Re: envelope/header rewriting for a single client

2016-11-10 Thread Geert Stappers
On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 02:17:01PM +1100, Richard James Salts wrote: > On 11/11/16 11:00, btb wrote: > >On Nov 10, 2016, at 17.17, Noel Jones wrote: > >>On 11/10/2016 4:05 PM, btb wrote: > >>>hi- > >>> > >>>i have an "appliance" which submits mail. it's inflexible, > >>>unfortunately, and uses cra

Re: envelope/header rewriting for a single client

2016-11-10 Thread Richard James Salts
On 11/11/16 11:00, b...@bitrate.net wrote: On Nov 10, 2016, at 17.17, Noel Jones wrote: On 11/10/2016 4:05 PM, btb wrote: hi- i have an "appliance" which submits mail. it's inflexible, unfortunately, and uses crappy values for the envelope sender and the from: header. i have communicated wi

Re: envelope/header rewriting for a single client

2016-11-10 Thread btb
On Nov 10, 2016, at 17.17, Noel Jones wrote: > > On 11/10/2016 4:05 PM, btb wrote: >> hi- >> >> i have an "appliance" which submits mail. it's inflexible, >> unfortunately, and uses crappy values for the envelope sender and the >> from: header. i have communicated with the vendor in an attempt

Re: envelope/header rewriting for a single client

2016-11-10 Thread Noel Jones
On 11/10/2016 4:05 PM, btb wrote: > hi- > > i have an "appliance" which submits mail. it's inflexible, > unfortunately, and uses crappy values for the envelope sender and the > from: header. i have communicated with the vendor in an attempt to > rectify this, but as might be expected, the outcom

envelope/header rewriting for a single client

2016-11-10 Thread btb
hi- i have an "appliance" which submits mail. it's inflexible, unfortunately, and uses crappy values for the envelope sender and the from: header. i have communicated with the vendor in an attempt to rectify this, but as might be expected, the outcome has been less than successful. hopefully so

Re: 421 4.4.2 service timed out

2016-11-10 Thread Wietse Venema
Rob A: > We are having issues sending emails with attachments over ~2 MB to some > recipients. In the situations were we have an error, the remote server > responds with "421 4.4.2 service timed out. (in reply to end of DATA > command)". If the problem is really size dependent (email does not g

Re: 421 4.4.2 service timed out

2016-11-10 Thread Rob A
What sort of network stats would be useful to diagnose the problem? Below is the output of netstat -s It looks like data is being transmitted fine up until the point that the remote server sends a [TCP Window Update] (see packet 1750 below). At that point my postfix server doesn't respond and th

Re: 421 4.4.2 service timed out

2016-11-10 Thread Keith Williams
That is exactly what it says, a service time out when you are sending email. You are probably on a very active server, a very bad/slow or busy connection. How busy is your server? Do you have some network stats? On 10/11/2016 21:54, Rob A wrote: We are having issues sending emails with att

421 4.4.2 service timed out

2016-11-10 Thread Rob A
We are having issues sending emails with attachments over ~2 MB to some recipients. In the situations were we have an error, the remote server responds with "421 4.4.2 service timed out. (in reply to end of DATA command)". We are not having these issues with all recipients, but there are many r

Re: which has priority settings, main.cf or master.cf?

2016-11-10 Thread Wietse Venema
vod vos: > We can configure [parameters] in main.cf > And can overwrite parameters=value in master.cf like; > -o > smtpd_recipient_restrictions=reject_non_fqdn_recipient,reject_unknown_recipient_domain,permit_sasl_authenticated,reject > > which has priority setting? See 'man 5 master'.