On Jan 4, 2012, at 9:54 PM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
> On Wednesday 04 January 2012 20:45:23 Eric Lemings wrote:
>> I just noticed that two of my Postfix configuration variables were
>> set twice, the latter of which was overriding the former. Here's
>> the new values:
>
> The list policy asks for "pos
On Wednesday 04 January 2012 20:45:23 Eric Lemings wrote:
> I just noticed that two of my Postfix configuration variables were
> set twice, the latter of which was overriding the former. Here's
> the new values:
The list policy asks for "postconf -n" because that reports values
Postfix is actual
On Jan 4, 2012, at 8:21 PM, Eric Lemings wrote:
>
> Here's my Postfix configuration:
>
> [root@myhost myuser]$ postconf -n
> snip
> On Jan 4, 2012, at 12:12 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>
>> On 1/4/2012 11:31 AM, Eric Lemings wrote:
>>> Greetings,
>>>
>>> Can anyone point me to some good guides/t
I just noticed that two of my Postfix configuration variables were set twice,
the latter of which was overriding the former. Here's the new values:
smtpd_client_restrictions = permit_mynetworkspermit_sasl_authenticated
reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.orgreject_rbl_client rbl-plus.mai
Here's my Postfix configuration:
[root@myhost myuser]$ postconf -n
command_directory = /usr/sbin
config_directory = /etc/postfix
content_filter = smtp-amavis:[127.0.0.1]:10024
daemon_directory = /usr/libexec/postfix
debug_peer_level = 2
enable_server_options = yes
header_checks = pcre:/etc/postfi
On Wed, 04 Jan 2012 17:31:55 -0500, Miles Fidelman wrote:
Benny Pedersen wrote:
On Tue, 03 Jan 2012 16:26:57 +0100, Frank Bonnet wrote:
I'm searching for a friend (who has very few money) an open source
antivirus scanner for email server that works with Postfix.
ClamAV hooks nicely into post
On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 12:28:03AM +0100, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
> On 01/05/2012 12:19 AM, Tobey Wheelock wrote:
> >On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 12:14:26AM +0100, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
> >>These are very different functions.
> >>Spam filtering is best achieved when mail is received, such as with
> >>amav
On 01/05/2012 12:19 AM, Tobey Wheelock wrote:
On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 12:14:26AM +0100, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
These are very different functions.
Spam filtering is best achieved when mail is received, such as with
amavisd-new and spamassassin.
Autoreply is best taken care of by the users' own d
On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 12:14:26AM +0100, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
> These are very different functions.
> Spam filtering is best achieved when mail is received, such as with
> amavisd-new and spamassassin.
>
> Autoreply is best taken care of by the users' own delivery agent, or
> .forward file.
Th
On 01/05/2012 12:02 AM, Tobey Wheelock wrote:
I have a content_filter installed that pipes mail to a script that
invokes spamassassin. That's working fine. Relevant lines from
master.cf:
smtp inet n - n - - smtpd
-o content_filter=spamfilter:dummy
sp
I have a content_filter installed that pipes mail to a script that
invokes spamassassin. That's working fine. Relevant lines from
master.cf:
smtp inet n - n - - smtpd
-o content_filter=spamfilter:dummy
spamfilter unix - n n - - pipe
flags=Rq user=spam
Benny Pedersen wrote:
On Tue, 03 Jan 2012 16:26:57 +0100, Frank Bonnet wrote:
I'm searching for a friend (who has very few money) an open source
antivirus scanner for email server that works with Postfix.
ClamAV hooks nicely into postfix with clammilter and smtp via clamsmtp
also wires in n
On Tue, 03 Jan 2012 16:26:57 +0100, Frank Bonnet wrote:
I'm searching for a friend (who has very few money) an open source
antivirus scanner for email server that works with Postfix.
ClamAV hooks nicely into postfix with clammilter and smtp via clamsmtp
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 12:36 PM, Gary Smith wrote:
>> Am 03.01.2012 18:30, schrieb Stan Hoeppner:
>>
>> > To add to this sentiment, haven't most/all the viri/malware pushers
>> > switched from an email delivery vector to drive-by downloads? I can't
>> > recall the last time I saw a viral email at
On 1/4/2012 11:31 AM, Eric Lemings wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> Can anyone point me to some good guides/tutorials for configuring Postfix on
> Mac systems? In particular, I'm trying to stop spam in its tracks. I've
> tried using the Server app and the older Server Admin app. I've even tried
> man
On 04-01-2012 00:14, Noel Jones wrote:
On 1/3/2012 3:37 PM, Tolga wrote:
Hi,
I thought I'd check the logs today, and I found something curious to
me:
Jan 3 15:58:44 bilgisayarciniz postfix/smtpd[6179]: NOQUEUE:
reject: RCPT from unknown[85.95.233.13]: 554 5.7.1 Service
unavailable; Client hos
Greetings,
Can anyone point me to some good guides/tutorials for configuring Postfix on
Mac systems? In particular, I'm trying to stop spam in its tracks. I've tried
using the Server app and the older Server Admin app. I've even tried manually
editing the Postfix config files by hand. Nothi
> Am 03.01.2012 18:30, schrieb Stan Hoeppner:
>
> > To add to this sentiment, haven't most/all the viri/malware pushers
> > switched from an email delivery vector to drive-by downloads? I can't
> > recall the last time I saw a viral email attachment.
>
> our barracuda saw 2929 in the last year
>
On 2012-01-04 6:37 AM, Tomas Macek wrote:
Hi list, is there any reason why the Reply-to: header is not set to
postfix-users in this list? When I press Reply button, I'm replying to
From: address, when pressing 'Reply to all', I'm replying to both the
list and the sender personaly. But why should
Am 04.01.2012 12:46, schrieb rihad:
> On 01/04/2012 03:29 PM, Robert Schetterer wrote:
>> Am 04.01.2012 12:01, schrieb rihad:
>>> Hi, all. Can Postfix 2.8 be configured to skip generating bounce
>>> messages in case there was a problem delivering the message?
>>> Sometimes we need to send message
rihad:
> On 01/04/2012 04:44 PM, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
> > On 2012-01-04 12:01, rihad wrote:
> >> Hi, all. Can Postfix 2.8 be configured to skip generating bounce
> >> messages in case there was a problem delivering the message?
> >> Sometimes we need to send messages to our subscribers through ph
On 01/04/2012 04:44 PM, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
On 2012-01-04 12:01, rihad wrote:
Hi, all. Can Postfix 2.8 be configured to skip generating bounce
messages in case there was a problem delivering the message?
Sometimes we need to send messages to our subscribers through phplist
from a legitimate a
On Wed, 4 Jan 2012, Jerry wrote:
On Wed, 4 Jan 2012 13:01:07 +0100
Erwan David articulated:
On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 12:37:53PM CET, Tomas Macek
said:
Hi list, is there any reason why the Reply-to: header is not set to
postfix-users in this list? When I press Reply button, I'm replying
to F
On 2012-01-04 12:01, rihad wrote:
Hi, all. Can Postfix 2.8 be configured to skip generating bounce
messages in case there was a problem delivering the message?
Sometimes we need to send messages to our subscribers through phplist
from a legitimate address, and we aren't really interested in gett
On Wed, 4 Jan 2012 13:01:07 +0100
Erwan David articulated:
> On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 12:37:53PM CET, Tomas Macek
> said:
> > Hi list, is there any reason why the Reply-to: header is not set to
> > postfix-users in this list? When I press Reply button, I'm replying
> > to From: address, when press
Sahil Tandon:
> I do not usually announce FreeBSD port version bumps here, but in this
> case, I felt it appropriate. Sorry to those for whom this is not
> relevant.
>
> I have updated the development port to Postfix 2.9 Snapshot 20120102 and
> removed the erroneous conf/post-install patch that w
On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 12:37:53PM CET, Tomas Macek said:
> Hi list, is there any reason why the Reply-to: header is not set to
> postfix-users in this list? When I press Reply button, I'm replying
> to From: address, when pressing 'Reply to all', I'm replying to both
> the list and the sender per
Am 04.01.2012 12:46, schrieb rihad:
> On 01/04/2012 03:29 PM, Robert Schetterer wrote:
>> Am 04.01.2012 12:01, schrieb rihad:
>>> Hi, all. Can Postfix 2.8 be configured to skip generating bounce
>>> messages in case there was a problem delivering the message?
>>> Sometimes we need to send messages
On Tue, 3 Jan 2012 21:12:29 -0500
Sahil Tandon articulated:
> I do not usually announce FreeBSD port version bumps here, but in this
> case, I felt it appropriate. Sorry to those for whom this is not
> relevant.
>
> I have updated the development port to Postfix 2.9 Snapshot 20120102
> and remov
On 01/04/2012 03:29 PM, Robert Schetterer wrote:
Am 04.01.2012 12:01, schrieb rihad:
Hi, all. Can Postfix 2.8 be configured to skip generating bounce
messages in case there was a problem delivering the message?
Sometimes we need to send messages to our subscribers through phplist
from a legitima
Hi list, is there any reason why the Reply-to: header is not set to
postfix-users in this list? When I press Reply button, I'm replying to
From: address, when pressing 'Reply to all', I'm replying to both the list
and the sender personaly. But why should I reply to the sender
personaly? Could a
Am 04.01.2012 12:01, schrieb rihad:
> Hi, all. Can Postfix 2.8 be configured to skip generating bounce
> messages in case there was a problem delivering the message?
> Sometimes we need to send messages to our subscribers through phplist
> from a legitimate address, and we aren't really interested
On 4/1/2012 10:04 πμ, Michael Maymann wrote:
All recommendations are welcome.
As has been discussed in the past, pflogsumm + mailgraph is a very
effective combination.
See:
http://www.howtoforge.com/postfix-monitoring-with-mailgraph-and-pflogsumm-on-debian-lenny
(Earlier discussion: e.g
Hi, all. Can Postfix 2.8 be configured to skip generating bounce
messages in case there was a problem delivering the message?
Sometimes we need to send messages to our subscribers through phplist
from a legitimate address, and we aren't really interested in getting
the bounces delivered to that
Am 04.01.2012 09:04, schrieb Michael Maymann:
> Hi List,
>
> would like to setup some statistics on my postfix server.
> I know of these solutions:
> web: http://mailgraph.schweikert.ch
> shell: qshape
>
>
> All recommendations are welcome.
>
> Thanks in advance :-)
> ~maymann
i recently teste
Hi List,
would like to setup some statistics on my postfix server.
I know of these solutions:
web: http://mailgraph.schweikert.ch
shell: qshape
All recommendations are welcome.
Thanks in advance :-)
~maymann
36 matches
Mail list logo
