> Am 24.01.2017 um 17:38 schrieb Wietse Venema :
>
> Christian Ro??ner:
>>
>>> Am 24.01.2017 um 12:48 schrieb Wietse Venema :
>>>
>>> Maybe you can start with a "null" proxy and smtpd_proxy_filter,
>>> and add some modifications to the SMTP command stream based
>>> on sender.
>>
>> Not sure, i
how about mounting ceph or glusterfs disk to
message store?
eero
25.1.2017 5.18 ap. "Patrick Domack" kirjoitti:
> This would not be a good thing to do, as deleted email will magically
> reappear.
>
> Using unison to sync it worked for me, over 10years ago. But these days,
> just use dsync part
This would not be a good thing to do, as deleted email will magically
reappear.
Using unison to sync it worked for me, over 10years ago. But these
days, just use dsync part of dovecot, and your life will be happy.
Quoting Patrick Chemla :
Hi Wietse,
Of course I thought about such NAS so
Hi,
On 01/24/2017 04:39 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> I understand that nginx uses the XCLIENT protocol to send client
> IP address information to Postfix. This is supported in smtpd(8)
> but it not in postscreen(8), because XCLIENT requires SMTP, and
> postscreen(8) normally does not receive SMTP in
On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 11:47 AM Vernon Fort
wrote:
> What’s the best way to get the latest version of postfix on centos 7?
>
Google "centos postfix build" and click on the first link, which is my
walk-thru for upgrading Postfix on CentOS, including CentOS 7.
I've been manually building Postfix
eval:
> I have Postfix/postscreen 3.1.4 + AV/AS/etc. running on a hosted
> VM.
>
> It acts as a front-end, delivering to another postfix instance
> that's on my LAN; the comm's over a VPN link.
>
> The local postfix instance delivers via LMTP to an IMAP store,
> currently on the same box. It also
I have Postfix/postscreen 3.1.4 + AV/AS/etc. running on a hosted VM.
It acts as a front-end, delivering to another postfix instance that's on my
LAN; the comm's over a VPN link.
The local postfix instance delivers via LMTP to an IMAP store, currently on the
same box. It also provides port 587
It turns out the previous admin neglected to include a section in master.cf
to indicate the relay port that was specified in the dkimproxy_in.conf file.
Adding that section cured the problem. Apparently the old system running on
lenny somehow tolerates the omission without causing any problems.
Very good, then. Thanks!
--
View this message in context:
http://postfix.1071664.n5.nabble.com/Postfix-can-t-send-from-localhost-tp88417p88458.html
Sent from the Postfix Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On 25/01/17 03:06, Vernon Fort wrote:
>> There's also detailed instructions on how to install the postfix packages at:
>> http://ghettoforge.org/index.php/Postfix3
>
> I also found this - https://oostergo.net/ - which appears to be a bit more
> updated.
How so? They're both at 3.1.4, the latest
On 1/24/2017 1:03 PM, bithead wrote:
> Scott - can you (or anyone else) shed some light on why there would be a DKIM
> content filter on the pickup process? Nothing I've read about DKIM so far
> has ever shown an example of why one might do that. As previously
> indicated, I've inherited this ser
Scott - can you (or anyone else) shed some light on why there would be a DKIM
content filter on the pickup process? Nothing I've read about DKIM so far
has ever shown an example of why one might do that. As previously
indicated, I've inherited this server, so am trying to back-learn the
previous
Benning, Markus:
> If /dev/log would not be hardcoded in syslog.h it would be possible to
> make the socket configurable in postfix and output directly to the
> rsyslog process.
Postfix does not write to the logging socket. The library does.
Wietse
Christian Ro??ner:
>
> > Am 24.01.2017 um 12:48 schrieb Wietse Venema :
> >
> > Maybe you can start with a "null" proxy and smtpd_proxy_filter,
> > and add some modifications to the SMTP command stream based
> > on sender.
>
> Not sure, if I totally understand. Null-Porxy meaning postfix
> proce
Hi, my problem is that postfix respond with the same reject code for
over-quota user and non-existent user (reject code 5.5.0 in both cases) ;
is right for non-existent user but for over-quota is 5.5.2.
my psotconf -n
address_verify_map =
alias_database = hash:/etc/aliases
alias_maps = hash:/etc/
Hiroyuki Sato:
> I set up NSS(nslcd) and PAM config for LDAP on CentOS6.
> And I got the following error when the postfix server can't connect to
> LDAP server.
> During this message, a user(in LDAP) lookup fail.
Postfix gets the information from THE SYSTEM LIBRARY FUNCTION
getpwnam_r().
* If get
* Mark Van Crombrugge :
> At this point I receive the above e-mail.
>
> In the e-mail details below, I can find that the message is sent by
> ironp...@ucr.ac.cr but even adding this e-mail address to the Postfix
> blacklist has no effect.
Why not block the machine litio.ucr.ac.cr [163.178.174.
On 1/24/2017 9:32 AM, Mark Van Crombrugge wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> We use Postfix - Dovecot – Sympa – spamassassin – clamav on an
> Ubuntu 14.04 server.
>
> Last week we sent out a message to a Sympa mailing list and one of
> the e-mail addresses was in Costa-Rica. (@ucr.ac.cr)
>
> Since then we
If /dev/log would not be hardcoded in syslog.h it would be possible to
make the socket configurable in postfix and output directly to the
rsyslog process.
:-(
On 2017-01-23 15:04, wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
And the logging daemon uses more CPU than Postfix. We're back 20 years
ago.
--
htt
I think you have a bounce loop with mailman? bouncing each bounce message from
ironport.
I would make sure the mailman queue is empty.
Ben
> On Jan 24, 2017, at 10:38 AM, Noel Jones wrote:
>
> On 1/24/2017 9:32 AM, Mark Van Crombrugge wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>>
>> We use Postfix - Dovecot – S
Hi,
We use Postfix - Dovecot – Sympa – spamassassin – clamav on an Ubuntu 14.04
server.
Last week we sent out a message to a Sympa mailing list and one of the e-mail
addresses was in Costa-Rica. (@ucr.ac.cr)
Since then we keep receiving an e-mail from their Cisco Iron Port system about
eve
On 24/01/17 10:57, Brad Chandler wrote:
>> Take a look at the gf-plus repository on Ghettoforge.
>> http://ghettoforge.org/index.php/Usage
>There's also detailed instructions on how to install the postfix packages at:
>http://ghettoforge.org/index.php/Postfix3
I also found this - https://oosterg
> Am 24.01.2017 um 12:48 schrieb Wietse Venema :
>
> Maybe you can start with a "null" proxy and smtpd_proxy_filter,
> and add some modifications to the SMTP command stream based
> on sender.
Not sure, if I totally understand. Null-Porxy meaning postfix process with
smtpd_proxy_filter option co
On 24/01/17 10:57, Brad Chandler wrote:
> Take a look at the gf-plus repository on Ghettoforge.
> http://ghettoforge.org/index.php/Usage
There's also detailed instructions on how to install the postfix
packages at:
http://ghettoforge.org/index.php/Postfix3
Peter
Hi Wietse,
Of course I thought about such NAS solution, but I wanted to check if
there is a way with 2 separate disks, with a kind of that could be aware
of emails files changes.
Actually, the mail server run onto a VM, on a big server. I have another
big server with same emails VM, and I ju
Hello, Wietse
Thank you for replying.
You mean that the Postfix server should not stop connection to LDAP server?
Even it is OS issue, can I change unknown user status?
I set up NSS(nslcd) and PAM config for LDAP on CentOS6.
And I got the following error when the postfix server can't connect to
Maybe you can start with a "null" proxy and smtpd_proxy_filter,
and add some modifications to the SMTP command stream based
on sender.
Wietse
Patrick Chemla:
> Hi,
>
> I have a running Fedora 24 emails server using postfix 3.1.3, with courier.
>
> I wonder how to build a pair of MTAs to secure emails at all time,
> having 2 servers receiving the emails, and users could connect to either
> server to get emails, maybe on a load balance
mar...@black-sheep-research.com:
> Any suggestion please?
Use an external content filter (Postfix is not a content-management
system). See
http://www.postfix.org/FILTER_README.html
http://www.postfix.org/MILTER_README.html
http://www.postfix.org/SMTPD_PROXY_FILTER.html
Wietse
Hiroyuki Sato:
> Hello, members.
>
> Is it possible to return 4XX value of the
> unknown_local_recipient_reject_code,
> when the mail server can't connect to LDAP server?
How does POSTFIX call the LDAP server? If it is done
via PAM_LDAP, please file a bug with your OS vendor
that PAM_LDAP mis-han
Hi,
I have a running Fedora 24 emails server using postfix 3.1.3, with courier.
I wonder how to build a pair of MTAs to secure emails at all time,
having 2 servers receiving the emails, and users could connect to either
server to get emails, maybe on a load balanced way.
Problems are with sy
Any suggestion please?
On 19 Jan 2017, 09:16 +, Martin Brampton ,
wrote:
> This is somewhat related to:
>
> On 19/01/2017 08:53, Petr Bena wrote: Re: How to effectively block
> communication to all domains except whitelisted?
>
> Since the start of this year, the amount of mail blocked by bla
Hello, members.
Is it possible to return 4XX value of the
unknown_local_recipient_reject_code,
when the mail server can't connect to LDAP server?
I have a postfix mail server. And It stores user information in the LDAP
server(Via PAM).
When the mail server disconnects to LDAP, currently the post
33 matches
Mail list logo
