Hi All,
I need some help in interpreting the following postfix log message,
please (this is showing up all over the log):
`Feb 24 17:46:55 mail postfix/smtpd[77980]: fatal:
smtpd_peer_hostaddr_to_sockaddr: cannot convert client address/port to
string: Servname not supported for ai_socktype`
It appears that Bill Cole via Postfix-users
said:
>What sort of "support" would you expect to see in a MTA?
When that RFC was published a lot of us were sceptical that anyone would use
the Author header
since there had been no interest whatsoever from any MTA or MUA developers or
operators.
A
Steffen Nurpmeso via Postfix-users wrote:
> I recall answers from John Klensin (2821, 5321, and more) were a list
> of in existence email piggybacks were each dressed down with a very
> short sentence.
your memory may be faulty. jck has never said anthing short.
randy
___
Bill Cole via Postfix-users wrote in
<6595a7f0-83ed-4abf-9062-61dd6134f...@billmail.scconsult.com>:
|On 2025-02-23 at 15:01:15 UTC-0500 (Sun, 23 Feb 2025 21:01:15 +0100)
|Steffen Nurpmeso via Postfix-users
|is rumored to have said:
...
|> it. Anyhow. I wanted to ask for long why postfix do
On 2025-02-23 at 15:01:15 UTC-0500 (Sun, 23 Feb 2025 21:01:15 +0100)
Steffen Nurpmeso via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
Hello.
Yes, unfortunately online on a Sunday, i should better have let
it. Anyhow. I wanted to ask for long why postfix does not
support the RFC 9057 Author: heade
P.S.:
Postfix users wrote in
<4z1fyh6j5nzj...@spike.porcupine.org>:
|Steffen Nurpmeso via Postfix-users:
|> Yes, unfortunately online on a Sunday, i should better have let
|> it. Anyhow. I wanted to ask for long why postfix does not
|> support the RFC 9057 Author: header, as it fixes a miss
Postfix users wrote in
<4z1fyh6j5nzj...@spike.porcupine.org>:
|Steffen Nurpmeso via Postfix-users:
|> Yes, unfortunately online on a Sunday, i should better have let
|> it. Anyhow. I wanted to ask for long why postfix does not
|> support the RFC 9057 Author: header, as it fixes a miss that
Steffen Nurpmeso via Postfix-users:
> Hello.
>
> Yes, unfortunately online on a Sunday, i should better have let
> it. Anyhow. I wanted to ask for long why postfix does not
> support the RFC 9057 Author: header, as it fixes a miss that
> starts with DomainKeys, and goes on ever since, and reache
Hello.
Yes, unfortunately online on a Sunday, i should better have let
it. Anyhow. I wanted to ask for long why postfix does not
support the RFC 9057 Author: header, as it fixes a miss that
starts with DomainKeys, and goes on ever since, and reached the
mountaintop of madness with the advent of
