On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 05:37:33PM +1300, Peter wrote:
> The main problem with this is that one of the primary advantages to
> using a DNSRBL is that it sits in front of SpamAssassin. DNSRBL
> blockign does not require deep inspection of message content so it can
> be checked first and clients blo
On 04/10/16 07:02, Sean Greenslade wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 03, 2016 at 01:47:28PM -0400, Fongaboo wrote:
> I personally don't use RBLs as hard blocks. Instead, I have them set up
> in my spam filter (SpamAssassin) with different weights. That way, if
> one particular RBL is acting up, I can de-weight
On Sat, 1 Oct 2016 15:31:28 +0200
John Fawcett wrote:
> I can't speak from hosting experience, but forcing authenticated smtp
> connections and rate limiting them with a policy service (like policyd
> or postfwd) would be my solution if I had to do this. That would have
> the advantages of being a
On Mon, Oct 03, 2016 at 05:25:15PM -0400, Fongaboo wrote:
>
> Running Postfix 2.11.7 on FreeBSD 10.2-RELEASE. I am migrating a
> listserv on an older box to this one, running newly-installed
> Mailman 2.1.20.
>
> I found a one-pager that showed me what to tar up and move over to
The tarball, doe
Running Postfix 2.11.7 on FreeBSD 10.2-RELEASE. I am migrating a listserv on an
older box to this one, running newly-installed Mailman 2.1.20.
I found a one-pager that showed me what to tar up and move over to migrate my
lists to the new instance of Mailman. Hostname is not changing, so that
On Mon, Oct 03, 2016 at 02:59:08PM -0400, Fongaboo wrote:
>
> On Mon, 3 Oct 2016, Sean Greenslade wrote:
>
> > I personally don't use RBLs as hard blocks. Instead, I have them set up
> > in my spam filter (SpamAssassin) with different weights. That way, if
> > one particular RBL is acting up, I c
> On Oct 3, 2016, at 11:57 AM, Viktor Dukhovni
> wrote:
>
>
>> On Oct 3, 2016, at 2:55 PM, Viktor Dukhovni
>> wrote:
>>
>> It should not be surprising that the correct key/value pair is:
>>
>> joeu...@foo.com joeu...@foo.com
>
> Oops, the RHS should have been "joeuser" without a domain.
On Mon, 3 Oct 2016, Sean Greenslade wrote:
I personally don't use RBLs as hard blocks. Instead, I have them set up
in my spam filter (SpamAssassin) with different weights. That way, if
one particular RBL is acting up, I can de-weight it and keep an eye on
it without it affecting delivery.
The
> On Oct 3, 2016, at 2:55 PM, Viktor Dukhovni
> wrote:
>
> It should not be surprising that the correct key/value pair is:
>
> joeu...@foo.com joeu...@foo.com
Oops, the RHS should have been "joeuser" without a domain.
# LHS = sender address RHS = list of logins
u...@exampl
> On Oct 3, 2016, at 2:38 PM, Jeremy Hansen wrote:
>
>> The table lookup key is a sender address, and the RHS is a list of
>> logins, so this example is backwards.
>
> So if my smtp authenticated username is just say “joeuser” which is a local
> unix account on the server and the email address
Thanks for the response.
> On Oct 3, 2016, at 9:44 AM, Viktor Dukhovni
> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 03, 2016 at 11:35:54AM +0200, Niklaas Baudet von Gersdorff wrote:
>
>> For example, if I want to send email from n...@niklaas.eu from my
>> account m...@niklaas.eu, I'd need the following entry in
>
Fongaboo:
>
> I'm running Postfix 2.11.7 on FreeBSD 10.2-RELEASE.
>
> Just wanted to get folks' opinions/rationale/thoughts on behavior of some
> of the RBL's.
>
> Specifically SORBS.NET... I first set up my server using a popular FreeBSD
> tutorial. SORBS.NET was included in a list of recomme
> On Oct 3, 2016, at 10:47 AM, Fongaboo wrote:
>
>
> I'm running Postfix 2.11.7 on FreeBSD 10.2-RELEASE.
>
> Just wanted to get folks' opinions/rationale/thoughts on behavior of some of
> the RBL's.
>
> Specifically SORBS.NET... I first set up my server using a popular FreeBSD
> tutorial. S
On Mon, Oct 03, 2016 at 01:47:28PM -0400, Fongaboo wrote:
>
> I'm running Postfix 2.11.7 on FreeBSD 10.2-RELEASE.
>
> Just wanted to get folks' opinions/rationale/thoughts on behavior of some of
> the RBL's.
>
> Specifically SORBS.NET... I first set up my server using a popular FreeBSD
> tutoria
I'm running Postfix 2.11.7 on FreeBSD 10.2-RELEASE.
Just wanted to get folks' opinions/rationale/thoughts on behavior of some
of the RBL's.
Specifically SORBS.NET... I first set up my server using a popular FreeBSD
tutorial. SORBS.NET was included in a list of recommended RBL's in the
lates
On Mon, Oct 03, 2016 at 11:35:54AM +0200, Niklaas Baudet von Gersdorff wrote:
> For example, if I want to send email from n...@niklaas.eu from my
> account m...@niklaas.eu, I'd need the following entry in
> smtpd_sender_login_maps:
>
> m...@niklaas.eu n...@niklaas.eu
The table lookup key is
On Mon, Oct 03, 2016 at 10:50:33AM -0500, Allison Jones wrote:
> mailing list manager. I believe I have a configuration problem with
> Postfix, but I'm not sure. I have tried to search google, as well as the
> listserv archives. The only messages I see with similar warnings come from
> foreign-
I am running Postfix+amavis in combination with spamassassin, and Sympa,
the mailing list manager. I believe I have a configuration problem with
Postfix, but I'm not sure. I have tried to search google, as well as
the listserv archives. The only messages I see with similar warnings
come from
Jeremy Hansen [2016-10-03 01:24 -0700] :
> I’m trying to wrap my head around what the issue is. I realize
> there’s a mismatch but I’m having trouble understanding exactly
> what the mismatch is or where to fix it.
>
> My smtpd_sender_login_maps=hash:/etc/postfix/valiases contains:
>
> @foo.com
I’m new to postfix. I’ve been using qmail for many years and decided it was
time to move on.
I’m running in to one issue:
553 5.7.1 : Sender address rejected: not owned by user user;
from= to=
In master.cf I had:
-o smtpd_sender_restrictions=reject_sender_login_mismatch
I’m trying to wrap m
20 matches
Mail list logo
