> -----Original Message----- > From: Noel Jones [mailto:njo...@megan.vbhcs.org] > Sent: 01 June 2009 14:30 > To: Paul Cocker; postfix-users@postfix.org > Subject: [SPAM?] Re: SPF implementation not working > Importance: Low > > Paul Cocker wrote: > > I'm trying to implement SPF on our Postfix 2.3.3 > installation running > > on CentOS 5.2 and have been using the "Sender address > verification for > > all e-mail" article on the postfix site. We're also using a > Barracuda > > filter and SPF verification hasn't been leading to false > positives so > > we're happy to enable it for everything. > > The article you refer to is about sending address > verification probes, not SPF. You have not enabled SPF in > postfix. Note that some sites consider the address probes > you have enabled a form of abuse - if you send too many of > them them, they will blacklist you. You might want to turn > that feature back off. >
Ah, clearly I have become confused somewhere along the line. Thanks, I'll check the articles you linked. Would I be correct in thinking you are referring only to reject_unverified_sender, or do you mean the entire smtpd_sender_restrictions block I posted? _____________________________________________________________________ Please consider the environment, think before you print. TNT Post is the trading name for TNT Post UK Ltd (company number: 04417047), TNT Post (Doordrop Media) Ltd (00613278), TNT Post Scotland Ltd (05695897), TNT Post North Ltd (05701709), TNT Post South West Ltd (05983401), TNT Post Midlands Limited (6458167)and TNT Post London Limited (6493826). Emma's Diary and Lifecycle are trading names for Lifecycle Marketing (Mother and Baby) Ltd (02556692). All companies are registered in England and Wales; registered address: 1 Globeside Business Park, Fieldhouse Lane, Marlow, Buckinghamshire, SL7 1HY.
