Stan Hoeppner:
> On 10/8/2011 3:33 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > That's a lot of text. How about some hard numbers?
>
> Maybe not the perfect example, but here's one such high concurrency
> synthetic mail server workload comparison showing XFS with a substantial
> lead over everything but JFS, in which case the lead is much smaller:
>
> http://btrfs.boxacle.net/repository/raid/history/History_Mail_server_simulation._num_threads=128.html
I see no write operations, no unlink operations, and no rename
operations.
Comments on performance are welcome, but I prefer that they are
based on first-hand experience, and preferably on configurations
that are likely to be seen in the wild.
Wietse
