On 19 Apr 2013 18:47, "Andreas Freyvogel" wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> I'm not sure if this is the correct group to ask so apologies if it's not.
>
> I wanted to ask if anyone has a good way of sending emails that have ZIP
> attachments that contain EXE files to QUARANTINE. I am using POSTFIX
sending
>
On 1 Apr 2013 18:16, "Patrick Lists" wrote:
>
> On 04/01/2013 04:59 PM, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote:
>>
>> so what you please have to suggest.
>> and obviously no option of third party like google calender etc.
>> we are looking for some centralized solution
>
>
> In addition to the previous sugges
On 26 March 2013 10:53, Marko Weber | ZBF wrote:
>
>
> Am 2013-03-26 10:30, schrieb Reindl Harald:
>>
>> Am 26.03.2013 09:44, schrieb Marko Weber|ZBF:
>>>
>>> Mar 25 14:04:35 mail postfix/smtpd[31103]: Untrusted TLS connection
>>> established from
>>> loninmrp15.uk.db.com[160.83.44.131]: TLSv1 wit
On 5 Mar 2013 19:07, "Wietse Venema" wrote:
>
> Simon Brereton:
> > Mar 5 08:45:14 mail postfix/proxymap[24831]: warning: mysql query
> > failed: MySQL server has gone away
>
> The mysql server closed the connection (or crashed).
>
> > Mar 5 10:
On 5 March 2013 16:47, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Simon Brereton:
>> Hi
>>
>> After years of a smoothly running mail server, my logs are starting to
>> fill with this error message:
>> fatal: proxy:mysql:/etc/postfix/mailalias.cf(0,lock|fold_fix): table
>> l
Hi
After years of a smoothly running mail server, my logs are starting to
fill with this error message:
fatal: proxy:mysql:/etc/postfix/mailalias.cf(0,lock|fold_fix): table
lookup problem
I haven't updated anything or changed any configs (in either mysql or
postfix) so I'd appreciate some hints
On 27 February 2013 13:16, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 27.02.2013 13:14, schrieb Muzaffer Tolga Özses:
>>
>> On 02/27/2013 02:04 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>>> egrep '(warning|error|fatal|panic):
>>
>> Unfortunately, all I get was these and similar, and the most recent one is
>> from 2 days ago.
On Dec 29, 2012 8:58 AM, "John Allen" wrote:
>
> My setup is Postfix (2.9.3) + Postgrey + Amavis-new + Dovecot(2.1.7)
running on Debian(Wheezy)/Ubuntu(12.04) servers.
> I have always assumed that header/body checks were worthwhile because
they would catch some mal-mail early and thus reduce the ov
On Dec 21, 2012 6:13 PM, "Viktor Dukhovni"
wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 03:10:11PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> > Viktor Dukhovni:
> > > I've not looked too closely at what it would take for "postconf"
> > > to be able to perform fully recursive parameter expansion. It is
> > > apparently
On 20 December 2012 12:44, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 12:25:03PM -0500, Simon Brereton wrote:
>
>> >> I did postmap the virtual_alias_maps. Is there something else I should I
>> >> do?
>> >
>> > No, but you've likel
On 20 December 2012 08:07, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 12:24:30AM -0500, Simon Brereton wrote:
>
>> >> newu...@example.org direc...@example.org, newu...@example.org
>> >>
>> >> But it occurs to me that this will create a loop - n
On 19 December 2012 22:05, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 05:27:17PM -0500, Simon Brereton wrote:
>
>> One of the clients I support is getting a consultant to do some
>> sensitive work for them and so one of the directors wants to get a
>> copy of all th
On Dec 19, 2012 10:06 PM, "Viktor Dukhovni"
wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 05:27:17PM -0500, Simon Brereton wrote:
>
> > One of the clients I support is getting a consultant to do some
> > sensitive work for them and so one of the directors wants to get a
&g
Hi
One of the clients I support is getting a consultant to do some
sensitive work for them and so one of the directors wants to get a
copy of all the mails sent to this new mail box.
At first, I though I would simply set up the new mailbox (all domains
are virtual) and then add an alias to virtua
On Nov 23, 2012 9:48 PM, "The Doctor" wrote:
>
> I was wondering who is the best CA Cert for Postfix?
The one YOU trust the most - even if that's someone no one else has heard
of.
Simon
On Aug 16, 2012 1:24 PM, "Jim Wright" wrote:
>
> On Aug 16, 2012, at 11:48 AM, Simon Brereton wrote:
>
> > mail #554 5.7.1 : Helo command rejected: Host not
found ##
> >
>
> > If I added in a check_helo_access before reject_invalid_helo_name that
would w
Hi
I have a line like this in my logs:
mail #554 5.7.1 : Helo command rejected: Host not found ##
This is clearly because I have reject_invalid_helo_name in my main.cf
Unfortunately, the fools at steelpartners.com have decided it's quite
okay to helo with sp.com (which actually resolves to Scott
On 17 July 2012 15:09, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Viktor Dukhovni:
>> On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 02:49:10PM -0400, Simon Brereton wrote:
>>
>> > Hi
>> >
>> > A quick question..
>> >
>> > Does Postfix do the variable substitutions after readin
On 25 June 2012 09:23, James B. Byrne wrote:
>
> On Mon, June 25, 2012 11:50, Simon Brereton wrote:
>> On 22 June 2012 16:57, Wietse Venema wrote:
>>> Simon Brereton:
>>>> I would like to use an alias file that routes any of
>>>> postmas...@exam
On 22 June 2012 16:57, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Simon Brereton:
>> I would like to use an alias file that routes any of
>> postmas...@example.net, postmas...@example.com,
>> postmas...@example.info, postmas...@example.org, etc (and also abuse@)
>> to postmas...@example
On May 29, 2012 6:03 PM, "mouss" wrote:
>
> Le 28/05/2012 09:53, Georg Schönweger a écrit :
> > Hi,
> >
> > i'm using a Newsreader to read this list (via news.gname.org). But afaik
> > i have to be subscribed to write to this list. And if i'm subscribed i
> > will receive every post via email too,
On 23 April 2012 22:28, snowie wrote:
> Hello Postfix-users,
>
> Just curious. I got these continuous attempt to connect to email server
> by my spam appliance.
> Any advice ?
>
> Thank you and best regards.
>
> Snowie
>
> Apr 24 10:19:15 email postfix/smtpd[2232]: connect from
> firewall.abc.com
On Apr 22, 2012 10:23 PM, wrote:
>
>
> > vis...@norpknit.com:
> >> I feel that all the messages has to be kept in queue as hold and there
> >> should be some script that will check the queue receiving time and will
> >> create a crontab with postsupre -r [message ID] for defined time to be
> >
> >
On Feb 17, 2012 6:14 PM, "Reindl Harald" wrote:
>
>
>
> Am 17.02.2012 21:59, schrieb Peter Blair:
> > On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 3:54 PM, Reindl Harald
wrote:
> >> how do other people act with such braindead sh**t?
> >
> > Look into greylisting it. You'll find that greylisting could very
> > well d
On Feb 4, 2012 1:03 PM, "Pete" wrote:
>
> On 04/02/2012 17:58, Nick Bright wrote:
>>
>> On 2/4/2012 11:47 AM, Pete wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Can someone confirm that the log excerpt below is most likely a bot of
>>> some kind attempting to authenticate to my Postfix server please ?
>>>
>>
>> T
On Feb 1, 2012 11:20 PM, "ml" wrote:
>
>
> Le mercredi 01 février 2012 à 19:30 -0800, Ori Bani a écrit :
> > 2012/2/1 ml :
> > >
> > > Le jeudi 02 février 2012 à 03:13 +0100, ml a écrit :
> > >> Le mercredi 01 février 2012 à 23:01 +0100, Reindl Harald a écrit :
> > >> >
> > >> > Am 01.02.2012 22:5
On 30 January 2012 12:49, /dev/rob0 wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 01:09:29AM -0800, Ori Bani wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 12:42 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt
>> wrote:
>> > * Ori Bani :
>> >> I'm curious to get feedback on the idea of mounting all the
>> >> postfix queue directories on a faster me
On 20 January 2012 09:47, James Seymour wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 08:15:35 -0500 (EST)
> Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> [snip]
>>
>> In the logging you will see postfix/smtps/smtpd,
>> postfix/submission/smtpd and postfix/smtpd.
> [snip]
>
> Two things (addressed to the OP and other readers):
>
>
On Jan 19, 2012 7:13 PM, "Steve Fatula" wrote:
>>
>> From: Robert Fitzpatrick
>> To: Postfix
>> Sent: Monday, January 16, 2012 1:12 PM
>> Subject: Spamcop listed gmail?
>>
>> Perhaps this is not the place for this, I didn't find a mailing list on
>> the spamcop site and just looking to see if th
On 5 January 2012 11:24, Eric Lemings wrote:
>
> On Jan 4, 2012, at 11:46 PM, Eric Lemings wrote:
>
>>
>> On Jan 4, 2012, at 9:54 PM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
>>
>>> On Wednesday 04 January 2012 20:45:23 Eric Lemings wrote:
I just noticed that two of my Postfix configuration variables were
set
Ask, not all..
On Dec 29, 2011 9:28 AM, "Simon Brereton"
wrote:
>
> On Dec 29, 2011 9:15 AM, "Nikolaos Milas" wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I am using postfix, amavisd-new, spam assassin, clamav on a gateway
> system.
> >
> > A s
On Dec 29, 2011 9:15 AM, "Nikolaos Milas" wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I am using postfix, amavisd-new, spam assassin, clamav on a gateway
system.
>
> A short question (I know it's a bit off-topic but I know that people here
run similar systems):
>
> I've read how to release and/or forward quarantined ma
On 1 December 2011 04:56, Roland de Lepper wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Where're planning to migrate postfix from Suse to Ubuntu 10.04 LTS. The
> Postfix version on Suse has an higher version number than in Ubuntu 10.04LTS
> (2.7.2 - 2.7.0).
>
> Because of the migration we have to shutdown the MySQL server to
On 24 November 2011 22:16, Keith Steensma wrote:
> Anyone have a recommendation for a 'free' client for a mac os x that works
> when communicating to a unix/linux server? I haven't found anything when
> 'googling' for an answer.
Mac OS X is unix - will the built in terminal not do?
http://www.
On 22 November 2011 11:52, David Mehler wrote:
> On 11/22/11, Simon Brereton wrote:
>> On 21 November 2011 19:33, David Mehler wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I'm running Postfix 2.8 and virtual mailbox domains with a mysql
>>> database. I&#x
On 21 November 2011 19:33, David Mehler wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm running Postfix 2.8 and virtual mailbox domains with a mysql
> database. I've also got spf and dkim signatures going as well as
> clamsmtp as an smtp proxy for virus checking. I'd now like to add in
> dspam antispam capability so that
Hi
When I set postfix many moons ago, I wasn't at all sure of what I was
doing and I followed a number of different howtos. The result is that
I inherited other peoples ideas of how things should be done and
lately I've seen advice and bells and whistles that make me think I
should go back and st
On 17 November 2011 14:02, Dennis Carr wrote:
> I'm about to do a migration from one server to another - old server runs
> Debian Lenny, new one runs Squeeze, both with respective current versions of
> postfix.
>
> Long and short is that I'm basically preparing to migrate everything,
> including u
On 17 November 2011 17:14, Tim Dunphy wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> I am attempting to build a basic postfix setup that is able to send mail to
> the internet. Receiving email is not a priority.
>
> I've verified that this basic setup DOES work on an Amazon EC2 instance and
> can be used to send em
On 17 November 2011 09:28, wrote:
> Zitat von Dan The Man :
>
>>
>>
>> Today I had an unhappy unix student try to submit an assignment to me and
>> could not. Spamcop has decided to go off blacklisting all yahoo/shaw etc
>> servers worldwide.
>
> The subject is wrong. Spamcop simply list mailserv
On 17 November 2011 01:13, Dilip Mishra // Viva
wrote:
> Hello Group,
> I want to implement some restrictions on postfix by which it would reject
> domains without mx records, as well as those specified in access table.
> These are some domains to I do not want to send mails at all. My problem is
On 16 November 2011 13:01, David Mehler wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying to get spf going on my arch postfix server. I'm wanting to
> get perl-policyd-spf going and am atempting to download the needed
> source. The issue is openspf.org appears down, anyone know why or if
> there's an alternative dow
On 10 November 2011 18:45, Steve Fatula wrote:
> This check says that the RFC requires a fully qualified hostname for HELO.
> Most internet searches show this to be a "safe" check that shouldn't really
> kill any real mail. Lately, noticed no ebay mail was coming through, looked
> through the logs
On 10 November 2011 07:21, privat wrote:
> After moving to a new host running Ubuntu 10.10 I get in outgoing mails
> sent from account "privat" a From:-field
>
> From: privat
>
> it used to be before
>
> From: ulrich.laut...@t-online.de
>
> In sender_canonical I have
> privat@local
On 9 November 2011 00:48, Noel Jones wrote:
> On 11/8/2011 10:35 PM, Simon Brereton wrote:
>> On 8 November 2011 15:30, Wietse Venema
>> wrote:
>>> Simon Brereton:
>>>> On 4 November 2011 15:49, Simon Brereton
>>>> wrote:
>>>>&g
On 8 November 2011 15:30, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Simon Brereton:
>> On 4 November 2011 15:49, Simon Brereton
>> wrote:
>> > Hi
>> >
>> > Amavis checks both incoming and outgoing mail. ?DKIMPROXY signs
>> > outgoing mail (sadly, before Amavis, s
On 4 November 2011 15:49, Simon Brereton wrote:
> Hi
>
> Amavis checks both incoming and outgoing mail. DKIMPROXY signs
> outgoing mail (sadly, before Amavis, so amavis verifies the signature
> - but I'm okay with that for now) on the submission port.
>
> Mail that i
On 8 November 2011 02:53, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> On 11/8/2011 1:13 AM, Geert Mak wrote:
>
>> We had a user account hacked (weak password) and our SMTP server was used
>> for sending spam. We discovered it after our mail server IP began to show up
>> in RBLs. We improved the passwords, however th
On 6 November 2011 04:22, David Southwell wrote:
> On Saturday 05 November 2011 22:40:03 Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
>> > -Original Message-
>> > From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org
>> > [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of David Southwell
>> > Sent: Saturday, November 05
On 5 November 2011 08:21, David Southwell wrote:
> On Saturday 05 November 2011 05:13:22 Wietse Venema wrote:
>> David Southwell:
>> > Did you read the original posting and the reply from Kamil. He spotted
>> > the primary cause. It was he who spotted the extra " " before
>> > policyd-spf in mast
Hi
Amavis checks both incoming and outgoing mail. DKIMPROXY signs
outgoing mail (sadly, before Amavis, so amavis verifies the signature
- but I'm okay with that for now) on the submission port.
Mail that is injected (i.e. from CRON, applications, etc), still
passes through amavis (obviously) but
On 2 November 2011 18:23, Noel Jones wrote:
> On 11/2/2011 2:33 PM, Simon Brereton wrote:
>
>>> The checks "above" permit_mynetworks and permit_sasl_authenticated
>>> are checks you want applied to your networks and authenticated
>>> users. G
On 2 November 2011 16:26, James Seymour wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Nov 2011 16:12:07 -0400
> Simon Brereton wrote:
>
> [snip]
>> ... but if I put reject_unknown_recipient_domain there
>> postconf.5 says it will
>>
>> Reject the request when Postfix is not final des
On 2 November 2011 15:53, James Seymour wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Nov 2011 14:31:14 -0400
> Simon Brereton wrote:
>
> [snip]
>>
>> ## SPAM STUFF and REJECT CODES ##
>> smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
>> reject_non_fqdn_sender,
On 2 November 2011 15:53, Carlos Mennens wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 3:38 PM, Ralf Hildebrandt
> wrote:
>> That's probably amavis, not postfix
>> Look at the amavis messages in your mail.log
>
> I think you're right. Postfix appears to be working fine. I'll view
> the logs and hit up the Amav
On 1 November 2011 18:53, Noel Jones wrote:
> On 11/1/2011 1:31 PM, Simon Brereton wrote:
>> On 31 October 2011 15:16, Noel Jones wrote:
>>> On 10/31/2011 12:31 PM, Simon Brereton wrote:
>>>> Googling led me to this thread:
>>>> http://comment
On 31 October 2011 15:16, Noel Jones wrote:
> On 10/31/2011 12:31 PM, Simon Brereton wrote:
>> Googling led me to this thread:
>> http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.postfix.user/210413
>>
>> But I don't understand how myu...@example.com is not owned by
>>
On 31 October 2011 15:16, Noel Jones wrote:
> On 10/31/2011 12:31 PM, Simon Brereton wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> I was evaluating my smptd_recipient_restrictions last week and decided that
>> it made no sense to have reject_sender_login_mismatch after
>> permit_sasl_aut
Hi
I was evaluating my smptd_recipient_restrictions last week and decided that it
made no sense to have reject_sender_login_mismatch after
permit_sasl_authenticated. So I changed it. At the time I was reviewing the
documentation I wasn't able to figure out the difference between
reject_authe
On 27 October 2011 12:07, /dev/rob0 wrote:
> On Thursday 27 October 2011 10:32:54 Simon Brereton wrote:
>> I know this gets beaten to death on a regular basis, but sometimes
>
> Indeed it does, such as ... today! Read the "Config check" thread.
It's tricky enoug
Hi
I know this gets beaten to death on a regular basis, but sometimes I get in a
muddle and I'd appreciate a sanity check. Currently my main.cf looks like:
## SPAM STUFF and REJECT CODES ##
smtpd_recipient_restrictions = reject_non_fqdn_sender,
reject_non_fqdn_recipient,
permit_
On 27 October 2011 07:42, nima chavooshi wrote:
> Hi
> In our company we want to send periodic announcement or newsletter mail to
> our customers (approximate 5 e-mail). because most of our customers have
> email account on yahoo and google and AOL mail services, I concern about
> that these m
On 26 October 2011 10:27, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On 10/26/2011 10:17 AM, Simon Brereton wrote:
> ...
>>
>> So my obvious question to the list is - Can I get amavis to explicity
>> add a header with the SPF validity, and if not, can I do this with
>> policyd?
Hi
I finally got around to implementing SPF for my mail server and domains. A lot
easier than I thought it would be, certainly much easier than DKIM and I'm
ashamed I didn't do it earlier.
In the course of doing that, I noticed that gmail/yahoo both add X-Headers
about the validity of the SPF
On 25 October 2011 15:06, Jack Fredrikson wrote:
> Here is a problem that many postfix users have had that has apparently never
> been resolved! I appeal to you for your help. I have been googling this for
> a very long time now. Here is my problem
>
> Oct 25 10:49:18 myserver postfix/pipe[3712]:
On 24 October 2011 11:20, Jack Fredrikson wrote:
> Hi;
> I'm still getting this (and *only* this) error:
> Oct 24 08:18:01 myserver postfix/pipe[21761]: 5CC9F5790195:
> to=, relay=dovecot, delay=0.66, delays=0.64/0/0/0.02,
> dsn=4.3.0, status=deferred (temporary failure)
Sounds like your file per
On 23 October 2011 13:13, Jack Fredrikson wrote:
> I may be dreaming, but this could be my last problem with my installation.
> After following all your good advice, I still have this one problem and it
> is pervasive in all emails:
> Oct 23 09:50:58 myserver postfix/pipe[30578]: BB2BB5790262:
> t
2011/10/21 Leslie León Sinclair :
> Something like:
>
>
> user = user_for_db
> password = password_for_db
> hosts = localhost
> dbname = database_name
> query = SELECT goto FROM alias WHERE address='%s' AND active = '1'
>
Thanks. But I think we should see what the OP has in his. As someone
al
On 21 October 2011 10:52, Jack Fredrikson wrote:
>
> From: Reindl Harald
> To: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Sent: Friday, October 21, 2011 10:39 AM
> Subject: Re: First Insallation, Bouncing Emails
>
>
> I'm on CentOS, not Debian
>
> Ralf Hildebrandt writes:
>
>>>
On 18 October 2011 14:27, Noel Jones wrote:
> On 10/18/2011 1:20 PM, Simon Brereton wrote:
>
>> I already use amavis to do the dkim checking on incoming mails. I'm
>> using dkimproxy to sign outgoing mails (and I confess I only found out
>> about opendkim after I&#x
On 19 October 2011 14:04, Steve Jenkins wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 12:03 PM, Steve Jenkins
> wrote:
>>>
>>> The following isn't one of my normal walkthrough HowTo blog posts, but it
>>> does contain some notes I wrote to myself about things to consider when
>>> deploying OpenDKIM with Amavi
On 18 October 2011 15:01, Simon Deziel wrote:
> On 10/18/2011 01:41 PM, Simon Brereton wrote:
>> On 18 October 2011 13:27, Simon Deziel wrote:
>>> On 10/18/2011 01:12 PM, Simon Brereton wrote:
>>>> Hi
>>>>
>>>> I expect that this is not rec
On 18 October 2011 14:17, Noel Jones wrote:
> On 10/18/2011 12:04 PM, Simon Brereton wrote:
>> On 13 October 2011 20:11, Noel Jones wrote:
>>> The only place you should really care about encryption is if your
>>> own clients submit SASL authenticated mail -- t
On 18 October 2011 13:52, Noel Jones wrote:
> On 10/18/2011 12:12 PM, Simon Brereton wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> I expect that this is not recommended practice, but before I implemented
>> DKIM signing, Amavis used to scan ALL mail - incoming and outgoing - and I
>> was
On 18 October 2011 13:27, Simon Deziel wrote:
> On 10/18/2011 01:12 PM, Simon Brereton wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> I expect that this is not recommended practice, but before I implemented
>> DKIM signing, Amavis used to scan ALL mail - incoming and outgoing - and I
>>
Hi
I expect that this is not recommended practice, but before I implemented DKIM
signing, Amavis used to scan ALL mail - incoming and outgoing - and I was happy
with that.
If I want Amavis to scan and rate the mail after dkim proxy has signed it, is
that as simple as adding the content filter
On 13 October 2011 20:11, Noel Jones wrote:
> The only place you should really care about encryption is if your
> own clients submit SASL authenticated mail -- the far most common
> auth mechanisms are PLAIN and LOGIN which really should be protected
> inside a TLS connection. This is commonly co
On 17 October 2011 19:43, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> On 10/17/2011 10:50 AM, Simon Brereton wrote:
>
>> Does your approach for sending to abuse work for Roadrunner? I have
>> 1000 pings a day from a host on RR cable and when I tried to email
>> abb...@rr.com, the connectio
On 17 October 2011 11:38, John Hinton wrote:
> On 10/17/2011 11:13 AM, Simon Brereton wrote:
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> This is a new one on me - I've never seen spammers attempt to use to SASL
>> Auth to inject spam. Has anyone else seen this?
>>
>> Oct 1
Hi
This is a new one on me - I've never seen spammers attempt to use to SASL Auth
to inject spam. Has anyone else seen this?
Oct 17 15:07:16 mail postfix/smtpd[14422]: connect from unknown[208.86.147.92]
Oct 17 15:07:16 mail dovecot: auth(default):
passdb(newslet...@mydomain.net,208.86.147.92)
On 13 October 2011 20:11, Noel Jones wrote:
> On 10/13/2011 6:39 PM, Simon Brereton wrote:
>> smtp_tls_CAfile = ?
>> smtp_tls_cert_file = ?
>> smtp_tls_key_file = ?
>
> Typcially these would be set to the same cert & keys as used by smtpd.
Since these are self-s
On 13 October 2011 19:16, Noel Jones wrote:
> On 10/13/2011 5:41 PM, Mark Homoky wrote:
>> On 11 Oct 2011, at 15:54, "Simon Brereton"
>> wrote:
>>
>>>>>
>>>>> this is obseleted (I'm running 2.7.1) and to use
>>>>&
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-
> us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Viktor Dukhovni
> On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 05:15:20PM -0400, Simon Brereton wrote:
>
> > postfix/smtpd[25614]: warning: TLS library problem:
>
Hi
My log files has a moderate amount of TLS warnings:
postfix/smtpd[25614]: warning: TLS library problem: 25614:error:14094416:SSL
routines:SSL3_READ_BYTES:sslv3 alert certificate unknown:s3_pkt.c:1102:SSL
alert number 46:
I'm aware that this could be (according to an older thread on this lis
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-
> us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Sahil Tandon
> On Tue, 2011-05-03 at 23:58:47 +0200, Simon Brereton wrote:
>
> > I'm trying to change my SASL auth from Cyrus to Dovecot.
> &g
> -Original Message-
> From: Wietse Venema [mailto:
> Simon Brereton:
> > Hi
> >
> > I'm trying to change my SASL auth from Cyrus to Dovecot.
>
> You have not shown any evidence that your Postfix version actually
> comes with Dovecot support.
Act
Hi
I'm trying to change my SASL auth from Cyrus to Dovecot.
I have Dovecot all set up - it's authenticating IMAP users and postfix is using
dovecot-lda to deliver mail, but when I changes main.cf to use Dovecot SMTP
Auth wasn't working.
After a few hours of fruitless searching I finally though
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-
> us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Simon Brereton
> I turned up mysql logging and did another test - and no query
> appeared in the mysql log! In an effort to prove to myself, I did
> From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-
> us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Patrick Ben Koetter
> * Simon Brereton :
> > > > Saslfinger -s says:
> > >
> > > saslfinger also reports much other, useful information which we
> need
> &g
> From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-
> us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Patrick Ben Koetter
> * Simon Brereton :
> > Probably not the best place for this, but hopefully someone will
> tell
> > me what I'm doing wrong anyway..
> >
>
> From: Simon Brereton
> Probably not the best place for this, but hopefully someone will tell
> me what I'm doing wrong anyway..
>
> I've gotten the TLS up and working. And SASL auth seemed to be
> working. I installed saslfinger and everything was fine there.
Hi
Probably not the best place for this, but hopefully someone will tell me what
I'm doing wrong anyway..
I've gotten the TLS up and working. And SASL auth seemed to be working. I
installed saslfinger and everything was fine there. But when trying to locally
inject mail on the submission po
> From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-
> us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of jeremy.als...@imap-mail.com
> Hi Victor.
>
> On Fri, 08 Apr 2011 00:59 -0400, "Victor Duchovni"
> wrote:
> > Start simple, and add features gradually. There is a steep learning
> > curve for a novice
> From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-
> us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Victor Duchovni
> On Thu, Apr 07, 2011 at 07:37:50PM +0200, Simon Brereton wrote:
>
> > > From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-
> > > us...@postfix
> From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-
> us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Patrick Ben Koetter
> * Simon Brereton
> > Hi
> >
> > Running 2.3.8 Debian package (I'll be upgrading shortly), I was
> already supporting TLS and SASL auth. One
> From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-
> us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Victor Duchovni
> On Thu, Apr 07, 2011 at 04:53:59PM +0200, Simon Brereton wrote:
>
> > However, when I test I get a SASL auth error. If I switch my
> client back to port 25, t
Hi
Running 2.3.8 Debian package (I'll be upgrading shortly), I was already
supporting TLS and SASL auth. One of my users recently moved to RCN and they
block port 25 so I'm trying to open 587.
I added this to my master.cf
submission inet n - - - - smtpd
-
> From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-
> us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Johan Pappu
>
> How do I Increase my mail sending speed in postfix to all the
> destinations?
>
> Do i need to make changes in main.cf?
>
> Please suggest me
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=postfix+increase+th
> From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-
> us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Jeroen Geilman
> Sent: Saturday, March 26, 2011 2:34 PM
> To: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Subject: Re: Making my own pipe..
>
> On 03/25/2011 12:02 AM, Simon Brereton wrote:
>
Hi
I'm still trying to get Postfix to use deliverquota to deliver the mails to my
Maildirs.
The only thing I could find on the net was a comment from Magnus
http://www.irbs.net/internet/postfix/0412/1673.html that I had to make my own
pipe.
So this is my attempt:
deliverquota unix -
1 - 100 of 108 matches
Mail list logo
