n 07/04/2010 10:53 PM, junkyardma...@verizon.net wrote:
What is stupid is to be so opposed to anti spam tools that have no
significant downside.
Makes one wonder about true motives.
--------------------------------------------------
From: "Matt Hayes" <domin...@slackadelic.com>
Sent: Sunday, July 04, 2010 7:29 PM
To: <postfix-users@postfix.org>
Subject: Re: Postfix.org SPF
On 07/04/2010 10:20 PM, junkyardma...@verizon.net wrote:
Some do not accept email from domains whose owner does not publish the
servers they authorize to transfer mail for their domain.
--------------------------------------------------
From: "Sahil Tandon" <sa...@freebsd.org>
Sent: Saturday, July 03, 2010 11:53 AM
To: <postfix-users@postfix.org>
Subject: Re: Postfix.org SPF
On Sat, 2010-07-03 at 11:45:39 -0700, junkyardma...@verizon.net wrote:
How about publishing an SPF record for postfix.org.
Why?
--
Sahil Tandon <sa...@freebsd.org>
Rejecting email souly on the fact that a domain doesn't publish an SPF
is stupid.
-Matt
I'm not opposed to it and please stop TOP posting.
-Matt
