> * Mark Alan :
> > > > Do you know any reliable Debian/Ubuntu repositories for the
> > > > newest Postfix 2.8?
> > >
> > > http://debian.incertum.net/
> >
> > Thank you, but the emphasis in my question was in 'reliable'.
And that was the answer you got.
> > A quick diff between the 2.8 sources
On Sun, Feb 06, 2011 at 10:14:13PM +0100, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> On Sun, 6 Feb 2011 20:51:55 +, Mark Alan
> wrote:
>
> > As such and for now http://debian.incertum.net/ must be seen as its
> > latin name implies incertum (=uncertain, irregular, unreliable)
>
> make a bump version request o
"Patrick Ben Koetter" wrote:
>* Mark Alan :
>> > > Do you know any reliable Debian/Ubuntu repositories for the
>> > > newest Postfix 2.8?
>> >
>> > http://debian.incertum.net/
>>
>> Thank you, but the emphasis in my question was in 'reliable'.
>>
>> A quick diff between the 2.8 sources and p
On 02/06/2011 11:24 PM, meyer-jor...@t-online.de wrote:
Hi Jeroen!
The Subject: line (or any other headers) are not logged by postfix.
You could send all mail through a filter that does this for you; you are
free to do anything you want in a filter.
[...]
Thanks for your effort. (I
Hi Jeroen!
> The Subject: line (or any other headers) are not logged by postfix.
> You could send all mail through a filter that does this for you; you are
> free to do anything you want in a filter.
[...]
Thanks for your effort. (I suppose I didn't were as precise as necessary. Pls.
excuse me.
Hi Wolfgang!
> I understand that your log contains warning lines listing the subjects
> of messages. Each of these lines should contain all the data you want -
> except for multiple recipients: the "Subject:" line will only contain
> one recipient, even if the message went to hundreds. If that
* Mark Alan :
> > > Do you know any reliable Debian/Ubuntu repositories for the
> > > newest Postfix 2.8?
> >
> > http://debian.incertum.net/
>
> Thank you, but the emphasis in my question was in 'reliable'.
>
> A quick diff between the 2.8 sources and patches at
> http://debian.incertum.net/ an
On Sun, 6 Feb 2011 20:51:55 +, Mark Alan
wrote:
> As such and for now http://debian.incertum.net/ must be seen as its
> latin name implies incertum (=uncertain, irregular, unreliable)
make a bump version request on debian lunchpad, but maybe only freebsd and
gentoo supports it
unpack source
On Sun, 06 Feb 2011 20:01:17 +0100, Robert Schetterer
wrote:
> > Do you know any reliable Debian/Ubuntu repositories for the
> > newest Postfix 2.8?
>
> http://debian.incertum.net/
Thank you, but the emphasis in my question was in 'reliable'.
A quick diff between the 2.8 sources and patches at
In an older episode, on 2011-02-06 21:23, meyer-jor...@t-online.de wrote:
I'm looking for a tool to analyze the postfix mail log. I want to get a clearly arranged
list of all passed (and delivered) mails (sender, recipient, date, subject [added as
warning line]).
I understand that your log co
On 2/6/11 9:23 PM, meyer-jor...@t-online.de wrote:
Can someone give me a hint:
I'm looking for a tool to analyze the postfix mail log. I want to get a clearly
arranged
list of all passed (and delivered) mails (sender, recipient, date, subject
[added as
warning line]).
The Subject: line (or a
Can someone give me a hint:
I'm looking for a tool to analyze the postfix mail log. I want to get a clearly
arranged
list of all passed (and delivered) mails (sender, recipient, date, subject
[added as
warning line]).
And amavis-new/spamassasin/postgrey makes the log less clear than it already
Am 06.02.2011 19:52, schrieb Mark Alan:
> Hello,
>
>
> Do you know any reliable Debian/Ubuntu repositories for the
> newest Postfix 2.8?
>
> Regards,
>
> M.
http://debian.incertum.net/
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
Hello,
Do you know any reliable Debian/Ubuntu repositories for the
newest Postfix 2.8?
Regards,
M.
14 matches
Mail list logo
