On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 5:25 PM, Ralf Hildebrandt <
ralf.hildebra...@charite.de> wrote:
> * Dominik Schulz :
> > Am Dienstag, 20. Dezember 2011, 16:41:49 schrieb Helder Oliveira:
> > > Has anyone experience with ReturnPath that can share ? Is the paid
> money
> > > worth the results ?
> > Yes, but
On Wed, 2011-12-28 at 19:48:48 -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Sahil Tandon:
> > I do not believe Mark should have to jump through extra hoops, or that
> > you should revert the change. This is a FreeBSD port-specific problem
> > created by me that I will address as soon as I can.
>
> Considering
Sahil Tandon:
> I do not believe Mark should have to jump through extra hoops, or that
> you should revert the change. This is a FreeBSD port-specific problem
> created by me that I will address as soon as I can.
Considering the short time left before the next stable release I
am considering the
On Wed, 2011-12-28 at 18:34:45 -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> ...
> Sites that use Postfix 2.8 without IPv6 have no inet_protocols
> setting in main.cf. They have never needed one because that was the
> default. Having to add "inet_protocols = whatever" for Postfix
> 2.9 is an unnecessary compatib
Sahil Tandon:
> > Sahil Tandon:
> > > FWIW, the FreeBSD Postfix port is patched so that post-install does not
> > > add "inet_protocols=ipv4" to main.cf during upgrades. Instead, users are
> > > notified[1] about the recent change of defaults, and asked to append the
> > > ipv4 line to their main.c
Am 29.12.2011 00:16, schrieb Jeroen Geilman:
> On 2011-12-28 23:58, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>
>> Am 28.12.2011 23:30, schrieb Stan Hoeppner:
>>> On 12/28/2011 2:41 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
this world would be a better one if more developers would have your
attitude instead permanently thr
On 2011-12-28 23:58, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 28.12.2011 23:30, schrieb Stan Hoeppner:
On 12/28/2011 2:41 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
this world would be a better one if more developers would have your
attitude instead permanently throwing things away and replace them
with half-baken replacement a
Am 28.12.2011 23:30, schrieb Stan Hoeppner:
> On 12/28/2011 2:41 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> this world would be a better one if more developers would have your
>> attitude instead permanently throwing things away and replace them
>> with half-baken replacement and shortly before they become bugf
On Wed, 2011-12-28 at 10:08:05 -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Sahil Tandon:
> > FWIW, the FreeBSD Postfix port is patched so that post-install does not
> > add "inet_protocols=ipv4" to main.cf during upgrades. Instead, users are
> > notified[1] about the recent change of defaults, and asked to appe
On 12/28/2011 2:41 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 28.12.2011 21:12, schrieb Wietse Venema:
>> Jerry:
>> [request to preserve a backwards-compatibility migration feature]
Wietse
>>>
>>> +1
>>
>> FWIW, I get no joy from making requests like this. It just annoys
>> me that Sahil, who is o
Ralf Hildebrandt:
> # postconf proxy_write_maps
> proxy_write_maps = $smtp_sasl_auth_cache_name $lmtp_sasl_auth_cache_name
> $address_verify_map $postscreen_cache_map ...
Having $postscreen_cache_map there should be sufficient, but I made
a mistake in the proxymap source code. You need to swap so
Ralf Hildebrandt:
> * Wietse Venema :
>
> > This will not work. You can't have two postscreen processes writing
> > to the same postscreen_cache file.
>
> > Instead, you must specify
> >
> > memcache = inet:mail.charite.de:11211
> > backup = proxy:btree:/var/lib/postfix/postscreen_cache
* Ralf Hildebrandt :
> # postconf proxy_write_maps
> proxy_write_maps = $smtp_sasl_auth_cache_name $lmtp_sasl_auth_cache_name
> $address_verify_map $postscreen_cache_map
> btree:/var/lib/postfix/postscreen_cache
>
> So, what should be listed?
> btree:/var/lib/postfix/postscreen_cache
> or
> pro
* Wietse Venema :
> This will not work. You can't have two postscreen processes writing
> to the same postscreen_cache file.
> Instead, you must specify
>
> memcache = inet:mail.charite.de:11211
> backup = proxy:btree:/var/lib/postfix/postscreen_cache
>
> (and be sure that "postconf pr
Am 28.12.2011 21:12, schrieb Wietse Venema:
> Jerry:
> [request to preserve a backwards-compatibility migration feature]
>>> Wietse
>>
>> +1
>
> FWIW, I get no joy from making requests like this. It just annoys
> me that Sahil, who is otherwise a sensible maintainer, works against
> my effor
Jerry:
[request to preserve a backwards-compatibility migration feature]
> > Wietse
>
> +1
FWIW, I get no joy from making requests like this. It just annoys
me that Sahil, who is otherwise a sensible maintainer, works against
my efforts to make Postfix upgrades as painless as possible.
When
On Wed, 28 Dec 2011 10:08:05 -0500 (EST)
Wietse Venema articulated:
> Sahil Tandon:
> > FWIW, the FreeBSD Postfix port is patched so that post-install does
> > not add "inet_protocols=ipv4" to main.cf during upgrades. Instead,
> > users are notified[1] about the recent change of defaults, and
> >
Sahil Tandon:
> FWIW, the FreeBSD Postfix port is patched so that post-install does not
> add "inet_protocols=ipv4" to main.cf during upgrades. Instead, users are
> notified[1] about the recent change of defaults, and asked to append the
> ipv4 line to their main.cf, if necessary.
Sorry, THAT IS
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 3:16 PM, Andrew Beverley wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-12-20 at 09:22 +, Helder Oliveira wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Recently we start sending lots of emails to hotmail accounts and lots of
> them are in the active queue waiting for delivery for long time...
> > Some of our clie
Ralf Hildebrandt:
[ Charset UTF-8 unsupported, converting... ]
> Just out of interest, when using a memcache map for postscreen:
>
> postscreen_cache_map = memcache:/etc/postfix/memcache-postscreen_cache.cf
>
> with /etc/postfix/memcache-postscreen_cache.cf containing:
>
> memcache = inet:mail.c
* Dominik Schulz :
> Am Dienstag, 20. Dezember 2011, 16:41:49 schrieb Helder Oliveira:
> > Has anyone experience with ReturnPath that can share ? Is the paid money
> > worth the results ?
> Yes, but it's not worth it in my opinion.
I frequently check my return path score, and it's at 99 almost all
Am Dienstag, 20. Dezember 2011, 16:41:49 schrieb Helder Oliveira:
> Has anyone experience with ReturnPath that can share ? Is the paid money
> worth the results ?
Yes, but it's not worth it in my opinion.
--
Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best Regards
Dominik
vboxadm.net - Postfix admin Interface
Just out of interest, when using a memcache map for postscreen:
postscreen_cache_map = memcache:/etc/postfix/memcache-postscreen_cache.cf
with /etc/postfix/memcache-postscreen_cache.cf containing:
memcache = inet:mail.charite.de:11211
backup = btree:/var/lib/postfix/postscreen_cache
being used
23 matches
Mail list logo
