> On Oct 7, 2019, at 7:46 PM, Jaroslaw Rafa wrote:
>
>> Unless your system sends all mail to statically configured
>> relays listed in /etc/hsots, you MUST NOT set:
>>
>> smtp_host_lookup = native
>
> But "native" doesn't mean /etc/hosts only! Native means system-configured
> name resoluti
Dnia 7.10.2019 o godz. 19:40:40 Viktor Dukhovni pisze:
>
> Unless your system sends all mail to statically configured
> relays listed in /etc/hsots, you MUST NOT set:
>
> smtp_host_lookup = native
But "native" doesn't mean /etc/hosts only! Native means system-configured
name resolution an
> On Oct 7, 2019, at 6:09 PM, Jaroslaw Rafa wrote:
>
> I found in the documentation that I have to add the parameter
> "smtp_host_lookup=native" to main.cf to make Postfix use system configured
> name resolution instead of trying to resolve names by itself.
Unless your system sends all mail to s
Gerben Wierda:
> > Turns out it is not hard to create the postlog client socket early
> > (i.e. before chroot). I drafted some code during my train commute,
> > needs to be cleaned up and tested. Maybe that will be sufficient
> > to make logging work on MacOS.
>
> That sounds like a plan. For the
On Tue, 8 Oct 2019, Jaroslaw Rafa wrote:
(However, it didn't help with my original Gmail issue - even mail relayed
via another server still goes to spam on the receiving side :()
Jaroslaw,
While not directly related to your issue, I've found that some clients who
use gmail end up with message
Dnia 8.10.2019 o godz. 00:09:34 Jaroslaw Rafa pisze:
> As I have trouble with sending emails to Gmail (I wrote about it in a
> different thread), I try to configure Postfix to send mail to Gmail via a
> different mail server as a relay. However, for reasons too long to explain
> here, I would like
As I have trouble with sending emails to Gmail (I wrote about it in a
different thread), I try to configure Postfix to send mail to Gmail via a
different mail server as a relay. However, for reasons too long to explain
here, I would like Postfix to refer to that server via hostname that I
defined i
El lun, 07-10-2019 a las 01:48 +0200, Gerben Wierda escribió:
> permit_mynetworks,
> permit_sasl_authenticated,
I don't see the need for these two in the data restriction class.
Quoting "Robert Schetterer", who wrote on 2019-10-07 at 18:21 Uhr +0200:
Also a wide bug is not to include the ipv6 stuff in SPF, did you
checked this, in the past creating a extra transport for google
only via ipv4 was helpfull too
At least for madduck.net, I have SPF set to "v=spf1 ?all", wh
martin f krafft skrev den 2019-10-07 18:48:
I really appreciate all your eyeballs. I really do!
http://multirbl.valli.org/ good place to test all is ok
Robert Schetterer skrev den 2019-10-07 18:21:
Also a wide bug is not to include the ipv6 stuff in SPF, did you
checked this, in the past creating a extra transport for google only
via ipv4 was helpfull too
amazon have around 80 ipv4 adresses in there spf, is this nearly as
good as +all :(
Quoting "Allen Coates", who wrote on 2019-10-07 at 10:15 Uhr +0100:
Only one set of double-colons is allowed in an IPv6 address. It expands to an
unspecified number of zeros; doing it twice results in ambiguity.
Quoting "Wietse Venema", who wrote on 2019-10-07 at 07:00 Uhr -0400:
The form "2
Am 07.10.19 um 07:11 schrieb martin f krafft:
Quoting "Wietse Venema", who wrote on 2019-10-06 at 19:13 Uhr -0400:
Perhaps the SMTP client IP address 2001:db8:bad::cafe:: has no PTR
record (or the name does not resolve to 2001:db8:bad::cafe::).
Good point, but the address has a PTR record to a
> On 7 Oct 2019, at 15:50, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> Wietse Venema:
>> Gerben Wierda:
If it is chroot related, try turning off smtpd chroot in master.cf,
and do "postfix reload?.
>>>
>>> Indeed, it is. If I turn chroot from y to n, I get my logging.
>>
>> Great. Do you insist on chro
Jaroslaw Rafa:
> Dnia 7.10.2019 o godz. 23:54:41 Peter pisze:
> >
> > We get this question on IRC a lot as well, it's a common problem.
> > The generic answer I always give is this:
> >
> > If you're having problems getting your mail received by major ESPs
> > you should first check your fcrdns*
Wietse Venema:
> Gerben Wierda:
> > > If it is chroot related, try turning off smtpd chroot in master.cf,
> > > and do "postfix reload?.
> >
> > Indeed, it is. If I turn chroot from y to n, I get my logging.
>
> Great. Do you insist on chroot? If so, does MacOS have strace or
> ktrace? Maybe you
Dnia 7.10.2019 o godz. 23:54:41 Peter pisze:
>
> We get this question on IRC a lot as well, it's a common problem.
> The generic answer I always give is this:
>
> If you're having problems getting your mail received by major ESPs
> you should first check your fcrdns*, then make sure you have SPF
Gerben Wierda:
> > If it is chroot related, try turning off smtpd chroot in master.cf,
> > and do "postfix reload?.
>
> Indeed, it is. If I turn chroot from y to n, I get my logging.
Great. Do you insist on chroot? If so, does MacOS have strace or
ktrace? Maybe you can find out if there is a diff
On 8/10/19 12:04 AM, Jaroslaw Rafa wrote:
Dnia 7.10.2019 o godz. 23:54:41 Peter pisze:
Also sign up for ESP-specific programs such as
feedback loops, Google postmaster tools and Microsoft's SNDS. Check
the individual postmaster pages for each ESP that you're having
problems with to make sure th
Dnia 7.10.2019 o godz. 23:54:41 Peter pisze:
> Also sign up for ESP-specific programs such as
> feedback loops, Google postmaster tools and Microsoft's SNDS. Check
> the individual postmaster pages for each ESP that you're having
> problems with to make sure that you're in compliance with all of
>
martin f krafft:
> Quoting "Wietse Venema", who wrote on 2019-10-06 at 19:13 Uhr -0400:
> >Perhaps the SMTP client IP address 2001:db8:bad::cafe:: has no PTR
> >record (or the name does not resolve to 2001:db8:bad::cafe::).
>
> Good point, but the address has a PTR record to a name with an
On 7/10/19 5:36 AM, martin f krafft wrote:
Folks,
I hope this is not too off-topic, but I figure this is the best mailing
list because we're probably not in this boat alone, wherein we're
annoyed (very) and a bit helpless about Google. I have to ask here,
because Google of course doesn't care
On 07/10/2019 06:11, martin f krafft wrote:
> Quoting "Wietse Venema", who wrote on 2019-10-06 at 19:13 Uhr -0400:
>> Perhaps the SMTP client IP address 2001:db8:bad::cafe:: has no PTR record (or
>> the name does not resolve to 2001:db8:bad::cafe::).
>
> Good point, but the address has a PTR re
23 matches
Mail list logo
