Postfix BCC handling - visibility

2009-07-31 Thread Paul Cocker
our side B) Postfix includes the BCC header and thus provides a route for people to find out who was BCC'd Clarification would be much appreciated. Paul Cocker _ Please consider the environment, think before you print. TNT

RE: [SPAM?] Re: SPF implementation not working

2009-06-03 Thread Paul Cocker
> -Original Message- > From: Noel Jones [mailto:njo...@megan.vbhcs.org] > Sent: 01 June 2009 14:30 > To: Paul Cocker; postfix-users@postfix.org > Subject: [SPAM?] Re: SPF implementation not working > Importance: Low > > Paul Cocker wrote: > > I'm try

SPF implementation not working

2009-06-01 Thread Paul Cocker
10:54:39 hostname postfix/qmgr[26216]: 419581F800F7: removed The mail is passed from the postfix mail server to the Barracuda server without being rejected, despite the forged from field and invalid IP. Paul Cocker _ Please c

Applying dfilt to one IP only

2009-05-29 Thread Paul Cocker
il out via 100.100.100.1. Paul Cocker _ Please consider the environment, think before you print. TNT Post is the trading name for TNT Post UK Ltd (company number: 04417047), TNT Post (Doordrop Media) Ltd (00613278), TNT Post Sc

Any good way to make this mail setup work

2008-10-23 Thread Paul Cocker
ese two systems alongside each other is doomed to either backscatter or administrative nightmare, but I thought I'd put it out there in case there's some good way to have them work together. Otherwise it's something for me to raise when the Barracuda is up for renewal. Thanks all. Pa

RE: My first config - unable to telnet to port 25, virtual.db missing

2008-10-23 Thread Paul Cocker
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Cocker > Sent: 23 October 2008 10:29 > To: postfix-users@postfix.org > Subject: RE: My first config - unable to telnet to port 25, > virtual.db missing > > > ===

RE: My first config - unable to telnet to port 25, virtual.db missing

2008-10-23 Thread Paul Cocker
> == > #!/usr/bin/perl > > use warnings; > use strict; > use File::Copy; > > my $valid_recpts = "/home/exchange/virtual.txt"; # original > file from exchange my $relay_recps = > "/home/exchange/relay_recipients"; # final file that will be > postmapped my $dos2unix = `/usr/b

RE: My first config - unable to telnet to port 25, virtual.db missing

2008-10-21 Thread Paul Cocker
> -Original Message- > From: Natxo Asenjo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 07 October 2008 15:54 > To: Paul Cocker > Cc: postfix-users@postfix.org > Subject: Re: My first config - unable to telnet to port 25, > virtual.db missing > > On Tue, Oct 7, 2

RE: Unable to attach disclaimer - permission denied

2008-10-17 Thread Paul Cocker
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 17 October 2008 12:33 > To: Paul Cocker > Cc: postfix users list > Subject: RE: Unable to attach disclaimer - permission denied > > > > Oct 17 11:29:07 server kernel: au

RE: Unable to attach disclaimer - permission denied

2008-10-17 Thread Paul Cocker
> -Original Message- > From: Wietse Venema [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 17 October 2008 11:48 > To: Paul Cocker > Cc: postfix users list > Subject: Re: Unable to attach disclaimer - permission denied > > Paul Cocker: > > I'm trying to setup disc

Unable to attach disclaimer - permission denied

2008-10-17 Thread Paul Cocker
fference, so clearly something more fundamental is wrong, but I don't know what. Paul Cocker TNT Post is the trading name for TNT Post UK Ltd (company number: 04417047), TNT Post (Doordrop Media) Ltd (00613278), TNT Post Scotland Ltd (05695897), TNT Post North Ltd (05701709), TNT Post

RE: Postfix listening on 25, unable to telnet to 25 - my first config

2008-10-13 Thread Paul Cocker
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Noel Jones > Sent: 13 October 2008 15:51 > To: postfix users list > Subject: Re: Postfix listening on 25, unable to telnet to 25 > - my first config > > Paul Cocker wrote:

RE: Postfix listening on 25, unable to telnet to 25 - my first config

2008-10-13 Thread Paul Cocker
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of mouss > Sent: 13 October 2008 16:11 > To: postfix-users@postfix.org > Subject: Re: Postfix listening on 25, unable to telnet to 25 > - my first config > > Paul Cocker a

RE: Postfix listening on 25, unable to telnet to 25 - my first config

2008-10-13 Thread Paul Cocker
> -Original Message- > From: Udo Rader [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 13 October 2008 15:01 > To: Paul Cocker > Cc: postfix users list > Subject: Re: Postfix listening on 25, unable to telnet to 25 > - my first config > > Paul Cocker schrieb: > >>

RE: Postfix listening on 25, unable to telnet to 25 - my first config

2008-10-13 Thread Paul Cocker
> -Original Message- > From: Noel Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 13 October 2008 13:36 > To: Paul Cocker; postfix-users@postfix.org > Subject: Re: Postfix listening on 25, unable to telnet to 25 > - my first config > > Paul Cocker wrote: > > >

RE: Postfix listening on 25, unable to telnet to 25 - my first config

2008-10-13 Thread Paul Cocker
> -Original Message- > From: Arek Czereszewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 13 October 2008 13:09 > To: Paul Cocker > Subject: Re: Postfix listening on 25, unable to telnet to 25 > - my first config > > Paul Cocker wrote: > > All my telneting had been

RE: Postfix listening on 25, unable to telnet to 25 - my first config

2008-10-13 Thread Paul Cocker
gt; > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Cocker > > Sent: Monday, 13 October 2008 8:58 PM > > To: postfix-users@postfix.org > > Subject: Postfix listening on 25, unable to telnet to 25 - my first > > co

RE: Postfix listening on 25, unable to telnet to 25 - my first config

2008-10-13 Thread Paul Cocker
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Barney Desmond > Sent: 13 October 2008 11:43 > To: postfix-users@postfix.org > Subject: Re: Postfix listening on 25, unable to telnet to 25 > - my first config > > Firewall? My attempt at reading the

Postfix listening on 25, unable to telnet to 25 - my first config

2008-10-13 Thread Paul Cocker
to find I'm not sure where to go. Paul Cocker TNT Post is the trading name for TNT Post UK Ltd (company number: 04417047), TNT Post (Doordrop Media) Ltd (00613278), TNT Post Scotland Ltd (05695897), TNT Post North Ltd (05701709), TNT Post South West Ltd (05983401), TNT Post Midlands Limi

Re: My first config - unable to telnet to port 25, virtual.db missing

2008-10-10 Thread Paul Cocker
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of mouss > Sent: 08 October 2008 16:10 > Cc: postfix-users@postfix.org > Subject: Re: [SPAM?] Re: My first config - unable to telnet > to port 25, virtual.db missing > Importan

RE: LDAP_STRONG_AUTH_REQUIRED

2008-10-08 Thread Paul Cocker
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Natxo Asenjo > Sent: 08 October 2008 15:29 > To: Postfix users > Subject: Re: LDAP_STRONG_AUTH_REQUIRED > > On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 4:12 PM, Paul Cocker > <[EMAIL PROTECT

RE: Re: My first config - unable to telnet to port 25, virtual.db missing

2008-10-08 Thread Paul Cocker
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Natxo Asenjo > Sent: 08 October 2008 14:52 > To: Postfix users > Subject: Re: [SPAM?] Re: My first config - unable to telnet > to port 25, virtual.db missing > > On Wed, O

RE: LDAP_STRONG_AUTH_REQUIRED

2008-10-08 Thread Paul Cocker
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Natxo Asenjo > Sent: 08 October 2008 15:00 > To: Postfix users > Subject: Re: LDAP_STRONG_AUTH_REQUIRED > > On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 3:37 PM, Paul Cocker > <[EMAIL PROT

LDAP_STRONG_AUTH_REQUIRED

2008-10-08 Thread Paul Cocker
Directory at our site being setup to require LDAP signing. Changing the script is outside my abilities, so I'm hoping someone else might have followed the same process and hit this stumbling block first. Any advice beyond reducing LDAP signing to 'Negotiate' is welcome. Paul Cocker

RE: [SPAM?] Re: My first config - unable to telnet to port 25, virtual.db missing

2008-10-08 Thread Paul Cocker
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of mouss > Sent: 08 October 2008 14:03 > Cc: postfix-users@postfix.org > Subject: [SPAM?] Re: My first config - unable to telnet to > port 25, virtual.db missing > Importance: Lo

RE: My first config - unable to telnet to port 25, virtual.db missing

2008-10-08 Thread Paul Cocker
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of mouss > Sent: 08 October 2008 09:04 > To: postfix-users@postfix.org > Subject: Re: My first config - unable to telnet to port 25, > virtual.db missing > > Paul Cocker wrote

RE: [SPAM?] Re: My first config - unable to telnet to port 25, virtual.db missing

2008-10-08 Thread Paul Cocker
> > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Cocker > > Sent: Wednesday, 8 October 2008 6:00 PM > > To: postfix-users@postfix.org > > Subject: RE: [SPAM?] Re: My first config - unable to telnet

RE: [SPAM?] Re: My first config - unable to telnet to port 25, virtual.db missing

2008-10-08 Thread Paul Cocker
I know, if the secondary MX server receives the e-mail, it shouldn't pass it inside but rather should pass it to the primary MX server, which should be the single point of contact with the internal mail server. Is this incorrect? Paul Cocker -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: My first config - unable to telnet to port 25, virtual.db missing

2008-10-07 Thread Paul Cocker
ter effect, unless I needed to lessen the load on the primary MX server which I don't. That this wasn't evident might suggest I've configured it incorrectly to act as a secondary MX server. Paul Cocker Systems Infrastructure Support Network Administrator and Security Specialis

RE: {Spam?} Re: My first config - unable to telnet to port 25, virtual.db missing

2008-10-07 Thread Paul Cocker
ng a list of valid e-mail addresses in postfix manually. So at this point I'll see to setup a method for queering AD, and I see the HOWTO section has a couple of articles which cover this. My only concern would be the risks in opening up communications to AD from the DMZ. Paul Cocker -

My first config - unable to telnet to port 25, virtual.db missing

2008-10-06 Thread Paul Cocker
these errors the reason it won't accept connections on port 25, or is there an error in the config above? Paul Cocker TNT Post is the trading name for TNT Post UK Ltd (company number: 04417047), TNT Post (Doordrop Media) Ltd (00613278), TNT Post Scotland Ltd (05695897), TNT Post North

RE: [SPAM?] Re: Altermime

2008-09-22 Thread Paul Cocker
This is as handed down by our lawyer. Paul Cocker -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of mouss Sent: 22 September 2008 14:38 Cc: postfix-users@postfix.org Subject: [SPAM?] Re: Altermime Importance: Low Paul Cocker wrote: > Does anyone h

Altermime

2008-09-22 Thread Paul Cocker
-postfix-debian-etch I lack the scripting skills necessary to modify the setup. Help is much appreciated. I am working on CentOS 5.2 and have installed altermime 3.7 from rpmforge. Paul Cocker st is the trading name for TNT Post UK Ltd (company number: 04417047), TNT Post (Doordrop Media

Understanding MX delivery

2008-09-15 Thread Paul Cocker
op MX server? Finally, if you want the server to deliver mail out as well as in, do you need to define a line for this, say: * : ? Thanks, Paul Cocker st is the trading name for TNT Post UK Ltd (company number: 04417047), TNT Post (Doordrop Media) Ltd (00613278), TNT Post Scotland Ltd (05695897)

RE: [SPAM?] Re: First Time Configuration assistance

2008-09-05 Thread Paul Cocker
ients, though let me know if there is a better way. Thanks for all the advice. Paul Cocker -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of mouss Sent: 05 September 2008 12:53 Cc: postfix-users@postfix.org Subject: [SPAM?] Re: First Time Configur

FW: Transport_map as second MX server

2008-09-05 Thread Paul Cocker
And it's dealt with further down the page. My apologies for crying wolf a little too quickly. Paul Cocker -Original Message- From: Paul Cocker Sent: 05 September 2008 12:37 To: postfix-users@postfix.org Subject: Transport_map as second MX server I'm running through

Transport_map as second MX server

2008-09-05 Thread Paul Cocker
y but as I understand it the second, third, fourth MX servers etc. should pass e-mail to the first MX server which then relays it to the internal mail servers. Assuming this is correct, should I be defining this setting at all? Paul Cocker TNT Post is the trading name for TNT Post UK Ltd (comp

RE: First Time Configuration assistance

2008-09-05 Thread Paul Cocker
It's CentOS 5.2, it's the version in the repository. It's not a bleeding edge distribution, but with seven years patching it doesn't aim to be. Paul Cocker Systems Infrastructure Support Network Administrator and Security Specialist -Original Message- From: Charles M

FW: First Time Configuration assistance

2008-09-05 Thread Paul Cocker
it before posting. Ah well. Paul Cocker Systems Infrastructure Support Network Administrator and Security Specialist -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Cocker Sent: 05 September 2008 12:00 To: postfix-users@postfix.org Subject:

First Time Configuration assistance

2008-09-05 Thread Paul Cocker
onsideration or configure? Beyond chroot that is, which is something I will investigate next. Many thanks, Paul Cocker TNT Post is the trading name for TNT Post UK Ltd (company number: 04417047), TNT Post (Doordrop Media) Ltd (00613278), TNT Post Scotland Ltd (05695897),TNT Post North Ltd (05