.208210+00:00 tgv24 sSMTP[58912
On 9/28/2024 6:33 PM, Wesley wrote:
On 2024-09-29 05:15, Steve Matzura via Postfix-users wrote:
I just moved from Postfix 3.3.0 on an older Ubuntu system to 3.8.6 on
Ubuntu 24.04 LTS. I ran through the standard configuration script and
then edited /etc/postfix/main.cf on the new system to
I just moved from Postfix 3.3.0 on an older Ubuntu system to 3.8.6 on
Ubuntu 24.04 LTS. I ran through the standard configuration script and
then edited /etc/postfix/main.cf on the new system to match the old one.
My syslog shows timeouts to destination addresses I know are good from
the old sys
This is probably off-topic, but maybe slightly related. I can open a
support ticket with Gandi, but something's definitely amiss with their
support system these days, as I have two open tickets with them for
other things directly related to their service which have not yet even
been assigned nu
On 23 Oct 2019, at 14:33, Steve Matzura wrote:
[...]
On a whim, I change the DNS record for mail from A to CNAME.
That's a weird and dangerous whim. Hostnames that are used as the
value for MX records MUST have A records and hence MUST NOT have CNAME
records. The CNAME *MIGHT* work if done
e:
On 23 Oct 2019, at 12:33, Steve Matzura wrote:
I change the DNS record for mail from A to CNAME
Don’t do that.
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2181
The domain name used as the value of a NS resource record, or part of
the value of a MX resource record must not be an alias. Not only is
,
the MX record was untouched. Now, when someone tries to send mail,
they're getting 554's and/or 5.7.1's about relays. I read an article at
https://bobcares.com/blog/554-5-7-1-relay-access-denied/ but don't know
what to change to affect this.
On 10/23/2019 11:23 AM, Noel Jon
from=
to= proto=ESMTP helo=
I don't know even where to start with this one. Time to go back to
school I think.
On 10/22/2019 7:10 PM, Steve Matzura wrote:
Thanks, Noel. Very helpful. MySQL is definitely installed and working,
but I don't know about Milter, as it was set up by some
nd
report back.
On 10/22/2019 3:46 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
On 10/22/2019 1:58 PM, Steve Matzura wrote:
I am running a copy of configurations from a running version 2
installation from Ubuntu 14.04, now alive as version 3 on Ubuntu 18.04.
I thought I'd be slick and port over all the user
I am running a copy of configurations from a running version 2
installation from Ubuntu 14.04, now alive as version 3 on Ubuntu 18.04.
I thought I'd be slick and port over all the user mailbox directories in
/var/mail/vmail, all the customized .cf's, and the MySQL database.
Everything ported
Thank you. I know it's been about three weeks since I asked the
question, but I've been swamped with other projects so haven't had a
chance to try it. I will, and will report back.
On Thu, 19 Jan 2017 15:22:57 -0500 (EST), you wrote:
>Steve Matzura:
>> I'm currently
Peter:
On Fri, 20 Jan 2017 11:01:25 +1300, you wrote:
>F17 came with postfix 2.9 (the 9 is important here). I would also do
>this to make a new setting in 2.10 compatible to previous versions:
>
>postconf smtpd_relay_restrictions=permit
I must be lucky then, because 'postconf -d|grep mail_versi
I'm currently running an implementation of version 2 on a Fedora
version 17 system, moving to a Ubuntu 16.04 LTS system which gave me
version 3. Before I start pulling my hair out, which I already did
going from version 1 to 2, is there an easy migration path for a
configuration file that's working
n Code 451] sid: hDVa1q0085AgUpg01 :: Sorry, I wasnt able to
establish an SMTP connection. Im not going to try again; this message
has been in the queue too long.
From: Steve Matzura
To:
Subject: test #2
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2015 21:29:34 -0400
Organization: Noisy Notes
Message-ID:
User-Agent: For
On Wed, 17 Jun 2015 18:04:01 +, you wrote:
>* LOGS! LOGS! LOGS!
>
>Nobody knows what your problem is until you POST LOGS!
I have. Not much in them.
On Wed, 17 Jun 2015 09:10:26 -0400, you wrote:
>Please send the output of postconf -n to the mailing list.
Paul: I purposefully obfuscated my FQDN and domain, but they both have
real and good data in them.
alias_database = hash:/etc/aliases
alias_maps = hash:/etc/aliases, hash:/var/lib/mailman/d
On Wed, 17 Jun 2015 13:27:43 +, you wrote:
>Sadly, you have a steep learning curve, as email infrastructure
>has continued to evolve (get more complex) over the last 4 decades.
Don't I know it!
>> Using LMTP for both components.
>
>Instead of telling a story, be the remote eyes of the person
Apologies if I've sent this before, but I lost a few mail messages due
to a slip of the finger, so in case I did post this before, here's a
very brief version.
I'm the de facto email administrator for a small Fedora 20 system,
going to uprade to 22 shortly, with Postfix and Dovecot supposedly
conf
Jose:
First of all, you hit the nail on the head as to what I need.
Understanding a problem or question is key to solving or answering it.
Now then ... I'll test relayed/routed mail first via the virtual
address file and see how that goes. Meanwhile ...
On Tue, 16 Jun 2015 09:40:45 -0400, you wr
I have finished setting everything up on a test system using a
different flavor of Linux and a more current version of everything
than my production system. Let's call them prod.example.com and
test.example.com. Without interrupting mail service on prod, which is
half of what that system does so I
On Wed, 13 May 2015 11:36:14 -0400 (EDT), you wrote:
>Steve Matzura:
>> I have charge of a very mixed system--current OS (Fedora 20--OK 21's
>> out but I just haven't upgraded yet), current (or nearly so) Mailman
>> (2.1.18-1), Postfix 2.10 with a configuration file
I have charge of a very mixed system--current OS (Fedora 20--OK 21's
out but I just haven't upgraded yet), current (or nearly so) Mailman
(2.1.18-1), Postfix 2.10 with a configuration file sfrom something a
lot older which I've run through the upgrade-configuration procedure,
and old Dovecot (1.0.1
While working for another company, I was outsourced--yes,
outsourced--to IBM for two years and found it a pleasant and
accessible place to work. I hope your experience was similar, and wish
you the best at your new location and with your new employer. You'll
have to tell us whether so much of what
On Sat, 21 Mar 2015 20:24:17 +, you wrote:
>On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 02:53:12PM -0400, Steve Matzura wrote:
>
>> I am usually fairly good at this, but some of the organizational and
>> configuration symbol-name differences between Postfix 2.5.5 and 2.10.5
>> are, we
I am usually fairly good at this, but some of the organizational and
configuration symbol-name differences between Postfix 2.5.5 and 2.10.5
are, well, way out there! :-) I thought I could drop the 2.5.5 .conf
file into place on the 2.10.5 system. No! To many symbols that have
changed, or section fo
39 matches
Mail list logo
