Re: smtpd_recipient_restrictions -- Best Practices

On 12/8/2011 2:04 PM, Peter L. Berghold wrote: Hi folks, Hope this isn't too dumb a question, but here goes: Is there are "best practice" concerning the ordering of the directives to the right hand side of the "=" for smtpd_recipient_restrictions? The reason I'm asking is I added a set of line

Re: Server configuration problem

On 10/4/2011 10:54 AM, Glenn English wrote: I'm getting a huge amount of Server configuration problem rejects. But not all -- I receive from my own nets and some lists. postfix check says I'm OK (I don't know if it checks the configuration(s)), and postfix restarts without complaint. root@se

Re: Request For Port 587

On 8/18/2011 9:13 AM, Carlos Mennens wrote: On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 9:02 AM, Matt Hayes wrote: Carlos, This is a direct quote from a bot running in #postfix on freenode: Port 587 is submission, for user submission of mail, NOT suitable for mail exchange. See the commented example in

Re: Request For Port 587

On 8/18/2011 8:53 AM, Carlos Mennens wrote: Today I received a ticket for altering the way my Postfix server handles mail and I don't understand it. The ticket / request is pasted below: ** According to RFC 4409 client mail submission to an email ser

Re: Sending Bulk Mails

On 6/6/2011 9:36 AM, Randy Ramsdell wrote: > Wietse Venema wrote: >> Stan Hoeppner: >>> On 6/4/2011 6:25 AM, /dev/rob0 wrote: >>> My recommendation to the OP is to consider outsourcing this. It will not cost that much, and a reputable email service provider can be well worth what t

Re: DSN virus

On 4/8/2011 9:31 AM, M. Rodrigo Monteiro wrote: > Hi! > > In my Postfix (2.8.2), I want to send DSN when Amavisd-new (2.6.4) > find a virus. Below is the log. > > Apr 8 10:17:35 SERVER amavis[12988]: (12988-09) Blocked INFECTED > (Eicar-Test-Signature), [XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX] [XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX] > ->

Re: public NIC not answering - connection refused

On 3/21/2011 9:41 AM, lance raymond wrote: > @John - thanks. Will post that output below. > @Matt - SElinux disabled, iptables stopped, so I don't think that is the > case. > > Original post did have; > "intet_interfaces = all which is the only thing I have found so far. " > so I am not sure if

Re: public NIC not answering - connection refused

On 3/21/2011 9:25 AM, lance raymond wrote: > I am close to having this production server in place and working, > running on CentOS 5 patch updated (thanks Steve). I have mysql working > nicely with dovecot, and can send mail using both squirrelmail and > roundcube but all outsite mail in is refus

Re: Windows Live problems - Resolved

On 3/18/2011 2:39 PM, Mark Moellering wrote: > Everyone, > > Thank you for your help. I found the culprit. I was missing the line: > > auth_mechanisms = plain login > > in my dovecot.conf file. Everything works now. Thank you so much for > all your help, > espec

Re: Windows Live problems

On 3/18/2011 12:23 PM, Mark Moellering wrote: > I am new to postfix. I have it set it up with dovecot on a unix box : > postfix 2.8 on freebsd 8.1 > > While it tests fine under Thunderbird (and kde-mail), I currently can't > send mail via Windows Live, although I can receive it. > > I have bee

Re: reverse dns problem

On 3/1/2011 9:53 AM, Matteo Cazzador wrote: > Hello everybody i receive from only one host this error from a postfix > mail virtual host. > Remote server refused my email and said: > > "said: 421 Refused. Your reverse DNS entry does not resolve. (in > reply to RCPT TO command))" > > I mad

Re: "Sorting" mail between different servers?

On 01/08/2011 07:11 AM, Jan Johansson wrote: A customer is migrating their mail environment, and in the interim a bit of trickery is needed. They are currently using a Postfix+Mailscanner machine as a gateway per the http://www.postfix.org/STANDARD_CONFIGURATION_README.html#firewall Now, how wo

Re: my server being used for spam

On 12/22/2010 12:52 PM, Razvan Chitu wrote: > Hello again, > This time the question is simple: my server is being maliciously > used to send spam, and this has to stop. Here are the log entries in > question (latest ones): > > Dec 22 19:03:17 raptor postfix/smtpd[25021]: lost connection after

Re: Temporarily disable mail acceptance

On 12/21/2010 4:35 PM, Tom Hendrikx wrote: > > Hi, > > To do some maintenance work, I need to temporarily disable mail > acceptance in my postfix MX. I'm curious what is the best way to do > this. The 2 (obvious) options I came up with: > > 1) stop listening on tcp/25, f.i. by firewall adjustmen

Re: Scripting changing sending MTA

On 12/14/2010 12:44 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > This is on a Fedora system. > > In the Postfix install documentation I found that I need to do the > following: > > /usr/sbin/alternatives --config mta > > And select '2' to switch to Postfix. > > Is there a way to put this into an install scrip

Re: CC all messages relayed through postfix

On 12/14/2010 11:43 AM, Randy Ramsdell wrote: > Jeroen Geilman wrote: >> On 12/14/10 4:04 PM, Randy Ramsdell wrote: >>> Matt Hayes wrote: >> >>>> >>>> >>>> BCC'ing all of your user's email is unethical IMHO. Scan outgoing and

Re: CC all messages relayed through postfix

On 12/13/2010 9:31 PM, Jerrale G wrote: > How would you store a CC of all mailings relayed through postfix, sent > by our users. We have plenty of logs but they dont tell us if someone > sends spam and how much, so that we may reprimand the user early before > ending up on spam lists. We could even

Re: why does Postfix attempt relay?

On 12/13/2010 10:11 AM, Zhou, Yan wrote: > Hi there, > > I am integrating Postfix 2.3.3 with LDAP. Everything works fine in > development and QA environments, but when the app. moves into our stage > environment, it fails. I do not understand why, but I do know our Stage > environment has tighter

Re: postfix qmgr not happy with db4.1

On 12/10/2010 09:52 PM, Len Conrad wrote: At 08:10 PM 12/10/2010, you wrote: mx1# pkg_info | egrep -i "(postfix|db4)" db41-4.1.25_4 The Berkeley DB package, revision 4.1 postfix-current-2.8.20101108,4 A secure alternative to widely-used Sendmail ... both installed with make and make in

Re: postscreen in snapshot 20101204 drops connections

On 12/6/2010 10:48 AM, Wietse Venema wrote: > I got less mail overnight, and unfortunately that was because of > a mis-coded output error test that caused postscreen to hang up > connections, and that caused clients to keep mail queued. Snapshot > 20101206 fixes this. > > Wietse Thank you

Re: (unknown mail transport error)

On 12/1/2010 12:45 PM, The Doctor wrote: > I am trying to send via majordomo but yet > I do see > > Dec 1 10:35:28 doctor doctor[31]: postfix/error[22238]: 371E112CFAB3: > to=, relay=none, delay=157827, delays=157783/43/0/0.21, dsn=4.3.0, > status=deferred (unknown mail transport error) > >

Re: Postfix and Google

On 10/22/2010 12:46 PM, Cameron Smith wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 9:10 AM, Cameron Smith > wrote: > > I have my mail system set up with 11 Postfix mail servers on my LAN > servers that send mail out through a single Postfix mail gateway. > > mx f

Re: can withholding mails ( postsuper -h ... ) help with tens of thousands of spam mails hogging mailq

On 10/21/2010 10:52 PM, Reinaldo de Carvalho wrote: 1. You are a backscatter (e.g. accepting email to unknown users). 2. or Some account has been compromissed and used to sent spam. 3. look this queue GUi: http://sourceforge.net/dbimage.php?id=215498 (korreio.sf.net) Nice software, onl

Re: Repeated mails

On 10/13/2010 10:17 PM, Alberto Lepe wrote: Yes Matt, I agree with you. However, for some reason a customer is complaining that some people are receiving several copies (in one case up to 15 copies) with exactly the same content, when he/she sent just one mail. I thought at the beginning it may

Re: Repeated mails

On 10/13/2010 09:43 PM, Alberto Lepe wrote: On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 10:33 AM, Matt Hayes mailto:domin...@slackadelic.com>> wrote: On 10/11/2010 10:26 PM, Alberto Lepe wrote: Hello, I need some advice with a problem (I believe is an easy question but I co

Re: Repeated mails

On 10/11/2010 10:26 PM, Alberto Lepe wrote: Hello, I need some advice with a problem (I believe is an easy question but I couldn't find an answer): My server logs is "normally" reporting twice almost every time someone is sending an email: ./mail.log.0:Oct 11 08:58:23 mail postfix/qmgr[5276]:

Re: Authenticated SMTP help

On 10/13/2010 2:32 PM, Don B wrote: > I have setup postfix/dovecot as per www.linuxmail.info with smtp > authentication and this seems to be working well. > > The problem is with auto generated messages (like log reports etc) that > I want to forward to an external address. These seem to be gettin

Re: PATCH: postscreen segfault

On 10/7/2010 9:21 AM, Wietse Venema wrote: > Wietse Venema: >> The following patch for postfix-2.8-20100923 eliminates two race >> conditions. Both are triggered when a client makes N > 1 simultaneous >> connections, and then disconnects M < N connections before postscreen >> has delivered the DNSB

Re: Restricting SASL?

On 10/4/2010 8:47 AM, Nicholas Sideris wrote: > Hello, > > Assuming that I had enabled SASL mechanism. Can I use a mysql: something > list (probably a custom query probing the user table for "1" in a > particular column) to restrict the access to SMTP relay to a very few users? > > eg. > > *s

Re: SMTPD AUTH broke ... ?

On 10/03/2010 09:58 PM, Nicholas Sideris wrote: On Oct 4, 2010, at 4:39 AM, Matt Hayes wrote: On 10/03/2010 09:32 PM, Nicholas Sideris wrote: Hello, I have the following trouble with enabling the smtpd auth for postfix ... First of all I am using Dovecot 1.2.x and I have enabled

Re: SMTPD AUTH broke ... ?

On 10/03/2010 09:32 PM, Nicholas Sideris wrote: Hello, I have the following trouble with enabling the smtpd auth for postfix ... First of all I am using Dovecot 1.2.x and I have enabled everything according to the available on-line HOW TOs. Everything seems fine to me and the appropriate socket

Re: Scanning Mails Relayed via Postfix Server/Spamassassin

On 9/30/2010 8:16 AM, Cimoni Enwis Ogwujiakwu wrote: > Hello, > I have setup a postfix server for scanning mails for spam relayed > through it and I have redirected all port 25 traffic through it from my > firewall but when I try sending mails through > telnet for example smtp.gmail.com 25 > I sti

Re: one more problem...

On 09/27/2010 07:19 PM, Troy Campbell wrote: For some reason I’m not getting emails rejected to unknown users even though I have it in my main.cf configuration file to do that i.e.,: unknown_local_recipient_reject_code = 550 Thanks again in advance for any help, Troy Troy, Please send a

Re: what does this error mean?

On 09/27/2010 07:08 PM, Troy Campbell wrote: Sep 27 15:01:01 abc postfix/qmgr[14745]: fatal: timeout connecting to transport: local Also if there is a site I can go to to search the archives that would be great! Thanks, Troy Troy, Probably best to post your postconf -n to the list with

Re: Please Help Me Secure My Mail Server

On 9/20/2010 4:29 PM, bper wrote: > > Hello, > > I have set up a postfix-dovecot server with smtp-auth using sasl by > following this link: > https://help.ubuntu.com/10.04/serverguide/C/postfix.html > > It seems to be working OK. The only thing is that when I view my logs, I see > a lot of 'rela

Re: force startssl on port 25

On 9/14/2010 1:11 PM, fakessh wrote: > hi guru of postfix > hi mouss and wieste > > hi all the users of ths list > > my question is simply > > is there a way to force startssl on port 25 > or it is not a good method > > many returns are welcome > I don't recommend doing that as not all MTA

Re: Postscreen update

On 09/13/2010 09:31 PM, Sahil Tandon wrote: On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 19:20:05 -0400, Matt Hayes wrote: I'm a bit confused with the postscreen_dnsbl_reply_map option. http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#postscreen_dnsbl_reply_map I've not had to use anything involving a DNSBL and

Re: Postscreen update

On 09/13/2010 07:37 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: Matt Hayes: Thanks for the update. I'm working on implementing this now, however, I'm a bit confused with the postscreen_dnsbl_reply_map option. I know this is useful when you enabled the DEEP checks, which I plan on doing, but want to m

Re: Postscreen update

On 09/13/2010 03:55 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: Postscreen is a single Postfix 2.8 daemon that keeps spambots away from Postfix SMTP server processes, so that more Postfix server resources remain available for handling mail. It will hopefully become part of the next stable Postfix release. After ad

Re: auth failure

On 9/2/2010 9:18 AM, Tom Kinghorn wrote: > Good afternoon list > > This is probably a stupid question, for which I apologize. > > Is there a way to log the username which failed to authenticate using > postfix? > > My logs show alot of messages like: /SASL LOGIN authentication failed: > authen

Re: Relay access denied: simple question

On 08/16/2010 10:44 PM, Alberto Lepe wrote: Hello! One of the mail users have problems sending mails to other domains. Looking at the logs, they display: Aug 17 09:49:55 mail postfix/smtpd[24050]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from *.technowave.ne.jp [210.150.98.251]: 554

Re: Limit the number of messages sent per user?

On 8/13/2010 4:56 PM, Leonel Florin Selles wrote: > i need to limit the number of messages sent per user in postfix, there are > someone to know how can i do that. > > > > I believe you can use policyd to do this. http://policyd.org -Matt

Re: question about Postfix and DNS (maybe not for this list)

On 08/11/2010 08:20 PM, Christopher Adams wrote: Hello all, I am having a bit of a problem and I am not sure that it is specifically Postfix-related, but I'll give it a shot. Feel free to flog me or tell me to go away. I am running Postfix 2.3 on a CentOS Linux server. I noticed on our firewa

Re: why no configure script?

On 08/04/2010 01:23 PM, Jay G. Scott wrote: what's the deal w/ no configure script? you do know that you DON'T NEED autoconf/automake to install, right? they're not hiding behind that old dodge, are they? i'm so sick of that. if i supply a configure script, will you guys use it? every time i

Re: how to get mails out of deferred queue ? (mail loop issue has been resolved in the meantime)

On 8/3/2010 4:50 AM, Dr. Rainer Kaluscha wrote: > Hi, > > we had a mail loop for one user so postfix put all his mails in the > deferred queue: > > to=, status=SOFTBOUNCE (mail forwarding loop for > u...@localhost.intern) > > Then we removed his .forward file so the mail loop issue was resolved.

Re: potconf -A returns a NULL value

On 7/23/2010 4:49 PM, Theodore Durst wrote: > Matt, > > I am probably misunderstanding this, have been playing ith the TLS > configuration but seemed to be spinning my wheels. What we need to do is > encrypt communication between this postfix server (which will only send) > and a relay server on a

Re: potconf -A returns a NULL value

On 7/23/2010 3:51 PM, Theodore Durst wrote: > I have been trying to get postfix running with TLS under AIX 5.2.3 with > no luck. Retracing my steps, I ran postconf and get no response when > running it with -A or -a fags. > > There are no man pages installed on this box and I am an AIX newbie > (c

Re: Info about another listening port on Postfix 2.3.3

On 7/21/2010 9:06 AM, Stefano Villa wrote: > Hi to all! I've a configuration file like this: > > smtp inet n - n - - smtpd >-o content_filter=dfilt: > > and I have to *add* another listening port (TCP 37025). > The line " -o content_filter=dfilt:" has the p

Re: FW: [JOB] Email Sys Admin, NYC | 80-100k+

t; can stay in countryside at my home, I can accept very low offers. > > Tõnu > skype:tonusamuel > > > > -Original Message- > From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org > [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Matt Hayes > Sent: Monday, July 19, 2010

Re: [JOB] Email Sys Admin, NYC | 80-100k+

On 7/19/2010 10:10 AM, Beau Gould (OSS) wrote: > Email Sys Admin, NYC | 80-100k+ > No. I hate unsolicited crap sent to a legit mailing list. Bugger off. -Matt

Re: client certificate?

On Sunday, July 18, 2010 10:47:54 am Wietse Venema wrote: > Christopher Hilton: > > Outlook express can be convinced to use 587 but my experience with > > my users I find that Outlook sometimes changes the port setting > > from 587 to 465 during configuration. > > > > You will need a certificate f

Re: smtp server authentication fail..

On 07/10/2010 02:10 PM, jason welsh wrote: hey list.. im trying to authenticate my postfix smtp server to yahoo/att server, I have followed the following guide http://postfix.state-of-mind.de/patrick.koetter/smtpauth/smtp_auth_mailservers.html and cannot get my server to authenticate.. here is t

Re: Convert an attachment to a link

On 7/7/2010 2:16 PM, Asif Iqbal wrote: > Where do I look in postfix to introduce the following behavior. > > When mail arrives to the mail server, > I like to convert any attachment to link if it is bigger than say 1M and add > a footer in the body like below, before dropping/relaying it to the >

Re: recipient_bcc_maps... noticing duplicate log entries when handing off to remote server

On 7/6/2010 10:43 AM, Victor Duchovni wrote: > On Tue, Jul 06, 2010 at 10:11:27AM -0400, Matt Hayes wrote: > >> I've been watching this for a while and still not sure what could be >> causing it it or if its a known issue, but thought I'd pass it along >> here o

Re: recipient_bcc_maps... noticing duplicate log entries when handing off to remote server

On 7/6/2010 10:11 AM, Matt Hayes wrote: > I've been watching this for a while and still not sure what could be > causing it it or if its a known issue, but thought I'd pass it along > here on the mailing list to see whatever one else thought. > Crap, forgot to add

recipient_bcc_maps... noticing duplicate log entries when handing off to remote server

I've been watching this for a while and still not sure what could be causing it it or if its a known issue, but thought I'd pass it along here on the mailing list to see whatever one else thought. I use recipient_bcc_maps to bcc email to my personal account to Gmail. recipient_bcc contents: -

Re: Postfix.org SPF

n 07/04/2010 10:53 PM, junkyardma...@verizon.net wrote: What is stupid is to be so opposed to anti spam tools that have no significant downside. Makes one wonder about true motives. -- From: "Matt Hayes" Sent: Sunday, July 04, 2010

Re: Postfix.org SPF

On 07/04/2010 10:20 PM, junkyardma...@verizon.net wrote: Some do not accept email from domains whose owner does not publish the servers they authorize to transfer mail for their domain. -- From: "Sahil Tandon" Sent: Saturday, July 03, 2010 11:53 A

Re: Mail blocked if not HTML

On 07/01/2010 10:19 PM, James R. Marcus wrote: I tried your command and it didn't take, I then ran what I posted and it seems to have worked. James On Jul 1, 2010, at 9:33 PM, Matt Hayes wrote: On 07/01/2010 07:29 PM, James R. Marcus wrote: no inspect smtp didn't work for

Re: Mail blocked if not HTML

On 07/01/2010 07:29 PM, James R. Marcus wrote: no inspect smtp didn't work for me. So you tried it and it didn't work or you ran the command and it wasn't correct? -Matt

Re: Mail blocked if not HTML

On 07/01/2010 07:02 PM, James R. Marcus wrote: For the ASA: af-cam-primary# conf t af-cam-primary(config)# class-map inspection_default af-cam-primary(config-cmap)# class inspection_default af-cam-primary(config-cmap)# no fixup protocol smtp 25 I believe its: no inspect smtp Most ASAs I'v

Re: Mail blocked if not HTML

On 07/01/2010 06:50 PM, James R. Marcus wrote: Yes. Well actually an ASA 5520 James On Jul 1, 2010, at 6:34 PM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: * James R. Marcus mailto:jmar...@edhance.com>>: Sorry I didn't post them before I was just trying to do a sanity check. Here they are: --- Po

Re: Mail blocked if not HTML

On 07/01/2010 05:55 PM, James R. Marcus wrote: Sorry I didn't post them before I was just trying to do a sanity check. Here they are: --- Postfix Logs --- Jun 23 16:48:10 relay0 postfix/smtp[30504]: 5ED4F114BBC: to=mailto:sa...@2co.com>>, relay=mail.2co.com[64.128.185.22

Re: Mail blocked if not HTML

On 07/01/2010 05:40 PM, James R. Marcus wrote: Slightly off topic, but a user has observed that any email sent in plain text is bounced, any mail sent as HTML gets sent. Has anyone encountered such an issue? My environment hasn't really changed in months and I'm confused. Thanks, James Ja

Re: Replace Private IP by Server Hostname in mail header

On 6/28/2010 1:07 PM, Rachid Abdelkhalak wrote: > > This is not a problem for me, the end customer's IT boss asked me to see > if it is possible to do it, he dont like to publish theire private IPs > for 'Security reasons'. > > If it is not possible, i have to give him convincing arguments. > >

Re: Should I be removing first received header for client IP

On 6/25/2010 11:06 AM, Mark Krenz wrote: > > Hi, this is more of a policy type of question, but I'm not sure who > else to ask right now. > > We are a small webhosting/email hosting provider. We offer our > clients authenticated SMTP relaying. One of our clients is complaining > because we

Re: "user unknown" when switching LDA

On 06/17/2010 08:31 PM, Darek M wrote: > Hi list, > > I had a properly running install of Postfix/MySQL/virtual, with the > following in main.cf > > virtual_mailbox_domains = > proxy:mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql_virtual_mailbox_domains.cf > virtual_mailbox_base = /home/vmail > virtual_mailbox_maps =

Re: Postfix and Google Apps

On 6/4/2010 3:45 PM, Cameron Smith wrote: > I have google apps managing mail for my domain but would like to use my > server to send newsletters and have run into an issue where I can send > with SMTP from accounts on the server using Postfix but when someone > replies to that email due to MX it ro

Re: ip range other than mynetworks

On 6/3/2010 2:51 PM, Josh Cason wrote: > I decided to impliment some new security and remove pop-before-smtp. But > I have some dialup users and some of them use email. The company I'm > going through is global pops. I would like to add there iprange to > postfix as allowed users. I looked at /etc/

Re: Debian argument.. postfix hostname

, and can't speak to any allowanced postfix does > or doesn't make on that platform. I run postfix on OS X, and don't expect > the OS to provide postfix with everything it needs. > > > Jim > > On Jun 2, 2010, at 9:46 PM, Matt Hayes wrote: > >>

Debian argument.. postfix hostname

Yes.. I know this has come up quite a bit, but on freenode in #postfix this discussion once again erupted when someone mentioned a bug in postfix and referencing this: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=214741 Now, I'm not all that bright on how postfix sorts out the hostname, and

Re: Sender address rejected: Domain not found

On 6/2/2010 8:50 AM, Robert Fitzpatrick wrote: > I am getting a lot of these for various domains... > > Jun 2 07:21:08 esmtp postfix/smtpd[55535]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from > mail.cypresspartners.com[72.242.211.227]: 450 4.1.8 > : Sender address > rejected: Domain not found; > from= > to= proto=

Re: Postfix 2.8 and 2.7 updates ready for testing

On 06/01/2010 08:50 PM, Sahil Tandon wrote: > On Tue, 01 Jun 2010, Matt Hayes wrote: > >> On 06/01/2010 08:30 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: >>> I just uploaded new versions of Postfix 2.8-20100601 "experimental" >>> and a release candidate for Postfix 2.7.1

Re: Postfix 2.8 and 2.7 updates ready for testing

On 06/01/2010 08:30 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: > I just uploaded new versions of Postfix 2.8-20100601 "experimental" > and a release candidate for Postfix 2.7.1 "stable". > > Both versions have the same fixes/workarounds for incompatible > changes in MacOS 10.6, OpenSSL 1.0.0, and Berkeley DB 5.0.21

Re: I've inherited a botnet target

On 5/26/2010 4:32 PM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: > * Matt Hayes : > >> postscreen doesn't require you to use RBL's during its checks, > > Ah yes, the earlytalking and all. > >> however, you have the ability to do so. The nice thing about doing RBL >> c

Re: I've inherited a botnet target

On 5/26/2010 4:21 PM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: > * brian : >> On 10-05-26 03:31 PM, Matt Hayes wrote: >>> >>> I wonder if using something like postscreen from the 2.8-snapshots would >>> help to curtail some of the resource usage. >>> >> &

Re: I've inherited a botnet target

On 5/26/2010 3:35 PM, brian wrote: > On 10-05-26 03:31 PM, Matt Hayes wrote: >> >> I wonder if using something like postscreen from the 2.8-snapshots would >> help to curtail some of the resource usage. >> > > Thanks, I'll check it out. However, I'd feel

Re: I've inherited a botnet target

On 5/26/2010 3:29 PM, brian wrote: > On 10-05-26 03:21 PM, Ansgar Wiechers wrote: >> >> The connections are being rejected, so unless your server resources are >> being exhausted by the delivery attempts I don't think you have to worry >> about it. > > As mentioned in another msg, I neglected to m

Re: I've inherited a botnet target

On 5/26/2010 2:53 PM, brian wrote: > I've a hunch that the following problem is not something that can be > configured away through postfix but, as I'm well aware that my config-fu > is not the strongest, I'd like any advice more experience among you > might have. I'm sure this isn't a rare problem

Re: which port to use for SSL/TLS?

On 5/21/2010 2:33 PM, Phil Howard wrote: > I'm trying to find out what port is to be used with "always on" SSL/TLS > (e.g. no STARTTLS command needed, it just does SSL/TLS once the TCP > connection is made, which I understand smtpd_tls_wrappermode=yes will > do), and the RFCs are coming up empty.

Re: Duplicating e-mail to another server

ad. >> >> Mike A. Leonetti >> As warm as green tea >> > > Look at recipient_bcc_maps[1] > > [1]http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#recipient_bcc_maps > > Brian >> On 05/19/10 13:37, Matt Hayes wrote: >> >>> On 5/19/201

Re: Duplicating e-mail to another server

On 5/19/2010 1:28 PM, Mike A. Leonetti wrote: > We are going to have an off-site e-mail archiving solution that needs to > receive e-mail for certain domains only. How can I have postfix copy > e-mail bound for only certain domains to another server (as well as > deliver it locally)? > Mike, al

Re: Delayed email after leaving my server?

On 5/19/2010 1:03 PM, Josh Cason wrote: > I don't know how to explain this. Have you guys every heard of a problem > were email is sent to another server and go stray for hours before being > delivered? The only network I had problems on was verizion text message. > You send a text msg from your e-

Re: SMTP Authentication in Exchange environment

On 5/13/2010 1:50 PM, Victor Duchovni wrote: > On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 01:07:00PM -0400, Matt Hayes wrote: > >>> You'll also need keys for "host/@EXAMPLE.COM" where >>> "EXAMPLE.COM" is your AD Kerberos realm and "servername" is the h

Re: SMTP Authentication in Exchange environment

On 5/13/2010 12:57 PM, Victor Duchovni wrote: > On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 12:19:04PM -0400, Kaleb Hosie wrote: > >> Hello, >> In our environment, we have a postfix server that receives mail and forwards >> only the HAM onto Exchange. >> >> I have several users that are using notebooks and looking to

Re: SMTP Authentication in Exchange environment

On 5/13/2010 12:19 PM, Kaleb Hosie wrote: > Hello, > In our environment, we have a postfix server that receives mail and forwards > only the HAM onto Exchange. > > I have several users that are using notebooks and looking to send and > receive mail remotely. I have Exchange setup to allow IMAP con

Re: Outgoing Approval Queue - Yes This is a Dumb Idea

On 4/26/2010 8:39 AM, Zachary Burns wrote: > I have a company controller that loves to micro-manage people and > unfortunately loves to do it with software instead of dealing with the > people problem...but anyway I'm getting off on a rant > > Is there a way to have postfix queue outgoing mail

Re: postfix smtp_loop() breaks SMTP

On 04/21/2010 09:45 PM, Mij wrote: > Hello folks, > > Postfix appears to be breaking RFC 5321 by speculatively injecting > the entire envelope session passing over replies from the server. > > In src/smtp/smtp_proto.c , smtp_loop() handles the delivery loop by > deliberately "pipelining" comman

Re: Set submission as to bypass RBLs

On 04/21/2010 09:23 PM, David Cottle wrote: > > > Sent from my iPhone > > On 22/04/2010, at 10:28, Matt Hayes wrote: > >> >> On 04/21/2010 08:14 PM, webmas...@aus-city.com wrote: >>> Quoting Matt Hayes : >>> >>>> n 04/21/2010

Re: Using Sasl authentication and RBL

On 04/21/2010 08:33 PM, Oliver Schinagl wrote: > On 04/22/10 02:10, Matt Hayes wrote: >> On 04/21/2010 07:19 PM, Oliver Schinagl wrote: >> >>> On 04/21/10 23:47, mouss wrote: >>> >>>> Oliver Schinagl a écrit : >>>> >>&g

Re: Set submission as to bypass RBLs

On 04/21/2010 08:14 PM, webmas...@aus-city.com wrote: > Quoting Matt Hayes : > >> n 04/21/2010 07:35 PM, David Cottle wrote: >> >>> #submission inet n - n - - smtpd >>> # -o smtpd_tls_security_level=encrypt >>&g

Re: Using Sasl authentication and RBL

On 04/21/2010 07:19 PM, Oliver Schinagl wrote: > On 04/21/10 23:47, mouss wrote: >> Oliver Schinagl a écrit : >> >>> Hello all, >>> >>> I've been trying to figure out why a new server I setup using postfix >>> doesn't allow me to relay messages after I authenticate (using >>> cyrus-sasl). It app

Re: Set submission as to bypass RBLs

n 04/21/2010 07:35 PM, David Cottle wrote: > #submission inet n - n - - smtpd > # -o smtpd_tls_security_level=encrypt > # -o smtpd_sasl_auth_enable=yes > # -o smtpd_client_restrictions=permit_sasl_authenticated,reject > # -o milter_macro_daemon_name=ORIGINATING S

Re: Major Bug!!

On 4/21/2010 1:20 PM, The Doctor wrote: > Dear Wietse, > > There is a bug in Postfix that should looked at immediately. > > FRom > > http://groups.google.com/group/alt.comp.mail.postfix/browse_thread/thread/fa83dc31cec1194e# > > In case you think I am being pompous, I am not. > > Found the pr

Re: Email service providers

On 12/30/2009 1:43 PM, Port Able wrote: > I am currently consulting for a small retailer. They have been using an > online email service provider for the past few years to blast > personalized emails to their customers (opt-in, and 100-200 thousand > emails at a time). They have asked me to see i

Re: Authenticated SMTP problem

On 12/13/2009 12:13 PM, Walter Breno wrote: > Hi, > i need to force everybody including local network users that uses mail > clients and webmail to authenticate on smtp to send mails from my server > , i has enables sasl_auth modules and authentication is working fine but > when i set the option sm

Re: Should Anyone Be Able To Send Telnet Email

Carlos Williams wrote: > On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 2:16 PM, Martijn de Munnik > wrote: >> If sending e-mail via telnet without a username/password is possible it is >> also possible with a client. > > OK so from that note I gather something with my config is not secure > or wide open. Is this is a

Re: ERROR in tcp protocol

Dhiraj Chatpar wrote: > HI, > > I am getting this error when i am trying to connect my postfix > via transport_maps = tcp:localhost:2525 > > Nov 16 13:48:34 mail postfix/trivial-rewrite[4403]: fatal: unsupported > dictionary type: tcp > Nov 16 13:48:35 mail postfix/master[4145]: warning: process

Re: Webmail

Just E. Mail wrote: > I am posting this message here because I want Postfix uses to suggest a > webmail application best suited with Postfix. This question has been > asked and answered several times but since LINUX is changing so fast, I > am asking again. > > System: CentOS 5.3, NSF-1.3.23, Post

Re: private/hash

Rocco Scappatura wrote: > Hello, > > I get: > > warning: connect #3 to subsystem private/hash: No such file or directory > > In main.cf I set: > > virtual_alias_domains = domain.tld > virtual_alias_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/virtual > > while in /etc/postfix/virtual > > kubasms@ domain.tld

  1   2   >