On Thu, Aug 01, 2024 at 12:54:16AM +0300, Dāvis Mosāns via Postfix-users wrote:
> and in master.cf I have:
> submissions inet n - n - - smtpd
>-o syslog_name=postfix/submissions
>-o smtpd_tls_wrappermode=yes
>-o smtpd_tls_security_level=encrypt
>-
On Wed, Jul 31, 2024 at 10:36:00PM +0200, John Fawcett via Postfix-users wrote:
> My first thought was to follow RFC7505 and define null mx records for my
> example.com that has no email accounts, so no server will bother to try and
> deliver email to it.
>
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc750
Davis Mosans via Postfix-users:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to setup Postfix in a way that will forward/relay all mail
> on SMTP port 25 but send out (don't forward) email when receiving on
> submission port 465.
You cant to receive email on port 465 and want to send that out to
the internet? That requi
Hi,
I'm trying to setup Postfix in a way that will forward/relay all mail
on SMTP port 25 but send out (don't forward) email when receiving on
submission port 465.
In main.cf I have:
transport_maps = lmdb:/etc/postfix/transport
and inside there I have
* smtp:[internal.example.org]:2525
and in mas
On 31/07/2024 23:34, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote:
I came across something that I have not seen before: a domain (call it
example.com) that has no email addresses. No one sends or receives email
for that domain.
If there is no email from sen...@example.com, the domain should say
so in
> I came across something that I have not seen before: a domain (call it
> example.com) that has no email addresses. No one sends or receives email
> for that domain.
If there is no email from sen...@example.com, the domain should say
so in SPF, DKIM, DMARC, and so on. Cloudflare has a webpage o
Hi
this is completely off topic for this list (there is only a marginal
connection since Postfix is the MTA but it's not a Postfix question),
but maybe someone has knowledge on this.
I came across something that I have not seen before: a domain (call it
example.com) that has no email address
I have updated some documentation:
> > We have an always_bcc setup in place for incoming mails:
> >
> > recipient_bcc_maps = pcre:/etc/postfix/backup_bcc.pcre
> >
> > /^(.*)@charite\.de$/backup+${1}=charite.de@backup.invalid
Added to the text for always_bcc, sender_bcc_maps, recipie
Ralf Hildebrandt via Postfix-users:
> We have an always_bcc setup in place for incoming mails:
>
> recipient_bcc_maps = pcre:/etc/postfix/backup_bcc.pcre
>
> /^(.*)@charite\.de$/backup+${1}=charite.de@backup.invalid
>
> Now I tried to redirect mails from my private address sent to an
On 2024-07-30 at 16:13:07 UTC-0400 (Tue, 30 Jul 2024 16:13:07 -0400)
John Thorvald Wodder II via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
I'm not claiming that "spamgateway.nil" is the actual domain. I'm
using a placeholder here because I don't want to draw attention to an
actual, real domain.
On 2024-07-30 at 15:28:58 UTC-0400 (Tue, 30 Jul 2024 15:28:58 -0400)
John Thorvald Wodder II via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
(I previously posted this request for help on ServerFault but got no
responses, so I'm hoping the official Postfix mailing list will go
better.)
This has al
Ralf Hildebrandt via Postfix-users:
> > Jul 31 09:24:13 mail-cbf-int postfix/error[2664442]: 4WYk9n2SK3z20ycy:
> > to=,
> > orig_to=, relay=none,
> > delay=0.62, delays=0.57/0.02/0/0.03, dsn=5.1.1, status=bounced (User
> > unknown)
>
> It works, if I replace toscx.hrn...@charite.de with the ac
Dnia 30.07.2024 o godz. 16:19:01 John Thorvald Wodder II via Postfix-users
pisze:
> The "access" file currently contains REJECT lines for both
> "spamgateway.nil" (no leading period) and ".spamgateway.nil" (leading
> period), and I did the postmap-and-restart dance after updating it, but
> the e-m
> Jul 31 09:24:13 mail-cbf-int postfix/error[2664442]: 4WYk9n2SK3z20ycy:
> to=,
> orig_to=, relay=none,
> delay=0.62, delays=0.57/0.02/0/0.03, dsn=5.1.1, status=bounced (User unknown)
It works, if I replace toscx.hrn...@charite.de with the actual mailbox
address after address expansion (thrn...
Ok, thanks, yes, debian.
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
Ah, thanks. Yes, of course. 🙁
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
On Jul 30, 2024, at 15:58, Wietse Venema wrote:
For actual support, you can reduce the detective work providing
CONCRETE details as in https://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html#mail
Actual configuration as reported by Postfix.
On 30.07.24 16:13, John Thorvald Wodder II via Postfix-users wrote
On 30.07.24 16:40, Gilgongo via Postfix-users wrote:
Thanks for all the replies on this - food for thought! Seems the general
consensus is that while in theory I should reject for p=reject (since
that's what the sender wants me to do), in practice things like mailing
lists and other forwarding co
We have an always_bcc setup in place for incoming mails:
recipient_bcc_maps = pcre:/etc/postfix/backup_bcc.pcre
/^(.*)@charite\.de$/backup+${1}=charite.de@backup.invalid
Now I tried to redirect mails from my private address sent to anybody
at charite.de to be redirected to someone el
19 matches
Mail list logo
