On Sun, Jul 26, 2015 at 10:27:54PM -0500, John Gateley wrote:
> I have a question regarding your script in:
>
>http://www.postfix.org/TLS_README.html#quick-start
>
> The script creates a smtp_tls_session_cache_database but not a
> smtpd_tls_session_cache_database. Is this intentional?
Yes.
I applied your patch to version 3.1-20150721 successfully and specified
the map like this:
smtpd_sender_restrictions =
[...]
check_sender_access { inline:{ send...@example.org=OK }, static: {
REJECT BAD SENDER } }
Unfortunately, while reloading/restarting postfix following
warning/error ap
Hi,
On 07/26/2015 01:34 AM, Robert Schetterer wrote:
Am 26.07.2015 um 03:04 schrieb Alex:
Hi,
I have a postfix-2.10.5 server on fedora, and have several users that
forward their mail through to gmail. This is apparently enough to
break SPF and make gmail think I'm the originator of the email,
Hello Wietse,
thank you for your extremly fast solution! Of course I´ll test your
patch ASAP.
I appreciate your work very much.
A lot of greetings from Germany,
Dominik
Am 26.07.2015 um 01:46 schrieb Wietse Venema:
Wietse Venema:
I'm thinking of adding multi-table lookup (similar to canoni
Oh one more thing that is a total guess on my part and I have no idea
whether it would help or not... but it couldn't hurt: implement IPv6
on your domain and publish a record for your MX (with the
appropriate reverse DNS).
My wild-ass reasoning: a lot of spam-bots are home machines that still
Daniele Nicolodi:
> >>> Maybe this helps:
> >>>
> >>> Go to your Mail settings and Accounts tab and add the address
> >>> you are forwarding from to 'Send mail as'. This is a new feature
> >>> from user requests, where Gmail will detect that you forwarded
> >>> from that account and
On 07/26/2015 01:04 PM, Daniele Nicolodi wrote:
> On 26/07/15 18:46, Raman Gupta wrote:
>> And:
>>
>> 3) Make sure the reverse DNS for the IP you use to send mail is
>> configured to point to your own domain and not your VPS provider's domain:
>>
>> dig -x
>>
>> Regards,
>> Raman
>>
>> On 07/26/20
On 26/07/15 19:51, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Daniele Nicolodi:
>> On 26/07/15 18:47, Wietse Venema wrote:
>>> Daniele Nicolodi:
Currently I'm able to send emails to my address @gmail.com from the
email address I'm currently using without having them classified as
spam, but not from any
On 26/07/15 19:59, DTNX Postmaster wrote:
> I would however have another look at your DNS configuration. Here's the
> relevant header;
>
> ==
> Received: from zed.grinta.net (grinta.net [109.74.203.128])
> by english-breakfast.cloud9.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABBED330874
> for ; Sun
On 7/26/2015 2:11 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
[snip]
>
> Postfix needs to be build on a system where libresolv supports
> DNSSEC. This is already available in a FreeBSD 7.2 virtual machine
> that I have lying around.
I'm running on FreeBSD 10.1, and it looks fine.
Many thanks for the comments.
On 7/26/2015 2:06 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 26, 2015 at 01:50:58PM -0400, Mike wrote:
[snip]
>
>> Is there a way to see if this prerequisite has been satisfied by the
>> version of Postfix I am running on my system.
>
> Send mail to one of the known DANE TLSA domains (after enablin
On 26 Jul 2015, at 20:12, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 26, 2015 at 07:59:48PM +0200, DTNX Postmaster wrote:
>
>> Make everything 'zed.grinta.net', forward and reverse, including your
>> MX record, and create CNAME records for your convenience, such as mail
>> client configuration. If y
On Sun, Jul 26, 2015 at 07:59:48PM +0200, DTNX Postmaster wrote:
> Make everything 'zed.grinta.net', forward and reverse, including your
> MX record, and create CNAME records for your convenience, such as mail
> client configuration. If you need an A apex record, just create that
> separately,
Mike:
> Postfix 2.11.5 on FreeBSD 10.1 AMD64
>
> I'm starting to look at implementing DANE on Postfix, and I have a
> question or two...
>
> Reading the info here:
> http://www.postfix.org/TLS_README.html#client_tls_dane
>
> I see the following prerequisite:
> "A compile-time DNS resolver librar
On Sun, Jul 26, 2015 at 01:50:58PM -0400, Mike wrote:
> I'm starting to look at implementing DANE on Postfix, and I have a
> question or two...
>
> Reading the info here:
> http://www.postfix.org/TLS_README.html#client_tls_dane
>
> I see the following prerequisite:
>
> "A compile-time DNS resolv
On 26 Jul 2015, at 18:16, Daniele Nicolodi wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I apologize in advance because my problem is not strictly related to
> postfix, but I don't know another mailing list with helpful people with
> enough knowledge of the of the subject.
>
> I have my personal emails handled by my own
Daniele Nicolodi:
> On 26/07/15 18:47, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > Daniele Nicolodi:
> >> Currently I'm able to send emails to my address @gmail.com from the
> >> email address I'm currently using without having them classified as
> >> spam, but not from any email address having a different local part
Postfix 2.11.5 on FreeBSD 10.1 AMD64
I'm starting to look at implementing DANE on Postfix, and I have a
question or two...
Reading the info here:
http://www.postfix.org/TLS_README.html#client_tls_dane
I see the following prerequisite:
"A compile-time DNS resolver library that supports DNSSEC. Po
On 26/07/15 18:46, Raman Gupta wrote:
> And:
>
> 3) Make sure the reverse DNS for the IP you use to send mail is
> configured to point to your own domain and not your VPS provider's domain:
>
> dig -x
>
> Regards,
> Raman
>
> On 07/26/2015 12:40 PM, Raman Gupta wrote:
>> I have a similar setup
On 26/07/15 18:47, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Daniele Nicolodi:
>> Currently I'm able to send emails to my address @gmail.com from the
>> email address I'm currently using without having them classified as
>> spam, but not from any email address having a different local part. I
>> believe this is becau
Daniele Nicolodi:
> Currently I'm able to send emails to my address @gmail.com from the
> email address I'm currently using without having them classified as
> spam, but not from any email address having a different local part. I
> believe this is because my @grinta.net email address is white liste
And:
3) Make sure the reverse DNS for the IP you use to send mail is
configured to point to your own domain and not your VPS provider's domain:
dig -x
Regards,
Raman
On 07/26/2015 12:40 PM, Raman Gupta wrote:
> I have a similar setup and don't (as far as I know) have any issues.
> Two things t
I have a similar setup and don't (as far as I know) have any issues.
Two things that will likely help you a lot:
1) Setup DMARC (SPF+DKIM) for your domain:
https://support.google.com/a/answer/2466580?hl=en.
2) Register/verify your domain(s) at https://postmaster.google.com/u/0/
HTH!
Regards,
Ram
Hello,
I apologize in advance because my problem is not strictly related to
postfix, but I don't know another mailing list with helpful people with
enough knowledge of the of the subject.
I have my personal emails handled by my own setup hosted on a virtual
private server. Since a while (I belie
On Sun, Jul 26, 2015 at 08:58:52AM +0200, Moritz Schmitt wrote:
> Thanks a lot for your very helpful reply!
>
> I implemented all the changes you suggested and now it works. My late
> reply is due to the fact that I needed to wait for another mail from
> outlook.com to see if everything works.
>
wie...@porcupine.org skrev den 2015-07-26 15:38:
See also:
http://www.postfox.org/TUNING_README.html
http://www.postfox.org/QSHAPE_README.html
incorrect domain
Wietse:
> There is one connection per "smtpd" process.
Michael Peter:
> >> but what about outgoing smtp connections to remote smtpd servers? how
> >> many
> >> connections postfix can establish for outgoing emails to different mail
> >> servers simultaneously ?
>
> Sorry, it is my mistake since i
User Nexus:
> I've found the answer on my questions in the official Postfix
> documentation. Feel free to skip answering on this email.
> Thanks again.
There still is hope for humanity.
Wietse
Thank you very much for your reply, please find my comments below.
> Michael Peter:
> [ Charset ISO-8859-1 converted... ]
>> Hi,
>>
>> master.cf
>> smtp inet n - - - 100 smtpd
>>
>> I understand that the default concurrent simultaneous incoming smtp
>> connection
User Nexus:
> My question now, is it correct to use 'check_sender_access' in
> 'smtpd_client_restrictions'
> section?
smtpd_client_restrictions (default: empty)
...
Other restrictions that are valid in this context:
o SMTP command specific restrictions that are describ
On Sat, 2015-07-25 at 21:04 -0400, Alex wrote:
> I have a postfix-2.10.5 server on fedora, and have several users that
> forward their mail through to gmail. This is apparently enough to
> break SPF and make gmail think I'm the originator of the email,
> instead of the actual sender. Consequently,
Alex:
This is apparently enough to break SPF and make gmail think I'm the
originator of the email,
instead of the actual sender. Consequently, gmail considers it spam
and moves it to a spam folder.
there is a MAAWG recommendation document:
https://www.m3aawg.org/documents/en/m3aawg-email-f
2015-07-26 10:19 GMT+03:00 User Nexus :
> 2015-07-25 17:51 GMT+03:00 Wietse Venema :
>
>> > Hello Guys,
>> >
>> > I'm trying to set up some restrictions in 'smtpd_client_restrictions'
>> > Postfix config block. You can see my 'smtpd_client_restrictions' block
>> > bellow:
>> >
>> > smtpd_client_re
2015-07-25 17:51 GMT+03:00 Wietse Venema :
> ?:
> > Hello Guys,
> >
> > I'm trying to set up some restrictions in 'smtpd_client_restrictions'
> > Postfix config block. You can see my 'smtpd_client_restrictions' block
> > bellow:
> >
> > smtpd_client_restrictions =
> >
34 matches
Mail list logo
