N from
> localhost[127.0.0.1]*/
>
> I am not sure, why postfix is refusing connection even if telnet to 587
> port is successful
>
>
> where do you see here postfix refuse anything?
>
> *lost* connection != refused connection
> postfix is just the messenger
--
w password, it too will be
found out. When I worked for an ISP, I had to receive notification the
customer's computer was virus/spyware/malware free before I re-enabled
the account with the new password.
> thanks for any pointers, sorry for ot post
--
Duane Hill
duih...@gmail.com
"If at first you don't succeed, so much for sky diving."
Thursday, January 9, 2014, 10:31:30 AM, you wrote:
> Command died with status 1: "/usr/local/bin/filter.sh".
> Command output:
> Jan 9 02:49:28.913 [29829] warn: netset: cannot include
> 127.0.0.0/32 as it has already been included
> Jan 9 02:49:28.913 [29829] warn:
On Monday, 10 December, 2012 at 14:49:47 UTC, doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca
confabulated:
> Direct Question:
> How can postfix used TNEF without an external agent
> such as Amavis or MailSCanner?
> --
> Member - Liberal International This is doc...@nl2k.ab.ca Ici
> doc...@nl2k.ab.ca
> God,Queen a
On Thursday, October 18, 2012 at 11:03:06 UTC, s...@hardwarefreak.com
confabulated:
> On 10/18/2012 4:08 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> i am not soo familar with dnsmasq but have a good expierience
>> with it to do tricks like "i need the content of /etc/hosts
>> via DNS for apache trafficserver wit
On Wednesday, October 10, 2012 at 13:43:13 UTC, salty.cowd...@gmail.com
confabulated:
> Am I missing something here or is postscreen missing from Debian 6.0.3? At
> what version of postfix is postscreen included?
According to documentation, Postfix version 2.8 and later:
http://www.postfix.o
On Wednesday, September 26, 2012 at 10:45:40 UTC, jehe...@gmail.com
confabulated:
> Hi All,
> I want to add multiple aliases file in my configuration. But it s not
> taking more than two aliases file. When I active only
> two aliases file it is working fine. But more than two not working. After
On Saturday, September 08, 2012 at 11:20:49 UTC, achal.toma...@gmail.com
confabulated:
> Yup you are right mailman is not an option have you seen interspire
> software sir?
Have you checked out phpList:
http://www.phplist.com/
> On Sat, Sep 8, 2012 at 4:18 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt <
> ralf.hildebr
On Friday, March 02, 2012 at 14:29:27 UTC, michael.demelba...@wsr.ac.at
confabulated:
> On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 07:19:41AM -0500, Al wrote:
>> I'm curious if anyone uses DBMail with postfix to store mail. If
>> so, what is the performance, could it be ran on the same system as
>> posfix while re
On Wednesday, January 25, 2012 at 13:41:54 UTC, dnsingh@gmail.com
confabulated:
> Duane, I am not using sender restrictions right now, but I can implement it.
> Ralf, can you please tell me a method to append incremental numbers at the
> end of each line? I need to do it as you pointed out.
On Wednesday, January 25, 2012 at 11:58:31 UTC, dnsingh@gmail.com
confabulated:
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 4:04 PM, Ralf Hildebrandt <
> ralf.hildebra...@charite.de> wrote:
>> * DN Singh :
>> > Hello Group,
>> >
>> > I have configured some rejection domains in postfix access file, where it
>>
On Monday, January 02, 2012 at 16:39:47 UTC, otthoncoe...@yahoo.com.br
confabulated:
> Hello,
> You can put this lines on main.cf
> notify_classes = resource, software, bounce
> bounce_notice_recipient = bou...@yourdomain.com
The bounce_notice_recipient would receive a copy of the messa
On Sunday, December 18, 2011 at 08:41:48 UTC, to...@ozses.net confabulated:
> On 18 December 2011 00:34, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>> On 12/17/2011 2:32 PM, Ansgar Wiechers wrote:
>> > On 2011-12-17 Tolga wrote:
>> >> I've been getting a lot of Chinese spam. I've googled and come across
>> >> a guide
On Thursday, December 15, 2011 at 21:41:51 UTC, bjloc...@lockie.ca confabulated:
> I run my own domain off a dynamic IP but all my postfix uses relayhost set to
> smtp.myisp.
> This works 99.9% of the time but I have encountered two recipients
> who use Barracuda's that block email from my domain
On Sunday, December 11, 2011 at 18:38:07 UTC, jseym...@linxnet.com confabulated:
> On Sun, 11 Dec 2011 13:15:28 -0500 (EST)
> Wietse Venema wrote:
> [snip]
>>
>> To turn on maildir support, append a trailing '/' to the name.
> Yes, I caught that. (But thanks for the note, anyway). I plan to
On Friday, December 09, 2011 at 10:46:48 UTC, f.bon...@esiee.fr confabulated:
> Hello
> I actually have one instance running on a host
> running as send only with SASL/TLS to let users
> relay their emails from external world, it runs
> on one IP adress.
> The host has two IP addresses on two et
On Thursday, December 08, 2011 at 19:17:44 UTC, pe...@berghold.net confabulated:
> smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
> permit_mynetworks,
> permit_auth_destination,
> reject_unauth_destination,
> check_sender_access hash:/etc/postfix/access,
> permit_sasl_authenticated,
>
fetch the quota,
> for the specific user with MySQL.
> Best regards.
Have you checked out this page:
http://wiki1.dovecot.org/Quota/Dict
I used the one similar for v2.x and was able to set up per-user quotas
with MySQL.
You should move this discussion over to the Dovecot mailing list.
--
Duane Hill
g/searching several ways to do the same with ease.
> Thanks in advance & for your time.
> Best regards.
I believe doveadm is a part of Dovecot 2.x.
--
Duane Hill
On Tue, 1 Nov 2011, Tolga wrote:
My postconf -n:
...
mynetworks = 127.0.0.0/8 127.0.0.2/32 184.82.40.0/24
You only have to have 127.0.0.0/8. 127.0.0.2/32 is included in the
aforementioned.
...
On Thu, 27 Oct 2011, Fred Kilbourn wrote:
Hi again,
It figures, after finally giving up and posting this, I found what appears
to be a simple solution.
You can configure dovecot use various back ends, I'll just tell it to save
quota information to mysql.
I can then in postfix, use check_recip
On Mon, 17 Oct 2011, Simon Brereton wrote:
Hi
This is a new one on me - I've never seen spammers attempt to use to SASL Auth
to inject spam. Has anyone else seen this?
Oct 17 15:07:16 mail postfix/smtpd[14422]: connect from unknown[208.86.147.92]
Oct 17 15:07:16 mail dovecot: auth(default):
On Wed, 12 Oct 2011 13:05:51 +0530
"J. Bakshi" wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 20:40:03 +0200
> Jeroen Geilman wrote:
>
> > On 2011-10-11 09:52, Tõnu Samuel wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2011-10-11 at 13:14 +0530, J. Bakshi wrote:
> > >> Hello Kirill,
> > >>
> > >> I need incoming mail rejected for nore...
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 4:05 PM, wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am building a Postfix 2.8.5 server. And I am delivering my mail only
> to the Dovecot IMAP mail store using LMTP.
>
> I am following the Wiki pages at www.postfix.org/VIRTUAL_README.html and
> http://www.postfix.org/lmtp.8.html for guidance i
2011/9/28 Niccolò Belli :
> Il 28/09/2011 15:20, Duane Hill ha scritto:
>>
>> You should
>> look at sieve_before and sieve_after in the Dovecot documentation
>
> It works, but I have one last problem.
> I want it to automatically create the junk folder, so I added
2011/9/28 Niccolò Belli :
> Il 28/09/2011 15:02, Noel Jones ha scritto:
>>
>> BTW, you should probably be using
>> reject_unknown_reverse_client_hostname if not already.
>
> Yes, I added it instead of reject_unknown_client_hostname.
> Unfortunately if an user uses a custom sieve script the global o
Hello Jeetu,
Tuesday, August 2, 2011, 9:15:13 AM, you wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm trying to use postscreen using postfix-2.8.4 on rhel-4 64 bit server
> My postconf is
> postscreen_access_list =
> permit_mynetworks,
> hash:/etc/postfix/whitelisted_clients,
> hash:/etc/postfix/
Saturday, July 30, 2011, 8:11:17 AM, I wrote:
> Saturday, July 30, 2011, 3:23:30 AM, Andrea wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 11:40 PM, Victor Duchovni
>> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 11:34:54PM +0200, Andrea Ganduglia wrote:
>>>
> This is not difficult, as long as you don't override
Saturday, July 30, 2011, 3:23:30 AM, Andrea wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 11:40 PM, Victor Duchovni
> wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 11:34:54PM +0200, Andrea Ganduglia wrote:
>>
>>> > This is not difficult, as long as you don't override postfix' default
>>> > behaviour with silly transport_
Wednesday, June 1, 2011, 3:33:41 AM, Ralf wrote:
> * kshitij mali :
>> Thank u ralf
>>
>> Can u please give me link for learn regular experssion
> The best book is:
> http://oreilly.com/catalog/9780596002893
> (IMHO of course)
I also use:
http://www.regular-expressions.info/
--
Duane
Sunday, May 29, 2011, 1:59:39 PM, Ronald wrote:
> Thank you very much for all the helpful suggestions. I have decided
> to go down the transport maps route, as it means I can just quickly
> pop in the delivery settings, temporarily, while I wait for the
> client to update DNS. It's a bit ugly, bu
Hello Ryan,
Tuesday, May 24, 2011, 4:15:39 PM, you wrote:
> Thank you so much for your time. I have removed the line,
> "check_sender_access hash://etc/postfix/sender_access"
> Is there anything else I should do?
> Thanks Again!
> Ryan
> Here is my new config file.
...
> smtpd_client_restrictio
Hello 张耀星,
Monday, May 23, 2011, 8:26:09 AM, you wrote:
> Hi Reindl
> I can't get that now. I'll post that later. But this does seem to be
> the key issue, as the server has been running for more than one year
> without any problem. And I haven't change anything for a long time.
> What do u think
Saturday, May 7, 2011, 4:34:03 PM, you wrote:
> On 05/07/2011 01:13 PM, Dennis Carr wrote:
>> Over the past couple days I'm noticing mail coming in from outside that is
>> supposedly from users of mine - but apparently isn't. HELO message comes
>> from chez-vrolet.net which is in my $mynetworks
Saturday, May 7, 2011, 12:13:53 PM, Dennis wrote:
> Over the past couple days I'm noticing mail coming in from outside that is
> supposedly from users of mine - but apparently isn't. HELO message comes
> from chez-vrolet.net which is in my $mynetworks setting, but the IP
> address for the incomi
OT response and the only one.
Saturday, April 30, 2011, 9:23:14 PM, Michael wrote:
> Just a small follow-up. Using SquirrelMail running on the mail server
> I have since successfully emailed the customer that previously
> rejected a conventional ESMTP message. Note that SquirrelMail also
> includ
Thursday, April 28, 2011, 1:19:11 AM, you wrote:
> Troy Piggins wrote:
>> Wondering how you're solving this for emails sent with Date: headers
>> way in the past or future. What do you think is a reasonably
>> acceptable in terms of dates. 3 days each side of the "correct"
>> date? 3 months?
On Mon, 18 Apr 2011 13:54:11 -0400
Alex wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to configure postfix v2.7.3 on fedora with the best
options
for utilizing RBLs, including zen, and was trying to implement
rbl_reply_maps (as per the STRESS_README of all places):
1 /etc/postfix/main.cf:
2 smtpd_client_restr
On Thu, 14 Apr 2011 13:19:03 -0300
Lima Union wrote:
Hi, I believe that this question is slightly OT but I'm seeing this
syslog format in Postfix: "Apr 10 08:53:12 relay1
postfix/cleanup[16550]:.", my question is if there's a way to
have
also printed the year in the date field? while look
On Mon, 07 Mar 2011 23:47:30 +0100
Reindl Harald wrote:
Especially for the great documentation
Not to mention this list and the vast knowledge all the subscribers
have to offer. It has been invaluable.
On Tue, 1 Sep 2009, rank1see...@gmail.com wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Sahil Tandon
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 23:37:56 -0400
Subject: Re: Simple filter via pipe
On Tue, 01 Sep 2009, rank1see...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't believe I can help you any furth
On Mon, 24 Aug 2009, Schwalbe, Oliver wrote:
Helo Newsgroup,
i will integrate an DNSBL/RBL-Blacklist to avoid SPAM.
So i insert a new row in my main.cf
main.cf before:
[snip]
main.cf after:
smtpd_recipient_restrictions = permit_mynetworks,
On Wed, 13 May 2009, Alvaro Mar?n wrote:
Duane Hill escribi?:
On Wed, 13 May 2009, Alvaro Mar?n wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to delete/discard an emai if it has a header with one value.
I've to do it after it is accepted (and after one content filter
execution) so I
On Wed, 13 May 2009, Alvaro Mar?n wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to delete/discard an emai if it has a header with one value.
I've to do it after it is accepted (and after one content filter
execution) so I thought in smtp_header_checks but I see that it doesn't
support actions like DISCARD.
Any idea
On Wed, 22 Apr 2009, Rick Duval wrote:
I have Postfix installed as part of a Virtualmin installation and I'm
having some emails reject because of size (so the reject says, pasted
below logs from the sending server)
2009-04-22 11:33:58 1LweSG-0004iM-Sn ** rdu...@csm-ltd.com
R=deliver_clean T=re
On Fri, 20 Mar 2009, Brandon Hilkert wrote:
I was able to mount it to a tmpfs partition. There was no change in
throughput with my script on a tmpfs vs ext3 drive.
So that would mean my disk is not a contribution factor right?
I'm just following this thread because of curiosity.
tmpfs? Or,
On Fri, 20 Mar 2009, Chris Dos wrote:
Chris Dos wrote:
Chris Dos wrote:
Noel Jones wrote:
Okay, since the e-mail never finishes sending because the user is
unknown on the other end and it is rejected
right away, is there another way to do this.
The whole point of this exercise for me is to j
On Fri, 20 Feb 2009, Daniel C wrote:
smtpd_recipient_restrictions = permit_mynetworks,
...
reject_rbl_client list.dsbl.org,
Remove this. It is not active. See:
http://dsbl.org/
-d
On Mon, 9 Feb 2009, David Cottle wrote:
I have got RBL tests and I got a client on godaddy. Naturally their
outgoing server (secureserver.net) is listed. I made changes to postfix
but its still rejecting, here is the extract of the main.cf and the rules.
I don't understand why its not wor
On Sat, 24 Jan 2009, Thomas wrote:
Thomas Ackermann wrote:
So, does anybody know what technically is the difference between the use
with and without the signs?
I mean, what network things may happen or not happen?
Nobody knows the technical differences?
Care to take a look at the Postfix d
On Wed, 21 Jan 2009, Todd A. Jacobs wrote:
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 10:08:52PM +, Duane Hill wrote:
Are you sure 'secureserver.net' and/or 'smtp.secureserver.net' are MX
records for the RCPT TO domain of the message you think should be
getting rejected?
Well, DNS sa
On Wed, 21 Jan 2009, Todd A. Jacobs wrote:
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 04:26:27PM -0500, Jorey Bump wrote:
Logically, it doesn't make sense to perform recipient checks before
you know the recipient.
Okay, I'll buy that. But this still doesn't work:
smtpd_delay_reject = yes
smtpd_recipient
On Sun, 18 Jan 2009, Jacky Chan wrote:
Noel Jones-2 wrote:
Jacky Chan wrote:
Dears,
I have serveral digital senders (scanning machine) on site, which relay
my
Postfix 2.5 as default email gateway. From my requirment, they can only
send
mail to INTRANET, I need to restrict those machines from
On Tue, 13 Jan 2009, Guy Story KC5GOI wrote:
...
reject_rbl_client list.dsbl.org,
dsbl.org has been off the air since around mid 2008. You should remove it.
...
On Mon, 5 Jan 2009, Corey Chandler wrote:
Magnus B?ck wrote:
That's because "@example.com" is not the correct syntax for transport
table domain wildcards. Do read transport(5) (hint: drop the "@").
Doh, that'd do it. It started life as a relay recipient map, so that'd
explain it-- I THINK
On Thu, 18 Dec 2008, mouss wrote:
use zen before spamcop. you will then probably realize that spamcop
doesn't catch enough spam thatis not caught by zen.
Very true. We have a datafeed from Spamhaus and out of roughly five
million connections every 24 hours, bl.spamcop.net rejects about 6,000
On Thu, 4 Dec 2008, Sturgis, Grant wrote:
On Thu, 2008-12-04 at 12:05 -0700, Christian Desrochers wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for you reply. Where can I read the archives, please?
Christian
Have you tried Google?
postfix.org is a good place too. You don't even need to search for them.
http://www.p
On Wed, 26 Nov 2008, Sturgis, Grant wrote:
On Tue, 2008-11-25 at 11:53 -0700, Wietse Venema wrote:
Sturgis, Grant:
I'm trying to hide our internal mail servers from the message
headers of
outbound email. I've done some reading about this and have found
two
solutions:
...
2. Use header_
Responding to the original message...
On Fri, 31 Oct 2008, Asai wrote:
Greetings. I've got this log entry over the past few days at the same time
I've been getting this
really strange spam from "worldswidedomainnames.com". This entry is appearing
50 or 60 times per day
in the logs:
1 Oct
On Fri, 31 Oct 2008, Asai wrote:
Greetings. I've got this log entry over the past few days at the same time
I've been getting this
really strange spam from "worldswidedomainnames.com". This entry is appearing
50 or 60 times per day
in the logs:
1 Oct 30 18:59:19 triata postfix/smtp[14090]
On Tue, 28 Oct 2008, Jos Chrispijn wrote:
Sometimes I get this message in my daily overview:
[snip]
Removing stale entries from sendmail host status cache:
mailwrapper: no mapping in /etc/mail/mailer.conf
[snip]
/etc/mail/mailer.conf:
sendmail/usr/local/sbin/sendmail
send-mail
Disregard.
On Wed, 22 Oct 2008, Duane Hill wrote:
I've been able to get a simple content filter running using the example from
(http://www.postfix.org/FILTER_README.html). However, am having problems
getting it to run configured as shown under the advanced content filter
section. I&
I've been able to get a simple content filter running using the example
from (http://www.postfix.org/FILTER_README.html). However, am having
problems getting it to run configured as shown under the advanced content
filter section. I'm not seeing something right. The error shown in the
logs is:
On Wed, 22 Oct 2008, Jose-Marcio Martins da Cruz wrote:
Joey wrote:
Hello All,
Does anyone have a good reference of how to create my own RBL so I can load
IP?s into it and check against it from postfix?
This is a simple script which converts a text file with a list of IP
addresses into a
On Tue, 21 Oct 2008, Jim Balo wrote:
From: Jim Garrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I can highly recommend gray-listing. It's all I use on
two Postfix servers, and SPAM is reduced by 98%. A few
get through, but it's quite tolerable, and I
haven't seen
a false-positive in at least two years.
Hi,
Do
On Tue, 21 Oct 2008, Noel Jones wrote:
Duane Hill wrote:
"practically none" would depend upon your amount of traffic. Our filter
servers get over seven million connections every 24 hours. Sane Security
does a fair job here at pushing the SpamAssassin score above the default
th
On Tue, 21 Oct 2008, Jim Balo wrote:
>You should post the results of 'postconf -n'. Perhaps you are missing
>some
>smtpd_*_restrictions items that could reduce the load.
broken_sasl_auth_clients = yes
command_directory = /usr/sbin
config_directory = /etc/postfix
content_filter = amavisfeed:[1
On Tue, 21 Oct 2008, Terry Carmen wrote:
/[ax]dsl.*\..*\..*/i 450 AUTO_XDSL Email Rejected. You appear to be
connecting from a Dynamic IP address. /client.*\..*\..*/i 450
AUTO_CLIENT Email Rejected. You appear to be connecting from a Dynamic IP
address.
/cable.*\..*\..*/i 450 A
On Wed, 22 Oct 2008, James Brown wrote:
On 22/10/2008, at 9:29 AM, Jim Balo wrote:
Hi,
I am currently using Postfix w/ Amavis-new, Pyzor, DCC and Clam.
I have trained the Bayesian Classifier with over 2,000 ham and 2,000
spam, but I am still getting quite a bit of spam.
I am about to
On Tue, 21 Oct 2008, Jim Balo wrote:
Hi,
I am currently using Postfix w/ Amavis-new, Pyzor, DCC and Clam.
I have trained the Bayesian Classifier with over 2,000 ham and 2,000
spam, but I am still getting quite a bit of spam.
I am about to install a new mail server and I wonder if there is
so
On Wed, 8 Oct 2008, Duane Hill wrote:
On Wed, 8 Oct 2008, Paul Cocker wrote:
But isn't recipient maps purely checking the destination address to see
if it's valid? If so, why does it matter when you check the validity so
long as you do before it reaches its final destination for t
On Wed, 8 Oct 2008, Paul Cocker wrote:
But isn't recipient maps purely checking the destination address to see
if it's valid? If so, why does it matter when you check the validity so
long as you do before it reaches its final destination for that domain
and is bounced?
Let's just assume your s
On Thu, 25 Sep 2008, Kurt Buff wrote:
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 11:04 AM, mouss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 12:55:44PM -0400, Jorey Bump wrote:
mydestination =
mydomain = example.com
myhostname = loki.example.com
Try:
mydestination = $myhostnam
On Tue, 23 Sep 2008, Peter Rabbitson wrote:
Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Peter Rabbitson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi,
I need to protect a specific local address by defining a very low
message_size_limit applicable only to this particular address.
Not possible in general. Only possible if the clien
On Tue, 23 Sep 2008, Meno wrote:
header_checks:
/^Return-Path:\\s+\\/ REJECT
I give up?
-d
On Fri, 19 Sep 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear List,
I am getting mail transport unavailable for one specific domain
'elsevier.com'. How should I debug? We have recently upgraded to Postfix
2.5.5 running on AIX 5.3 OS.
http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html
See the logs below.
On Wed, 17 Sep 2008, Noel Jones wrote:
Milos Prudek wrote:
Dne Wednesday 17 of September 2008 18:32:35 Ralf Hildebrandt napsal(a):
* Milos Prudek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I suspect that my email server has been cracked. How do I make sure it
happened?
You check the logs.
You check the integrity
On Thu, 11 Sep 2008, Nicolas Haller wrote:
Hi all,
I have a little problem with Postfix. I have a Postfix server acting as
fallback_relay. This box have a big queue (between 1 and 10
mails). The box is under FreeBSD and all is ok except this message I see
in syslog:
postfix/qmgr[52291]
On Wed, 3 Sep 2008, Duane Hill wrote:
On Wed, 3 Sep 2008, Raymond Keller wrote:
/^[0-9]+\.[0-9]+\.[0-9]+\.[0-9]+$/554 RFC 2821 does not allow bare
address literals.
FYI- This can be shortened a bit more:
/^(?:\d{1,3}\.){3}\d{1,3}$/ REJECT RFC 2821 does not allow bare address
On Wed, 3 Sep 2008, Raymond Keller wrote:
/^[0-9]+\.[0-9]+\.[0-9]+\.[0-9]+$/554 RFC 2821 does not allow bare
address literals.
FYI- This can be shortened a bit more:
/^(?:\d{1,3}\.){3}\d{1,3}$/ REJECT RFC 2821 does not allow bare address
literals.
Also, I don't see under:
http:
On Fri, 22 Aug 2008, Michael G. Reed wrote:
Worked like a champ. (for anyone else interested, put "OK"
for "dunno" below and you're good to go :). Thanks!
Take CAREFUL consideration in using "OK". It can open your server up like
a can of worms. Telling Postfix OK will bypass all fur
On Fri, 22 Aug 2008, Raymond Jette wrote:
Good morning,
The following is in my main.cf file:
Relay_recipient_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/relay_recipients,
Hash:/etc/postfix/relay_recipients_oldmailsystem
This is working good. The problem I am having is using a cron job to schedu
On Wed, 20 Aug 2008, John Baker wrote:
Hi,
I user reported mail not getting to him from somebody and I found this in the
log:
NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from bmmail.cwf.org[216.54.2.34]: 504 : Helo
command rejected: need fully-qualified hostname; from=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
to=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Wed, 20 Aug 2008, James wrote:
I added a header check to reject empty subjects.
The error from the server for an empty subject is:
"Server replied: 550 5.7.1 message content rejected"
Can I change it to say "empty subject rejected?
You should be able to add that into the header check. I.e.
On Tue, 19 Aug 2008, Adam C. Mathews wrote:
Presenting using the following blacklists...
dul.dnsbl.sorbs.net
psbl.surriel.com
zen.spamhaus.org
These do a good job for me, but I wanted to look for opinions on a
couple additional ones. Specifically look for false-positive opinions,
adding addi
On Thu, 14 Aug 2008, Vince Sabio wrote:
** At 16:07 + on 08/14/2008, Duane Hill wrote:
On Thu, 14 Aug 2008, Vince Sabio wrote:
** At 15:42 + on 08/14/2008, Duane Hill wrote:
2.5.1 is there.
Here's what I've got:
ares-root# ls -ld /usr/ports/mail/postfix*
drwxr-xr-x 3 r
On Thu, 14 Aug 2008, Vince Sabio wrote:
** At 15:42 + on 08/14/2008, Duane Hill wrote:
On Thu, 14 Aug 2008, Vince Sabio wrote:
Okay, I've upgraded to v2.4, which seems to be the most current version in
FreeBSD ports (not v2.5 ... not sure why). Now I just need to figure out
what
On Thu, 14 Aug 2008, Vince Sabio wrote:
** At 11:00 -0400 on 08/14/2008, Wietse Venema wrote:
Vince Sabio:
I upgraded my FreeBSD server to v7.0-RELEASE -- everything seems to
be running fine *except* for postfix. When I start postfix, I get:
ares-root# postfix start
postfix/postfix-script
On Thu, 14 Aug 2008, Wietse Venema wrote:
Vince Sabio:
I upgraded my FreeBSD server to v7.0-RELEASE -- everything seems to
be running fine *except* for postfix. When I start postfix, I get:
ares-root# postfix start
postfix/postfix-script: warning: damaged message: corrupt/AE0AB49AF76
postfix/p
On Thu, 7 Aug 2008, Rich Shepard wrote:
Every now and then a message that should be rejected by one of my UCE
filters makes it though to my inbox. Today, three of them did so. I'd like
to learn how to find why the lists aren't working on occasion.
The most frequently involved list is badip (I
On Mon, 4 Aug 2008, Jay Chandler wrote:
I'm attempting to map local_recipient_maps via a Pgsql query.
The database contains the username portion of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is there a way to append @example.com to the result of the lookup query?
I'm not familiar with Pgsql. However, MySQL has a con
91 matches
Mail list logo
