On July 5, 2024 3:03:58 PM UTC, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
wrote:
>On Fri, Jul 05, 2024 at 08:45:49AM -0400, Scott Kitterman via Postfix-users
>wrote:
>
>> > Note, "undo" isn't quite what I'm suggesting, rather I hope Debian will
>> > replace the hardcoded preëmpt of the Cyrus SASL conf
On Fri, Jul 05, 2024 at 08:45:49AM -0400, Scott Kitterman via Postfix-users
wrote:
> > Note, "undo" isn't quite what I'm suggesting, rather I hope Debian will
> > replace the hardcoded preëmpt of the Cyrus SASL configuration directory,
> > by a default value of $cyrus_sasl_config_path, that match
On Friday, July 5, 2024 4:00:59 AM EDT Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 04, 2024 at 05:01:41PM -, John Levine via Postfix-users
> wrote:
>
> > OK, I'll invent a user. Perhaps if we can get Scott to undo the control
> > file move he can add a sasl user at the same time.
On Fri, 5 Jul 2024 at 09:10, Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users <
postfix-users@postfix.org> wrote:
> I think in case of amavis it's just the order of logs being written.
> IIUC amavis does not confirm receiving message from postfix until after
> it's
> scanned and passed further, which is w
Thank you for your reply, Viktor.
So I've been wrong for the past few years in thinking it was working.
Surprising (to me!) but yet another warning to not pick up "working
configurations" from web sites (and possibly mis-read them). :(
I understand what you're saying. I may have mistaken chec
On 05.07.24 08:42, Gilgongo via Postfix-users wrote:
I'm setting up a server to handle outbound mail for sasl auth accounts and
would like to scan that mail for spam and malware before DKIM signing
because I assume scanning might potentially add headers that could break
the sig.
Right now I have
On Fri, Jul 05, 2024 at 08:42:31AM +0100, Gilgongo via Postfix-users wrote:
> # For OpenDKIM signing
> 127.0.0.1:10027inetn-n--smtpd
> ... configs...
> -o smtpd_milters=inet:127.0.0.1:8891
>
> So I assume DKIM should come last. But the logs imply the spam/v
On Thu, Jul 04, 2024 at 05:01:41PM -, John Levine via Postfix-users wrote:
> OK, I'll invent a user. Perhaps if we can get Scott to undo the control file
> move he can add a sasl user at the same time.
Note, "undo" isn't quite what I'm suggesting, rather I hope Debian will
replace the hardco
I'm setting up a server to handle outbound mail for sasl auth accounts and
would like to scan that mail for spam and malware before DKIM signing
because I assume scanning might potentially add headers that could break
the sig.
Right now I have the following (extract) in my Amavis conf:
$interface
