Noel Jones wrote (on Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 06:39:34PM -0500):
> On 3/29/2012 4:49 PM, N. Yaakov Ziskind wrote:
> > (version 2.7.0; postconf -n upon request). I'm having trouble using the
> > transport table with a non-default server port. Specifically, I have
> >
>
/dev/rob0 wrote (on Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 05:14:04PM -0500):
> On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 05:49:20PM -0400, N. Yaakov Ziskind wrote:
>
> > (version 2.7.0; postconf -n upon request). I'm having trouble
> > using the transport table with a non-default server port.
> > Spe
(version 2.7.0; postconf -n upon request). I'm having trouble using the
transport table with a non-default server port. Specifically, I have
sh...@ziskind.us:[pizza.ziskind.us]:2525
me...@crownkosher.net :[pizza.ziskind.us]:2525
the last being newly added. Results:
Mar 25 08:02:11 c
gh?
> On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 9:45 AM, N. Yaakov Ziskind wrote:
>
> > A particular mailer, slightly broken, cannot send mail to a postfix
> > (2.7.0) box:
> >
> > Feb 5 08:51:16 pizza postfix/smtpd[30453]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
> > chocolate .egps.com[38
A particular mailer, slightly broken, cannot send mail to a postfix
(2.7.0) box:
Feb 5 08:51:16 pizza postfix/smtpd[30453]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
chocolate .egps.com[38.119.130.7]: 450 4.1.8
: Sender address rejected: i
Domain not found; from=
to= proto=ESMTP helo=
Where the sample@domain
I'm getting errors like this from one particular sender:
Oct 19 13:54:13 pizza postfix/smtpd[31372]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
chocolate.egps.com[38.119.130.7]: 450 4.1.8
:
Sender address rejected: Domain not found; from=
to= proto=ESMTP helo=
where the capitalized domain name has been munged.
Christopher Adams wrote (on Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 05:20:52PM -0700):
> I noticed on our firewall that there were constant connections from the
> machine running Postfix to addresses all over the world. The interesting
> thing is that the connection is using OpenDNS [208.67.216.132], a public DNS
> s
Sometimes the downstream MX has a 'special cookbook' of super secret
anti-spam body checks, and you will always have this problem.
Vasya Pupkin wrote (on Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 06:37:26PM +0400):
> It is already as restrictive as possible and acceptable for me. I do
> not want to loose any non-spam
In my experience, ALL the NDRs I've ever seen are useless - if mail is
bad, it should be REJECTed, otherwise the system is breaking down
somewhere.
Is there a way to just drop bounces on the floor?
Vasya Pupkin wrote (on Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 06:52:22PM +0400):
> You of course understand that this
Phil Howard wrote (on Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 12:10:39PM -0400):
> On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 10:40, markus reichelt wrote:
>
> > ALso, I can only stress what has been said already: get your distro
> > shit together; go along with your hunch about slackware, ask
> > slackware specific questions on a sla
Ralf Hildebrandt wrote (on Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 09:57:42AM +0200):
> > Administrators of sites that want to trouble-shoot connectivity issues
> > with your server will use "telnet 25" from time to time. There is no
> > need to block this, it is by far the least likely source of any
> > significant
Jim Wright wrote (on Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 04:47:05PM -0500):
> On Jun 3, 2010, at 1:36 PM, Moe wrote:
>
> > My point is: When 'myhostname' and 'mydomainname' are left out of main.cf
> > then postfix makes an attempt to auto-detect them.
>
> There's your problem. Fix that. See my original reply
Matt Hayes wrote (on Wed, Jun 02, 2010 at 11:48:53PM -0400):
>
>
> On 06/02/2010 11:44 PM, Jim Wright wrote:
> > Failure to properly configure Postfix isn't a bug. Documentation exists
> > for a reason, if a config doesn't work, fix the config. Don't complain
> > because magic doesn't happen.
Matt Hayes wrote (on Wed, May 19, 2010 at 12:49:43PM -0400):
> On 5/19/2010 1:03 PM, Josh Cason wrote:
> > I don't know how to explain this. Have you guys every heard of a problem
> > were email is sent to another server and go stray for hours before being
> > delivered? The only network I had prob
Noel Jones wrote (on Tue, May 04, 2010 at 02:33:48PM -0500):
> On 5/4/2010 2:16 PM, Charles Gregory wrote:
> >On Tue, 4 May 2010, Nataraj wrote:
> >>Enclosed is a tcpdump of a telnet connection where nothing was typed,
> >>i.e. I telnetted to the smtp server and 5 seconds later the server
> >>close
Sahil Tandon wrote (on Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 12:02:34AM -0400):
> On Tue, 27 Apr 2010, N. Yaakov Ziskind wrote:
>
> > Sahil Tandon wrote (on Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 11:23:22PM -0400):
> > > Assuming you did not make any mistakes while editing syslog.conf, did
> > > you r
Sahil Tandon wrote (on Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 12:02:34AM -0400):
> On Tue, 27 Apr 2010, N. Yaakov Ziskind wrote:
>
> > Sahil Tandon wrote (on Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 11:23:22PM -0400):
> > > Assuming you did not make any mistakes while editing syslog.conf, did
> > > you r
Sahil Tandon wrote (on Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 11:23:22PM -0400):
> On Tue, 27 Apr 2010, N. Yaakov Ziskind wrote:
>
> > I'd like to stop postfix from scribbling to syslog.
> >
> > syslog stuff from main.cf ('postconf -n' data upon request):
> >
> &g
I'd like to stop postfix from scribbling to syslog.
syslog stuff from main.cf ('postconf -n' data upon request):
syslog_facility = mail
syslog_name = postfix
# grep -v "#" /etc/syslog.conf
auth,authpriv.* /var/log/auth.log
*.*;auth,authpriv.none;mail.none-/var/
Victor Duchovni wrote (on Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 01:28:24AM -0400):
> Also, at this point, with Postfix driving such a large share of the
> Internet email infrastructure,
Can you, please, elucidate on this? Some numbers, perhaps, or a list of
Fortune XX companies that use it? It would be useful in
> Perhaps you missed this in prior email:
>
> - Send non-verbose logging.
>
> - Send logging that covers an entire message life cycle from the
> SMTP port to final delivery.
>
> Wietse
It never ceases to amaze me, how really bright people (and I'm assuming
everyone on this list has an IQ
Victor Duchovni wrote (on Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 03:00:52PM -0400):
> On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 02:37:36PM -0400, N. Yaakov Ziskind wrote:
>
> > # ldd smtpd
> > linux-gate.so.1 => (0xb7f3e000)
> > libpostfix-master.so.1 => /usr/lib/libpostfix-master.so.1 (
N. Yaakov Ziskind wrote (on Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 02:37:36PM -0400):
> Wietse Venema wrote (on Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 02:28:12PM -0400):
> > N. Yaakov Ziskind:
> > > Uh-oh. Just upgraded a Ubuntu box to the latest and greatesti (jaunty
> > > jackelope), and postfix
Wietse Venema wrote (on Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 02:28:12PM -0400):
> N. Yaakov Ziskind:
> > Uh-oh. Just upgraded a Ubuntu box to the latest and greatesti (jaunty
> > jackelope), and postfix is dying all over the place:
> >
> > Apr 24 14:06:25 chocolate postfix/smtpd[
Uh-oh. Just upgraded a Ubuntu box to the latest and greatesti (jaunty
jackelope), and postfix is dying all over the place:
Apr 24 14:06:25 chocolate postfix/smtpd[5176]: connect from unknown[unknown]
Apr 24 14:06:25 chocolate postfix/smtpd[5176]: lost connection after CONNECT
from unknown[unknown
Charles Marcus wrote (on Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 05:51:51AM -0400):
> On 4/24/2009, Vince Sabio (vi...@vjs.org) wrote:
> > I'd rather not post information like that _pro forma_; if there's
> > some subset of that information that might be of help in diagnosing
> > this issue, then I'd be happy to post
Roderick A. Anderson wrote (on Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 11:22:35AM -0800):
> Not too clear from the subject and probably a lame idea.
>
> Situation: We have a system (MX1) that is having hardware problems.
> Currently they are irritations but we want to rebuild the system before
> it really crashes
Wietse Venema wrote (on Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 09:04:04AM -0500):
> N. Yaakov Ziskind:
> > In: DATA
> > Out: 354 End data with .
> > Out: 451 4.3.0 Error: queue file write error
> >
> > puzzling.
>
> The actual problem is logged in the MAILLOG fi
Wietse Venema wrote (on Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 09:03:42PM -0500):
> I'd say, run "postfix set-permissions" and if that does not
> do the job, kill off or update SELINUX, APPARMOR, etc.
>
> Wietse
# postfix/postfix-script: fatal: usage: postfix start (or stop, reload,
abort, flush, or check)
Today a message registered an unfamiliar error in postfix:
Jan 7 20:10:26 geulah postfix/smtpd[2021]: connect from
host67.72.248.165.conversent.net[72.248.165.67]
Jan 7 20:10:28 geulah postfix/smtpd[2021]: 0C846439E2:
client=host67.72.248.165.conversent.net[72.248.165.67]
Jan 7 20:10:28 geula
Magnus Bck wrote (on Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 06:54:55AM +0100):
> On Wednesday, January 07, 2009 at 06:46 CET,
> "N. Yaakov Ziskind" wrote:
>
> > On an email gateway (accepting internet email and passing
> > it on to other machines), how do I send one us
On an email gateway (accepting internet email and passing
it on to other machines), how do I send one user's email
to two different destinations? I tried with aliases, but
that only appears to work with local delivery.
Thanks!
James D. Parra wrote (on Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 03:00:51PM -0800):
> Nov 30 05:54:28 mydomain postfix/smtp[28398]: connect to
> sbcmx5.prodigy.net[207.115.21.24]: Connection timed out (port 25)
> Nov 30 05:54:28 mydomain postfix/smtp[28398]: 3980347D80A2:
> to=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, relay=none, delay
I have a simple (I'll post postconf -n if it would help)
Postfix box that basically takes in mail and hands it off.
I have one user that would like to send and receive mail
from the outside. I'm ok with receiving mail, but I have
to (I think) set up some authentication so that I don't
become an o
34 matches
Mail list logo
