[pfx] Re: Handing off via localhost:10025 to spamassassin for scanning failure

2024-06-29 Thread Curtis J Blank via Postfix-users
in those log entries. Just saying looks like my expectations were off... On 6/29/24 11:59, Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users wrote: On 29.06.24 10:28, Curtis J Blank via Postfix-users wrote: I meant to mention I do not see any connections/traffic on port 10026 in the mail logs. see

[pfx] Re: Handing off via localhost:10025 to spamassassin for scanning failure

2024-06-29 Thread Curtis J Blank via Postfix-users
I meant to mention I do not see any connections/traffic on port 10026 in the mail logs. -Curt On 6/29/24 10:21, Curtis J Blank via Postfix-users wrote: On 6/29/24 04:01, Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users wrote: On 29.06.24 01:41, Curtis J Blank via Postfix-users wrote: No I am not

[pfx] Re: Handing off via localhost:10025 to spamassassin for scanning failure

2024-06-29 Thread Curtis J Blank via Postfix-users
On 6/29/24 09:38, Bill Cole via Postfix-users wrote: On 2024-06-28 at 23:45:33 UTC-0400 (Fri, 28 Jun 2024 22:45:33 -0500) Curtis J Blank via Postfix-users is rumored to have said: OK I tired this. What "mydestination" is set to does not matter whether it's localhost or 127.

[pfx] Re: Handing off via localhost:10025 to spamassassin for scanning failure

2024-06-29 Thread Curtis J Blank via Postfix-users
On 6/29/24 08:40, Ralph Seichter via Postfix-users wrote: * Curtis J. Blank via Postfix-users: Everything except this that is: mydestination = $myhostname, localhost.$mydomain, $mydomain, www.$mydomain Should this be set to: mydestination = $myhostname, 127.0.0.1.$mydomain, $mydomain, www

[pfx] Re: Handing off via localhost:10025 to spamassassin for scanning failure

2024-06-29 Thread Curtis J Blank via Postfix-users
On 6/29/24 04:01, Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users wrote: On 29.06.24 01:41, Curtis J Blank via Postfix-users wrote: No I am not confusing inbound and outbound not you, someone other perhaps :-) and for this I'm only concerned about inbound and actually only on ports 10024-26

[pfx] Re: Handing off via localhost:10025 to spamassassin for scanning failure

2024-06-28 Thread Curtis J Blank via Postfix-users
   -o mynetworks=127.0.0.0/8     -o smtpd_use_tls=no     -o smtp_use_tls=no spamtnsp   unix  -   n   n   -   -   local     -o alias_maps=lmdb:/etc/aliaases On 6/29/24 01:26, Peter via Postfix-users wrote: On 29/06/24 18:09, Curtis J Blank via Postfix-users wrote: I don'

[pfx] Re: Handing off via localhost:10025 to spamassassin for scanning failure

2024-06-28 Thread Curtis J Blank via Postfix-users
ual_alias_domains = lmdb:/etc/postfix/virtual virtual_alias_maps = lmdb:/etc/postfix/virtual On 6/28/24 23:27, Peter via Postfix-users wrote: On 29/06/24 15:16, Curtis J Blank via Postfix-users wrote: Peter, my  misunderstanding, sorry. This is what I discovered today in my testing. I expl

[pfx] Re: Handing off via localhost:10025 to spamassassin for scanning failure

2024-06-28 Thread Curtis J Blank via Postfix-users
set to use 127.0.01 explicitly. If anyone can explain the detailed why I am curious to know. Thanks, -Curt On 6/28/24 22:16, Curtis J Blank via Postfix-users wrote: Peter, my  misunderstanding, sorry. This is what I discovered today in my testing. I explicitly used 127.0.0.1 and not localhost

[pfx] Re: Handing off via localhost:10025 to spamassassin for scanning failure

2024-06-28 Thread Curtis J Blank via Postfix-users
Yeah I thought of including the config but that OP was long due to all the logging so I didn't want to make it longer. I did say in my OP I would provide anything if requested. -Curt On 6/28/24 21:11, Peter via Postfix-users wrote: On 29/06/24 05:59, Curtis J Blank via Postfix-users

[pfx] Re: Handing off via localhost:10025 to spamassassin for scanning failure

2024-06-28 Thread Curtis J Blank via Postfix-users
tfix-users wrote: On 29/06/24 03:17, Curtis J Blank via Postfix-users wrote: Well Peter all the "mynetworks =" that I have defined explicitly state 127.0.0.1 not localhost and all the logging shows 127.0.0.1 not localhost. So that is why I say I am using 127.0.0.1. So I cannot follow

[pfx] Re: Handing off via localhost:10025 to spamassassin for scanning failure

2024-06-28 Thread Curtis J Blank via Postfix-users
tool to drill the hole in the cable. When the DESTA came out and you could use Thinwire (coax) that was a revolution!. Yes I'm old. LOL https://gunkies.org/wiki/DEC_Ethernet_Transceivers On 6/28/24 12:59, Curtis J Blank via Postfix-users wrote: Always in a good mood. It's a waste not

[pfx] Re: Handing off via localhost:10025 to spamassassin for scanning failure

2024-06-28 Thread Curtis J Blank via Postfix-users
ch off that backbone. TCP/IP was in it's infancy too at the time. That was over 30 years before ipv6 was around so localhost was 127.0.0.1 and now to me, oh yeah, ::1 is too now. -Curt On 6/28/24 12:09, Ralph Seichter via Postfix-users wrote: * Curtis J. Blank via Postfix-users: What I

[pfx] Re: Handing off via localhost:10025 to spamassassin for scanning failure

2024-06-28 Thread Curtis J Blank via Postfix-users
Thank you, Alexander, Matus, Jaroslaw, Peter, and Bill, just the kind of ideas I was looking for. My old postfix server is running 2.11 and I have not dealt much with postfix really since then because like I said it just worked, did what I needed it to do. Currently I'm working with 3.9 and I

[pfx] Re: Handing off via localhost:10025 to spamassassin for scanning failure

2024-06-28 Thread Curtis J Blank via Postfix-users
ter via Postfix-users wrote: * Curtis J. Blank via Postfix-users: I would like to get some insight as to the cause and correct configuration to use. [...] Maybe it is simply too early in the morning for me to get your point, but what insight are you looking for, exactly? You already found out that

[pfx] Handing off via localhost:10025 to spamassassin for scanning failure

2024-06-27 Thread Curtis J Blank via Postfix-users
I would like to get some insight as to the cause and correct configuration to use. Building a new server that in part is my postfix server and spent the last couple of days pulling my hair out trying to get it to deliver mail. I have an existing postfix server that has been working since 2014