On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 8:59 AM, Steve Matzura
wrote:
> I have finished setting everything up on a test system using a
> different flavor of Linux and a more current version of everything
> than my production system. Let's call them prod.example.com and
> test.example.com. Without interrupting ma
On Sun, Apr 6, 2014 at 2:05 PM, Ramesh wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
>
Hi!
> Presently we have primary MX and backup MX servers, when primary goes down
> mails will be queued in secondary MX, once primary restored all messages
> pushed from backup MX to primary MX, messages are not lost. I would like to
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 7:25 AM, wrote:
> On 20.01.2014 12:42, li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
>
>> Am 20.01.2014 12:25, schrieb fr...@3dn.nl:
>>
>>> I'm trying to have postfix use smtp_bind_address with the address set to
>>> multiple IP-aliasses (eg. eth1:0, eth1:1
>>> etc.). As the default gateway is
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 10:49 AM, Miles Fidelman
wrote:
> Hi Folks,
Hi.
>
> I'm currently running a pretty basic high-availability configuration for our
> mail server (postfix) - it simply runs in a Xen virtual machine, with
> mirrored disks across two machines (DRBD), and failover of the VM if
Hi!
Just for your information: not all hosts have correctly set rDNS.
I suggest you try setting up an actual spam filter (like assp,
spamassasin or other), spam is everyday harder to fight.
Ildefonso.
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 3:16 PM, Gary Chambers wrote:
> All,
>
> I had a piece of spam slip th
d should work.
Sincerely,
Ildefonso Camargo
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 11:29 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 09.02.2012 04:49, schrieb Jose Ildefonso Camargo Tolosa:
>> Greetings,
>>
>> Reindi, search through postfix docs for that:
>>
>> + permit_sasl_authent
Greetings,
Reindi, search through postfix docs for that:
+ permit_sasl_authenticated
+ permit_mynetworks (play with the mynetworks definition, so,
initially you allow all mail from your local network, and when *all*
of your users moved to new authenticated schema, you just removed
local network
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 9:03 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Greg Wilson:
>> One attempt
>> was to make 2 entries with the same host name in /etc/hosts
>>
>> e.g
>> 10.222.100.1 exchange.mydomain.local exchange
>> 10.333.200.2
>> exchange.mydomain.local exchange
>>
>> Then changed the transport map
>> t
Hi!
I would answer you with another question:
In the event of a server failure, how are users directed to the other server?
I mean, there are several ways of doing that, and knowing your current
one would be helpful.
Sincerely,
Ildefonso Camargo.
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 6:57 PM, Greg Wilson w
2012/1/10 Leslie León Sinclair :
> Can anyone point me in the right direction, I´m stucked here and Google
> is not helping...
define "telnet" here, do you mean: direct connection to port 25? or an
*actual* telnet session (port 23).
Ildefonso.
>
> Best regards.
>
>
> Participe en Universidad 20
Ok, I agree with /dev/rob0 , this has gone way off topic for this list.
All of us are free to handle spam as we decide to do it, if Dennis
wants to block @yahoo.* @gmail.com @hotmail.com , that's his decision.
In my case, the amount of spam I receive from these domains is
minimal (and is catch by
Posting to list, sorry!
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 11:00 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 17.11.2011 16:20, schrieb Tõnu Samuel:
>> On Thu, 2011-11-17 at 15:39 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
Spammers ARE blacklisted, even they are called "yahoo". Just have good
ISP with good reputation. My s
Greetings,
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 10:30 AM, Mark Goodge wrote:
> On 17/11/2011 14:39, Dennis Clarke wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Today I had an unhappy unix student try to submit an assignment ..
>>
>> tell your students to use the email address provided by the school on the
>> school domain. Also, as
Hi!
People, I just don't get it, what is the point of comments such as:
> > What did I forget?
>
> In my opinion ? A brain.
and
> > What did I forget?
>
> * rm -rf / (Read mail, really fast)
> * A name
> * http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html#mail
>
Jeroen and Bastian, I think that was too
Hi!
Thanks for your answer!
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 7:31 PM, mouss wrote:
> Le 23/08/2010 04:47, Jose Ildefonso Camargo Tolosa a écrit :
>>
>> Hi!
>>
>> I got a curiosity, I have noted that the Date header the mail takes
>> comes from the client computer, so,
Hi!
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 12:30 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 01:41:20PM -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>> Anyway, if you had the time and inclination and were able to get
>> your hands on a few units, it would be great to see some basic
>> queue performance data from you on S
Hi!
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 9:02 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> Stan Hoeppner put forth on 8/16/2010 6:56 PM:
>> Wietse Venema put forth on 8/16/2010 2:36 PM:
>>> Stan Hoeppner:
Google uses less than 1/10th of 1% "Enterprise grade" hardware, using the
typical definition of "Enterprise grade
Hi!
Thanks for your answer!
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 3:34 AM, Ansgar Wiechers wrote:
> On 2010-08-22 Jose Ildefonso Camargo Tolosa wrote:
>> I got a curiosity, I have noted that the Date header the mail takes
>> comes from the client computer, so, if my computer have a wrong d
Hi!
I got a curiosity, I have noted that the Date header the mail takes
comes from the client computer, so, if my computer have a wrong date,
my mail will go out with a wrong date too.
I know the server will put its own timestamp when it process the
message, but the destination mail client will u
Hi!
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 7:50 PM, Christopher Adams wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I am having a bit of a problem and I am not sure that it is specifically
> Postfix-related, but I'll give it a shot. Feel free to flog me or tell me to
> go away.
Ok: go away!
No, just kidding, read on.
>
> I am run
Hi!
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 8:33 AM, Noel Jones wrote:
> On 8/10/2010 2:59 AM, Jacqui Caren-home wrote:
>>
>> Udo Rader wrote:
>>>
>>> On 08/07/2010 05:40 AM, Dennis Carr wrote:
On Fri, 6 Aug 2010, junkyardma...@verizon.net wrote:
> See Zip Attachment
>>
>> I assumed this was a
Hi!
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Jorge Andrea G Carminati
wrote:
> hi all! I've a postfix server with a network table of around 100 IP
> addresses (net/host), is there a way to explicitly permit the relaying to
> the Internet from some of these IPs and others not?
> thanks in advance.
Yes, t
ey.com> wrote:
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 12:17:40AM -0430, Jose Ildefonso Camargo Tolosa
wrote:
> > The plug-ins you...
Most platforms optionally compile-in LDAP support, and link against LDAP
libraries (static or dynamic). Don't confuse run-time dynamic linking
with dynamic loading of ne
Greetings,
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 11:15 PM, Victor Duchovni
wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 11:01:16PM -0430, Jose Ildefonso Camargo Tolosa wrote:
>
>> Of course, postfix support "plug-ins"
>> architecture, so, it is likely that you just need to add the ldap
>&g
Greetings,
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 10:00 AM, Andrew G. Grant
wrote:
> Jose,
>
> Unfortunately, looking at another server OS doesn't help me to find the
> answer to this question. But thank you for the suggestion.
I know, but it would simplify your life.
>
> I am still trying to find out how App
Greetings,
What are you using for SASL authentication, in my case, I'm using
dovecot, which in turn uses pam, which in turn uses LDAP. And then
use:
smtpd_sender_login_maps = ldap:/etc/postfix/sender_login.cf
and
permit_sasl_authenticated on smtpd_recipient_restrictions
and
reject_sender_log
Hi!
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 6:47 AM, spambox wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 10 May 2010 01:00:29 -0430
> Jose Ildefonso Camargo Tolosa wrote:
>
>> Hi!
>>
>> Yes, I know, this is kinda off-topic, but looks interesting.
>
> Thank you for your interest!
&
Hi!
Yes, I know, this is kinda off-topic, but looks interesting.
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 8:08 AM, spambox wrote:
> Hello everyone.
>
> This is my first question here so please forgive me if i'm out of topic or
> something...
>
>
> I'm building up this architecture with postfix + ldap + Courier I
Hi!
This is getting interesting. How, exactly, does mailman (or other
mailing list manager) handles this? I mean, I have seen several
SPF-enabled domains, and these domains have subscriptions to one or
more lists... now, reading the headers for one of the messages of this
lists, I got this:
S
Greetings,
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 10:11 AM, wrote:
> Quoting Jonathan Tripathy :
>
>> Hi Folks,
>>
>> Does anyone know how to make a backup MX server query the primary mx
>> server if a mailbox exsists, before accept the contents of the mail?
>>
>> I have a problem with MAILER-DAEMON messages..
Hi!
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 1:47 PM, LuKreme wrote:
> On 8-Feb-2010, at 17:34, Jose Ildefonso Camargo Tolosa wrote:
>>
>> 100% of the servers I have access to, have,
>> at least once in the last year, been scanned by a bot (or person, who
>> knows) for /roundcoube
Hi!
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 11:44 AM, Mark Goodge wrote:
> On 09/02/2010 16:00, Jose Ildefonso Camargo Tolosa wrote:
>>>
>>> Possibly, although there are different reasons for detesting OE and
>>> Outlook.
>>> OE and Outlook are crap desktop clients
Hi!
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 7:35 AM, Mark Goodge wrote:
> On 09/02/2010 11:53, Thijssen wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 12:28, Mark Goodge
>> wrote:
>>
>>> But for day-to-day use as a long-term replacement for a desktop
>>> client, or for any user who gets a much larger than normal volume
>>>
Hi!
Sorry for keeping the "off-topic"... but I had to answer
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 4:35 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> Kay put forth on 2/1/2010 11:49 AM:
>
>> In my job (hosting company) I see boxes exploited via roundcube all the
>> time. Squirrelmail? Not one so far. Part of the reason is
Hi!
IMHO, you have two choices:
1. Integrate your OS to LDAP, thus making LDAP users also OS (local)
users, in this case, you should make the shell for every "mail-only"
users to /bin/false, or maybe a "menu-like" shell that only let them
run a mail client or something like that (really old-schoo
Hi!
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 3:16 PM, Victor Duchovni <
victor.ducho...@morganstanley.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 06, 2009 at 09:36:17PM +0200, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
>
> > * Terry L. Inzauro :
> > > What is the recommended and most scalable method for implementing SMTP
> Auth
> > > against OpenL
Hi!
I use to use assp along with postfix, and I do the archiving
configuration on ASSP, so that I can have separate SPAM and NOTSPAM
archives.
Anyway, I use Maildir format, and run a script that deletes messages
older that 15 days, but I believe that a similar script can be used
for moving/compre
Hi!
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 7:11 PM, Ray wrote:
> On Wednesday 04 March 2009 16:35:01 Magnus Bäck wrote:
>> On Thursday, March 05, 2009 at 00:26 CET,
>>
>> Ray wrote:
>> > On Wednesday 04 March 2009 16:12:32 Terry Carmen wrote:
>> > > Ray wrote:
>> > > > Alice (al...@example.com) sends Bob a
hink about just letting the spam in. Assp has proved to be very
good, and its free.
If you need any further assistance (maybe help replacing your exchange
with something just as good, and a lot cheaper), don't hesitate to
contact me :) .
Once again, I hope this helps,
Ildefonso
Hi!
On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 8:11 AM, Paul Hutchings
wrote:
> I appreciate that it's hard to make up for the failings of other peoples
> email/internet infrastructure, but I'm looking for options/suggestions
> on how to deal with that old problem of "Blocking unwanted mail when the
> occasional wan
Hi!
On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 11:09 PM, Jorey Bump wrote:
> Jose Ildefonso Camargo Tolosa wrote, at 12/19/2008 08:47 PM:
>> On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 7:19 AM, Jorey Bump wrote:
>>> Jose Ildefonso Camargo Tolosa wrote, at 12/18/2008 06:28 AM:
>>>
>>>> I think y
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 7:19 AM, Jorey Bump wrote:
> Jose Ildefonso Camargo Tolosa wrote, at 12/18/2008 06:28 AM:
>
>> I think you should send more info on your config, for example:
>>
>> MX record for your domain.
>> myhostname entry from main.cf
>>
>&g
Hi!
Well, I don't know what are you doing, but I'm able to send mail to
gmail accounts with no problem at all (from my house's test server,
which is on a DSL line (dynamic IP), by the way, and have a "dyndns"
domain).
I think you should send more info on your config, for example:
MX record for y
hi!
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 4:18 AM, Rocco Scappatura
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 4:49 AM, mouss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > Jose Ildefonso Camargo Tolosa a écrit :
>> >
>> >>> However, Postfix supports access maps t
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 4:49 AM, mouss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jose Ildefonso Camargo Tolosa a écrit :
>
>>> However, Postfix supports access maps that can reject mail for
>>> over-quota users, if you are willing to periodically add up all
>>> the mail
Hi!
On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 9:53 PM, Wietse Venema <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> mouss:
>> Rocco Scappatura a ?crit :
>> > Hello,
>> >
>> > I have a post-office platform based on
>> > Postfix-2.5.2+Courier-IMAP-4.0.1-Courier-authlib-0.53+MySQL-5.0.33.
>> >
>> > Can someone give some hint on how ena
Hi!
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 3:43 PM, Chris St Denis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I need to add support for (multi-recipient) aliases that are only able to
> receive messages from selected users.
>
> I was initially looking at mailman or majordomo, however from what I
> understand of them, they aut
Hi!
I just couldn't avoid reading this post.
I actually make a live out of replacing MS solutions with Open
Source-based solutions. I know, it is not perfect, and there are some
features that you will not get, but in my experience these features
are not used very often.
Anyway, I would give a t
Hi!
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 7:47 AM, Robert Spencer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> Sorry about the OT post, but this list is the most qualified of those
> I'm on to answer this. I've Googled around and experimented for months
> now. The goings slow and I'm hoping someone can give me the
49 matches
Mail list logo
