Hi,
I had missed something simple I guess,
lists..xx.nz local:
in the transport file
Once in mail gets delivered to mailman OK.
regards
Steven
From: Koga Hayashi
Sent: Wednesday, 25 November 2020 3:45 PM
To: Steven Jones ; postfix-users@postfix.org
Steven,
A bit more information about your postfix server configuration will be greatly
appreciated.
postconf -n
If possible, let us see the log when loop occurs.
regards
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org On
Behalf Of Steven Jones
Sent: Monday, November 23, 2020 8:49 AM
To: postfix-users@
On 25/11/20 1:53 am, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
However, this thread is off-topic. We should close it with conclusion:
don't avoid duplicate mail based on Message-Id:
A better conclusion would be to not consider messages with a missing or
empty Message-Id to be duplicates of each other. I
On 24/11/20 3:56 am, Wietse Venema wrote:
Jaroslaw Rafa:
Dnia 23.11.2020 o godz. 10:18:39 D'Arcy Cain pisze:
I used to have a client who was not getting emails from one of his
friends. Turned out that the friend's client/MUA was not adding the
message ID.
Doesn't Postfix automatically add M
On 24 Nov 2020, at 17:23, Jaroslaw Rafa wrote:
> That's the reason why I ignore the specifics of your setup and concentrate
> on de-duplication in general.
Interesting rationalization. But sure, have it your way.
--
'A man like that could inspire a handful of broken men to conquer a
cou
Dnia 24.11.2020 o godz. 16:25:54 @lbutlr pisze:
>
> Note that the headers you include have NEITHER a reply-to header NOR an
> X-Listname header. Why? Because those are added BY MY MAILSERVER.
[...]
> Not talking about average mail users, Never have been talking about
> average mail users. This s
On 24 Nov 2020, at 15:08, Jaroslaw Rafa wrote:
> Dnia 24.11.2020 o godz. 14:37:13 @lbutlr pisze:
>>> Only the copy that went through the mailing list has those,
>>
>> No.
>>
>> Please re-read what I wrote.
>
> So, I looked through my archives and found an actual message from this
> mailing list
Hi Richard,
Amavisd-new can be extended to support SAVDI. I am using it in one of my
installation. Just google search amavisd + savdi, there are numerous
documentation on how to do so.
Kind regards
On Tue, Nov 24, 2020, 9:07 PM Richard Siddall
wrote:
> michael Schumacher wrote:
> > Joe,
> >
>
Dnia 24.11.2020 o godz. 14:37:13 @lbutlr pisze:
> > Only the copy that went through the mailing list has those,
>
> No.
>
> Please re-read what I wrote.
So, I looked through my archives and found an actual message from this
mailing list, that someone sent both to me and to list. Below are the ac
On 24 Nov 2020, at 13:57, Jaroslaw Rafa wrote:
> Dnia 24.11.2020 o godz. 12:20:23 @lbutlr pisze:
>>> I'm not talking about client getting confused about threading. I'm talking
>>> about the fact that when you get only an off-list message and reply to it,
>>> the reply goes only to the original sen
Dnia 24.11.2020 o godz. 12:20:23 @lbutlr pisze:
> > I'm not talking about client getting confused about threading. I'm talking
> > about the fact that when you get only an off-list message and reply to it,
> > the reply goes only to the original sender and not to the list,
>
> No, that is not the
On 24 Nov 2020, at 02:44, Jaroslaw Rafa wrote:
> Dnia 23.11.2020 o godz. 16:29:13 @lbutlr pisze:
>>
>> This is not accurate. First, the direct message almost certainly arrives
>> first.
>
> Unless you use greylisting
That's a whole different issue and anyone using greylisting now I would never
On 23 Nov 2020, at 23:55, Bob Proulx wrote:
> @lbutlr wrote:
>> Bob Proulx wrote:
>>> But so many people use Gmail these days that they have gotten used to
>>> the way Gmail does things. And Gmail de-duplicates and saves the
>>> first message with any particular message-id that arrives. And then
On 23 Nov 2020, at 23:51, Bob Proulx wrote:
> @lbutlr wrote:
>> On 23 Nov 2020, at 15:27, Jaroslaw Rafa wrote:
>>> Dnia 23.11.2020 o godz. 11:49:39 D'Arcy Cain pisze:
If someone replies to a mailing list and copies the sender then that
person gets two copies. The above recipe avo
On 24 Nov 2020, at 05:50, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> On 23.11.20 16:30, @lbutlr wrote:
>> Or you use procmail/Sieve to add a reply-to header to messages that have
>> the mailing list email in the headers.
> It's silly to set up procmail rule to remove "duplicate" message and then
> set up ru
> michael Schumacher wrote:
>> Joe,
>>
Due to some recent malware (in attachments, obvious stuff) wanted to add AV
> scanning. I gather "Amavis-new" is the hot ticket these days,
>>> I deal with Sophos products and would like to use their linux product to do
> the scanning. Seems to be preci
michael Schumacher wrote:
Joe,
Due to some recent malware (in attachments, obvious stuff) wanted to add AV scanning. I
gather "Amavis-new" is the hot ticket these days,
I deal with Sophos products and would like to use their linux product to do the
scanning. Seems to be precious little on
On 24.11.20 13:50, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
note that it's possible to Bcc: message to mailing list so it does not
contain list address in To:/Cc:
... as this message clearly shows.
I set mailing lists not to avoid duplicate messages (and usually drop direct
mail).
However, this thread
Dnia 23.11.2020 o godz. 11:49:39 D'Arcy Cain pisze:
If someone replies to a mailing list and copies the sender then that
person gets two copies. The above recipe avoids that.
On 11/23/20 5:27 PM, Jaroslaw Rafa wrote:
If someone gets two copies - a direct one and the mailing list one - then
h
On 11/24/20 1:51 AM, Bob Proulx wrote:
> @lbutlr wrote:
>> On 23 Nov 2020, at 15:27, Jaroslaw Rafa wrote:
>>> Dnia 23.11.2020 o godz. 11:49:39 D'Arcy Cain pisze:
If someone replies to a mailing list and copies the sender then that
person gets two copies. The above recipe avoids that.
>>
Dnia 23.11.2020 o godz. 16:29:13 @lbutlr pisze:
>
> This is not accurate. First, the direct message almost certainly arrives
> first.
Unless you use greylisting :) - in that case list message usually arrives
first, as the direct message is generally from previously unknown sender and
has to wait.
21 matches
Mail list logo
