disable_mime_output_conversion

disable_mime_output_conversion can be used to disable the 8bit->7bit conversion while sending mails to mailers not annnouncing "8BITMIME" after EHLO. But is the a way of seeing how often this conversion is actually being used? -- Ralf Hildebrandt Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk Char

Re: How to forward messages with invalid From: address?

On 01/06/2012 03:26 AM, Bob Proulx wrote: Wietse Venema wrote: Bob Proulx: From: Some User This case is mailed but the From: line is changed to be the account user owner of the forwarding process. The result shows up in the What clobbers the From: header? Postfix does not, because otherwi

Re: How to forward messages with invalid From: address?

Wietse Venema wrote: > Bob Proulx: > > From: Some User > > > > This case is mailed but the From: line is changed to be the account > > user owner of the forwarding process. The result shows up in the > > What clobbers the From: header? Postfix does not, because otherwise > you would not have

Re: Illegal block?

On Tue, 03 Jan 2012 23:37:16 +0200, Tolga wrote: Jan 3 15:58:44 bilgisayarciniz postfix/smtpd[6179]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from unknown[85.95.233.13]: 554 5.7.1 Service unavailable; Client host [85.95.233.13] blocked using sbl.spamhaus.org; http://www.spamhaus.org/SBL/sbl.lasso?query=SBL10061

Re: How to forward messages with invalid From: address?

Bob Proulx: > I have an account on a host machine that receives email from a mailing > list. That account then uses procmail to forward some messages to a > different account on a different host machine. > > :0 > ! u...@example.com > > All fine for the most part. But infrequently someone po

Re: Postfix & cyrus-sasl 2.1.25 issues

Quanah Gibson-Mount: > --On Thursday, January 05, 2012 7:39 PM -0500 Wietse Venema > wrote: > > Hi Wieste, > > >> A 2.1.25 linked Postfix always complains about no available mechanism: > > > > I recall that OpenLDAP also links with Cyrus SASL. Perhaps Postfix > > and OpenLDAP were built with di

How to forward messages with invalid From: address?

I have an account on a host machine that receives email from a mailing list. That account then uses procmail to forward some messages to a different account on a different host machine. :0 ! u...@example.com All fine for the most part. But infrequently someone posts a message to the mailing

Re: Postfix & cyrus-sasl 2.1.25 issues

--On Thursday, January 05, 2012 7:39 PM -0500 Wietse Venema wrote: Hi Wieste, A 2.1.25 linked Postfix always complains about no available mechanism: I recall that OpenLDAP also links with Cyrus SASL. Perhaps Postfix and OpenLDAP were built with different Cyrus SASL versions? No, that is n

Re: Postfix & cyrus-sasl 2.1.25 issues

Quanah Gibson-Mount: > I'm curious if anyone has tested Postfix SMTP auth in conjunction with > Cyrus-SASL 2.1.25. My testing shows that when used linked to Cyrus-SASL > 2.1.25, SMTP auth fails with an unknown mechanism error. Downgrading to > Cyrus-SASL 2.1.23 with the exact same configuratio

Postfix & cyrus-sasl 2.1.25 issues

I'm curious if anyone has tested Postfix SMTP auth in conjunction with Cyrus-SASL 2.1.25. My testing shows that when used linked to Cyrus-SASL 2.1.25, SMTP auth fails with an unknown mechanism error. Downgrading to Cyrus-SASL 2.1.23 with the exact same configuration and build parameters works

Re: Best way to implement autoreply and spamassassin?

On 06/01/12 03:49, Tobey Wheelock wrote: > On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 11:03:44PM +1300, Peter wrote: >> There are (at least) two options for you: >> >> 1. postfixadmin comes with a vacation program that works with virtual >> users and can work by modifying SQL tables to change aliases for those >> us

Re: Internal+external mailrelay

Hi Ralf, one additional question. I figured that our printers perhaps should be allowed to send mails to anyone - hence I need to specifically relay mail for these to any domain. This mean I have to configure the following rules in postfix: 1. All mail to our_own_domain are send to our_external_ho

Re: PANIC: Accidentally misconfigured postfix and thus incoming messages bounced

Am 05.01.2012 18:33, schrieb Noel Jones: And then I got postfix/bounce[16947]: D3F729435A: sender non-delivery notification: 01487F069D ... Does the "sender non-delivery notification" mean that my misconfigured postfix succesfully sent out a message? The "status= " part that you

Re: PANIC: Accidentally misconfigured postfix and thus incoming messages bounced

On 1/5/2012 11:20 AM, Marcus Mülbüsch wrote: > Hello List, > >I upgraded postfix and accidentally restarted it with the > standard postfix configuration file instead of my configuration file. > >After about 100 bounced messages I realized my mistake and > replaced the configuration file.

PANIC: Accidentally misconfigured postfix and thus incoming messages bounced

Hello List, I upgraded postfix and accidentally restarted it with the standard postfix configuration file instead of my configuration file. After about 100 bounced messages I realized my mistake and replaced the configuration file. My setup has fetchmail collect the E-Mails from so

Re: Postfix Mac Aministration

On 5 January 2012 11:24, Eric Lemings wrote: > > On Jan 4, 2012, at 11:46 PM, Eric Lemings wrote: > >> >> On Jan 4, 2012, at 9:54 PM, /dev/rob0 wrote: >> >>> On Wednesday 04 January 2012 20:45:23 Eric Lemings wrote: I just noticed that two of my Postfix configuration variables were set

Re: Best way to implement autoreply and spamassassin?

On 2012-01-05 12:04 PM, Dennis Guhl wrote: On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 11:54:05AM -0500, Charles Marcus wrote: On 2012-01-05 5:15 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote: There's no good reason not to use LDA, and many upsides to using it: I think there is one... I rely heavily on the x-original-to header I us

Re: Best way to implement autoreply and spamassassin?

On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 11:54:05AM -0500, Charles Marcus wrote: > On 2012-01-05 5:15 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote: > >There's no good reason not to use LDA, and many upsides to using it: > > I think there is one... I rely heavily on the x-original-to header I > use a lot of aliases), and I think this

Re: Best way to implement autoreply and spamassassin?

On 2012-01-05 5:15 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote: There's no good reason not to use LDA, and many upsides to using it: I think there is one... I rely heavily on the x-original-to header I use a lot of aliases), and I think this is lost when using the dovecot LDA isn't it? -- Best regards, Char

spam problems, was: Re: Postfix Mac Aministration

[ subject changed to be relevant to the thread ] On Thursday 05 January 2012 10:24:11 Eric Lemings wrote: > On Jan 4, 2012, at 11:46 PM, Eric Lemings > wrote: > > This change seems to have been my missing link. Since I made > > it, spam arriving in IMAP boxes has dropped drastically in the > > p

Re: Postfix Mac Aministration

On 1/5/2012 10:24 AM, Eric Lemings wrote: > Well I spoke too soon. The flood of spam started again this morning. > > Obviously something isn't working. All testimonials I've read say that grey > listing stops 90% of spam but its not working. > > Eric. How effective any particular anti-spam

Re: delivery temporarily suspended: conversation with, 127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1] timed out while receiving the initial server greeting

On 1/5/2012 10:18 AM, Noah wrote: > > Sometimes when sending mail to my postfix server I receive the claim > that "delivery temporarily suspended: conversation with, > 127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1] timed out while receiving the initial server > greeting" . I am seeing this message show up to the local use

Re: Postfix Mac Aministration

On Jan 4, 2012, at 11:46 PM, Eric Lemings wrote: > > On Jan 4, 2012, at 9:54 PM, /dev/rob0 wrote: > >> On Wednesday 04 January 2012 20:45:23 Eric Lemings wrote: >>> I just noticed that two of my Postfix configuration variables were >>> set twice, the latter of which was overriding the former.

Re: delivery temporarily suspended: conversation with, 127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1] timed out while receiving the initial server greeting

Am 05.01.2012 17:18, schrieb Noah: > > Sometimes when sending mail to my postfix server I receive the claim that > "delivery temporarily suspended: > conversation with, 127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1] timed out while receiving the initial > server greeting" . I am seeing this > message show up to the lo

outbound postfix for customers

Dear list, We want to setup a outbound postfix server in our datacenter dedicated to our customers. We want separate logs, separate spool directories, possibility to set mail quota per customer, Didicated IP addresses per customer. Do you guys have experience with this kind of setup? I was think

Re: Send bouncing to specific bounce-account

On 1/5/2012 8:04 AM, Michael Maymann wrote: > Hi List, > > I have a mailrelay (internal->external), that I'm trying to harden > by allowing only certain external domains. > Is it possible to send bouncing mails to a specific > bou...@mydomain.com account, so I can > ke

Re: Best way to implement autoreply and spamassassin?

On 1/5/2012 8:49 AM, Tobey Wheelock wrote: > You mention that you do this for new installs. How hard is it to > convert an existing installation to using Dovecot LDA? For system users it's brain dead easy, a single line change in main.cf. It's slightly more complicated for virtual users, but by

Re: Best way to implement autoreply and spamassassin?

On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 11:03:44PM +1300, Peter wrote: > There are (at least) two options for you: > > 1. postfixadmin comes with a vacation program that works with virtual > users and can work by modifying SQL tables to change aliases for those > users. This is compatible with special extension

Send bouncing to specific bounce-account

Hi List, I have a mailrelay (internal->external), that I'm trying to harden by allowing only certain external domains. Is it possible to send bouncing mails to a specific bounce@mydomain.comaccount, so I can keep an extra eye on what is being bounced when I do the switch, and perhaps some weeks af

Re: Fwd: free antivirus scanner ?

On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 4:28 PM, Phill Macey wrote: > > On 05/01/2012 6:16 AM, "francis picabia" wrote: >> >> Connect: 11661 >> ... >> Reject total:   18525 > > Huh? You have more rejects than you had connects in the first place (every > rejected client must first connect before it can be rejected

Re: Best way to implement autoreply and spamassassin?

* Stan Hoeppner : > On 1/4/2012 5:44 PM, Tobey Wheelock wrote: > > > Yes, dovecot, but I'm not currently using it as LDA. Instead, postfix > > delivers the mail itself. > > There's no good reason not to use LDA, and many upsides to using it: > > 1. Superior performance as messages are indexed

Re: Best way to implement autoreply and spamassassin?

On 1/4/2012 5:44 PM, Tobey Wheelock wrote: > Yes, dovecot, but I'm not currently using it as LDA. Instead, postfix > delivers the mail itself. There's no good reason not to use LDA, and many upsides to using it: 1. Superior performance as messages are indexed during delivery. Without LDA, all

Re: Postfix Mac Aministration

On 1/5/2012 12:46 AM, Eric Lemings wrote: > The RBL sites come from various Postfix tutorials on the web, many of which > are getting woefully dated. Thanks for the updates. First, please use the generic term "dnsbl" instead of "RBL". RBL is a copyrighted/trademarked term specific to MAPS Corp

Re: Best way to implement autoreply and spamassassin?

On 05/01/12 12:44, Tobey Wheelock wrote: > On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 12:28:03AM +0100, Jeroen Geilman wrote: >> On 01/05/2012 12:19 AM, Tobey Wheelock wrote: >>> On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 12:14:26AM +0100, Jeroen Geilman wrote: These are very different functions. Spam filtering is best achiev

Re: Postfix Mac Aministration

On 1/4/2012 10:54 PM, /dev/rob0 wrote: > You could consolidate all of your restrictions into > smtpd_recipient_restrictions. Unless you need complex whitelisting, > it's usually easier that way, to only maintain one set of > restrictions. I recommend this as well. For me it's much easier to w