On 29 November 2010 01:56, Victor Duchovni
wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 01:36:12PM -0700, ghe wrote:
>
>>> I run postfix and my mail clients use smtps so I was thinking I may as
>>> well close port 25. How can I do that?
>>
>> I'd use iptables or equivalent.
>>
>> I have my doubts about postf
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 11:08:09AM +1000, Stephen Thorne wrote:
> On 2010-11-28, Victor Duchovni wrote:
> > > It's up at http://www.porcupine.org/postfix-mirror/workarounds.html
> > > and soon at http://www.postfix.org/workarounds.html.
> > >
> > > Please have a look for glaring errors. I'll link
Le 28/11/2010 22:59, Eero Volotinen a écrit :
2010/11/28 Pete:
On Sun, 2010-11-28 at 23:38 +0200, Eero Volotinen wrote:
2010/11/28 Jerry:
On Sun, 28 Nov 2010 23:06:48 +0200
Eero Volotinen articulated:
I want to masquerade domain.fi with domain.com on outgoing mail? How
to do this on postfi
On 2010-11-28, Victor Duchovni wrote:
> > It's up at http://www.porcupine.org/postfix-mirror/workarounds.html
> > and soon at http://www.postfix.org/workarounds.html.
> >
> > Please have a look for glaring errors. I'll link it off the top-level
> > webpages when the text is OK.
>
> Looks good. Ju
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 01:36:12PM -0700, ghe wrote:
>> I run postfix and my mail clients use smtps so I was thinking I may as
>> well close port 25. How can I do that?
>
> I'd use iptables or equivalent.
>
> I have my doubts about postfix itself because I think that'd be an RFC
> violation. So
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 06:10:45PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Wietse Venema:
> > Victor Duchovni:
> > >
> > > Wietse, is this sufficient? I know it is not very detailed on the
> > > "impact analysis". Since pipelined "[message].QUIT"
> > > works correctly, while in theory there could be other
Wietse Venema:
> Victor Duchovni:
> >
> > Wietse, is this sufficient? I know it is not very detailed on the
> > "impact analysis". Since pipelined "[message].QUIT"
> > works correctly, while in theory there could be other pipelining issues,
> > none other that SAV come to mind.
>
> Thanks. I'll p
Eero Volotinen:
> No, I want that my smarthost that is used via smtp, replaces domain
> with another (for example.fi to example.com) in from field.
>
> is the correct configuration option this:
> http://swoolley.org/man.cgi/5/canonical
For address rewriting on INPUT:
http://www.postfix.org/ADDRE
2010/11/28 Pete :
>
> On Sun, 2010-11-28 at 23:38 +0200, Eero Volotinen wrote:
>> 2010/11/28 Jerry :
>> > On Sun, 28 Nov 2010 23:06:48 +0200
>> > Eero Volotinen articulated:
>> >
>> >> I want to masquerade domain.fi with domain.com on outgoing mail? How
>> >> to do this on postfix?
>> >
>> > http:
>>> I have my doubts about postfix itself because I think that'd be an RFC
>>> violation. So far...
>>
>> Could you elaborate on that a bit? I'm not sure what you mean.
>
> See Mouss' reply for a non-newbie response :-)
>
> Postfix is very good about obeying the 'rules'. And AFAIK, port 25 is one
On Sun, 2010-11-28 at 23:38 +0200, Eero Volotinen wrote:
> 2010/11/28 Jerry :
> > On Sun, 28 Nov 2010 23:06:48 +0200
> > Eero Volotinen articulated:
> >
> >> I want to masquerade domain.fi with domain.com on outgoing mail? How
> >> to do this on postfix?
> >
> > http://www.postfix.com/postconf.5.
2010/11/28 Jerry :
> On Sun, 28 Nov 2010 23:06:48 +0200
> Eero Volotinen articulated:
>
>> I want to masquerade domain.fi with domain.com on outgoing mail? How
>> to do this on postfix?
>
> http://www.postfix.com/postconf.5.html#masquerade_domains
Is this really correct setting? Manual says:
"Op
On Sun, 28 Nov 2010 23:06:48 +0200
Eero Volotinen articulated:
> I want to masquerade domain.fi with domain.com on outgoing mail? How
> to do this on postfix?
http://www.postfix.com/postconf.5.html#masquerade_domains
--
Jerry ✌
postfix-u...@seibercom.net
___
On 11/28/10 1:43 PM, Grant wrote:
I have my doubts about postfix itself because I think that'd be an RFC
violation. So far...
Could you elaborate on that a bit? I'm not sure what you mean.
See Mouss' reply for a non-newbie response :-)
Postfix is very good about obeying the 'rules'. And AF
On 28 November 2010 21:58, mouss wrote:
> Le 28/11/2010 21:38, Grant a écrit :
I run postfix and my mail clients use smtps so I was thinking I may as
well close port 25. How can I do that?
>>>
>>> See the description of the "Service type": inet
>>>
>>> http://www.postfix.org/mas
I run postfix and my mail clients use smtps so I was thinking I may as
well close port 25. How can I do that?
>>>
>>> See the description of the "Service type": inet
>>>
>>> http://www.postfix.org/master.5.html
>>
>> Thanks Viktor. I commented the following in master.cf:
>>
>> smtp
On 11/28/2010 10:06 PM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
Hi,
I want to masquerade domain.fi with domain.com on outgoing mail? How
to do this on postfix?
With the masquerade_domains setting in main.cf.
Thanks,
--
Eero
--
J.
Hi,
I want to masquerade domain.fi with domain.com on outgoing mail? How
to do this on postfix?
Thanks,
--
Eero
Le 28/11/2010 21:38, Grant a écrit :
I run postfix and my mail clients use smtps so I was thinking I may as
well close port 25. How can I do that?
See the description of the "Service type": inet
http://www.postfix.org/master.5.html
Thanks Viktor. I commented the following in master.cf:
>> I run postfix and my mail clients use smtps so I was thinking I may as
>> well close port 25. How can I do that?
>
> I'd use iptables or equivalent.
>
> I have my doubts about postfix itself because I think that'd be an RFC
> violation. So far...
Could you elaborate on that a bit? I'm not sur
>> I run postfix and my mail clients use smtps so I was thinking I may as
>> well close port 25. How can I do that?
>
> See the description of the "Service type": inet
>
> http://www.postfix.org/master.5.html
Thanks Viktor. I commented the following in master.cf:
smtp inet n -
On 11/28/10 1:22 PM, Grant wrote:
I run postfix and my mail clients use smtps so I was thinking I may as
well close port 25. How can I do that?
I'd use iptables or equivalent.
I have my doubts about postfix itself because I think that'd be an RFC
violation. So far...
OTOH, you are liable
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 12:22:08PM -0800, Grant wrote:
> I run postfix and my mail clients use smtps so I was thinking I may as
> well close port 25. How can I do that?
See the description of the "Service type": inet
http://www.postfix.org/master.5.html
--
Viktor.
I run postfix and my mail clients use smtps so I was thinking I may as
well close port 25. How can I do that?
- Grant
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 02:13:11PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> C:MAIL FROM: SIZE=338
> C:RCPT TO:
> C:RSET
> C:QUIT
>
> S:221 2.0.0 Service closing transmission channel
>
> Which means that Postfix reads the 221 as a positive reply to "MAIL
> FROM", and that Postfix reads EOF instead of t
Victor Duchovni:
> C> MAIL FROM:
> C> RCPT TO:
> C> RSET
> C> QUIT
>
> S> 250 2.1.0 Sender OK
> S> 221 2.0.0 Service closing transmission channel
Should not the Postfix SMTP client read the 221 as a positive
response to RCPT TO, and consider the recipient as "deliverable"?
Victor Duchovni:
>
> Wietse, is this sufficient? I know it is not very detailed on the
> "impact analysis". Since pipelined "[message].QUIT"
> works correctly, while in theory there could be other pipelining issues,
> none other that SAV come to mind.
Thanks. I'll put this up on a page so people
Wietse, is this sufficient? I know it is not very detailed on the
"impact analysis". Since pipelined "[message].QUIT"
works correctly, while in theory there could be other pipelining issues,
none other that SAV come to mind.
The SMTP service at mail.global.frontbridge.com does not fully conform
t
On 11/28/2010 03:50 PM, Len Conrad wrote:
... which failed until I added /var/spool/postfix/etc/hosts
As I said.
there are not any "y" on any non-commented line in master.cf.
As mouss already told you, that does not mean it isn't chrooted. there
are defaults. the default for c
Marnix Petrarca (DaemonLabs.com):
>
> Hello everyone,
Please follow instructions in the mailing list welcome message:
- Send "postconf -n output".
- Show "postfix logging".
- In this case, also show "telnet hostaddress 25" output.
Wietse
> i'm running postfix from the Fedora Core 12
Len Conrad:
>
> >Wietse Venema:
> >> Len Conrad:
> >> > main.cf:
> >> >
> >> > check_policy_service inet:127.0.0.1:10023,
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > but postfix ain't happy:
> >> >
> >> > Nov 26 15:23:02 mgw1 postfix/smtpd[92264]: fatal: host/service
> >> > localhost/10023 not found: hostname nor
At 08:29 AM 11/28/2010, you wrote:
>Le 28/11/2010 15:14, Len Conrad a écrit :
>>
[snip]
but postfix ain't happy:
Nov 26 15:23:02 mgw1 postfix/smtpd[92264]: fatal: host/service
localhost/10023 not found: hostname nor servname provided, or not known
Nov 26 15:23:03
>Wietse Venema:
>> Len Conrad:
>> > main.cf:
>> >
>> > check_policy_service inet:127.0.0.1:10023,
>> >
>> >
>> > but postfix ain't happy:
>> >
>> > Nov 26 15:23:02 mgw1 postfix/smtpd[92264]: fatal: host/service
>> > localhost/10023 not found: hostname nor servname provided, or not known
>>
Le 28/11/2010 15:14, Len Conrad a écrit :
[snip]
but postfix ain't happy:
Nov 26 15:23:02 mgw1 postfix/smtpd[92264]: fatal: host/service localhost/10023
not found: hostname nor servname provided, or not known
Nov 26 15:23:03 mgw1 postfix/master[87697]: warning: process
/usr/local/libexec/p
Wietse Venema:
> Len Conrad:
> > main.cf:
> >
> > check_policy_service inet:127.0.0.1:10023,
> >
> >
> > but postfix ain't happy:
> >
> > Nov 26 15:23:02 mgw1 postfix/smtpd[92264]: fatal: host/service
> > localhost/10023 not found: hostname nor servname provided, or not known
>
> Postfix doe
>>[snip]
>>
>>but postfix ain't happy:
>>
>>Nov 26 15:23:02 mgw1 postfix/smtpd[92264]: fatal: host/service
>>localhost/10023 not found: hostname nor servname provided, or not known
>>
>>Nov 26 15:23:03 mgw1 postfix/master[87697]: warning: process
>>/usr/local/libexec/postfix/smtpd pid 92264 exit
On 11/28/2010 02:50 PM, Marnix Petrarca (DaemonLabs.com) wrote:
Hello everyone,
Hi!
DO NOT post NEW questions to OLD threads.
i'm running postfix from the Fedora Core 12 x64 distribution. The
postfix box is on a 10.x.x.x segment of my firewall, and i'm
connecting from a 192.x.x.x segme
Le 27/11/2010 22:43, Len Conrad a écrit :
[snip]
but postfix ain't happy:
Nov 26 15:23:02 mgw1 postfix/smtpd[92264]: fatal: host/service localhost/10023
not found: hostname nor servname provided, or not known
Nov 26 15:23:03 mgw1 postfix/master[87697]: warning: process
/usr/local/libexec/pos
Hello everyone,
i'm running postfix from the Fedora Core 12 x64 distribution. The postfix box
is on a 10.x.x.x segment of my firewall, and i'm connecting from a 192.x.x.x
segment of the same firewall. I never had any of this problem, but perhaps
something changed or i forgot. There is a NAT re
39 matches
Mail list logo
