Can I have input about this recommendation? Is there unreasonable security
risk? I think not, but I want to double check
On 02/28/2016 10:51 PM, Ruben Safir wrote:
> On 02/29/2016 01:34 AM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
>> I think we can fix your issue fairly simply.
>>
>> Please, as I asked in my reply a
> Date: Sunday, February 28, 2016 21:56:48 -0500
> From: Ruben Safir
>
> On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 02:46:40AM +, Richard wrote:
>>
>> > Date: Sunday, February 28, 2016 21:07:19 -0500
>> > From: Ruben Safir
>> >
>> > Ah - ok I'm learning something at least..
>> >
>> > Mostly some address bo
On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 02:46:40AM +, Richard wrote:
>
>
> > Date: Sunday, February 28, 2016 21:07:19 -0500
> > From: Ruben Safir
> >
> > Ah - ok I'm learning something at least..
> >
> > Mostly some address bounces, cruft from the list 4 list sends
> > sandwiched in betweem at 17:17:14 a
> Date: Sunday, February 28, 2016 21:07:19 -0500
> From: Ruben Safir
>
> Ah - ok I'm learning something at least..
>
> Mostly some address bounces, cruft from the list 4 list sends
> sandwiched in betweem at 17:17:14 and change.
>
> Two things about this bother me. Previously with majordom
On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 07:37:34PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Ruben Safir:
> > Feb 28 17:17:18 2016 (29233)
> > smtp
> > to hangout for 10 recips, completed in 69.241 seconds
>
> What is the Postfix logging that starts around 17:16:09 and that
> ends around 17:17:18, for a session that recei
On Sun Feb 28 2016 11:13:00 Viktor Dukhovni
said:
>
> On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 06:37:29AM -0700, @lbutlr wrote:
>
>> Are there any consequences to stripping out the Received header that
>> contains the sender�s IP address (and usually their LAN address as well)?
>
> It is better to anonymiz
Ruben Safir:
> Feb 28 17:17:18 2016 (29233)
> smtp to
> hangout for 10 recips, completed in 69.241 seconds
What is the Postfix logging that starts around 17:16:09 and that
ends around 17:17:18, for a session that receives mail from Mailman.
Wietse
On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 06:41:56PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Ruben Safir:
> > Seems that mailman is unable to send messages to postfix fast enough
>
> When Mailman is falling behind, what is the number of SMTP deliveries
> per second from Mailman to Postfix?
>
> Wietse
>
> Evidently...
Ruben Safir:
> Seems that mailman is unable to send messages to postfix fast enough
When Mailman is falling behind, what is the number of SMTP deliveries
per second from Mailman to Postfix?
Wietse
On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 10:54:12AM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Ruben Safir:
> > On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 01:29:21PM +, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> > > On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 09:13:44AM -0400, Ruben Safir wrote:
> > >
> > > > > > What can cause the list mail to hang for 3 hour or more?
> > > > >
On 02/28/2016 05:46 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
> On 02/28/2016 02:26 PM, Ruben Safir wrote:
>> On 02/28/2016 12:33 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
>>>
>>> If there are more than one or two files in the out/ queue, and if the
>>> smtp log has successive entries of the form
>>
>> there are 38 files in there at pr
On 02/28/2016 12:33 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
> On 02/28/2016 07:29 AM, Ruben Safir wrote:
>>
>> No, I mean I send messages and they don't show up for a half hour even
>> in the postfix logs
>
>
> Assuming Mailman 2.1.x, the usual cause of this is a backlogged 'out'
> queue in Mailman. Look at M
Add that ignore to smtp_header_checks.pcre, dont touch incoming
On 28. feb. 2016 14.38.13 "@lbutlr" wrote:
And is adding to header_checks.pcre:
/^Received: .*ESMTPSA.*/ IGNORE
On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 06:37:29AM -0700, @lbutlr wrote:
> Are there any consequences to stripping out the Received header that
> contains the sender�s IP address (and usually their LAN address as well)?
It is better to anonymize the header content, than to strip it,
and important to only strip h
Ruben Safir:
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 01:29:21PM +, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 09:13:44AM -0400, Ruben Safir wrote:
> >
> > > > > What can cause the list mail to hang for 3 hour or more?
> > > >
> > > > Both mailman and Postfix log activies and errors. I recommend tha
Are there any consequences to stripping out the Received header that contains
the sender’s IP address (and usually their LAN address as well)?
And is adding to header_checks.pcre:
/^Received: .*ESMTPSA.*/ IGNORE
Enough to strip it out, or does it need to be in mime_header_checks as well?
(I’ve
16 matches
Mail list logo
