Hi,
I was reported that the e-mails people send never get to my server. When
I first was reported, I tested and it was true. I tested some more and
found out I couldn't get e-mail when I switch to submission port. How
can I fix this? You can find my postconf -n and master.cf below (at the
mom
As previously mentioned, the chroot for smtp is turned off:
cat /etc/postfix/master.cf | grep "smtp inet"
smtp inet n - n - - smtpd
From: Wietse Venema
To: Postfix users
Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2011 3:07 PM
Subje
http://www.nk.ca/blog/index.php?/archives/1275-Phishing-spam-mail-script-intercepted.html
--
Member - Liberal International This is doc...@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doc...@nl2k.ab.ca
God, Queen and country! Never Satan President Republic! Beware AntiChrist
rising!
https://www.fullyfollow.me/rootnl2k
Onta
On Mon, 2011-10-10 at 07:20:22 +0530, Janantha Marasinghe wrote:
> I want to know if postfix can be used to save a copy of every e-mail
> sent and received (including attachments) by a mail server for email
> retention.
See http://article.gmane.org/gmane.mail.postfix.user/221022 and the
mailing
On 20/09/2011, at 11:04 AM, Tom Lanyon wrote:
> When using a LDAP lookup table the 'special_result_attribute' parameter is
> available to allow me to recurse to other DNs [e.g. recursing to members of a
> LDAP group]. I can also use the 'leaf_result_attribute' parameter to select
> the attribut
Hi All,
I want to know if postfix can be used to save a copy of every e-mail
sent and received (including attachments) by a mail server for email
retention. If it could indexed for easier searching that would be great!
Thnks
J
On Sun, Oct 09, 2011 at 06:03:36PM -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> On 10/9/2011 3:29 PM, Bron Gondwana wrote:
>
> > I'm honestly more interested in maildir type workload too, spool doesn't
> > get enough traffic usually to care about IO.
> >
> > (sorry, getting a bit off topic for the postfix list)
- Цитат от Bron Gondwana (br...@fastmail.fm), на 10.10.2011 в 01:50 -
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 01:33:31AM +0300, karave...@mail.bg wrote:
>> Nice setup. And thanks for your work on Cyrus. We are
>> looking also to move the metadata on SSDs but we have not
>> found yet cost effective d
--
From: "Bron Gondwana"
Sent: Sunday, October 09, 2011 6:28 PM
To: "vg_ us"
Cc: "Bron Gondwana" ; "Stan Hoeppner"
;
Subject: Re: Premature "No Space left on device" on XFS
On Sun, Oct 09, 2011 at 04:42:25PM -0400, vg_ us wrote:
From: "Bron G
On 10/9/2011 3:29 PM, Bron Gondwana wrote:
> I'm honestly more interested in maildir type workload too, spool doesn't
> get enough traffic usually to care about IO.
>
> (sorry, getting a bit off topic for the postfix list)
Maybe not off topic. You're delivering into the maildir mailboxes with
l
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 01:49:44AM +0300, karave...@mail.bg wrote:
> I do not trust Postmark - it models mbox appending and skips
> fsync-s. So it is too different from our setup. The best benchmark
> tool I have found is imaptest (from dovecot fame) - it is actually
> end to end benchmarking, in
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 01:33:31AM +0300, karave...@mail.bg wrote:
> Nice setup. And thanks for your work on Cyrus. We are
> looking also to move the metadata on SSDs but we have not
> found yet cost effective devices - we need at least a pair of
> 250G disk for 20-30T spool on a server.
You ca
- Цитат от Bron Gondwana (br...@fastmail.fm), на 10.10.2011 в 01:28 -
> On Sun, Oct 09, 2011 at 04:42:25PM -0400, vg_ us wrote:
>> From: "Bron Gondwana"
>> >I'm honestly more interested in maildir type workload too, spool doesn't
>> >get enough traffic usually to care about IO.
>>
>> wil
On Sun, Oct 09, 2011 at 04:42:25PM -0400, vg_ us wrote:
> will postmark transaction test do? here -
> http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=linux_2639_fs&num=1
Oh:
http://blog.goolamabbas.org/2007/06/17/postmark-is-not-a-mail-server-benchmark/
"Thus it pains me a lot that they ar
- Цитат от Bron Gondwana (br...@fastmail.fm), на 10.10.2011 в 01:12 -
>
> Here's what our current IMAP servers look like:
>
> 2 x 92GB SSD
> 12 x 2TB SATA
>
> two of the SATA drives are hotspares - though I'm
> wondering if that's actually necessary now, we
> haven't lost any yet, and we
On Sun, Oct 09, 2011 at 04:42:25PM -0400, vg_ us wrote:
> From: "Bron Gondwana"
> >I'm honestly more interested in maildir type workload too, spool doesn't
> >get enough traffic usually to care about IO.
>
> will postmark transaction test do? here -
> http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=articl
On Sun, Oct 09, 2011 at 03:24:44PM -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> That said, there are plenty of mailbox
> servers in the wild that would benefit from the XFS + linear concat
> setup. It doesn't require an insane drive count, such as the 136 in the
> test system above, to demonstrate the gains, esp
- Цитат от Bron Gondwana (br...@fastmail.fm), на 09.10.2011 в 23:29 -
>
> My goodness. That's REALLY recent in filesystem times. Something
> that recent plus "all my eggs in one basket" of changing to a
> large multi-spindle filesystem that would really get the benefits
> of XFS would be
--
From: "Bron Gondwana"
Sent: Sunday, October 09, 2011 4:29 PM
To: "Stan Hoeppner"
Cc:
Subject: Re: Premature "No Space left on device" on XFS
On Sun, Oct 09, 2011 at 02:31:19PM -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
On 10/9/2011 8:36 AM, Bron Gondwana
On Sun, Oct 09, 2011 at 02:31:19PM -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> On 10/9/2011 8:36 AM, Bron Gondwana wrote:
> > How many people are running their mail servers on 24-32 SAS spindles
> > verses those running them on two spindles in RAID1?
>
> These results are for a maildir type workload, i.e. POP/I
On 10/9/2011 9:32 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Stan Hoeppner:
>> On 10/8/2011 3:33 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>>> That's a lot of text. How about some hard numbers?
>>
>> Maybe not the perfect example, but here's one such high concurrency
>> synthetic mail server workload comparison showing XFS with a
On 10/9/2011 8:36 AM, Bron Gondwana wrote:
>> http://btrfs.boxacle.net/repository/raid/history/History_Mail_server_simulation._num_threads=128.html
>
> Sorry - I don't see unlinks there. Maybe I'm not not reading very
> carefully...
Unfortunately the web isn't littered with a gazillion head-to-
Stan Hoeppner:
> On 10/8/2011 3:33 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > That's a lot of text. How about some hard numbers?
>
> Maybe not the perfect example, but here's one such high concurrency
> synthetic mail server workload comparison showing XFS with a substantial
> lead over everything but JFS, in w
On Sun, Oct 09, 2011 at 03:56:39AM -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> On 10/8/2011 3:33 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > That's a lot of text. How about some hard numbers?
>
> Maybe not the perfect example, but here's one such high concurrency
> synthetic mail server workload comparison showing XFS with a
On 10/8/2011 3:33 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Stan Hoeppner:
> [ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
>> On 10/8/2011 5:17 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>>> Stan Hoeppner:
nicely. On the other hand, you won't see an EXTx filesystem capable of
anywhere close to 10GB/s or greater file
25 matches
Mail list logo
