Re: Postfix cannot send mails when Mailscanner is added

Thank you good members, I have to be sincere, I did not know that Mailscanner was not supported by Postfix. I was trying it because there is a mail server (supporting one of my emails) running on postfix which uses Mailscanner and I thought I could emulate. Otherwise am sorry for spamming your boxe

Re: Address re-writes

On 4/3/2012 10:28 PM, Daniel L. Miller wrote: > > I think a broader statement for what I'm looking for is to be able > to re-write the recipient based on the sender, and vice versa. If > Postfix does not support this, do you know of a tool that does that > I can use as a proxy/filter? A milter s

Re: Address re-writes

On 4/3/2012 11:03 AM, Wietse Venema wrote: Daniel L. Miller: On 4/3/2012 10:27 AM, Wietse Venema wrote: Daniel L. Miller: and fax-access: mess...@inbound.efax.comREDIRECTtheal...@amfes.com As documented, REDIRECT affects all recipients. It is meant to yank mail out of its norm

Re: defer mail for unknown recipients for one domain only

Wietse Venema: > Wietse Venema: > > The implicit "unknown recipient" test at the end is not part of > > smtpd_recipient_restrictions, and this implicit test currently does > > not play along with any defer_if features requested from within > > smtpd_recipient_restrictions. > > I finally had some t

Re: defer mail for unknown recipients for one domain only

Wietse Venema: > The implicit "unknown recipient" test at the end is not part of > smtpd_recipient_restrictions, and this implicit test currently does > not play along with any defer_if features requested from within > smtpd_recipient_restrictions. I finally had some time to check this. It seems t

Re: verify database error

Zitat von "Daniel L. Miller" : On 4/3/2012 10:32 AM, Wietse Venema wrote: Daniel L. Miller: I keep seeing the following in the log: postfix/verify[27427]: close database /var/lib/postfix/verify.db: No such file or directory /* * With some Berkeley DB implementations, close fails wi

Re: TLS Emails

On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 09:39:22AM -0500, /dev/rob0 wrote: > > One of these domains in particular is a remote site with their > > own Exchange 2007 server and they have asked me to allow TLS > > emails through, HSBC Bank is asking for this. > > I don't think the request is reasonable, but it is e

STOP THE PISSING CONTEXT (RrDNS-v-PTR)

Guys, have your pissing context somewhere else.

Re: RrDNS-v-PTR

On 4/3/2012 12:18 PM, Sam Jones wrote: > >>> I do apologise for the distress, offence and disturbance my rude stupid >>> question has obviously caused you. I won't repeat it and I hope you can >>> forgive me. >> >> Re-reading what I wrote, and reading your reply, leaves me at a bit of a >> loss as

Re: Address re-writes

Daniel L. Miller: > On 4/3/2012 10:27 AM, Wietse Venema wrote: > > Daniel L. Miller: > >> and fax-access: > >> mess...@inbound.efax.comREDIRECTtheal...@amfes.com > > As documented, REDIRECT affects all recipients. It is meant to yank > > mail out of its normal path, and was original

Re: verify database error

On 4/3/2012 10:32 AM, Wietse Venema wrote: Daniel L. Miller: I keep seeing the following in the log: postfix/verify[27427]: close database /var/lib/postfix/verify.db: No such file or directory /* * With some Berkeley DB implementations, close fails with a bogus ENOENT * error

Re: verify database error

Daniel L. Miller: > I keep seeing the following in the log: > > postfix/verify[27427]: close database /var/lib/postfix/verify.db: No > such file or directory /* * With some Berkeley DB implementations, close fails with a bogus ENOENT * error, while it reports no errors with put+sy

Re: Address re-writes

On 4/3/2012 10:27 AM, Wietse Venema wrote: Daniel L. Miller: and fax-access: mess...@inbound.efax.comREDIRECTtheal...@amfes.com As documented, REDIRECT affects all recipients. It is meant to yank mail out of its normal path, and was originally implemented for emergencies (that i

Re: Address re-writes

Daniel L. Miller: > I'm sure I've done something dumb as usual - I just don't see it. > > My users are all virtual and stored in LDAP. I also have LDAP aliases. > I also have recipient, sender, canonical, and transport entries. > > I have defined a particular alias in LDAP - this alias is mapp

Re: RrDNS-v-PTR

> > I do apologise for the distress, offence and disturbance my rude stupid > > question has obviously caused you. I won't repeat it and I hope you can > > forgive me. > > Re-reading what I wrote, and reading your reply, leaves me at a bit of a > loss as to what prompted this immature drivel. My

Re: performance problems

Stan Hoeppner: > So the postscreen connection limit is good for slowing bots, no surprise > since bots are the postscreen target, but the smtpd connection limit is > still appropriate/needed for slowing legit bulk mailer clients, assuming > one chooses to use it vs the other anvil based restriction

Re: RrDNS-v-PTR

On 4/3/2012 10:41 AM, Sam Jones wrote: > On Tue, 2012-04-03 at 10:31 -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote: >> It's possible, but the devil is in the details, which you did not >> provide to us. > It really was just a general question as to how an MTA, specifically > Postfix, would respond if multiple alter

verify database error

I keep seeing the following in the log: postfix/verify[27427]: close database /var/lib/postfix/verify.db: No such file or directory Yet... ls -al /var/lib/postfix/verify.db: -rw-rw-rw- 1 postfix postfix 1564672 2012-04-03 09:47 verify.db Why? This is on Linux 2.6.35 and XFS if it makes a di

Address re-writes

I'm sure I've done something dumb as usual - I just don't see it. My users are all virtual and stored in LDAP. I also have LDAP aliases. I also have recipient, sender, canonical, and transport entries. I have defined a particular alias in LDAP - this alias is mapped to two users. If I send

Broken link on "Howto" page

I don't know if this is really the best place to report this or not; however, I am sure someone will say something one way or the other. Not really an earth shattering problem; however on the page, under "Lookup Tables", the one entitled: "Mysql howto by Daniel

Re: performance problems

On 4/3/2012 10:27 AM, Wietse Venema wrote: > Stan Hoeppner: >> Setting smtpd_client_connection_count_limit also sets >> postscreen_client_connection_count_limit if you're using postfix 2.8 and >> postscreen. Thus the limit is enforced before connections are handed to >> smtpd processes, so you don

Re: RrDNS-v-PTR

On Tue, 2012-04-03 at 11:53 -0400, Wietse Venema wrote: > With Postfix, multiple IP address per A record are fine, as long > as the CLIENT IP address is listed among them. > > However, having multiple PTR records for one IP address, that is a > different matter. Postfix will not try to guess which

Re: RrDNS-v-PTR

Sam Jones: > Good Afternoon, > > My senior tech and I have been having a squabble over PTR, Hostnames and > reverse mapping. > > If you have a client connect from 1.2.3.4 and perform a host name lookup > on that, so you get back host.example.com, would it impact on mail if a > forward query for h

Re: RrDNS-v-PTR

On Tue, 2012-04-03 at 10:36 -0500, /dev/rob0 wrote: > > > > If you have a client connect from 1.2.3.4 and perform a host name > > lookup on that, so you get back host.example.com, would it impact > > on mail if a forward query for host.example.com returned multiple > > A records, say 1.2.3.4 & 5.6

Re: RrDNS-v-PTR

On Tue, 2012-04-03 at 10:31 -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote: > On 4/3/2012 9:56 AM, Sam Jones wrote: > > Good Afternoon, > > > > My senior tech and I have been having a squabble over PTR, Hostnames and > > reverse mapping. > > > > If you have a client connect from 1.2.3.4 and perform a host name looku

Re: RrDNS-v-PTR

On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 03:56:13PM +0100, Sam Jones wrote: > My senior tech and I have been having a squabble over PTR, > Hostnames and reverse mapping. > > If you have a client connect from 1.2.3.4 and perform a host name > lookup on that, so you get back host.example.com, would it impact > on ma

Re: RrDNS-v-PTR

On 4/3/2012 9:56 AM, Sam Jones wrote: > Good Afternoon, > > My senior tech and I have been having a squabble over PTR, Hostnames and > reverse mapping. > > If you have a client connect from 1.2.3.4 and perform a host name lookup > on that, so you get back host.example.com, would it impact on mail

Re: performance problems

Stan Hoeppner: > Setting smtpd_client_connection_count_limit also sets > postscreen_client_connection_count_limit if you're using postfix 2.8 and > postscreen. Thus the limit is enforced before connections are handed to > smtpd processes, so you don't needlessly eat up additional smtpds. Note tha

Re: Postfix cannot send mails when Mailscanner is added

On 4/3/2012 8:51 AM, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote: > On 4/3/2012 9:32 AM, Kizito Thomas wrote: >> I am trying out Mailscanner for the first time in my life [...] > I highly recommend to use amavisd-new instead of Mailscanner. [...] > The latter uses an unsupported direct queue manipulation whi

RrDNS-v-PTR

Good Afternoon, My senior tech and I have been having a squabble over PTR, Hostnames and reverse mapping. If you have a client connect from 1.2.3.4 and perform a host name lookup on that, so you get back host.example.com, would it impact on mail if a forward query for host.example.com returned mu

Re: TLS Emails

On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 02:02:37PM +, Mark Pote wrote: > I have a Centos, Postfix, Amavisd, Spamassassin, MySQL setup and > clean mail for quite a few domains. > > One of these domains in particular is a remote site with their > own Exchange 2007 server and they have asked me to allow TLS > e

TLS Emails

Hi all, I have a Centos, Postfix, Amavisd, Spamassassin, MySQL setup and clean mail for quite a few domains. One of these domains in particular is a remote site with their own Exchange 2007 server and they have asked me to allow TLS emails through, HSBC Bank is asking for this. I have looked

Re: Postfix cannot send mails when Mailscanner is added

On 4/3/2012 9:32 AM, Kizito Thomas wrote: > Dear good people, > I am trying out Mailscanner for the first time in my life, I have this > test postfix server that has been working properly until when I added > a line: > /**/ > I highly recommend to use amavisd-new instead of Mailscanner. The former

Re: Enabled SMTP AUTH but mails from external networks still being rejected

Den 2012-03-28 15:31, Phill Edwards skrev: Mar 29 00:04:33 zrf postfix/smtpd[624]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from unknown[xx.xxx.180.193]: 554 5.7.1 : Client host rejected: Access denied; from= smtpd_client_restrictions = permit_mynetworks, reject missing permit_sasl_authenticated postfix do a