On Thu, 11 Jun 2015 21:42:18 -0700
"Jithesh AP" wrote:
> With this info, if someone can educate me on why it started working
> fine with the opera client but telnet is broken, it would help me
> understand better and kill my curiosity?
>
port 465 need SSL, not plain TELNET...
Hi
Looks like i solved it, but have some strange behavior that i am not able
to explain.
Below is config info ---
postconf -n
alias_database = hash:/etc/aliases
alias_maps = hash:/etc/aliases
broken_sasl_auth_clients = yes
command_directory = /usr/sbin
config_directory = /etc/postfix
daemon
Noel Jones wrote:
Does anyone know if there's a way to exempt / prevent 471 (or other
temporary reject codes) from being cached?
The best solution is to not attempt to verify external senders.
Many sites will consider this abuse and blacklist you.
Thanks for your comment Noel. I wil
On 6/11/2015 3:13 PM, Al Zick wrote:
...
I don't know anything about dspam, but I have some comments on your
postfix configuration.
>
> If I integrate it into my postfix's master.cf, dspam doesn't crash
> anymore, but I have greater problems.
>
> Here is my master.cf:
>
> # SMTP no filter
> 1
On 6/11/2015 2:30 PM, Jithesh AP wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Apologies for long mail, wanted to give all the info i have.
> Followed this URL to configure SASL -
> http://www.postfix.org/SASL_README.html. Followed the dovecot
> portion, did not setup cyrus, as i was bit confused.
>
> postconf-n is at this l
Hi,
I really hope that someone can help me.
I know that some of this may be off topic for this list, but some of
this has to directly deal with my postfix master.cf.
The goal is to provide the same filtering for everyone who receives
email on this system.
I have a mail server that is a r
Hi,
Apologies for long mail, wanted to give all the info i have.
Followed this URL to configure SASL -
http://www.postfix.org/SASL_README.html. Followed the dovecot portion, did
not setup cyrus, as i was bit confused.
postconf-n is at this location -
https://www.dropbox.com/s/4ktakqpwe89y
On 6/11/2015 5:49 AM, Mick wrote:
> Good morning,
>
>
> I have found 'reject_unverified_sender' superb at reducing the
> number of SPAM messages getting though. I've set up a whitelist for
> those few trusted senders or domains where their dopey mail servers'
> don't comply. I do have a minor pr
On 2015-06-11 16:15, Jithesh AP wrote:
Hi
Hi,
Thank you for your mail.
I reduced the log level and here is the error that shows up as soon as
i try to send a mail from my desktop opera client (the mailserver
runs on my amazon instance). Desktop is at home and using the comcast
connection
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 07:15:06AM -0700, Jithesh AP wrote:
> Jun 11 06:18:44 ml postfix/smtpd[20765]: warning:
> c-24-6-42-3.hsd1.ca.comcast.net[24.6.42.3]: SASL LOGIN authentication
> failed: authentication failure
SASL authentication (login with username + password) is failing.
This need not m
Hi
Thank you for your mail.
I reduced the log level and here is the error that shows up as soon as i
try to send a mail from my desktop opera client (the mailserver runs on my
amazon instance). Desktop is at home and using the comcast connection
Jun 11 06:18:27
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 12:23:47PM +, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
>
> > ogrj.ch.3057IN MX 10 smtasg01.abxsec.com.
> > ogrj.ch.3057IN MX 20 smtazh01.abxsec.com.
> > ogrj.ch.3057IN MX 110 smta2.abxsec.com.
> > ogrj.ch.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Am 11.06.2015 um 14:23 schrieb Viktor Dukhovni:
> There was a problem looking up the addresses of the above hosts,
> perhaps a nameserver was down, or a network connectivity problem
> prevented access.
>
I thought about that too but after my test
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 02:07:18PM +0200, Tobi wrote:
> ogrj.ch. 3057IN MX 10 smtasg01.abxsec.com.
> ogrj.ch. 3057IN MX 20 smtazh01.abxsec.com.
> ogrj.ch. 3057IN MX 110 smta2.abxsec.com.
> ogrj.ch. 3057
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hello list
I currently have a weird problem with my postfix installation. Emails
to the domain ogrj.ch cannot be sent anymore. Postfix claims that no
MX host for said domain has a valid address record.
A dns query for the MX of this domain tells me
Good morning,
I have found 'reject_unverified_sender' superb at reducing the number of
SPAM messages getting though. I've set up a whitelist for those few
trusted senders or domains where their dopey mail servers' don't comply.
I do have a minor problem with mail servers that do comply, but
16 matches
Mail list logo
